A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Science of Solar B Transient phenomena – this aim covers the wide ranges of explosive phenomena observed on the Sun – from small scale flaring in the.
Advertisements

The Solar Wind and Heliosphere (with a space weather emphasis!) V J Pizzo (NOAA/SEC)
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Using Potential Field Models to Learn About CME Coronal Context and Consequences J.G. Luhmann and Yan Li (Space Sciences Lab, UCB) C.N. Arge (CIRES, U.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
Integrating Global MHD Models with SECCHI Observations Pete Riley, Zoran Mikic, Jon Linker, Roberto Lionello, and Slava Titov SAIC, San Diego, California.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
Utilizing CISM MHD Results in SEP Modeling S. A. Ledvina, D. Odstrcil, J. G. Luhmann, D. Krauss-Varban, and I. Roth.
30-Day Science Plan Angelos Vourlidas, Russ Howard SECCHI Consortium Meeting IAS 8 March 2007.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
10-year vision for Solar/Heliosphere area Scenario: Simulations of the time-dependent corona and solar wind based on incoming and archived solar magnetograph.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
13 July 2004 STC Directors VideoConference W. Jeffrey Hughes, Director What is Space Weather? The Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling –Research.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
CISM solar wind metrics M.J. Owens and the CISM Validation and Metrics Team Boston University, Boston MA Abstract. The Center for Space-Weather Modeling.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
CISM SEP Modeling Background The major SEP events come from the CME-generated coronal and interplanetary shock(s) These “gradual”events can have a “prompt”
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
F1B: Determine the Dominant Processes of Particle Acceleration Phase , Open the Frontier UV Spectroscopic determin- ation of pre/post-shock density,
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
2002 May 1MURI VMG mini-workshop1` Solar MURI Vector Magnetogram Mini-Workshop Using Vector Magnetograms in Theoretical Models: Plan of Action.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
Luhmann1 An NSF Science and Technology Center led by Boston University, involving solar partners at SAIC, U of Colorado, BU, HAO, Stanford, NRL, AFRL,
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Characterization of Coronal Mass Ejection Deflection using Coronagraph Image Sequences Jenna L. Zink, GMU Undergraduate Research Scholars Program, Rebekah.
Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Solar Energetic Particle Events: An Overview Christina Cohen Caltech.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Outline of WG 2 Sessions: Interplanetary Phenomena Working Group Leaders: Ian Richardson and Ilia Roussev.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
Solar Drivers of Space Weather Steven Hill NOAA/SEC June 14, 2007 Research Experience for Undergraduates.
29 April 2010 Space Weather Workshop 2010 From Research To Operations: Transitioning CISM Models W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated Space Weather.
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Community Modeling: What Users Could Use Janet Luhmann SSL, University of California, Berkeley SHINE Workshop, July 2007, Whistler.
AFRL/CISM Collaborations
The Community Coordinated Modeling Center: A Brief Overview NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Lika Guhathakurta
Space weather forecasters perspective: UK David Jackson and Mark Gibbs SEREN Bz workshop, Abingdon, 9-10 July 2014.
Matt Hill Gang Li SHINE 2007 Session summary for Shock geometry & upstream and downstream phenomena 1-day session: Tuesday morning Tuesday afternoon.
SHINE 2006 Student Day Working Group III summary Zermatt, Utah, July 31 - August 4 Gang Li.
1 University of California, San Diego, U.S.A., 2 NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A., 3 George Mason University, U.S.A., 4 Naval Research Laboratory,
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
30 April 2009 Space Weather Workshop 2009 The Challenge of Predicting the Ionosphere: Recent results from CISM. W. Jeffrey Hughes Center for Integrated.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
ST23-D2-PM2-P-013 The UCSD Kinematic Global Solar Wind Boundary for use in ENLIL 3D-MHD Forecasting Bernard JACKSON1#+, Hsiu-Shan YU1, Paul HICK1, Andrew.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Introduction to Space Weather
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann
Presentation transcript:

A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive test particle (ion) population in a post-process approach that uses the MHD model shock to characterize shock source “injections”, and the time-dependent modeled magnetic field lines between the Sun and a selected observer location to define the path of transport from the shock. SOHO (LASCO, EIT, MDI) Images and magnetogram Local Solar Wind parameters can drive the magnetosphere simulation; SEPs enter the magnetosphere along open field lines and at low latitudes on occasion. Our models can replace the data in both cases. This poster provides an update on the approach that CISM is taking to develop a physics-based model of the coupled corona and solar wind, including the transient disturbances known as CMEs. As a first case study of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) event, CISM chose a relatively simple halo CME in May 1997 that was well-observed at the Sun and had geospace effects. Major progress on the initiation of that event is described in an acoompanying poster. A n approach known as the Cone Mode (of CMEs)l is being developed as a simpler alternative to modeling many events in the heliosphere, and to enable the addition of the solar energetic particle component of heliospheric space weather. The Cone Model is also highlighted in an accompanying poster. Comparisons of the models with observations are regularly used to guide their development and adjust strategies.. CISM’s Cone Inversion Model of CMEs uses 2D coronagraph images of halo CMEs to estimate the location, orientation, and properties of a 3D cone-shaped disturbance that may be used to simulate a CME injection in the solar wind simulation. This scheme, developed under MURI, is now a CORHEL option (see Cone Model poster) Observer Shock- connected field lines in the Cone model give SEP source location and strength. IMP-8 data, Plot from A. Tylka Selected Halo CME Event, Selected Halo CME Event, May 12, 1997 Time-dependent corona and CME Initiation-A Case Study SOHO MDI synoptic map for CR1913 (left) and (below) modeled magnetic field lines, and simulated SOHO EIT EUV images, These illustrate the ability of the coronal model to reproduce coronal holes-the solar wind sources. The coronal model couples to the solar wind model (right) to produce CISM’s CORHEL. Overview of CISM Solar/Heliosphere Research: From Solar Wind to SEP Events J.G. Luhmann, D. Krauss-Varban, Y. Li, S. Ledvina, C.O. Lee, W. Abbett, B. Lynch 1, J.A. Linker, P. Riley, Z. Mikic, R, Lionello 2, D. Odstrcil 3,4, Y. Liu, X-P. Zhao 5, C.N. Arge 6 1 University of California, Berkeley, 2 SAIC, 3 University of Colorado, 4 NOAA-SEC, 5 Stanford, 6 AFRL ENLIL boundary conditions from MAS, May 12 ’97 event showing cone model injection location. (From D. Odstrcil and X-P. Zhao.) (SOHO LASCO images) Observed sites of other CMEs show two distinctive coronal magnetic field settings involved in simple CMEs. These.show initial field geometries with both simple (parallel) active region and overlying coronal field geometries and multipolar geometries with magnetic null points. Both are being tested to determine if the resulting eruption properties depend on the initial field geometry. Major progress is being made in modeling the details of one specific well-observed event (See CME Initiation Poster). Other CMEs (right) from the region can tell us if the same initiation mechanism repeats. STEREO and ACE mission data will provide unique opportunities to test our model of SEP events at several locations at once- to see if we reproduce this classical concept. Shock strength from the May 12.’97 event cone model (left, from S. Ledvina) and modeled SEP proton event time profile (above) The recent corona has been very quiet, dominated by several large low latitude coronal holes. These have produced an ideal period to see if the model can also reproduce the solar wind stream structure. Student C. Lee runs the coupled models at the CCMC to compare (above) the measured and modeled solar wind At left are plots of coronal magnetic field lines from a GONG Website that uses one of our models. At right is a plot from the CCMC- showing solar wind results. Coupled Model Grids (V. Pizzo) SOHO and Yohkoh data plots from Y. Li (left) and modeled pre-CME field geometries of two types from B. Lynch (right) (D. Odstrcil) (Images, from J. Linker, P. Riley, Z. Mikic )