AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 17 High Lift Devices
Advertisements

Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
Project Presentation Boiler Xpress December 5, 2000 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal Van Meter AAE 451 Aircraft Design.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #1
D & C PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 November 4, 2003
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Christopher Cottingham
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review II October 17, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Aero Design Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Craig Kohring, Pat Tice, Sean Dineen, Mark Gasser James Pallardy, Katie Schipf, AJ Dayvie.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
2007 SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Team 5 Final Design Review
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Airfoils and Simulation
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
UAV Wing Design For Efficiency At Low Reynolds Numbers
Airfoils and Simulation
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Airfoils.
Airfoils and Simulation
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Presentation transcript:

AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation B-19 Group 5: Andrea Doyle, Tim Kacmar, Ryan Kirker, Meghan Perry-Eaton, Denis Sullivan, Mike Trela, Thomas Zieg February 5, 2004

Overview Introduction Main Wing Selection Engine Selection Takeoff and Landing Distances Passive Lift Enhancement Static Stability Conclusions

Introduction Design Drivers Allowable Parameters Maximum Level Speed at Constant Altitude Maximum Climb Rate Allowable Parameters Total Planform Area between 400 and 800 in2 Power Plant Consisting of an Electric Motor Internal Cargo Bay of Specified Dimensions Sport Propeller of Specific Pitch and Diameter Digital Radio Control System (7 Channels)

Why a Flying Wing? Advantages Minimum Drag High Speed Absence of Horizontal Tail Maximizes Climb Rate Given AC and CG locations Maximizing Excess Power

Weight Breakdown

Wing Loading Design Drivers: Max Level Cruise  High Wing Loading Max Rate of Climb  Low Wing Loading Large aircraft are not a good comparison. R/C Model Aircraft Wing Loading Professional Kit Models: 12 oz/ft2. Conceptual Design: 27 oz/ft2. Maximize Available Power, Decrease Drag

Overall Wing Design Taper Ratio, 0.4 – Like Elliptical Planform Wing Sweep, 20% – Historical Data Winglets – Decrease Drag, Stability Dihedral, none Winglets & Wing Sweep are effective Dihedral Twist takes away from effective Dihedral

Wing Airfoil Section: EH 3.0/12.0 Low Moment about A.C. -0.002 Thick Section Structure Stability Designed for Flying Wing model Aircrafts

Wing Specifics Flaps for increase lift at take off and acceleration to cruise. Dimensions Wing Area, 600 sq. in. Compromise between low drag and low CL. Wing Span, 5.4 ft A = 7.1, 8.1 with winglets Root Chord, 1.09 ft & Tip Chord .44 ft CL @ cruise, .225

Estimated Cruise Velocity Importance Velocity estimation greatly effects the design of the wing.

Estimated Velocity Theoretical Estimate: 100 ft/s Based on a propeller efficiency ranging from .4 to .6 Conservative Estimate: 80 ft/s Battery will not be fully charged and other losses will occur.

Wing Twist & Angle of Attack Twist: For Stability & Control of Aircraft Minimize Moment @ A.C. Low Stability Factor, 8% Longer Wing Span Good Weight Estimate Calculated -4° of Twist from Root to Chord Root Chord, α = 4 ° Tip Chord, α = 0 ° Mean Aerodynamic Chord, α = 2.5° .817 ft long at 1 ft from the root chord.

Propulsion System Astro 15 Motor 12” X 8” Pitch Propeller 9.78 lbs. Static Thrust 2.16 lbs. Cruise Thrust (2 lbs. of Drag at Cruise)

Take-Off and Landing Analysis CDO= 0.015 Aspect Ratio=7.15 CLG=1 Take-off Weight= 8lb =0.1, wet grass 5 foot obstacle Wing Loading= 1.687 lb/ft2 VTD= 43.34 ft/sec Landing Weight= 7lb Dropped landing gears =0.3, wet grass, large surface area interaction with ground

Lift Enhancement Airfoil Data EH3.0-12.0 Cl max = 1.0 αs 2-D no flaps = 10 degrees CLmax no flaps = 0.90 αs 3-D no flaps = 13.129 degrees Flap Information Plane δf = 30 degrees Sf/Sw = 0.20 cf/cw = 0.25 3-D with flaps ΔCLmax = 0.0189 CLmax = 0.9189 αs 3-D flapped = 11.629 degrees ΔCD0 = 0.0156

Stability

Conclusions Flying Wing Configuration Wing Dimensions Estimated 8 lb Takeoff Weight Wing Dimensions Area: 597 in2 Span: 4.7 ft Root Chord: 1.08 in Tip Chord: .44 in Wing Twist: 5° EH 3.0-12.0 Airfoil Cl max-1.0 3% Camber 12 % Thickness Wing Loading 27 oz/ft2

Power Plant Takeoff and Landing Flap Information Cruise Speed Astro Cobalt 15 Electric Motor -Shaft Output Power: 268 W -12 Cell Pack -2.38:1 Gear Ratio -12x8 Propeller Takeoff and Landing Takeoff Speed: 48.34 ft/s Takeoff Distance: 248.57 ft Landing Distance: 743.12 ft Flap Information Plane Δf = 30 degrees Sf/Sw = 0.20 cf/cw = 0.25 Cruise Speed 80 ft/s

Questions??