Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U N I V E R S I T Y L a f a y e t t e OF LOUISIANA RockSat 2010 Team CajunSat Mark Roberts Dr. Andy Hollerman Department of Physics University of Louisiana.
Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
U of MN student team members Kyle Marek-Spartz (team lead), Seth Frick, Cait Mantych, Mary Pattison, Alana Gedrose, Alex Knutson-Smisek, Philip Hansen,
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Charles Galey, Peter J. Jay, Nicholas Roder, William Ryan.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 University A University B Team # Logo 1 Logo 2.
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.
Critical Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
DUNLOP LUNAX-II Conceptual Design Review Star Mission to the Moon-X1 Dan Hawk, Dr Schmitt, Dr Konings-Dudin October 13, 2009.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
SloshSAT Conceptual Design Review Dr. Robert Walch Sage Andorka Dan Welsh Zach Sears Maurice Woods III Motoaki Honda Ryan Estrick 14 Oct
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus April 24, 2012 FMS Report.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop Colorado & Virginia Space Grant Consortium.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report WVU Rocketeers West Virginia University 2/14/ Team Members Justin Yorick Ben Provence Mike.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
Northwest Nazarene University Chad Larson, Ben Gordon, Seth Leija, David Vinson, Drew Johnson, Zach Thomas June 1 st, 2012.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
Temple University Advisors: Dr. John Helferty & Dr. Chang-Hee Won Charles Wright Jinyan Chen Billy Cheng Brittany Gray 1.
RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement”
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
2016 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
Conceptual Design Review
Critical Design Review Team Name
Space Proximity Atmospheric Research above Tropospheric Altitudes
RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop
Launch Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson

 Section 1: Mission Overview ◦ Purpose ◦ Goals ◦ Theory ◦ Success ◦ Benefits ◦ Expected Results ◦ Concept of Operations  Section 2: Design Overview ◦ Design Process ◦ Design Requirements ◦ System Overview ◦ Design View ◦ Superhydrophobic ◦ Flexible Chips ◦ Radiation Hardened Chips ◦ Data / Sensors ◦ Block Diagram ◦ Prototyping Plan ◦ RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance ◦ Shared Can Logistics

 Section 3: Management ◦ Team Organization ◦ Budget ◦ Work Breakdown Schedule ◦ Timeline ◦ Risk Factors  Section 4: Conclusions

 Study the feasibility of using superhydrophobic materials in the presence of high acceleration and vibrations for possible use on space missions.  Test Radiation Hardened chips and new flexible chips with American Semiconductors

 Do research on superhydrophic material that would allow it to be used in future space missions.  Gather data on Radiation hardened chips and to gain experience working with the microchip industry.

 W hen water is in contact with the superhydrophobic surface (diatomaceous earth) it is more attracted to its own surface tension than it is to the material. This is because the material works like a microscopic bed of nails. Diatomaceous earth is a new material developed by John Simpson at Oakridge National Laboratory and is exceptional due to its high contact angle with water and low price.

 For this mission to be considered a success, the SH material needs to be recovered and tested post-flight. It would be best if the superhydrophobic material survived the flight.  Get usable data from the radiation hardened chips

 The goal of this launch is to prove that this diatomaceous earth can survive a rocket launch and still be functional post-flight.  This material could have many different benefits if it is shown to survive space travel. The SH material has already been shown to work in microgravity by NNU and NASA’s Reduced Gravity program. NASA would benefit from the data gathered if they decide to use this material on future missions.  Provide data to American Semiconductors about their radiation hardened chips.

 It is hypothesized that the material will survive the high acceleration and vibrations and still be functional in post-flight testing.

 It is expected that the radiation hardened chips will make less errors in the flight compared to the non-hardened chips.

Concept of Operations Rocket Launch/G- switch triggered Time =1.3 min Height: 75km Start of main chip data Time=2.8 min Apogee of Flight Best data on chips gathered Time= 4.5 min Height: 75km Main chip data complete Time=5.5 min Chute is deployed Time= 15 min Lands in ocean

 Design Superhydrophobic Encasement  Design American Semiconductor Board/ Final Design of Plate.  Build encasement/Build American Semiconductor board.  Implement into Plate ◦ Test board ◦ Run full flight test

 Physical Envelope Cylindrical:  Diameter: 9.3 inches  Height: 4.75 inches  Mass Canister + Payload = 20±0.2 lbf  Center of Gravity Lies within a 1x1x1 inch envelope of the RockSat payload canister‘s geometric centroid.

 A Superhydrophobic “donut” will be on one plate  Along with that is the Flexible chips attached to small cylinders.  The electrical systems will be on another plate above the original plate.

Superhydrophobic “donut” Flexible Chips American Semiconductor Board Geiger Counter

“Donut”  A donut shaped hollow object will house Superhydrophobic material. This shape allows for different forces on different axis.  This will be on the lower plate and will be placed around the center support.

Flexible Chip Cylinders  New flexible chips from American Semiconductors will be placed on different axis to find effects of space travel on them.

 American Semiconductors will work with students to design a board which will test their radiation hardened chips American Semiconductor Board & Geiger Counter

 Time  Radiation – Geiger Counter  American Semiconductor data will be stored on a flash memory.

Radiation Hardened Chip FleX Clock/Signal Power Memory Geiger Counter

 Between now and the CDR, the superhydrophobic enclosure will be in production. The American Semiconductor plate will be fully designed and the actual AVR board will be in production.

 Predicted mass - 10lb  Using Rocksat Workshop Plexiglas plate ◦ Diameter – 9” ◦ Height – 3” to 4.5”  A g-switch will be used for activation  Using deionized double contained water

 We will share a canister with the RockOn Workshop.  We will stay in contact with Colorado via and keep then updated with our design.  We will be using standoffs.

Electrical –American Semiconductors David Vinson Seth Leija Drew Johnson Mechanical - Superhydrophobic Ben Gordon Chad Larson Zach Thomas

ItemAmount Budgeted ($) ½ Can $ paid by American Semiconductors Superhydrophobic MaterialMade by NNU for less then $50.00 TravelFunded by Idaho Space Grant FacilitiesProvided by NNU Radiation Hardened Chips and Electronics Provided by American Semiconductors

Electrical/ American Semiconductors Design Fabricate AVR Build Mechanical/ Superhydrophobic Complete Design Begin Fabrication of Enclosure Paint material on interior of “donut”

Complete design on SH subsystem Nov 14 Preliminary Design with American Semiconductors Begin Fabrication Nov 30 Finalized Design Jan 30 Complete Fabrication Electrical Subsystem Mechanical Subsystem Begin Testing

 Risk 1: SH enclosure breaks  Risk 2: G-switch fails to start data collection  Risk 3:Malfunction on electrical board. Consequence Risk 1Risk 2 Risk 3 Possibility

 The main focus before the CDR will be completing the design of the American Semiconductor board and begin the construction of the board.  Begin fabrication of superhydrophobic enclosure.

 Questions?