IOOS, NOAA and HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD 2005 28.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teresa Garner Larry Atkinson. Introduction to HFRADAR Sites & Data Circulation in the Bay Tidal Sub-tidal Quality Control Efforts Instrument Comparisons.
Advertisements

Measuring Two-Dimensional Surface Velocity Distribution
1NOAA-NWS Technology Summit The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) High Frequency Radars Dr. Samuel Walker Integrated Ocean Observing System Program.
Spectrum from a Prism. Example of a Spectrum Kirchoff’s Laws.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay Larry Atkinson Teresa Garner Jose Blanco.
OPeNDAP CODAR Combining Server Provide CODAR surface current vectors in response to request for data within a user-specified region and time range. Will.
QARTOD 2: Remote Currents Working Group Definitions: Level 1 – refers to radials Level 2 – refers to total vectors Level 3 – refers to higher level data.
February 28, 2005 NOAA / NOS / CO-OPS An Oceanographic Processing Environment: From System Design to Data Quality Chris Paternostro, Oceanographer NOAA,
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Processes for Current Measurements From USCG ATONs Jennifer Dussault Qartod II February 28,2005.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems (4) Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ext 251 Dunes of sand.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ph: Dunes of sand and seaweed,
SeaSonde Overview.
Remote Currents: HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
“Questions in peak bagging” 1)Two components: leakage matrix & spectral line profile - do we have sufficient accuracy? (simulated data sufficiently real?)
Dr. Hugh Roarty - Rutgers University Dr. Lisa Hazard – Scripps Institution of Oceanography Prof. Lucy Wyatt - Australian Coastal Ocean Radar Network Dr.
Assessment and Quantification of HF Radar Uncertainty Fearghal O’Donncha Sean McKenna Emanuele Ragnoli Teresa UpdykeHugh Roarty.
Towards a Standard for Real-time Quality Control Procedures for in situ Ocean Waves Richard Bouchard 1 and Julie Thomas 2 1.NOAA’s National Data Buoy Center.
Target Tracking with Binary Proximity Sensors N. Shrivastava, R. Mudumbai, U. Madhow, S. Suri Presented By Shan Gao.
National High Frequency Radar Network Jack Harlan, Ph. D. NOAA IOOS Program Office Project Manager: HF Radar DHS Training 21 Apr 2010 Washington, DC.
Modeling study of the coastal upwelling system of the Monterey Bay area during 1999 and I. Shulman (1), J.D. Paduan (2), L. K. Rosenfeld (2), S.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
U.S. IOOS ® HF Radar Network 10 Years of Experience Measuring Ocean Surface Currents Jack Harlan, Ph.D. U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ®
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
IOOS National HF Radar Update Jack Harlan IOOS National HF Radar Project Manager GCOOS Annual Meeting September 2012 Corpus Christi.
Zdenka Willis Director, US IOOS ® NOAA Principal to USGEO Chairman of GOOS Regional Alliances.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Ocean Wave and Current Radars By Laura Elston. Our earth is a very aqueous environment with nearly three quarters of it covered by ocean. So how do we.
4.1 The Position, Velocity, and Acceleration Vectors 4.1 Displacement vector 4.2 Average velocity 4.3 Instantaneous velocity 4.4 Average acceleration 4.5.
Jump to first page 1 Chapter 3 Kinematics of particles Differentiation: the ratio between two increments when they are extremely small, e.g. velocity.
AWIPS-2 HF Radar Sea-Surface Current Product By Ross Van Til Contributions by: Nicole Kurkowski, OS&T Dr. Pablo Santos, WFO Miami Dr. Jack Harlan, NOAA.
The Prediction of Wind-Driven Coastal Circulation PIs: John Allen and Jack Barth, OSU Academic Partners: Government Partners: Industrial Partners: COAS,
The VIEW antenna is located on an open beach and is more isolated from structures which can cause distortion; therefore, its pattern shape is similar to.
Ensemble-based Assimilation of HF-Radar Surface Currents in a West Florida Shelf ROMS Nested into HYCOM and filtering of spurious surface gravity waves.
1 Implementing QA/QC Standards for In Situ Ocean Sensors Using OGC-Sensor Web Enablement a.k.a. QARTOD to OGC a.k.a. Q2O Project Status Brief to NOAA IOOS.
Mr. Robert Forney Dr. Hugh Roarty Dr. Scott Glenn Measuring Waves with a Compact HF Radar MTS/IEEE OCEANS15 October 2015 Washington DC.
Fourth Meeting of Global High Frequency Radar Network Hugh Roarty Rutgers University.
L. K. (Nick) Shay, J. Martinez-Pedraja and M. Archer Department of Ocean Sciences, RSMAS To improve our understanding of surface processes and their linkages.
Summary of QARTOD and Recent Workshops on QA/QC March 9-10, 2006.
Maracoos DMAC and Asset Map June Maracoos DMAC Principles Data is served and integrated using open, interoperable data standards recommended by.
NOAA and HF Radar FY05 and Beyond Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services SCCOOS Meeting 18 October.
CODAR Surface Current Maps Improve Coast Guard Search And Rescue Nearest Coastal Site CODAR Currents SLDMB Drifter SAROPS NowSAROPS w/ HFR Surface Currents.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Evaluation of the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) cost over the target space in.
Improved Direction of Arrival Methods for Oceanographic HF Radars Brian Emery Department of Mechanical Engineering, and Marine Science Institute University.
Real-Time Beyond the Horizon Vessel Detection
Quality Assurance of Real-Time Oceanographic Data
QA/QC Methods for 13 MHz Brant Beach (BRNT) Test Case
Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network
National High Frequency Radar Network
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay
Challenges in Centralized Aggregated Data Quality Control
Bistatic Systems: Preparing for Multistatic
Rainfall Averaging Methods
Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn March 5th, 2015
Lecture 23 – Versions of ITRF, WGS 84, and their relationships to NAD 83 9 April 2009 GISC3325.
Multi-band impedance matching using an evolutionary algorithm
Chapter 9 Map Digitizing and GPS
Colin Evans, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut
Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Recognizing First and Second Order Features
Examples of spectral fields
Find the velocity of a particle with the given position function
An Ocean Current Monitoring System for Coastal New Jersey
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Coastal Ocean Dynamics Radar (CODAR) Mapping of
Types of Errors And Error Analysis.
Spatial Signal Processing with Emphasis on Emitter Localization
Presentation transcript:

IOOS, NOAA and HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD February 2005

Current Activities within NOS National Ocean Service - Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) –Developing QA/QC Methods –Developing Algorithmic Standards –Velocity Vector Products for Navigation –Tidal Velocity Products –Particle Trajectory Products –National HFR Data Server

FY05 IOOS QA/QC and Standards Level 1 Errors: Influence radial velocity –Spectral frequency estimation algorithms e.g. MUSIC –SNR Level 2 Errors: Influence total velocity –E.g. Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP)  Algorithmic Standards

Level 1 Error Analysis Spectral Frequency Estimation DOA Codar SeaSonde uses MUSIC NOAA Project –Effect of SNR Averaged Spectra Individual Frequency Bins –Empirical and Simulation-based

Level 2 Error Analysis Total Vector Formation –two-radial-only estimates (GDOP) –unweighted least-squares (LS) estimates –level-1 error-weighted LS estimates –single-site solutions –distance-weighted LS estimates –averaging radius-dependent LS estimates

Future Work Product Development –Trajectory-based –Assimilation into circulation models –Level 3 error analysis