Design Analysis of Everyday Objects IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Don Norman Worked for industry (Apple) Professor First published in 1988 Does not focus on computer interfaces Coined: user-centered design Goal: Motivate.
Advertisements

How to Evaluate a Proposal Barbara A. Howell, M.A. University of Central Florida PAD 5850.
Annoy Your Users Less Session 202 Philip Wolfe, Lead Developer Farm Credit Services of America.
Saul Greenberg User Centered Design Why User Centered Design is important Approaches to User Centered Design.
What is Design? Professor: Tapan Parikh TA: Eun Kyoung Choe
Bus 411 DAY 27. Timeline (tick-tock) May 1  Take home final available  Due May 3PM May 5  Team 2 Case 22 Yellow Roadway Corp.  Round four case.
Before usability CS 147: Intro to HCI Dan Maynes-Aminzade After 1 st Usability Review.
James Tam User Centered Design Why User Centered Design is important Approaches to User Centered Design.
CS CS 5150 Software Engineering Lecture 12 Usability 2.
213: User Interface Design & Development Professor: Tapan Parikh TA: Eun Kyoung Choe
User Personas Assignment IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Scenario Assignment IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Midterm Exam Review IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Heuristic Evaluation IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Design Process …and the project.
Course Wrap-Up IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher. 2 C.J. Minard ( )
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
User-Centered Design Good design The user says “Yes, I see” or “Of course”. A simple explanation is sufficient. Bad design The user says “How am I going.
A New Paradigm for E-Groceries IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 20, 2005.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 22, 2004.
IMT530- Organization of Information Resources1 Feedback Like exercises –But want more instructions and feedback on them –Wondering about grading on these.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 18, 2007.
10th Workshop "Software Engineering Education and Reverse Engineering" Ivanjica, Serbia, 5-12 September 2010 First experience in teaching HCI course Dusanka.
Introduction to HCI Marti Hearst (UCB SIMS) SIMS 213, UI Design & Development January 21, 1999.
Mid-Term Exam Review IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
What is HCI? IMD07101: Introduction to Human Computer Interaction Brian Davison 2011/12.
People: Usability IS 101Y/CMSC 101Y November 5, 2013 Marie desJardins Amanda Mancuso University of Maryland Baltimore County.
People: Usability COMP 101 November 12, 2014 Carolyn Seaman Amanda Mancuso Susan Martin University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Practical Programming COMP153-08S Week 5 L2: HCI.
CSCD 487/587 Human Computer Interface Winter 2013 Lecture 3 HCI and Interactive Design.
SCV2113 Human Computer Interaction Semester 1, 2013/2013.
Interaction design IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane.
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
Design of Everyday Things - Donald Norman CS A470.
Usability Evaluation/LP Usability: how to judge it.
CLASSROOM CHANGE  Starting Thursday class will move to:  SB
JENNIFER WONG CHAPTER 7: USER – CENTERED DESIGN. The point of the book was to advocate a user- centered design which is a philosophy that things should.
CS 3120 USER INTERFACE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (UIDIE) Dr. Ben Schafer
What is interaction design? Eileen Kraemer CSCI 4800/6800 University of Georgia.
ASCENTIUM th Ave NE, Ste 225 Bellevue, WA t f ascentium.com PREPARED FOR Ascentium | October 22, 2015 | Page 1/10.
Design Quotes  "The two most important tools an architect has are the eraser in the drawing room and the sledge hammer on the construction site." —Frank.
The Design of Everyday Things Darn these hooves! I hit the wrong switch again! Who designs these instrument panels, raccoons?
Interaction Design John Kelleher. Interaction Design “Designing interactive products to support people in their everyday and working lives” Software.
Web Design Guidelines by Scott Grissom 1 Designing for the Web  Web site design  Web page design  Web usability  Web site design  Web page design.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
Chapter 1: What is interaction design?. Bad designs From:
Interaction Design: Overview
Design Process … and some design inspiration. Course ReCap To make you notice interfaces, good and bad – You’ll never look at doors the same way again.
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
Before usability CS 147: Intro to HCI After 1 st Usability Review.
Today Discussion Follow-Up Interview Techniques Next time Interview Techniques: Examples Work Modeling CD Ch.s 5, 6, & 7 CS 321 Human-Computer Interaction.
Use the cards to control the lecture… Usability Design.
Evaluation / Usability. ImplementDesignAnalysisEvaluateDevelop ADDIE.
CS 3120 USER INTERFACE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION (UIDIE)
Team Name Team members: _______________________________.
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Bell-ringer: 7 minutes Choose at least 2 to complete:
Norman Chapter 4 Knowing What To Do
Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?
The Design of Everyday Things
Irony Assignment.
Software Engineering D7025E
PostPC Computing Heuristic Evaluation Prof. Scott Kirkpatrick, HUJI
What could you invent to measure something in a new way…….
CS305, HW1, Spring 2008 Evaluation Assignment
After 1st Usability Review
Do this with at least 3 different people
Presentation transcript:

Design Analysis of Everyday Objects IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher

2 Review l Design for improved usability l Design model should match user model l Norman’s design guides –make things visible »affordances »crucial distinctions »constraints –provide good mappings and interface metaphors –provide feedback

3 Assignment l The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the usability of “everyday objects” l Each student will bring an “everyday object” from home to class –try to bring an object that causes you great frustration or an object that you really like and think is well-designed l In class we will break up into groups of 4 and evaluate/analyze the usability of each student’s “everyday object”

4 Assignment l Get out 2 sheets of paper –put your name, and the object’s name at the top of each sheet –title 1 sheet “Good Design Elements” and the other “Bad Design Elements” l Make three (3) columns on each paper (see next two slides for examples) –title column 1 “Visibility” –title column 2 “Mappings and Metaphors” –title column 3 “Feedback” –pass each object (and the 2 sheets of paper) to each member of the team

5

6

7 Assignment l Analyze each object in terms of Norman’s framework (or the heuristics) l Each member should write at least three comments (good, bad, or both) about each object on the papers l These papers will be turned in!!

8 In-Class Presentation l Volunteers will present their objects l Tell us: –what are the good design aspects? »e.g., good visibility, mappings and metaphors, and feedback »explain why they are good –what are the bad design aspects »e.g., poor visibility, mappings and metaphors, and feedback »explain why »make a specific recommendation on how to improve the design l Talk for about 3-5 minutes

9 Summary l Bad UI design surrounds us –it’s in everyday objects and software applications l Bad UIs lead to poor usability and make: –systems difficult to learn –systems difficult to remember –users less efficient –users more prone to make errors –users less satisfied l User-centered design can help –better understanding of users and their mental models leads to better design decisions / improved usability