Staff Health Care Committee Recommendations An update for UAA’s APT and Classified Staff Councils November 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Member refers to plan member, an individual eligible for prescription drug benefits under a plan. ©2010 Caremark. All rights reserved. This presentation.
Advertisements

Common/shared responsibilities between jobs.
What You Wanted to Know About Formularies Emmanuelle Mirsakov Pharm.D. Candidate 2007 USC School Of Pharmacy.
Connecticuts Value Based Insurance Design The Health Enhancement Program for Connecticut State Employees (Covers Active State Employees and Retirees After.
City and County of Honolulu
Understanding Mail Order Community pharmacists provide a valuable service desired by patients. Very rarely are mail order and community pharmacies allowed.
Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs)
Choosing Community Health Services
Commonwealth Connector Minimum Pharmacy Standards October 11, 2007.
Confidential and Proprietary Information © 2011 Express Scripts, Inc. All Rights Reserved 1 The State of New Mexico Prescription Drug Program 2013.
Solution in Drug Plan Management 2011 September 8, 2011 Basil Rowe Vice President, Total Rewards and Shared Services Shoppers Drug Mart
Value & Coverage Issue Brief Slides A Closer Look at Health Plan Coverage Policies and Approaches.
1 Mary Kyle, Deputy Human Resources Director October 13, 2011.
New Jersey State Health Benefits Program Joint Committee on Public Employee Benefits Reform September 13, 2006.
You’ve Got Drugs! James M. Dowden May Current Environment.
Montana University System URx: Rethinking our Rx program: A New Strategic Approach.
Lesson 2 Choosing Community Health Services You need to understand the options in health care services available in your community. Being health-literate.
Pharmacy Program Initiatives Threshold, Mandatory Generic, Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) Javier Menendez, RPh Pharmacy Manager Department of Medical Assistance.
Drug Utilization Review (DUR)
Billing Standards for Public Clinics Kelly F. McDonald, MPH Oregon Immunization Program Billables Project Contractor Recommendations of the IPAT Billable.
April 14, 2004 Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor FDA Docket No. 2004N-0115 State of Illinois Canadian Drug Study FDA Docket No. 2004N-0115 Presented By: Ram.
State of New Hampshire Pharmacy Benefit Changes Effective 10/1/2010 Presented By: Melisa Briggs.
This presentation contains confidential and proprietary information of Caremark and cannot be reproduced, distributed or printed without written permission.
CITY OF LAREDO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT By: Daniel E. Migura Jr. HEALTH & BENEFITS FUND.
Plan Year. 2 WHAT’S NOT CHANGING FOR 2014  Premiums will remain the SAME  First Choice providers and Generic Medications are STILL NO COST TO.
Meeting the Medication Needs of Iowans: the IowaCare Pilot Pharmaceutical Program and UIHC Medication Assistance Center Lisa Mascardo, PharmD Assistant.
From Registration to Accounts Receivable – The Whole Can of Worms 2007 UBO/UBU Conference 1 Briefing:Unraveling the Mystery of Pharmacy Claims Date:21.
1 ©2010 Caremark. All rights reserved. CVS Caremark proprietary and confidential information. Not for distribution. This is NOT insurance. Discounts are.
Plan Design FeatureUSA NetworksNon USA Networks Annual Deductible $0 Drugs purchased outside the USA Networks are covered under your medical plan. 80%
Presented by: Keenan & Associates Debra L. Yorba, Sr. Vice President February 22, 2014 License Plan Design Sub-Committee Recommendations KPPC/ESI.
Section 24.2 Participating in Your Healthcare Slide 1 of 18 Objectives Describe how to choose and participate fully in your healthcare. Compare different.
1 COPRA Meeting May 19, What is Open Enrollment When is Open Enrollment Premiums Medical Co-Pays Covering Children up to Age 26 New Pharmacy Management.
Triple Choice Enrollment THE BASICS DEFINITIONS HMO (Health Maintenance Organization): A form of health insurance combining a range of coverage.
Public Employees Benefits Board April 23, PEBB Procurement Bid Alternatives.
Copay Structure Principles in Practice Copyright © – Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)Slide 1.
Washington State Rx Services: Prescription Benefit Update Elizabeth James, PharmD October 16, 2007.
URx : Rethinking our Rx program: A New Strategic Approach.
Faculty Senate AUGUST 24, 2011 PENDING BOARD OF TRUSTEES APPROVAL.
PRESENTATIONOF ANNUAL INSURANCE CONTRACTS October 25, 2011.
Unique & Creative Plan Design Suggestions to Help Control Costs
Health Care Distribution, Ch. 7. United States Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2002 was 10 trillion dollars  1.6 trillion of it was spent on health care.
State of New Hampshire Pharmacy Benefit Changes Effective November 1, 2011 Presented By: Melisa Briggs.
CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future.
1 Governor’s Office of Health Policy and Finance MaineCare Pharmacy Initiatives.
City of Plano Retiree Non-Medicare Open Enrollment Plan Year 2010.
Retiree Health Benefits Program Medicare Part D and Your State Benefits Your Benefits Choices.
MTM Discussion Topics UPlan Pharmacy Program UPlan decision to add MTM
Pharmacy Benefits Rx4 Traditional replaces Rx3
The University of North Carolina Today’s Agenda  Cost of Health Care  How the University Compares  Employee Survey Results  Steering Committee  Questions.
The community pharmacy environment HMI Public Hearing Set 1 Hearing 2
Drug Formulary Development & Management
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
Shelby County Government 2014 Benefits Annual Enrollment: 11/01/2013 – 11/15/2013.
Pharmacy Benefit Management (PBM) 101
Travis County HRMD FY 2012 Benefits Work Session Employee Benefits Committee HRMD Staff.
Pharmacy Benefit Design Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February 2016.
Rx carve Out Proposal Board Meeting April4, 2016.
Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage Tim Cutler, PharmD Marilyn Stebbins, PharmD Clinical Pharmacists Mercy Medical Group - a service of CHW Medical Foundation.
Drug Utilization Review & Drug Utilization Evaluation: An Overview
Private Insurance Payers and Plans Chapter 3
Managed Care Models: The Benefit vs. Cost Balance
Annual Employee Benefit Meeting
Introduction to Clinical Pharmacy
University Benefits Brian Schlichting Gayle Schanou
Pharmacy – Fully Insured versus Self Funding
Drug Formulary Development & Management
Report of Faculty Senate Benefits Subcommittee
Presentation transcript:

Staff Health Care Committee Recommendations An update for UAA’s APT and Classified Staff Councils November 2009

Caremark’s Initial Recommendations

Caremark Recommendation #1: Copay Changes RecommendationWhat This Means Increase brand copays Generic Keep at $5 Preferred Brand Currently $20, increase to $25 Non-preferred Brand Currently $35, increase to $50 *Mail orders pay 2 copays for a 3 month supply Copay would increase by $5 or 25% for Preferred Brand, and by $15 or 43% for Non- Preferred Brand In 2008, the two tier structure (generic, brand) became a three tier structure (generic, preferred brand, non-preferred brand). For the 2008 standard plan: Generics decreased from $7 to $5 Down $2 or 28% Preferred brands increased from $10 to $20 Up $10 or 100% Non-preferred brands increased from $10 to $35 Up $25 or 250% Note: These copays could be magnified by other proposed penalties (i.e. the mail order penalty).

Caremark Recommendation #2: Require Mail Order for Maintenance Meds RecommendationWhat This Means Incentivized Mail Program Maintenance medications (taken monthly) would be required to be filled through the mail order program after 4, 5, or 6 fills. If participants choose to continue to purchase in the retail environment, they would pay an additional retail copay. After 4, 5, or 6 fills on a maintenance medication (one taken monthly) at the local retail pharmacy, the prescription would have to be filled through mail order. The “additional copay” would mean that the patient would pay twice the copay for the drug: Add $5 for generic Add $20 or $25 for preferred brand [depending on whether the copay rates change] Add $35 or $50 for non-preferred brand [depending on whether the copay rates change] This would be a new penalty. Note: This penalty could be magnified by other proposed penalties (i.e. the “dispense as written” penalty).

Caremark Recommendation #3: Dispense As Written Penalty RecommendationWhat This Means Dispense As Written Participants would be charged an additional copay for choosing a brand drug when a generic equivalent is available. If a patient uses a brand drug when a generic is available, the patient would pay an additional copay for the drug: Add $5 for generic Add $20 or $25 for preferred brand [depending on whether the copay rates change] Add $35 or $50 for non-preferred brand [depending on whether the copay rates change] This would be a new penalty. Note: This penalty could be magnified by other proposed penalties (i.e. the mail order penalty).

Caremark Recommendation #4: Performance Step Therapy RecommendationWhat This Means Performance Step Therapy Participants would be required to use a generic before a non-preferred brand is covered. Participants would be required to try the generic version of a drug before a non- preferred brand is covered. The intent is to ensure there is a reason a member is choosing to use brand rather than generic. There is no additional charge associated with this recommendation, but it could require a change in the prescription filled from what was written by the doctor.

Caremark Recommendation #5: Preferred Brand Optimization RecommendationWhat This Means Preferred Brand Optimization Caremark would reduce the list of prescriptions currently on the preferred brand list, to include only those with the lowest net cost, and shortest patent life (time before a generic is available). Some prescriptions currently considered Preferred Brand would shift to the Non- Preferred Brand, which is at a higher copay level. Existing prescriptions could be moved to the higher copay level, which could be magnified if copay levels are increased or other penalties are instituted. This change would affect 1016 participants, or about a third of the people on prescriptions in a given month.

Caremark Recommendation #6: Specialty Guideline Management RecommendationWhat This Means Specialty Guideline Management A comprehensive, clinical review of specialty medication would be implemented, evaluating patient progress to determine whether appropriate results were achieved. Patient progress would be reviewed for participants currently on specialty medications. Specialty medications are a narrow class of drugs, and very few of us (about 89 people) are using them. They treat conditions such as HIV, Multiple Sclerosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Staff Health Care Committee’s Response to the Recommendations

SHCC Response: Principles Control health care costs while protecting the best interests of the thousands of staff we represent Identify reasonable compromises we can stand behind Respect the doctor/patient relationship Consider significant mail and weather factors in any changes that are mandatory

SHCC Response: Concerns Raising copays again so soon, particularly to the degree Caremark has recommended Implementing too many changes simultaneously. It makes more sense to select targeted changes and assess the results. Potential for Caremark’s recommendations to build on each other. An employee could pay $150 a month to remain on a non-preferred brand of insulin, purchased at the retail pharmacy to ensure the medicine is not damaged by sub-zero temperatures or stolen by neighbors. This would be an increase from $35 now, and $10 paid two years ago. Punishment for not using the mail order plan, when there are real concerns about effectiveness, temperatures, and mail problems in locations where flights have trouble getting in

SHCC Response: Recommendations Require patients to try generic before using preferred brand prescription. Exceptions must be made if there is a medical reason not to use the generic. Penalty for using brand when a generic is available is not necessary, since only patients who have a medical need for the brand should be using it Reduced list of preferred brands is not necessary or justified to affect more than a third of users Add incentive (not punishment) to increase mail order usage: 50% of retail for first mail order, rather than 66%

SHCC Response: Recommendations (cont.) Specialty medication evaluations should be conducted by the doctor, not the pharmacy vendor While the committee feels it is too soon for a copay increase, it is willing to support an increase of $5 for both the preferred and non-preferred brand medications, as long as it is NOT accompanied by any additional penalties for using a brand or not using the mail order program.

SHCC Response: Long Term Recommendations Consider modifying brand copays so the lower tier is for brands with no available generic and brands where the patient has documented they cannot take the generic, and the higher tier is for brands with a generic available and no medical reason why it is not being used Human Resources needs to improve communication about the factors that affect the health care plan costs, and how we can control them Increase equality for non-union staff on the Joint Health Care Committee (who currently have one seat, but make up 60-70% of employees)

Questions?