Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Return on Investment: Training and Development
Advertisements

Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Risk The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives. A risk is often specified in terms of an event or circumstance and the consequences.
Show Me the Money: Moving From Impact to ROI
Project Management Framework May 2010 Ciaran Whyte Risk Administrator Planning & Strategic Projects Unit.
THE PROCESS OF PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING UNIT 5001 Dr Jo Alleyne MCMI 1.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Tomorrow’s Ireland...Today Quality Standards in Youth Work A work in progress.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
REJ - 1 REJ from Microsoft Chris Gibbs November 5 th, 2007 MBA 731.
2/5/2004CEdMA Europe CEdMA Toolset 2004 ROI in Training Norman Buckberry Chairman CEdMA Europe
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Hartley, Project Management: Integrating Strategy, Operations and Change, 3e Tilde Publishing Chapter 12 Integration Management Practising a common, coordinated.
Family Outreach and Response Program Strategic Plan September 26 th, 2012.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Sharif University of Technology Session # 4.  Contents  Systems Analysis and Design Sharif University of Technology MIS (Management Information System),
Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
Bracknell Forest Council: Evaluation of the Domestic Abuse Perpetrator Service (DAPS) Liz Phillips.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Results-Based Management
Integrating Safety Management Systems – Opportunities for Improvement
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Technology Transfer Execution Framework. 2 © 2007 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Relationship Between Your EPRI Value and.
Community Health organizing concepts. community health professionals must possess specific knowledge and skills.  identify problems,  develop plan to.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Introduction to the Continual Service Improvement Toolkit Welcome.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
1 Monitoring and Evaluating Employee Wellness Programs.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
How to Use the ROI Methodology in Your Team Coaching Engagements
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
PaRROT Program Introduction. Learning objectives Understand and be aware of: History, objectives principles and expected outcomes of PaRROT Program content,
Use of Resources Calderdale workshop 18 May 2009 Janet Matthews- Audit Commission Steve Brennan- Calderdale PCT.
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.
Are we there yet? Evaluating your graduation SiMR.
CHANGE READINESS ASSESSMENT Measuring stakeholder engagement and attitude to change.
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
Hunter Trainers & Assessors Network (HTAN) Facilitator HTAN Recognition Network – Sue Flindell.
How to Demonstrate the Value of Contract Education Jack J. Phillips, Ph.D. Chairman ROI Institute, Inc. May 11, :00 AM- 12:00 PM 5 Levels of Evaluation.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme October 2007 Progress and progression + evaluation.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Return on Investment: Training and Development Session 1 ROI and Evaluation.
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Portfolio, Programme and Project
ROI INSTITUTE ™ ROI Institute is the only organization in the world that provides a comprehensive learning process to evaluate programs at five levels,
Presentation transcript:

Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Integrating a Framework  Many organisations follow a disjointed staged approach to their monitoring and evaluation following a framework which is responsive rather than proactive. Contract Reporting Internal progress updates Retrospective evaluations Reporting Business Plan Short term response to need Contractual obligation Delivery Monitoring Engagement with services Periodic activity

Integrating a Framework  Introducing an ROI evaluation methodology allows for an integrated framework ensuring better service planning and monitoring together with an evaluation of impact Business Plan Strategic Justification Programme outcomes Staged KPI’s Contractually aligned Delivery Monitoring Engagement with Services Progress towards KPI’s and Outcomes Impact Formative review of delivery Phillips Return on Investment Methodology TM Ongoing Evaluation Contract Reporting Internal progress updates Retrospective evaluations Reporting

Why use ROI methodology? CREDIBILITY More than 2,000 organisations have implemented the ROI Methodology More than 3,000 professionals have attended ROI Certification Workshops More than 15,000 professionals have participated in two-day ROI workshops International and Local ROI Networks 20 books translated into 25 languages Taken from Site content © ABDI ltd 2008

Why use ROI methodology? BOTTOM LINE IMPROVEMENT but can my intervention take the credit? A vital question, with a three-part answer:  Not causality but evidence of a chain of impact.  Impact results are adjusted for the impact of other influences.  Standardisation through twelve guiding principles supports credibility. Taken from Site content © ABDI ltd 2008

Why use ROI methodology? The ROI methodology links the outcome to the intervention through a chain of impact at up to five levels : 1. Participant reaction and planned action. 2. Participant learning. 3. Related personal or operational changes. 4. Related improvements in own environment or business results. 5. Hence return on investment - the net financial gain set against the total cost. Taken from Site content © ABDI ltd 2008

REACTIONLEARNINGAPPLICATION BUSINESS IMPACT ROI Impact Mapping Feedback Forms Surveys Pre/post event test Simulations Self perception Observations Action plans Focus groups Follow ups Self perception Access to performance info Access to financial info Identify costs Identify intangibles Identify influences Relevance of project / event Importance of project / event Recommend to other Learning outcomes achieved Relevant skills gained Maintaining of skills Application of skills Completion of action plans New practices Performance improvements Reduced costs Increased efficiency Isolate effects Control groups Trend analysis Participation estimate Measure intangibles Benefit to Cost ratio Calculate ROI Report analysis to the project deliverers to inform any repeat events or to highlight potential issues Ongoing reporting / feedback to project developers, participants Final Evaluation Report Executive summary Presentation Communication to stakeholders PLANNING ANALYSIS REPORTING THE MODEL Model re-representation by permission © ABDI ltd 2008

Integrating the Model  Business planning  Justify the programme in terms of an opportunity or a need  Specify the long term desired outcomes for the programme  Break the outcome into staged KPI’s  Identify business need for each stage and align with ROI model Business NeedROI Model Return on Investment A case load (cost) reduction for high dependency drug users Business Improvement Increase in self referral to alternative support services Application of skills / personal changes Provide service users with knowledge of community support service through online signposting service Participant Learning Service users to access online signposting and rate relevance Participant Reaction

Integrating the Model  Recording delivery progress  Establish methodology for recording progress to KPI’s / Outputs which includes:  Activity  Risks / Issues  Mitigating measures  Recording delivery Impact  Establish a monitoring environment which utilises existing systems such as client databases, CRM’s etc  Enhance monitoring procedures to ensure the timely and appropriate collection of core data  Develop tools which are standard in style, yet bespoke in content to ensure relevance to the delivery programme

Integrating Model  ROI toolkit  To support the different stages of the ROI model a toolkit should be developed which will include standardised documentation:  Objectives and Target Planning (evaluation plan pt.1)  Data collection Plan (evaluation plan pt.2)  ROI Analysis Plan (evaluation plan pt.3)  Include frequently used tools for measuring the learning and application of skills and business changes. These should be integrated with delivery  Feedback forms / simulations / tests  Action plans / interviews / focus groups  Identify early, and develop methods for full cost calculations

Integrating Model  Reporting Standards Frequent reporting to all stakeholders is key. This should include:  To management / board / funders  Periodic updates on delivery  Headline impact such as engagement and business improvement  To programme deliverers and participants  Success of achieving learning outcomes immediately after delivery  Ongoing reports outlining application and associated changes, leading to…  Full ROI impact assessment

And finally, the12 Guiding Principles 1. When a higher level evaluation is conducted, data must be collected at lower levels 2. When an evaluation is planned at a higher level, the previous level of evaluation does not have to be comprehensive 3. When collecting and analysing data use only the most credible sources 4. When analysing data choose the most conservative alternative for calculations 5. At least one method must be used to isolate the effects of the solution 6. If no improvement data is available, assume no improvement 7. Estimates of improvements should be adjusted for the potential of error 8. Extreme data items or unsupported claims should not be used in ROI calculations 9. Only the first year of benefits should be used in the ROI analysis 10. Cost of the solution should be fully loaded 11. Intangible measures are defined as measures that are purposely not converted to money 12. The results of the ROI Methodology must be communicated to all key stakeholders