Justice Griffith Family Youth Conferences and Indigenous Over-representation: Micro Simulation Case Study Anna Stewart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Restorative Justice in Australia Hennessey Hayes School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Griffith University.
Advertisements

Historical context Good Friday Agreement Criminal Justice Review 1998 Criminal Justice Review Implementation plan 2000 Justice [ N.I] Act 2002 December.
Justice Reinvestment - a Federal Perspective National Centre for Indigenous Studies - Justice Reinvestment Forum Roger Wilkins AO 2 August 2012.
Priority Youth Offender Project Alice Chapman Director Youth Conference Service Youth Justice Agency.
New(?) Directions in Adult & Juvenile Sentencing in Australia Christine Bond Samantha Jeffries Griffith University.
A Partner’s Perspective of the Whole Systems Approach.
Dr Kelly Richards, School of Justice, Queensland University of Technology.
Aboriginal women’s access to diversionary programs in NSW Ruth McCausland School of Social Sciences University of New South Wales.
People with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system – when is disability a crime? “Lock ‘Them’ Up? Disability and Mental Illness Aren’t.
What are the priority issues for improving Australia’s Health Groups Experiencing Health Inequities ATSI.
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER AT There for young people 24/7 PREVENTING FAMILY BREAKDOWN OR COMMUNITY PLACEMENT BREAKDOWN TRANSITIONAL SUPPORT.
April 2006 South Pacific Council of Youth and Children’s Courts 2006 Tasmanian Conference “ The Child Protection System and Magistrates Courts - A Focus.
Irish Youth Justice Service: A Review Presentation by Ms Michelle Shannon, National Director at ‘Juvenile Justice: Criminal and Welfare Concerns ’
Lisa M. Broidy, Anna L. Stewart, Carleen M. Thompson, April Chrzanowski, Troy Allard and Susan M. Dennison Griffith University, School of CCJ and Key Centre.
The Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS) First Biennial Conference Slieve Russell Hotel, March 2008 Michelle Shannon, National Director.
Justice Griffith 1 Juvenile Offending Trajectories A Queensland Study.
Justice Griffith Maltreatment and Offending Trajectories: Identifying Pathways for Intervention Anna Stewart Michael Livingston Susan Dennison.
Group Risk Assessment Model Monitoring trends in re-offending among convicted offenders in adult and children’s court Fourth National Justice Modelling.
Marisela Velazquez, PhD Candidate James Cook University
The transition from juvenile to adult criminal careers Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Pathways Through Justice A statistical analysis of contact between youth and the WA juvenile justice system Presentation to Justice Research Conference.
Police and young people Aaron Isaac. Police and Young People  Legislation introduced such as the (powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, was introduced,
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Misspent Youth - Opportunities for Juvenile Justice Address by The Hon Wayne Martin Chief Justice of Western Australia JOHN CURTIN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Alternative dispute resolution is the term used for a number of dispute resolution processes that are an alternative.
Hackney’s Safer Schools Partnership Nicola Baboneau, Community & Partnerships, The Learning Trust.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Juvenile Crime Categories of Crime – Legal Studies 3C.
Justice system statistics: an overview – including their use and misuse South Pacific Council of Youth and Children's Courts Jonathon Rees and Tony Jacques.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Examining Adult-Onset Offending: A case for Adult Cautioning Carleen Thompson Anna Stewart Troy Allard April Chrzanowksi Funded by a Criminology Research.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
NAIDOC Week Oration NSW Police 8 July 2009 Tom Calma Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner.
INDIGENOUS IMPRISONMENT RATES: INDICATIVE OF ENTRENCHED DISADVANTAGE MORE THAN SERIOUS CRIMINALITY? Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Hosted.
The Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ~SPEP~
Drugs and Harm Minimisation
NSW Department of Education & Training Aboriginal Education and Training Policy ACE SOCIAL INCLUSION FORUM Sebel Sydney 26 February.
Australian Government Australian Institute of Criminology Drugs, Alcohol and Crime: A study of juvenile detainees Jason Payne ‘AIJA Youth.
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
I ndigenous G uardians a d l item (IGsAL) are necessary in child protection court cases.
1 NSW ABORIGINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL. 2 NSW ABORIGINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL (AJAC) Independent arm of NSW Govt Established in 1993 & became a.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Targeting Crime Prevention to Reduce Offending Identifying communities that generate chronic and costly offending Anna Stewart Troy Allard April Chrzanowski.
CRIME AND DEVIANCE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION IS TAKEN FROM HOLMES HUGHES & JULIAN AUSTRALIAN SOCIOLOGY – A CHANGING SOCIETY.
Juvenile justice trends in Australia
DEVELOPMENTS IN AUSTRALIAN CRIME VICTIMISATION SURVEYS.
1 Making the most of evaluation a provider perspective on the outcomes of Brighter Futures Andrew Anderson, The Benevolent Society.
Faculty of Arts Hannah Graham Associate Lecturer in Criminology & Sociology, and current PhD candidate School of Sociology & Social Work, UTAS
Analysis of FTE data for XXX YOT
Restorative Justice The Garda Model (Young Offending) Sergeant Andy Tuite Garda National Juvenile Office The Law Society Tuesday 16 th October 2007.
Children in court & Diversionary Schemes By Maddie.
The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne.
Family Group Conferencing an inclusiveness and empowering process Presenters Jenny Lang Marion Barnett Enda Cotter.
1 Disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians and the Historical Context Academic English B 25 November 2008.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Reducing Youth Re-offending How do we build on the existing approach to help a more challenging cohort to stop offending? Lin Hinnigan Chief Executive.
Strategic Forum Canberra, 10 February Welcome to Country Matilda House.
Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Mechanics of the YCJA Mechanics of the YCJA Consequences under YCJA Consequences.
SHARING THE NORTHERN IRELAND EXPERIENCE
Benchmarking Excellence in Restorative Conferencing
National Coordinator Tackling Indigenous Smoking
National Coordinator Tackling Indigenous Smoking
Youth Justice: A balanced approach
THE YOUTH JUSTICE SYSTEM QUEENSLAND NEEDS
Alternatives to criminal law processes
Justice Reinvestment for Aboriginal Young People
The fiscal squeeze on justice has tightened in recent years
Preventable mortality in justice-involved young people
Presentation transcript:

Justice Griffith Family Youth Conferences and Indigenous Over-representation: Micro Simulation Case Study Anna Stewart

Justice Griffith 2 Aim of presentation provide an example of the use of micro simulation modelling for examining a policy initiative –Describe the policy initiative –Examine simulation modelling –Compare two scenarios –Discuss the implications

Justice Griffith 3 Background 2001 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Justice Agreement –reduced the rate of Indigenous people coming into contact with the CJS –by the year 2011 there will be a 50% reduction in the rate of Indigenous incarceration Need to reduce the number of Indigenous young people in the Juvenile Justice System

Justice Griffith Juvenile Justice System over representation in the juvenile justice system of indigenous children –4.4% of the year old population Indigenous –34.7% of court appearances –57% of young people in detention young people with a finalised juvenile court appearance –38.6% of Indigenous males –6.6% of non-Indigenous males –13.4% of Indigenous females –1.9% of non-Indigenous females

Justice Griffith 5 Youth Justice Conferencing diversionary program to address offending behaviour –introduced in Queensland 1997 –2001 in pilot mode –available state wide in 2004 was identified in the 2003 Justice Negotiation Group Progress Report as a process to reduce over representation Will YJC reduce over-representation by Indigenous children in the juvenile justice system by 2011?

Justice Griffith 6 Simulation Modelling Provides a tool for examining policy impact out over time –short term and long term impact –‘what if’ questions Allows experimentation with the system out over time Build a computer model of the system –develop scenarios –run different scenarios out over time multiple times to reduce variation –compare the relative impact

Justice Griffith 7 Juvenile Justice Simulation Model –Developed in 2002 –funded by an Australian Research Council and Office of Economic and Statistical Research –computer model of the juvenile justice system –leverage points early intervention crime prevention diversion court ordered intervention

Justice Griffith 8 Schematic Diagram of Juvenile Justice Simulation Model

Justice Griffith 9 System Experiments Baseline Simulation Scenario 1: Introduce YJC state wide Scenario 2: Introduce YJC and target Indigenous young people What difference do these changes make to over representation by indigenous young people in 2011?

Justice Griffith 10 Baseline Assumptions –Do nothing – no introduction of YJC –only change is demographic Outcome in 2011 –increase in court appearances 6% non-Indigenous children 30% Indigenous children increase in population of 10 – 17 year old indigenous children (4.4% to 5.7%) proportion of Indigenous to non-Indigenous increases over representation stays the same

Justice Griffith 11

Justice Griffith 12 Scenario 1: Introduce YJC Queensland wide Assumptions –Referral rates different for different offences different for first, second, and third appearance same for Indigenous and non-Indigenous young people –Efficacy rates 15% reduction in reappearances Luke and Lind (2002) evaluation of NSW conferencing

Justice Griffith 13 Scenario 1: Outcome in 2011 reduction in court appearances –due to diversionary nature of YJC 5.6% Indigenous 8.8% non-Indigenous –due to non-reappearance 5.2% Indigenous 5.6% non Indigenous total reduction –11% Indigenous –14% non-Indigenous 3% increase in over representation by Indigenous young people in court appearances

Justice Griffith 14

Justice Griffith 15 Scenario 2: Target Indigenous children YJC Assumptions –100% of Indigenous children conferenced at first offence –same efficacy – 15% –subsequent offences same rate as non- Indigenous children

Justice Griffith 16 Scenario 2: Outcome in 2011 reduction in court appearances –due to diversionary nature of YJC 27.2% Indigenous 8.8% non-Indigenous –Reduction due to non-reappearance 22.4% Indigenous 5.6% non Indigenous total reduction in court appearances –50% reduction in Indigenous appearances –14% reduction in non Indigenous appearances 36% decrease in over representation in court appearances

Justice Griffith 17

Justice Griffith 18 Implications for the Justice Agreement YJC could result in a reduction in over representation –only if seriously targeted at Indigenous young people –no guarantee the efficacy will remain the same need to try other interventions criminal justice system interventions are unlikely to make dramatic difference –need to target initiation of offending –early interventions –community based interventions 16.7% offend

Justice Griffith 19 Simulation modelling provides a tool for examining the relative impact of different interventions out over time provides an opportunity to experiment with different interventions to reach targets