CBA Results Files Getting started. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRIP South Region Gas Regional Investment Plans Investment WS – 29 th Sep 2011.
Advertisements

Market Integration & SoS Updated proposals for SJWS #6 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 26 April 2012.
Update on Transparency Obligations Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOGs Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
GRIP South South Region Second Edition Gas Regional Investment Plan SGRI – 15 November 2013.
1st Ten Year Network Development Plan: ERGEG opinion
GRIP South South Region Gas Regional Investment Plans SGRI – 23 September2013.
Gas Regional Initiative Region North-West Gas Regional Investment Plan Project Marie-Claire Aoun, Carole Mathieu CRE RCC Meeting The Hague – 4 April 2013.
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
International Climate Policy Hamburg Institute of International Economics International Climate Policy Graduation and deepening: a suggestion to move international.
Concept of Data Collection Vincent Scherrer Junior Adviser, System Development ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
CBA Results Files Filling in the templates. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015
1 March 2-3, 2015, Bonn Expert workshop Addressing Variable Renewables In Long‐Term Energy Planning (AVRIL) Renewables Energy Integration In Long‐Term.
Infrastructure projects Initial proposals for SJWS #5 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 April 2012.
Cost-Benefit Analysis Modelling: indicators & Monetization TYNDP/CBA SJWS 6 – 13 May 2014.
CBA Results Files Analysing the results. 2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP 2015
Market Integration & SoS Initial proposals for SJWS #5 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 March 2012.
Global Competitiveness in a Liberalised EU Energy Market Wim Groenendijk, Member of the Board Brussels, 22 November 2011 Gas infrastructure and Markets.
Future Energy Scenarios 2015 Supply Marcus Stewart Demand and Supply Manager.
TYNDP SJWS #3 Demand TYNDP – 3 rd SJWS 08 March 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
© OECD/IEA NATURAL GAS MARKEREVIEW 2008 Gas and the Sustainability Drive: what will it do the fuel mix? Ian Cronshaw, Head of Energy Diversification.
TYNDP SJWS #1 Infrastructure Projects -- Supply & Demand TYNDP st SJWS 24 January 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
TYNDP SJWS #2 Security of Supply – Market Integration TYNDP – 2 nd SJWS 15 February 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
ENTSO-E’s Network Development Plans and Network Codes: How a strong European grid supports security of supply, affordable electricity prices through market.
The Economics of the South Stream Pipeline in the Context of Russo-Ukrainian Gas Bargaining Chi-Kong Chyong Judge Business School.
Gas Development Master Plan Overview of the GDMP Model Capacity Building Workshop Bali, 1-2 July 2013.
Further consultation on NTS entry baselines Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Compliance and Enforcement 14 August 2007.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Nina Grall Directorate General – Energy and Transport European Forum Gas 2007 – Paris Towards one.
Energy Union Concept Walter Boltz, Chair of CEER Gas Working Group 27 th Madrid Forum, April 2015.
1 Gas Regional Investment Plan North West Europe GRI Meeting, November 25 th 2011.
Concept of Transparency Platform Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
Benoît Esnault Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) - ERGEG 19th Madrid Forum, March 2011 Energy Infrastructure Package ERGEG preliminary.
TYNDP concept SJWS #7 – conclusion on TYNDP concept TYNDP Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 29 May 2012.
TYNDP SJWS #5 Demand & Supply – Infrastructure Projects TYNDP – 5 th SJWS 20 April 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.
GRIP South South Region Gas Regional Investment Plans SGRI – 30 th April 2013.
Implementation of Transparency Guidelines Martin Reisner Advisor Current Status and future Challenges Ljubljana – 13 September 2012.
A National Grid Fit For The Future Chris J Murray. Newton Institute - 26 th May 2010.
1 South Gas Regional Initiative 16 th Dec 2011 South Gas Regional Initiative 16 th Dec 2011.
Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic Performance Indicators TYNDP/CBA SJWS 6 – 13 May 2014.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
27 th IG meeting 28 th March 2014 Enagás, GRTgaz, REN and TIGF.
Long-term modeling of resilience and flexibility of European gas transportation system: integrated factors Dresden, April 3, 2009 Vitaly Protasov, Expert,
Transparency Platform Project introduction Panagiotis Panousos Business Area Manager, System Operation ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September.
Projects and topology Ádám Balogh Adviser How does your data submission translate into a Project in the topology TYNDP 2017 SJWS Energy Community.
Winter 2006/07 so far Gas Forum 29 January Actual Weather  December was the 5th warmest on record on a Composite Weather Variable Basis.
PEAK CAPACITY COST & DEMAND RESPONSE PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEMAND RESPONSE PLANNING COMMITTEE BILL DICKENS TACOMA POWER FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
SLED Electricity Modelling results – Serbia László Szabó, András Mezősi
How the PCIs are developed Céline Heidrecheid System Development Business Area Manager TYNDP perspective on project progress Copenhagen – 24 June 2016.
A Perspective on Infrastructure and Energy Security in the Transition 3 rd of March 2016.
Storage users in entry/exit regimes suffer from double charges for transmission
Cost-Benefit Analysis
40th IG meeting 29th November 2016
Gas Regional Investment Plans
Background and Process
Public workshop: CBA 3.0 –come and improve with us the transmission and storage assessment methodology Brussels 07 November 2017.
Brussels, 29th April 2009 Presentation by Martin Altstätter
The LNG role to improve SoS in Europe
TYNDP: Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2016
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
ACER opinion on ENTSOG’s 2011 Ten-Year Network Development Plan
40th IG meeting 29th November 2016
Scenario: Real GDP is 3,000 units, the average price level is $4 a unit and the quantity of money in the economy is $1,500. Calculate the velocity of.
WINTER OUTLOOKS 2018/2019 Alban Joyeau ENSTO-E Lukas Galdikas ENTSO-E
Peak demand Cases Peak case #1 Peak case #2 Peak case #3
Working Time Item 8.1 of the agenda
Problems identified by NRAs
Projects of Common Interest
SUMMER OUTLOOKS 2019 Lea Dehaudt, Moderator ENTSO-E
Problems identified by NRAs
ROMANIA 2019 NEEDS IDENTIFICATION ROMANIA 2019.
July update JANUARY 2019.
Presentation transcript:

CBA Results Files Getting started

2 We highly encourage you to >Read the CBA Methodology:  Annex F on Methodology of TYNDP _Annex_F_lowres.pdf  And ESW-CBA Methodology _Adapted_ESW-CBA_Methodology.pdf >Read the TYNDP DEVELOPMENT-PLAN-2015 Getting started

3 12 Result files for each Group of projects >DISRUPTED RATE >DISRUPTED QUANTITY >REMAINING FLEXIBILITY >INDICATORS >MONETIZATION >MARGINAL PRICE >GPI >FLOWS >CO2 and demand >IMPORT ROUTE DIV >N-1 ESW CBA >Economic Template Getting started Modelling results Capacity-based indicators results Economic Template

4 Units of the files Getting started Units DISRUPTED RATE% of country (or balancing zone* ) demanddaily basis DISRUPTED QUANTITYGWh/ddaily basis REMAINING FLEXIBILITY% of country (or balancing zone* ) demanddaily basis INDICATORSSSPDi = % of supply price diversification on country Gas Billyearly basis SSPDe= % of supply price dependence of country Gas Billyearly basis USSD/CSSD= % of country demand on yearly basisyearly basis MONETIZATIONEUR/ddaily basis MARGINAL PRICEEUR/GWh GPIEUR/GWh FLOWSGWh/ddaily basis CO2 and demandCO2= in tonsdaily basis demand= in GWhdaily basis IMPORT ROUTE DIVno unit (HHI index) N-1% of country demanddaily basis Economic templateBill components= 10^6 EUR/yearyearly basis *: for country having more than 1 balancing zone

5 Overview of Modelling results Ref caseLNGRUNODZLYAZ chexpchexpchexpchexpchexpchexp DISRUPTED RATE DISRUPTED QUANTITY REMAINING FLEXIBILITY Normal situation (NONE) RU transit disruption NO transit disruption DZ transit disruption LY transit disruption AZ transit disruption Ukraine Langeled Transmed Green Stream TANAP Belarus Franpipe MEG MONETIZATION MARGINAL PRICE GPI INDICATORS: USSD/CSSD (supply dependence) _LNG _RU_NO_DZ_LY_AZ INDICATORS: SSPDe_ (price dependence) _LNG _RU_NO_DZ_LY_AZ INDICATORS: SSPDi_ (price diversification) _LNG _RU_NO_DZ_LY_AZ Reviewed!

6 Common File structure for these Files and Worksheets Files structure FileWorksheet DISRUPTED RATESTART-END Values DISRUPTED QUANTITYSTART-END Values REMAINING FLEXIBILITYSTART-END Values INDICATORSSTART-END All Clusters MARGINAL PRICESTART-END Values GPISTART-END Values

7 Drop down list to select the results you want to look at >DISRUPTED RATE >DISRUPTED QUANTITY >REMAINING FLEXIBILITY >INDICATORS >MONETIZATION >MARGINAL PRICE >GPI Files structure (modelling results files) Global context Disruption scen Infra. scen Temporal period Indicators Price Conf. Temporal period Price Conf.

8 Disruption and Remaining Flexibility >No supply price configurations for these indicators >Calculated at country (or BZ) level >To be looked at under high demand situations: DC (=Design Case) and 2W (=2 weeks cold spell) >Disruption Rate: measures the share of country’s demand which cannot be supplied  A 0% disruption rate means the country is not facing disruption  A 10% disruption on peak day means that the country’s infrastructures only allow to supply 90% of its peak demand >Remaining Flexibility: measures the additional demand the country could cope with, expressed as share of the country’s actual demand  A 20% remaining flexibility means the country could cope with a 20% increase of its demand >Above indicators are also calculated under 8 route disruption scenarios (Ukraine, Belarus, …) Modelling results - 1 cf. Annex F on Methodology p22

9 Monetized results >Monetized results are calculated under the 13 price configurations >EU Bill >Marginal Price: by country (even by balancing zone)  To be looked at for AW (=Average winter) and AS (=Average summer) >GPI (Gas Price Index): proxy for the country gas Bills, calculated by country  To be looked at for AW (=Average winter) and AS (=Average summer) Modelling results - 2 cf. Annex F on Methodology p15 to 18

10 Indicators >Indicators are calculated for each of the 6 supply sources. >They are calculated at country level on a yearly basis >Supply source dependence measures the share of country’s demand that cannot be supplied if EU faces a total absence of this source. It is calculated both under uncooperative (USSD) and cooperative (CSSD) behaviour between countries  A country’s uncooperative dependence of 40% to LNG means that this country needs at least 40% of LNG to supply its demand, if not supported by other countries >Supply price dependence (SSPDe) measures the dependence of country gas bill on that source  A country’s price dependence of 40% to Norwegian gas means that an increase of 10% of Norwegian price would induce a 4% increase of the country’s gas bill >Supply price diversification (SSPDi) measures the ability of each country to take advantage on a cheap source in its gas bill  A country’s price diversification of 30% to Algerian gas means that a decrease of 10% of Algerian price would be reflected in a 3% decrease of the country’s gas bill Modelling results - 3 cf. Annex F on Methodology p23 to 26

11 >N-1 for ESW-CBA: calculation based on capacities and peak demand (non modelled) Capacity-based results – N-1 New! cf. Annex F on Methodology p21

12 >N-1_ESW-CBA Result file: impact of Group of projects provided  By country  In 2 worksheets o N-1_green for GREEN global context (using countries’ GREEN peak demand) o N-1_grey for GREY global context (using countries’ GREY peak demand)  In these worksheets for the 2 Infrastructure scenarios o Low Infrastructure scenario: lines 4 to 33 o High Infrastructure scenario: lines 36 to 65  Detail by country to be found in the Countries Worksheets Capacity-based results – N-1 New!

13 >Import Route Diversification (IRD): HHI index which measures the diversification of paths that gas can flow through to reach a zone. Together with the Supply Source Price Diversification, it provides a proxy to the assessment of counterparty diversification. Capacity-based results - IRD New! cf. Annex F on Methodology p21

14 >IMPORT ROUTE DIV Result File: impact of Group of projects provided  in columns BG to BQ, under Infra Scenarios HUGH (BH to BL) and LOW (BM to BQ)  by country (green lines) Capacity-based results - IRD New! Interpretation of figures (50)= -50 = decrease 40 = +40 = increase - = no impact

Thank You for Your Attention ENTSOG -- European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas Avenue de Cortenbergh 100, B-1000 Brussels EML: WWW: