results from the phase III TRIBE trial

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Integration of Capecitabine into Anthracycline- and Taxane-Based Adjuvant Therapy for Triple Negative Early Breast Cancer: Final Subgroup Analysis of the.
Which difference should we target? Alberto Sobrero Ospedale San Martino IRCCS Genova, Italy.
Multi trial evaluation of longitudinal tumor measurement (TM)-based metrics for predicting overall survival (OS) using the RECIST 1.1 data warehouse Background:
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
KRAS Status in Response to Cetuximab
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Surrogate Endpoints and Correlative Outcomes Hem/Onc Journal Club January 9, 2009.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
A Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival Data from Three Randomized Trials of Bevacizumab (BV) and First-Line Chemotherapy as Treatment for Patients with Metastatic.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
RECIST Overview.
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
Prospective study of EGFR intron 1 CA tandem repeats as predictive factor of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan Antoniotti C 1, 2, Loupakis F 3, Cremolini.
High Cereblon Protein Expression Correlates with Improved Response and Survival in Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide 1 Cereblon Expression Predicts.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
2013 ASCO Annual Meeting Chicago, 31 May – 4 Jun 2013
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Mace L. Rothenberg, M.D. Professor of Medicine Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Management: KRAS Mutations and EGFR.
long term follow up of the CELIM trial
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Pritchard KI et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
D. P. Modest 1, R. P. Laubender 2, L. Fischer von Weikersthal 3, U. Vehling-Kaiser 4, M. Stauch 5, H. Hass 6, H. F. Dietzfelbinger 7, D. V. Oruzio 8, S.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Who can benefit from chemotherapy holidays after first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer ? N. Perez-Staub, B. Chibaudel, A. Figer, A. Cervantes,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Clinical outcome according to tumor HER2 status and EGFR expression in advanced gastric cancer patients from the EXPAND study F. Lordick,* Y-K. Kang, P.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
ASCO 2009 BEVACIZUMAB IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: An Update of the CALGB and AVOREN Trials Reviewed by: Dr. Daniel.
Response, PFS or OS – what is the best endpoint in advanced colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “VELOUR” Study
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Progression-Free Survival Times Overall Survival Times
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Primary side of origin affects the outcome of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently of BRAF status and mucinous.
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Ali Shamseddine,MD,FRCP
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

results from the phase III TRIBE trial Early Tumor Shrinkage (ETS) and Deepness of Response (DoR) predict Progression Free, Post-Progression and Overall Survival: results from the phase III TRIBE trial Cremolini C., Loupakis F., Antoniotti C., Masi G., Lonardi S., Trenta P., Tomasello G., Ronzoni M., Ciuffreda L., Zaniboni A., Carlomagno C., Boni C., Negri F., Barone C., Vitello S., Giuntini N., Bonetti A., D’Amico M., Boni L., Falcone A. On behalf of the GONO (Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest, Italy) investigators Background TRIBE – study design Results: ETS correlates with PFS, OS and PPS Results: DoR correlates with PFS, OS and PPS Results: Analyses as continuous variables Phase III TRIBE trial demonstrated that FOLFOXIRI plus bev provides a significant advantage in terms of PFS, RECIST response, and OS as compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. Falcone et al, ASCO Ann Meet 2013 Results from CRYSTAL and OPUS trial showed that the anti-EGFR cetuximab was able to increase the ETS, that was significantly associated with PFS and OS (more evidently in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab arm) Piessevaux et al, J Clin Oncol 2013 the anti-EGFR cetuximab was able to increase the DoR, that was significantly associated with post-progression survival (PPS) and OS Mansmann et al, ASCO GI 2013 both ETS and DoR may be regarded as valuable predictors of clinical outcome to be further investigated. HR for PFS 95%CI p Higher ETS 0.983 0.978-0.987 <0.0001 HR for OS 0.979 0.973-0.984 HR for PPS 0.987 0.982-0.993 *Median DoR: 38.9% ETS > 20% (Progr/N=208/256), mPFS: 12.7 mos ETS ≤ 20% (Progr/N=171/187), mPFS : 10.0 mos HR: 0.66 [0.52-0.79] p<0.0001 DoR > median* (Progr/N=201/241), mPFS: 13.1 mos DoR ≤ median* (Progr/N=217/243), mPFS : 9.3 mos HR: 0.61 [0.49-0.73] p<0.0001 Results: ETS and DoR according to treatment arm HR for PFS 95%CI p Higher DoR 0.983 0.980-0.987 <0.0001 HR for OS 0.979 0.975-0.983 HR for PPS 0.987 0.984-0.991 DoR > median* (Died/N=110/241), mOS: 36.8 mos DoR ≤ median* (Died/N=156/243), mOS : 21.3 mos HR: 0.47 [0.35-0.58] p<0.0001 N=443* FOLFIRI + bev Arm A N = 222 FOLFOXIRI + bev Arm B N = 221 p Range -100%/+56.9% -100%/+54.5% Median -21.4% -30.2% <0.0001 ETS > 20% 114 (51%) 142 (64%) ETS ≤ 20% 108 (49%) 79 (36%) 0.006 ETS > 20% (Died/N=118/256), mOS: 35.8 mos ETS ≤ 20% (Died/N=120/187), mOS : 22.4 mos HR: 0.54 [0.39-0.67] p<0.0001 Both ETS and DoR correlate with PFS, PPS and OS irrespectively of the treatment arm. Conclusions Definitions FOLFOXIRI + bev allows to achieve an higher early response rate and a better extent of DoR compared to FOLFIRI + bev. ETS predicts PFS, PPS and OS also in patients treated with chemotherapy + bev, thus confirming the importance of achieving an early response in order to improve long-term prognosis. DoR significantly correlates with PPS and OS, as previously demonstrated with chemotherapy + cetuximab, but also with PFS. These data confirm the value of both ETS and DoR as determinants of long-term outcome and potential endpoints for clinical trials. *65 patients were not evaluable for ETS Early Tumor Shrinkage (ETS): relative change in the sum of the longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at week 8 compared to baseline. Cut-off value: 20%. Piessevaux et al, J Clin Oncol 2013 Deepness of Response (DoR): relative change in the sum of the longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at the nadir in the absence of new lesions or progression of non-target lesions compared to baseline. Exploratory cut-off: median DoR in evaluable patients. ETS > 20% (Died/N=118/208), mPPS: 17.1 mos ETS ≤ 20% (Died/N=120/171), mPPS : 10.7 mos HR: 0.64 [0.47-0.81] p=0.0005 DoR > median* (Died/N=110/201), mPPS: 18.4 mos DoR ≤ median* (Died/N=156/217), mPPS: 10.5 mos HR: 0.58 [0.44-0.73] p<0.0001 N=484* FOLFIRI + bev Arm A N = 245 FOLFOXIRI + bev Arm B N = 239 p Range -100%/+56.9% -100%/+54.5% Median -33.8% -42.2% 0.0009 *24 patients were not evaluable for DoR chiaracremolini@gmail.com