Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard"— Presentation transcript:

1 What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Tanios Bekaii-Saab, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacy The Ohio State University – James Cancer Hospital

2 Is There a Role for Second Line Treatment In Advanced Pancreas Cancer
A comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials show an advantage for second line therapy in pancreas cancer Data supports 5-FU based therapy for patients with PD on gemcitabine therapy Data supports gemcitabine-based therapy for patients with progressive disease on 5-FU ( or even gemcitabine ) based therapy

3 Gemcitabine Following 5FU
Phase II study with N=63 Primary end point = Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) 27% achieved a CBR ( median duration = 14 weeks) mOS = 3.85 mos Tolerable Rothenberg ML, et al. Annals of Oncology 7: , 1996

4 Gemcitabine in combination with a platinum agent
Paclitaxol Rahma OE, et al . Annals of Oncology 00:1-8;2013

5 Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in pretreated patients: Phase II study
69% prior gemcitabine 5% prior FOLFIRINOX mOS = 7.3 mos ( 95% CI, months) mPFS = 1.7 mos ( 95% CI, mos) 1 PR and 6 SD Hosein PJ et al. American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013 : 36(2)

6 Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in pretreated patient : Single institute experience
All patients had prior gemcitabine 40% had prior FOLFIRINOX No PR; 65% SD mPFS = 3.7 mos mOS = 5.3 mos Tolerable Peddi P, et al . J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;4(4):

7 Gemcitabine following FOLFIRINOX failure : Retrospective analysis
100 % with prior FOLFIRINOX Median time to TF = 5 months mOS = 5.7 mos ( 95% CI ) mPFS = 2.0 mos ( 95% CI ) Da Rocha Lino A et al . Abstract #473 – ASCO GI 2015

8 Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel in Refractory Pancreas Cancer : Single Institution Analysis
N=23 pts Prior therapies included G, G + Oxaliplatin and FOLFIRINOX 4 PR ( including 2 pts on prior FOLFIRINOX) , 6 SD and 12 PD mOS = 5 mos ( mos) Zaniboni A et al. e15202 – ASCO 2014

9 Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel Following First-Line FOLFIRINOX in Refractory Pancreas Cancer : Single Institution Analysis N=28 Med Interval from FOLFIRINOX to G + Nab-paclitaxel = 5 weeks 5 PR, 8 SD and 12 PD OS = 23 weeks ( weeks) TTF = 12.0 weeks ( weeks) Median Dose Density ~ 60% Zhang Y et al . Abstract ASCO GI 2014

10 A modified regimen of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Chemotherapy Dose Administration Frequency Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IVPB over 30 min given q2weeks Nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 IVPB over 30 min Survival analyses N Median (months) 95% CI (months) Progression free survival (PFS) 47 4.8 (2.6, 7.4)) Overall survival (OS) 11.1 (5.3, NR) Toxicities N(%) Grades All grades 3 / 4 Neutropenia 12 (25) 5 (10) Febrile neutropenia 1 (2.1) -- Thrombocytopenia 9 (15) 3 (2) Neuropathy 13 (27) 1 (2) Fatigue 3 (6) Krishna K et al. Abstract 366 – ASCO GI 2015

11 Capecitabine +/- Ruxolitinib (RECAP) Overall Survival
Ruxolitinib + Cape (n=64) Placebo + Cape (n=63) Median OS, days 136.5 129.5 Survival rate, % 3-months 64 58 6-months 42 35 12-months 22 11 HR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.53–1.18) 2-sided P=0.25 HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat. Hurwitz et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 suppl; abstr 4000

12 RECAP: Overall Survival in Patients with CRP > 13 mg/L
Ruxolitinib + Cape (n=31) Placebo + Cape (n=29) Median OS, days 83.0 55.0 Survival rate, % 3-months 48 29 6-months 42 11 12-months HR=0.47 (95% CI: 0.26–0.85) 2-sided P=0.01 Hurwitz et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 suppl; abstr 4000

13 RECAP : Progression-Free Survival in Patients with CRP > 13 mg/L
Ruxolitinib + Cape (n=31) Placebo + Cape (n=29) Median PFS, days 48.0 41.5 Survival rate, % 3-months 35 13 6-months 21 5 12-months HR=0.62 (95% CI: 0.35–1.10) 2-sided P=0.10 PFS in patients with CRP ≤ 13 mg/L: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.47–1.41); P=0.47 Hurwitz et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 suppl; abstr 4000

14 Conclusions Gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine-based combinations are considered standard of care following FOLFIRINOX failure in patients with mPCA A modified regimen of gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel may be optimal if choice is made for this regimen Phase III trials are needed to evaluate the potential benefit from gemcitabine-based therapy following FOLFIRINOX failure JAK/Stat inhibition does not seem to produce a benefit in patients with mPCA who failed prior gemcitabine. At best , a subgroup of patients with CRP elevation may have a marginal benefit


Download ppt "What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google