Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free."— Presentation transcript:

1 Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free Survival in Uveal Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA. 2014;311(23):2397-2405. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.6096 Flow of Study Participants a Data regarding why patients did not proceed to the therapeutic portion of the protocol were not collected. b After primary outcome analysis, 19 additional patients were registered and 18 treated with selumetinib without randomization to complete the planned 120-patient enrollment. c As of April 22, 2013. d As of December 31, 2013. Figure Legend:

2 Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free Survival in Uveal Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA. 2014;311(23):2397-2405. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.6096 Progression-Free SurvivalKaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival in all evaluable patients (n = 96; panel A) and in patients with tumor harboring mutations in exon 5 of GNAQ or GNA11 (n = 80; panel B) treated as of April 22, 2013, are shown. The median progression-free survival was 7 weeks (95% CI, 4.3-8.4 weeks) among evaluable patients randomized to chemotherapy (n = 49) and 15.9 weeks (95% CI, 8.4-21.1 weeks) for evaluable patients randomized to selumetinib (n = 47). The hazard ratio for progression-free survival in all evaluable patients was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.30-0.71; P <.001) in favor of selumetinib (panel A). When limiting analysis to the 80 patients with tumor harboring a mutation (chemotherapy, n = 42; selumetinib, n = 38), the hazard ratio was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.34-0.87; P =.01) in favor of selumetinib (panel B). Figure Legend:

3 Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free Survival in Uveal Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA. 2014;311(23):2397-2405. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.6096 Best Tumor Response for Each PatientData regarding the best tumor response are shown for the 47 patients evaluable for response in the chemotherapy group (panel A) and the 49 patients evaluable for response in the selumetinib group (panel B) who had undergone at least 1 tumor assessment after treatment and before the clinical cutoff date on December 31, 2013. Each marker represents data for an individual patient. The percentage change from baseline in the sum of the diameter of the target lesions is shown on the y-axis. Negative values indicate tumor shrinkage. The horizontal dashed lines indicate 20% tumor enlargement consistent with progression of disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and 30% tumor shrinkage consistent with a partial response by RECIST. Five patients with wild-type tumors for exon 5 of GNAQ and GNA11 were tested for exon 4 mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 and are indicated by triangles. Figure Legend:


Download ppt "Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google