Outcomes Tool Selection Committee Kick-Off Meeting April 29, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

Tennessee Outcomes Measurement System (TOMS) v.1.3
1 Working Group 1 Organisation of Statutory Services at the Sub-national level South East Europe Consultation Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock.
State of New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services (DAS) Adolescent Task Force.
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
Changing the way Services are Provided, Resources are Utilized, Outcomes are Evaluated, and Funding is Channeled Using an Internet-Based Data System to.
1 The Road to Recovery Understanding the Principals of : Person Centered Planning Family Centered Planning Natural Supports.
Starting June 1, 2007 The New DDD Assessment What It Means To You: A new way to evaluate and plan for supports and services for people with developmental.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Youth Outcome Questionnaire & Arkansas Indicators Compliance Rates and Satisfaction with Services Kazi Ahmed Paula Stone October 18, 2012.
Preliminary working draft; subject to change 0 BH Health Home October 18, Commission Meeting DRAFT PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT, SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Access To Recovery III GPRA Training Welcome Introductions Agenda
Foster Care Redesign: Region 3b
Home and Community Based Services for Children with Autism Waiver (HCBS-CWA)
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Arkansas Addictions System Reform: Project 95 Update November 5, 2010 Department of Human Services.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
First Induction Meeting for Owners and Principals of Private Schools and Kindergartens. October 2009.
Katie A. Implementation Progress & Hurdles: Child & Family Team Component Donna Ewing-Marto, Executive Family Partner, Family & Youth Roundtable Sarah.
Introduction to the Child & Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS) Our Community. Our Kids. Dr. Gary Buff, Ed.D. President and COO.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Outcomes Tool Selection Committee May 27, Introduction of Committee Children’s Behavioral Health Care Commission Terry Lawler Hot Springs School.
Department of Child Services, Services and Outcomes 1/19/15.
The Process of Scope and Standards Development
Welcome to the Performance Indicator Data Webinar Hosted by: The Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly. Thank.
Behavioral Health Coding that Works in Primary Care Mary Jean Mork, LCSW April 16 & 17, 2009.
OCTOBER- NOVEMBER 2011 Ohio Department of Mental Health Community Mental Health Prior Authorization Training 1.
Senate Bill 82: The Investment in Mental Health Wellness Act of 2013 Grant Awards Scott Kennelly L.C.S.W Assistant Director Clinical Services.
Child Welfare Services for Aboriginal Families. Mission and Values… MISSION The Ministry of Children and Family Development (MCFD) supports healthy child.
What’s Health Got to Do With It? Integrating Education & Health Care Transitions to Achieve Mutual Outcomes APSE National Conference Philadelphia, PA June.
FAMILY PEER SUPPORT SERVICES OMH Children’s Division of Integrated Community Services May 19, 2015 Presentation to New York State Success Membership.
Maryland Cancer Plan Pain Management Committee Suzanne A Nesbit, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Coordinator, Cancer Pain Service Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer.
Seth Bernstein, Ph.D. ABHA Executive Director Jeb Brown, Ph.D
Child and Adolescent Task Force Report Charlotte V. McNulty, Vice Chair Presentation to House Health, Welfare and Institutions General Assembly Building.
Back to our Roots – Spotlight on Colorado A New Medicaid Infrastructure Grant Beth MacKenzie & Karen Ferrington November 8, 2010.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
Statewide Quality Advisory Committee (SQAC) Meeting October 20, 2014.
Health Care Cost Database Presented by the Office of the Commissioner of Securities and Insurance January 2011.
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
Ohio Consumer Outcomes Protocol The Lighthouse Youth Services A Lighthouse Youth Services Performance Improvement Project.
Arkansas Mental Health in Education Association (ARMEA) Presentation by: Deb Swink, MSE & Ruth Fissel, LCSW.
Alaska’s Behavioral Health System Presentation to the Idaho Behavioral Health Transformation Workgroup March 24 th 2010 Bill Hogan Commissioner Commissioner.
Supervising with the CANS: Integrating the CANS into the Fabric of Your Supervisory Processes Nancy L. Moore, LISW Ann Klein, MA Hamilton Choices, LLC;
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
Part A Treatment Adherence Site Visit reviews Kinga Cieloszyk, MD,MPH Deputy Medical Director of Clinical Care, NYCDOHMH, HIV Care, Treatment, and Housing.
Chapter 25 Management and Policy Copyright 2004 by Delmar Learning, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Quality in Healthcare: A Glimpse of the.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Standardized Assessment: Issues and Opportunities Lisa R. Shugarman, Ph.D. Director of Policy Alzheimer’s Advisory Committee.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Presentation to the SAMHSA Advisory Councils
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). January 2006 Report to President and Congress Section 724(i) REPORT- Not later than 4 years after the date.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Understanding Positive Behavior Support Closing the Gap Conference November 12, 2009 Pamela A. Clark, MSW.
Presented to: DHS Board of Directors Presented by: Ashley Fielding Date: December 9, 2015 DHS Legislative Update Georgia Department of Human Services.
Children’s Intensive Services (CIS) Program Evaluation Presented By: Elizabeth Earls – President/CEO Rhode Island Council of Community Mental Health Organizations.
October 15, 2015 Peter F. Luongo, Ph.D..  Alcohol misuse or abuse often goes undetected with a majority of clinicians citing lack of confidence in alcohol.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Parents, Caregivers and Youth Information on BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale April 13, 2012.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives October 23-24, 2014 Pocatello, Idaho.
Update on Medicaid Integration in SW Washington January 7, 2016 Erin Hafer, MPH Director, New Programs Integration & Network Development.
The NC Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Planning Grant DIVISION OF MH/DD/SAS.
A New Model to Support Youth Aging Out of Foster Care: Incorporating Youth Voice, EBPs, Trauma Informed Care and Assessment Tools Jodi Harding, Clinical.
Healthy Choices at HOPE  Grant Muse, MSW Director, Healthy Choices at HOPE
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
Northwestern Counseling & Support Services
Utilizing Data for Real Quality of Life Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes Tool Selection Committee Kick-Off Meeting April 29, 2015

Act 1593 of 2007 Act 1593 of 2007 mandated the implementation of an assessment tool to guide service decisions and outcomes, and authorized an outcomes-based data system to support tracking, accountability, and decision- making. Youth Outcomes Questionnaire (Y-OQ®) was chosen by Work Group to comply with Act 1593 of 2007

House Bill 1129 of 2014 Required DHS to submit a report to both the House and Senate Committee on Public Health, Welfare, and Labor by May 31, 2014, regarding: Cost to the state and to the affected providers requiring the administration of the outcomes-based system Benefits realized as a result of requiring the administration of the Y-OQ® Clinical rationale for requiring the Y-OQ® for all clients receiving behavioral health services Some key challenges with the administration of the Y-OQ® in Arkansas were identified.

Challenges With Current Outcomes Tool Family Involvement – YOQ® was designed to be completed independently by the parent or guardian (or youth) – Family involvement is necessary for the YOQ® to be effective and beneficial to the clinical process – Providers noted the difficulty in continued engagement of parents and guardians which includes both treatment planning and YOQ® administration

Challenges With Current Outcomes Tool Literacy – The YOQ® is written at a 5 th grade level – Providers expressed that parents or guardians, at times, do not have the reading and comprehension skills to read and answer the YOQ® questions, therefore, staff members had to read the questions to the parents

Challenges With Current Outcomes Tool Instrument Length and Frequency – The YOQ ® is 64 questions and is required to be administered to the client and parents every 90 days – Very time consuming for clients and their parents – Providers reported that parents often complain about completing the same 64 questions so often

Provider Challenges Identified From Survey – Documentation – Too much staff time used in administering tool – Lack of reliable and useful data – No integration within EHR/EMR

Why are we here? Act 161 of 2015 requires that the Division of Behavioral Health Services (DBHS) select a new outcomes measurement tool no later than September 30, 2015

Outcomes Tool Selection Committee To meet the mandate of Act 161, DBHS plans to convene a nine member voting committee which would consist of: – One Children’s Behavioral Health Care Commission Representative – Two DHS Representatives – Two Community Mental Health Center Representatives Clinician Quality Assurance Director – Two Private Provider Representatives Clinician Quality Assurance Director – Two Consumer Representatives Youth Representative Family Representative Open Invitation to Meetings

Decisions To Be Made 1.Define Goals of Outcomes Tool 2.Determine which behavioral health clients should have outcomes tracked? 3.Determine how date from outcomes tool will be collected 4.How will providers use data?

Decisions To Be Made 5.How will the State use the data? 6.How data will be presented / Where will data be located at? 7.Discuss payment / reimbursement for collection of Outcomes data 8.Recommend what happens to providers who fail to utilize / complete outcomes tool

*Out of 57 Respondents

Recommended Outcomes Instruments – CAFAS – CANS – Develop a state specific instrument – Let Providers Use Own Outcomes Measures as Required during Accreditation – Utilize Required Treatment Plan Reviews

Next Meeting Next meeting: 1:00pm, May 20 th, Location: TBD Contact: