Target Paper Status Summary 13 th December 2011 Chris Booth 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Art of Publishing Aka “just the facts ma’am”.
Advertisements

WebHopper, Student Timesheets, and You Students use WebHopper to submit timesheets to you electronically for approval. You will use WebHopper to approve.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Appraisal Form 4 (Summary): Review, Edit, and Approve for Appraisees (Primary and Secondary Care)
MICE MICE Target Mechanism Paul Smith University of Sheffield 8 th June 2010 (Based upon talk given by Chris Booth at CM26)
7 Feb 2000JMM1 Editing a GSM spec - tips for experts.
Revising your Rough Draft 1.Thematic Revisions 2.Structural Revisions 3.Descriptive Revisions 4.Sentence Level Revision (Editing)
Target Status Report Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
MICE TARGET HARDWARE C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 - The MICE Experiment.
Target Paper Status Summary 21 st December 2010 Chris Booth 1.
ClearEye: An Visualization System for Document Revision CPSC 533C Project Update Qiang Kong Qixing Zheng.
Target: K. Long, 16Nov2009. Schedule for T2 re-instatement: T2#2: – Inspection of T2#2 documented in MICE Note 272 Some issue with Notes site … couldn’t.
MICE Target Status Chris Booth Sheffield 10 th May 2006.
MICE Target Review Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
Target: K. Long, 16Nov2009. Schedule for T2 re-instatement: T2#2: – Next steps: Non-DLC bearings: – Delay in material delivery: » Torlon delivery expected.
Target: K. Long, 16Nov2009. Schedule for T2 re-instatement: T2#2: – Next steps: Non-DLC bearings: – Continuing delay in material delivery! » Vespel and.
Target Assembly and Installation Update 20 th August 2009 Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 5 Funding Application Workflow, Communication, and Tracking.
At the login page, you will enter the following: Click “Logon” Do not use dashes in User ID.
Introduction to Design. What is Design? Blueprint of your solution Blueprint of your solution All decisions you have made about solution? All decisions.
Title of Paper with 54pt Times New Roman Font in Bold Letters Xxxx NNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN NNN N NNNNNNNNNNNNN Names of the Authors, in bold.
MICE Collaboration Meeting Frascati 26 – 29 June 2005 Work Group report On Design & Safety Review.
BT Wholesale Customer Roadmap 1 st July 2008 Welcome Chris Booth Business Improvement Programme Graham Crane Consult21.
Status of installed target Preparation of “demonstrator” target Chris Booth Sheffield 25 th January 2008.
Job Resume Mrs. Cook (All information in this PowerPoint can be found on pages in your textbook)
1 IEEE Technology Selection Process Presentation of Contribution C Dan Gal Berlin, September 14, 2004.
May 7, We manage documents and their changes with versioning and check out/check in procedures.
FIMS Specification Group EBU-AMWA FIMS August 2011.
Target Status Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th February 2008.
Scheduling and Staffing System: How to Set-Up a New Academic Year As of 12/05/2003.
Detector Paper The NA61/SHINE experiment: beams and detector system Roman Planeta – Jagiellonian University Rainer Renfordt – Johann Wolfgang Goethe University.
WebScan Change Order. WebScan change order: What is it? Beginning in 2010 changes to a WebScan order will need to be submitted via a WebScan change order.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
GEtServices Purchasing Units & Materials Training For Suppliers Request.
Geant4 Orsay Workshop K.Amako 1 Geant4 User’s Documents Geant4 Orsay Workshop 18 October, 2000 Katsuya Amako (KEK/CERN)
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Conference Paper. 2 Disclaimer This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies.
IEEE P1603 reviewer’s guideline Wolfgang Roethig, WG chair.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 22 January 2008 Trine Hansen.
Target Commissioning Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Initial commissioning plans Chris Booth Sheffield 11 th February 2008.
DPG : presentation of a draft Joint Program Document DPG, 5 September 2006.
Professor : Ming – Shyan Wang Department of Electrical Engineering Southern Taiwan University Thesis progress report Sensorless Operation of PMSM Using.
Editing Status of Accelerator Systems R&D, CesrTA, ATF2 as of Sep.10 K. Yokoya.
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Completion Reports and User Access.
European Commission 1 Quick Guide to the eTIP V1.3.
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Completion Reports and User Access.
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Common Issues and Processes.
1 Geant4 Documentation Dennis Wright Geant4 Delta Review 9 October 2002 Internal documentation review Documentation improvements Plans for future improvements.
How to Create an E-Portfolio See a sample e-portfolio at See an example.
NuMI Detector NIM Paper Draft MINOS Detectors NIM Paper Status and Job List for this Meeting Dave Ayres & Alec Habig Argonne & Minnesota – Duluth MINOS.
DEVELOPING NATIONAL FORMULARIES BASED ON THE WHO MODEL FORMULARY Tisocki K, Laing RL, Hogerzeil H, Mehta DK, Ryan RSM.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole update 27 th January 2011 Mechanical Engineering status update N. Collomb1.
NITS on webSmart OASIS. NITS on webSmart OASIS Agenda  Company and User Permissions  Electronic Industry Registry requirement  WebSmart OASIS NITS.
1 WRITING CHEMICAL RESEARCH PAPERS OUTLINE AND FIRST DRAFT.
The OASIS Feedback Process Using OASIS to Drive Improvement.
NEW GRANTS MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE (GME) Completion Reports and Applications.
TDR end game. Timeline constraints We need to use the current momentum to conclude the TDR work Needed by all funding agencies to support funding requests.
Target Status 27 th August 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016.
Target Installation Plan
Registrars of Voters Conference April 21, 2017
How to complete the profile and make an application.
Summaries due next week
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTATION FOR CONSTITUENT BODIES MEETINGS
A balanced argument.
ภาควิชาวิทยาการคอมพิวเตอร์ คณะวิทยาศาสตร์
Word: References & Workflow Participation Project
Rough guide to adding Time Off Entitlement
Introduction to Design
Using the INCOSE Handbook and SEBoK as THE Foundation for SECM-Domain
Overview of small drafting group output on Interpretation documents
Presentation transcript:

Target Paper Status Summary 13 th December 2011 Chris Booth 1

1 Introduction (KL) ok 2 Requirements and Overview (CB) ok 3 Linear motor (CB) – 3.1 Electromagnetic design (PS/NS) missing – 3.2 Stator (CB,PS) needs figs & refs – 3.3 Permanent magnets (CB,PS) needs figs & refs 4 Mechanical design and construction (JT) – 4.1 Target Shaft (JT) needs figs & refs – 4.2 Target Bearings (JT) needs figs & refs – 4.3 Stator (JT) see 3.2 – 4.4 Mechanical integration (CB – are people happy? ) check numbers – 4.5 Quality Assurance & Quality Control (JT, GB, PS?) magnetic missing 5 Optical position-measurement system (CB,PS) – 5.1 Optical Vane (PS,CB) needs figs & refs – 5.2 Laser Source (PS,CB) needs figs & refs – 5.3 Optical Fibres (PS,CB) needs figs & refs – 5.4 Collimators, Lenses & Mechanical Mount (PS,CB) needs figs & refs – 5.5 Optical sensors (PS,CB) brief! 6 Stator Operation & Power electronics (PS) lengthy! needs figs 7 Control, Electronics & DAQ (PS) needs figs 8 Performance (PH,AD) missing 9 Summary (CB) missing 2

Summary Most of the material is now there! CB edited some sections to improve consistency, remove history,.... More editing needed! Most lack figures and references. – (Some figs from JT – quality may be an issue.) Some sections missing: – EM Design: N Schofield contacted, agreed to provide. – Magnetic QA – PS listed, should be BS! – Performance: PH & AD In absence of EMcC I wrote “mechanical integration” section (frame, jacking system, services) – Are they adequate? Is the balance ok? Previously decided to document design of last summer. Do we wish to update? – Said would review when present version complete. 3

Next? We need the missing sections! Still inconsistencies of style (level of detail, tenses, etc.) Propose I revise text, send list of figures (& references) required. Need input! – Others’ views on amount of detail. – Are bullet-points acceptable? – Can we reference internal notes? Add summary, aim for essentially complete draft early(-ish!) in New Year. Are we agreed we leave new stator for later paper? 4