Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder1 Optimal Jet Finder work in progress Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria British Columbia, Canada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Advertisements

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
Dijet Transverse Thrust cross sections at DØ Veronica Sorin University of Buenos Aires.
2007/03/20Optimal Jet Finder1 Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria British Columbia, Canada Damir Lelas Rolf Seuster Michel Lefebvre, Rob McPherson,
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
DØ Run II jet algorithms E. Busato (LPNHE, Paris) TeV4LHC Workshop 12/1/2004 Outline:  Introduction  The Ideal Jet Algorithm  DØ Run II Cone Jet Algorithm.
M. Lefebvre25 October QCD Multijet Event Generation MLM prescription for the removal of event double counting M. Lefebvre University of Victoria.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS Slide 1 Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Top mass in t-tbar  6jets Status Report Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria British Columbia, Canada Top meeting CERN, 21 Feb 2007 Michel Lefebvre.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
T-tbar  6jets quick look at Optimal Jet Finder jets Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria British Columbia, Canada LAPP, 28 Feb 2007 Michel Lefebvre.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Reconstruction of High Transverse Momentum Top Quarks at CMS Gavril Giurgiu (Johns Hopkins University) For the CMS Collaboration 2009 DPF Meeting Wayne.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Top-partner mass reconstruction by using jets Michihisa Takeuchi ( KEK,YITP ) In collaboration with Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK), Naotoshi Okamura (KEK)
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Tagging Hadronic Tops at High Pt Brock Tweedie Johns Hopkins University 16 Sept 08 D.E. Kaplan, K. Rehermann, M. Schwartz, B.T. arXiv: (to appear.
1 P. Loch U of Arizona July 22, 2011 Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction and jet physics at the LHC (Part II) What Are Jets? The experimentalist’s.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.
OPTIMAL JET FINDER Ernest Jankowski University of Alberta in collaboration with D. Grigoriev F. Tkachov.
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
Recent multiplicity studies at ZEUS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinHadron Structure 2004, Sept. 1st University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of the.
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
1 CMS Sensitivity to Quark Contact Interactions with Dijets Selda Esen (Brown) Robert M. Harris (Fermilab) DPF Meeting Nov 1, 2006.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Jet reconstruction with Deterministic Annealing Davide Perrino Dipartimento di Fisica – INFN di Bari Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di Alice – 13/11/2007.
Jet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) on behalf.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
W mass reconstruction and jet calibration in ttbar events
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Optimal Jet Finder (OJF) in ATLAS
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Semileptonic ttH(Hbb) studies at UCL
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder1 Optimal Jet Finder work in progress Physics and Astronomy University of Victoria British Columbia, Canada LAPP, 02 March 2007 Michel Lefebvre Laboratoire d’Annecy-le- vieux de physique des particules, France

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder2 Jets: from partons to detector signatures M. Dobbs and J.B. Hansen, Comput. Phys. Commun. 134 (2001) 41. QCD partons Jets of hadons Detector signals

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder3 Infrared and collinear safety hep-ex/ Quark and gluon jets (identified to partons) can be compared to detector jets, if jet algorithms respect collinear and infrared safety (Sterman & Weinberg, 1977)

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder4 Optimal Jet Finder (OJF) Documentation  proposed by Fyodor Tkachov  short introduction: Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, (2003)  authors webpage (with links to source code, etc.) Implementation in Athena in progress  Rolf Seuster, Damir Lelas  Discussions with Peter Loch and others ongoing

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder5 Optimal Jet Finder (OJF) HEP event: list of particles (partons hadrons calorimeter cells towers preclusters) result: list of jets recombination matrix the 4-momentum q j of the j-th jet expressed by 4-momenta p a of the particles E. Jankowski

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder6 Recombination matrix i.e. no more than 100% of each particle is assigned to jets the fraction of the energy of the a-th particle that does not go into any jet the 4-momentum q j of the j-th jet expressed by 4-momenta p a of the particles (a=1,2,...,n parts ) the fraction of the energy of the a-th particle can be positive only E. Jankowski Fixes the jet configuration

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder7 Soft energy and fuzzyness Cylindrical kinematics fuzziness transverse energy left outside the jets

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder8 Final jet configuration The recombination matrix is found by minimizing R weights the relative contributions For cylindrical kinematics

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder9 Algorithm: fixed n jets case 1.Start with some (random) value of the recombination matrix z aj and minimize  with respect to z aj for some given p a 2.Repeat this a few times, each time starting with a different (random) z aj 3.The value of z aj that corresponds to the smallest of the minima of  is the final jet configuration for the required (fixed) number of jets

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder10 Algorithm: general case If the number of jets is to be determined 1.Start with n jets = 1 2.Find the corresponding n jets configuration 3.Check if  <  cut is fulfilled; if yes stop here 4.If not, increase n jets by one and repeat at 2 The parameter  cut is some small positive number, analogous to the jet resolution parameter of conventional recombination algorithms

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder11 A few comments OJF is infrared and collinear safe the authors claim it is based on an optimal jet definition that solves the problem of jet definition in general conventional jet algorithms have z aj equal to 0 or 1, i.e. a particle either entirely belongs to some jet or does not belong to that jet at all  Hadronization is always effect of interaction of at least two hard partons evolving into two jets, so some hadrons that emerge in this process can belong partially to both jets (continuous z aj for OJF) need to assess the robustness of the algorithm  small changes in input particle kinematics  pileup

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder12 Optimal Jet Finder (OJF) OJF evaluation ongoing  comparison with other jet algorithms speed issues  observables number of jets kinematics distributions event shape variables  robustness In the following slides, some results I have recently obtained looking at fully hadronic ttbar events  an “excuse” to play with OJF

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder13 Samples Generated by Damir Lelas Sample 5204  ttbar  6jets, full simulation, Athena AOD produced using Athena  1050 events, E T > 7 GeV filter on jets  ParticleJetContainer each produced which its own H1 weights –Cone4TowerParticleJetsCone4TopoParticleJets –ConeTowerParticleJetsConeTopoParticleJets –Kt4TowerParticleJetsKt4TopoParticleJets –Kt6TowerParticleJetsKt6TopoParticleJets  JetCollection using OJF no proper H1 weights available: use Cone weights number of jets fixed to 6 R parameter set to 0.7 –FuzzyTowerJetsFuzzyClusterJets

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder14 Jet-parton matching Study events with “true” jet hypothesis Matching criteria  For each parton, look for a matching jet restrict search in a region limited by  R max = 0.2 keep the closest jet in this region  Demand that a jet be matched only once matching efficiencies depends on interparton distances –same top combinations  R(u-b)  = ±  R(ubar-bbar)  = ±  R(u-dbar)  = ±  R(ubar-d)  = ±  R(dbar-b)  = ±  R(d-bbar)  = ± –other 9 combinations  R   2.40

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder15 Parton matching efficiencies no p T jet cuts applied

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder16 Normalized distributions: towers corresponds to events after requiring at least 6 jets in |eta| < 3

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder17 Normalized distributions: topo clusters

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder18 Normalized p T distributions: towers

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder19 Normalized E distributions: towers

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder20 Normalized p T distributions: topo clusters

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder21 Normalized E distributions: topo clusters

Michel Lefebvre, 2007/03/02Optimal Jet Finder22 Comments Very encouraging results for OFJ  here fixed number of jet mode!  should try with number of jets not fixed adjust  parameter  more events would allow mass plots requires 6 matched partons 1 to 1  more systematic tests being discussed compare with particle truth need larger samples explore various OJF parameter values