03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coupled modelling - snow Patrick Samuelsson Rossby Centre, SMHI
Advertisements

Land surface in climate models Parameterization of surface fluxes Bart van den Hurk (KNMI/IMAU)
J. Ogée – N. Viovy – P. Friedlingstein – P. Ciais G. Krinner – N. deNoblet J. Polcher (IPSL) Evaluation of the global biospheric model ORCHIDEE against.
Satellite data products to support climate modelling: Phenology & Snow Cover Kristin Böttcher, Sari Metsämäki, Olli-Pekka Mattila, Mikko Kervinen, Mika.
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
MONIMET Action B4 Model system calibration by FMI, SYKE, METLA, UHEL Tuula Aalto.
MODIS The MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS ) Kirsten de Beurs.
Quantitative information on agriculture and water use Maurits Voogt Chief Competence Center.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Modeling Changes in Vegetation Dynamics in Alaska: Implications for Arctic Herbivores Eugénie Euskirchen ESPSCoR All Hands Meeting, May , 2010.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS Variation of land surface albedo and its simulation Shusen Wang Andrew Davidson Canada Centre for.
1 CODATA 2006 October 23-25, 2006, Beijing Cryospheric Data Assimilation An Integrated Approach for Generating Consistent Cryosphere Data Set Xin Li World.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
CABLE: the Australian community land surface model
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
AMMA-UK Kick-off meeting Jan 2005 WP1 Land surface and atmosphere interactions Chris Taylor Phil Harris.
Are the results of PILPS or GSWP affected by the lack of land surface- atmosphere feedback? Is the use of offline land surface models in LDAS making optimal.
Image: NASA ECHAM5/6 projects by Quentin Bourgeois, Junbo Cui, Gabriela Sousa Santos, Tanja Stanelle C2SM’s research group - Isabelle Bey.
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Preparatory work on the use of remote sensing techniques for the detection and monitoring of GHG emissions from the Scottish land use sector P.S. Monks.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement P. Peylin, C. Bacour, P. Ciais, H. Verbeek, P. Rayner Flux data to highlight model deficiencies.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
Improving the Representation of Fire Disturbance in Dynamic Vegetation Models by Assimilating Satellite Data E.Kantzas, S.Quegan & M.Lomas School of Maths.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
JULES: Joint UK Land Environment Simulator A community land surface scheme.
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
Changes and Feedbacks of Land-use and Land-cover under Global Change Mingjie Shi Physical Climatology Course, 387H The University of Texas at Austin, Austin,
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Land Surface Processes in Global Climate Models (1)
JULES on Eddie Richard Essery (with thanks to Mike Mineter and Magnus Hagdorn Contemporary Climate, 8 October 2009.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Status report from the Lead Centre for Surface Processes and Assimilation E. Rodríguez-Camino (INM) and S. Gollvik (SMHI)
TERRA TERRA Soil Vegetation Atmosphere Transfer across Models and Scales.
Earth’s Energy Balance Complexity, climate change and human systems HCOL 185.
State-of-the-Art of the Simulation of Net Primary Production of Tropical Forest Ecosystems Marcos Heil Costa, Edson Luis Nunes, Monica C. A. Senna, Hewlley.
Remote Sensing of Vegetation. Vegetation and Photosynthesis About 70% of the Earth’s land surface is covered by vegetation with perennial or seasonal.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Vegetation Phenology and the Hydrological Cycle of Monsoons
A Bottom-Up Modelling Perspective on Representativeness: The Example of PIXGRO Europe J. Tenhunen.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
An Improved Global Snow Classification Dataset for Hydrologic Applications (Photo by Kenneth G. Libbrecht and Patricia Rasmussen) Glen E. Liston, CSU Matthew.
Dipl.-Geogr. Markus TumD Wessling German Aerospace CenterGermany German Remote Sensing Data CenterTel Land Surface DynamicsFax.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research Vegetation dynamics in simulations of radiatively-forced climate change Richard A. Betts, Chris D.
Dipl.-Geogr. Markus TumD Oberpfaffenhofen German Aerospace Center (DLR)Germany German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD)Tel Land.
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainties in the Development of Climate Scenarios Climate Data Analysis for Crop Modelling workshop Kasetsart University,
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
Performance Comparison of an Energy- Budget and the Temperature Index-Based (Snow-17) Snow Models at SNOTEL Stations Fan Lei, Victor Koren 2, Fekadu Moreda.
Phenology Phenology is the study of living organisms’ response to seasonal and climatic changes in their environment. Seasonal changes include variations.
Data assimilation in C cycle science Strand 2 Team.
1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research Tropical vegetation dynamics in simulations of radiatively-forced climate change Richard Betts Hadley.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Community Land Model (CLM)
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
The NCAR Community Climate System Model (CCSM)
VALIDATION OF FINE RESOLUTION LAND-SURFACE ENERGY FLUXES DERIVED WITH COMBINED SENTINEL-2 AND SENTINEL-3 OBSERVATIONS IGARSS 2018 – Radoslaw.
Biomass and Soil Moisture simulation and assimilation over Hungary
Presentation transcript:

03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen

Contents Modeling framework in Snowcarbo Models REMO – regional climate model JSBACH – land surface scheme Demonstration of model performance Regional Local Conclusions and future perspectives 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute2

Modelling framework in Snowcarbo Models applied: REgional climate MOdel of MPI -M, Hamburg REMO Produce regional climatic forcing Land surface scheme (LSS) of GCM ECHAM JSBACH Produce regional CO2 balance consisting of assimilation and emissions in ecosystems 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute3

Modelling framework in Snowcarbo Relatively high spatial resolution ~18km High time resolution 1 hour Stays close to actual weather of target years Climate initialised once per day REMO and JSBACH are offline coupled REMO does not get feedback from JSBACH but interacts with its own surface scheme 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute4

03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute5 Validation against various data REMO2008 JSBACH Land cover classification from remote sensing Detailed meteorology Observed climate (ECWMF) CO 2 concentration field 3D REMO2008 tracer Anthropogenic and ocean CO 2 sources, fires Indicators of regional CO 2 balance Vegetation type classification from remote sensing CO 2 flux (NEE) field 2D CO2 flux Flux and concentration data Snow cover and phenology related variables Snow data Snow data, Phenology, etc.

03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute6 Validation against various data REMO2008 JSBACH Land cover classification from remote sensing Detailed meteorology Observed climate (ECWMF) CO 2 concentration field 3D REMO2008 tracer Anthropogenic and ocean CO 2 sources, fires Indicators of regional CO 2 balance Vegetation type classification from remote sensing CO 2 flux (NEE) field 2D CO2 flux Flux and concentration data Snow cover and phenology related variables Snow data Snow data, Phenology, etc.

REMO: forcing and initialisation Regional climate model requires as boundary data Atmospheric conditions Wind speeds, Temperature, Humidity Sea surface temperature, ice cover Surface parameter fields As initial data in addition to those above Soil temperature and moisture Sources of initial and boundary meteorological data General circulation models Re-analysis data products, here ERA-Interim, ECMWF 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute7

REMO: basic characteristics Dynamic core of DWD operational model Physics and surface model from ECHAM Surface parameter maps for Surface background albedo, roughness length, vegetation ratio, leaf area index, forest fraction, soil field capacity Rotated spherical grid Close to rectangular  Resolution applied in Snowcarbo ° 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute8

REMO: surface parameter maps Standard land cover of USGS classified according to Olson cover types (n=100) Parameter values allocated to each Olson type Parameters aggregated from 1km USGS map to maps of resolution of the model In Snowcarbo the USGS map is replaced by National Corine Land Cover (CLC), European CLC and Globcover datasets  Allocations from new land cover classes to Olson ones needed 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute9

REMO: influence of land cover – forest fraction 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute10 Standard USGS land coverNational Corine land cover

REMO: In this project runs in forecast mode Model initialised daily at 6pm Spun-up until midnight in order to let the flowfield to develop into a reasonable state Run for 24 consequent hours with hourly output  Weather stays close to observed  Sensitive to meteorological boundary  Not very sensitive to surface parameterisation 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute11

03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute12 Validation against various data REMO2008 JSBACH Land cover classification from remote sensing Detailed meteorology Observed climate (ECWMF) CO 2 concentration field 3D REMO2008 tracer Anthropogenic and ocean CO 2 sources, fires Indicators of regional CO 2 balance Vegetation type classification from remote sensing CO 2 flux (NEE) field 2D CO2 flux Flux and concentration data Snow cover and phenology related variables Snow data Snow data, Phenology, etc.

Modelling framework in Snowcarbo: JSBACH LSS of ECHAM to account for Surface energy partitioning – e.g. water balance Carbon cycle In offline coupled mode JSBACH is used to account for ecosystem carbon balance - CO2 exchange Process model Processes described down to as small scale as possible Limited by computational resources 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute13

JSBACH: characteristics 4 tiles, i.e. 4 PFTs (plant functional type) for each grid cell Photosynthesis of C3 and C4 plants Radiation in canopy Carbon storages in soil and vegetation Q10 approach for soil decomposition LAI (leaf area index) dynamics described with four phenology models 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute14

JSBACH: parameterisations for PFTs Tropical broadleaf evergreen trees Tropical broadleaf deciduous trees Temperate broadleaf evergreen trees Temperate broadleaf deciduous trees Coniferous evergreen trees Coniferous deciduous trees Raingreen shrubs Deciduous shrubs C3 grass C4 grass Tundra Swamp (not used) Crops Glacier 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute15 Phenology Photosynthesis Carbon storage sizes Decomposition rates of carbon storages Albedo for NIR and VIS Roughness length, LAImax, etc. Dynamic vegetation Nitrogen cycle PFT distribution is revised with more detailed land cover products

03/06/ ECHAM5 bottom layer JSBACH radiation Thermal and hydrological conditions CO 2 concentration H & LE CO 2 flux Albedo & roughness length Light absorbtion in canopy Photosynthesis (unlimited water) ECHAM soil model Photosynthesis (water limited) Carbon pool model + land use change phenology Land boundary properties LAI fAPAR NPP Gross assimilation, R d g c stressed g c unstressed

03/06/ REMO JSBACH radiation Thermal and hydrological conditions CO 2 concentration H & LE CO 2 flux Albedo & roughness length Light absorbtion in canopy Photosynthesis (unlimited water) ECHAM soil model Photosynthesis (water limited) Carbon pool model + land use change phenology Land boundary properties LAI fAPAR NPP Gross assimilation, R d g c stressed g c unstressed Offline coupling in Snowcarbo

03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute18 Validation against various data REMO2008 JSBACH Land cover classification from remote sensing Detailed meteorology Observed climate (ECWMF) CO 2 concentration field 3D REMO2008 tracer Anthropogenic and ocean CO 2 sources, fires Indicators of regional CO 2 balance Vegetation type classification from remote sensing CO 2 flux (NEE) field 2D CO2 flux Flux and concentration data Snow cover and phenology related variables Snow data Snow data, Phenology, etc.

03/06/ JSBACH Light absorbtion in canopy Photosynthesis (unlimited water) ECHAM soil model Photosynthesis (water limited) Carbon pool model + land use change phenology Land boundary properties LAI fAPAR NPP Gross assimilation, R d g c stressed g c unstressed REMO in tracer mode radiation Thermal and hydrological conditions CO 2 concentration H & LE CO 2 flux Albedo & roughness length

03/06/ JSBACH Light absorbtion in canopy Photosynthesis (unlimited water) ECHAM soil model Photosynthesis (water limited) Carbon pool model + land use change phenology Land boundary properties LAI fAPAR NPP Gross assimilation, R d g c stressed g c unstressed REMO in tracer mode radiation Thermal and hydrological conditions CO 2 concentration H & LE CO 2 flux Albedo & roughness length Observed climate (ECWMF) Anthropogenic and ocean CO 2 sources, fires

REMO tracer run Uses the same meteorological initial and boundary data as the first REMO run Additionally Gets CO2 flux estimates of vegetation from JSBACH Utilizes prescribed anthropogenic and land fire emissions from a database Ocean sources from a database Requires background CO2 concentrations Produces 3D CO2 concentration fields 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute21

Demonstration of model performance JSBACH was forced regionally with REMO derived climatic forcing Forecast mode for climate model Standard land cover in both models Default carbon storages in JSBACH for flux measurement sites Sodankylä and Hyytiälä About a decade of measurements as climatic forcing 1000 years spin up for soil carbon storages with present climate 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute22

Demonstration of model performance Regional daily average NEE 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute23

Demonstration of model performance Daily NEE at Sodankylä Scots pine site (gm -2 s -1 ) 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute24

Demonstration of model performance Daily NEE at Hyytiälä Scots pine site (gm -2 s -1 ) 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute25

Conclusions and future perspectives  Assimilation and emissions of CO2 in ecosystems explicitly modeled  Offline coupled REMO – JSBACH framework produces CO2 balance in high temporal and in relatively high regional resolution  National level estimates of CO2 balance can be extracted from the regional maps To be done  Evaluation of the results against CO2 flux and concentration data  Adjustment of the relevant parameters in order to produce better regional estimates 03/06/2015Finnish Meteorological Institute26