NCP meeting Jan 27-28, 2003, Brussels Colette Maloney Interfaces, Knowledge and Content technologies, Applications & Information Market DG INFSO Technology-enhanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Commission DG Information Society Info Day Brussels, 2 June 2005 Focal points: 1. Concepts, methods and core services 2. Tools in Rich Environments.
Advertisements

DG INFSO- Grid Research & Infrastructures: W. Boch, M. Campolargo 1 Delivery of Industrial-strength Grid Middleware: establishing an effective European.
Information Society Technologies Third Call for Proposals Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission Key action III: Multmedia.
Opportunities for the cultural sector Claude POLIART DG Information Society (IFSO)
Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme 5th EU Framework Programme.
ICT Work Programme NCP Infoday 23 June Maria Geronymaki DG INFSO.H.2 ICT for Government & Public Services Objective.
EU-funded Digital Preservation Research APA 2014 Conference Brussels, 22 October 2014 Dr. Manuela Speiser European Commission DG CONNECT, unit "Creativity"
HORIZON 2020 The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Europe in a changing world – inclusive, innovative and reflective Societies Albert.
FP7 - ICT Call 3 1 Challenge Digital Libraries and Technology enhanced Learning Carlos Oliveira (Deputy Head of Unit) DG INFSO E3 – Cultural Heritage.
Cultural Content and Digital Heritage Bernard Smith European Commission INFSO/D2.
Cultural Heritage and the 6th Framework Programme Cultural Heritage and the 6th Framework Programme Bernard Smith Head of Division Preservation and Enhancement.
Der erste und zweite Call des 6. Rahmenprogramms und ihre Bedeutung für Museen, Archive und Bibliotheken in Österreich
FP6 Thematic Priority 2: Information Society Technologies Dr. Neil T. M. Hamilton Executive Director.
Provisional draft ICT for Independent Living and Inclusion European Commission, DG Information Society and Media E-Inclusion Unit (H3) Challenge 7.
Provisional draft 1 ICT Work Programme Challenge 2 Cognition, Interaction, Robotics NCP meeting 19 October 2006, Brussels Colette Maloney, PhD.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE WG PROJECT IDEAS AND INITIATIVES WG3 CREATIVITY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEETING BUCHAREST
IST Programme Added-value: New Applications + Services Global Economy Networked Society Commodity: Computing + Networking “Single Digital Space” High -
DG XIII Telecommunications, information market and exploitation of research Creating a European Library Space  European cooperation v Networking across.
Research on Technology Enhanced Learning in the EU TELEBALT,
1 European policies for e- Infrastructures Belarus-Poland NREN cross-border link inauguration event Minsk, 9 November 2010 Jean-Luc Dorel European Commission.
Local services and Community Memory: knowledge sharing and policy support Let’s map the future 28 February 2003 Rob Davies MDR Partners
ICT PSP Infoday Brussels Call 2011 – Theme 2 Digital Content ICT-PSP Call Theme 2: Digital Content Federico Milani, Marc Röder Infso E6/eContent.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
Man-Sze Li IC Focus Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap SME aspects.
Caring and Sharing Collaboration in Digital Curation outside North America Ross Harvey Simmons College, Boston Curation Matters: 17 June 2010.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
IST programme Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society FUTURE PLANS FP6 Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society FUTURE PLANS FP6 RRRESE.
Access to Culture Bernard Smith Head of Division Cultural Heritage Applications Head of Division Cultural Heritage Applications.
The Knowledge Exchange Presentation to CNI April 2005 Bas Cordewener, SURF Sigrun Eckelmann, DFG Norman Wiseman, JISC.
“ Mapping the Future" “Preservation and enhancement of CH” Unit Luxembourg, January 28, 2003.
ICT Work Programme Objective 4.2 Technology Enhanced Learning European Commission, DG Information Society and Media Unit E3 – Cultural Heritage.
Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme 5th EU RTD Framework Programme.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson, Head of Unit Technology-enhanced.
Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Bernard Smith Head of Unit Cultural Heritage Applications.
| Collaboration at Rural Business Approach.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
Agency for International Science and Technology Development Programmes in Lithuania IST IN FP6: COVERAGE AND MAIN TARGETS Dr. Rimantas Skirmantas International.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Towards a Knowledge Society Towards a Knowledge Society Carlos Oliveira Carlos Oliveira DG -
1 European e-Infrastructure experiences gained and way ahead OGF 20 / EGEE User’s Forum 9 th May 2007 Mário Campolargo European Commission - DG INFSO Head.
Collaboration in eRegion- ICT for Growth and Empowerment Bror Salmelin Head of Unit, New working environments European Commission, DG Information Society.
WINE: IDEAS FOR FUTURE EUROPEAN COOPERATION PROJECTS Two opportunities for future joint European projects: 1. Grundtvig 1 and 4
CALIMERA: Co-ordination Action Cultural Applications: Local Institutions Mediating Electronic Resource Access.
IST programme Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society RESULTS FROM FP5 Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society RESULTS FROM FP5 Rr.
The DEER The Distributed European Electronic Resource.
26/05/2005 Research Infrastructures - 'eInfrastructure: Grid initiatives‘ FP INFRASTRUCTURES-71 DIMMI Project a DI gital M ulti M edia I nfrastructure.
1 An initiative developed in the framework of the START project supported by the European Commission (DG InfSo) START IST SSA.
Why to care about research?
Heritage for All, Luxembourg 2-3 June 2003 Cultural Heritage and the 6 th Framework Programme Bernard Smith Head of Division Preservation and Enhancement.
Jacques Bus Head of Unit, DG INFSO-F5 “Security” European Commission FP7 launch in the New Member States Regional on-line conference 22 January 2007 Objective.
H2020 FOCUS ON EDUCATION Creat-it Conference
Proposals and projects in FP7 Challenge 7 Information day Brussels January 2007 Coordination and Support Actions.
Technology-enhanced Learning: EU research and its role in current and future ICT based learning environments Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced.
Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Claude Poliart Project Officer Cultural Heritage.
1 Kostas Glinos European Commission - DG INFSO Head of Unit, Géant and e-Infrastructures "The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE KEY ISSUES David Fuegi
June 25, 2016 Concepts and methods for exploring the future of learning with digital technologies A research network funded by the European Commission,
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures for Research and Education Data Sharing Grant.
EUB Brazil: IoT Pilots HORIZON 2020 WP EUB Brazil: IoT Pilots DG CONNECT European Commission.
Name - Date Technology-enhanced Learning: tomorrow’s school and beyond Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate General.
Project Meeting Standards and Specifications Marco Marsella European Commission DG Information Society Directorate E - Unit E3 Technology Enhanced Learning.
Why Invest in Humanities Research Infrastructure? Dr Jennifer Edmond Trinity College Dublin Co-Head, DARIAH VCC-2.
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Information Day on “Search Engines for Audio-Visual Content”
Digital preservation challenges and actions at European level
Presentation for information days Units involved:
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Coordination and Support Actions
Presentation transcript:

NCP meeting Jan 27-28, 2003, Brussels Colette Maloney Interfaces, Knowledge and Content technologies, Applications & Information Market DG INFSO Technology-enhanced Learning Access to Cultural Heritage Scope & focus in 2003

Technology-enhanced Learning and Access to Cultural Heritage Technology-enhanced Learning and Access to Cultural Heritage Objective: To develop advanced systems and services that help improve access to Europe‘s knowledge and educational resources (including cultural and scientific collections) and generate new forms of cultural and learning experiences

Outline Part 1. Technology-enhanced Learning Part 2. Access to Cultural Heritage

 Part 1 Technology-enhanced Learning

Focus - integrating ICT in education and training environments and processes  Technologies: Tools for learning object production; repositories of reusable learning objects, assembly of personalised courses, metadata Platforms supporting the use of virtual and remote labs Computer Supported Collaborative Learning environments  Supporting innovation in learning through: New organisational scenarios for universities & schools New experimental delivery systems for Life-long Learning New pedagogical approaches Underpinned by open platforms, systems and tools Technology-enhanced Learning IST

Improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of learning, for individuals and organisations, independent of time, place and pace, through the development of open systems and services in support of ubiquitous, experiential and contextualised learning and virtual collaborative learning communities. Work combines advanced cognitive and knowledge-based approaches with new media, including virtual and augmented reality, virtual presence and simulation, takes account of technological, pedagogical as well as organisational aspects, and aims at demonstrating next-generation learning solutions in sizeable field experiments. Technology-enhanced Learning in Workprogramme

Principle Intrinsic links of - pedagogical - technological - organisational aspects Target Groups Higher education ……. Organisational Pedagogical Technical Technology-enhanced Learning Focus on the learning process and where we have the most impact

Approach Collaborative Learning Virtual Communities Collaborative Learning Virtual Communities Ubiquitous Access Knowledge Creation, Management... Knowledge Creation, Management... Learning Resources INDIVIDUALS ORGANISATIONS Technology-enhanced Learning

Research foci  Leading edge technology (eg broadband, mobile, GRIDs, ubiquitous computing) to be applied according to insights from pedagogical research  Interoperability of technology components for new architectural models using commodity products  Knowledge modelling, representation and visualisation for learning - creating interoperable and widely accessible knowledge pools  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - flexible communities of practice Technology-enhanced Learning

 Improve quality and learning-effectiveness  Reflect the nature of learning as a social process (collaboration, interaction, tacit knowledge)  Support learners to construct their own knowledge according to their learning needs  Link organisations objectives and learning goals of individuals  New pedagogical approaches that ‘blend’ new and old ways of learning Challenges Technology-enhanced Learning

 Part 2 Access to Cultural Heritage

Emergence of large-scale, inclusive cultural landscapes where Europe’s digital heritage is globally visible, interacts intelligently with users, and persists over time Prevent loss and restore access to Europe’s essential cultural and scientific resources that are in obsolete formats or are too rare or fragile for regular physical access Objectives for 2010

Access to Cultural Heritage  Measurable impact:  European wide approach to deposit new digital content within 10 years  Reduce by 50% the cost of digitization within 5 years  Assured protection from loss of digital resources within 10 years

Advanced digital libraries services, providing high-bandwidth access to distributed and highly interactive repositories of European culture, history and science Focus on shared test-beds and increased cultural- research cooperation Digital library services IPNoESTRP Highly recommended Not recommended

Environments for intelligent heritage and tourism, re-creating and visualising cultural and scientific objects and sites for enhancing user experience in cultural tourism Focus on enhancing user experience Addressing common (not specific) needs of Europe’s museums, monuments, sites, etc., An effective network should include take-up in NoEs and/or “demo” projects under STRP Intelligent heritage and tourism IPNoESTRP Not recommendedHighly recommendedPossible

Advanced tools, platforms and services in support of highly automated digitisation processes and workflows, digital restoration and preservation of film and video material, and digital memory management and exploitation Focus on structuring new research communities around preservation Substantially reduce the cost of digitisation Provide an industrial platform for film and video restoration and preservation Preservation and digitisation IPNoESTRP Highly recommended Not recommended

 Working on topics such as: Middleware and distributed systems Knowledge management and information handling Content authoring Trust and security Internet-based technologies Mobile technologies Multimodal interfaces Language technologies Visualisation and virtual/augmented/mixed reality  Always focusing on integration into systems that can be tested in the real-world and can solve real- world problems Applied research implies …

Where is the research focus?

 Protection and conservation of physical objects, monuments, sites, etc., except where they direct link to digitally enhanced user experiences  Generic technology development without any context or relevance to the problems of Europe’s cultural institutions  Projects addressing a particular object, monument, site, or dealing with dealing with specific thematic collections  Projects trying to cover everything – eLearning, tourism, eCommerce, etc.  Projects lacking strategy/policy impact Out of Scope

 Key messages: No lower threshold on size, just ambition Ambition: tangible significant impact on a wide spectrum of core stakeholders Generate knowledge, and new collaborations Integration for DL: value-chain, existing “national” collections, public-private funding, training, end-user involvement Integration for preservation: public institution-private company, multidisciplinary, demonstration, international cooperation, institutional buy-in, building a research community Should be THE project in the field Integrated projects

 Key messages: Integration for DL: joint training, interactive working, shared use of infrastructure, national programme commitment, create pan- European platform, common approaches, interoperability, open standards, exchange of expertise Integration for intelligent heritage: create pan-European platform, common approaches, interoperability, open standards, demo’s and take-up, develop technology roadmaps Integration for preservation: joint management of knowledge portfolio, staff exchange, common legal structures, long-term objectives, new research opportunities, concentration of resources, common approaches, develop policy roadmaps Integration for digitisation: joint training, includes national funders, Ministerial commitment, create pan-European platform, common approaches, interoperability, open standards, “good” and “best” practice guidelines Networks of excellence

Using the instruments

 Finding a way to extend an existing project  Having lots of “sleeping” partners  Covering the map of Europe with nodes, etc.  A loose group of like minded individuals  Re-submitting a rejected proposal from past/other programmes and asking for 3-times as much funding  Trying to “federate” different groups without any coherence, just because the “Commission wants it”  Making a good small research project look like an IP by tripling everything Ambition is not ….

Further Information  Cultural Heritage in IST   Technology-enhanced Learning in IST    Knowledge technologies:   Human Language technolgies   EC staff in Luxembourg: 