Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Advertisements

Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
Westinghouse Owners Group Risk-Informed Repair and Replacement – Implementation of 10 CFR Twelfth International Conference on Nuclear Engineering.
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
Job Hazard Analysis. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives Identify the purpose of JHA Recognize the benefits of JHA Understand the.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
NRC Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Initiatives
“Regulatory Risk-Informed Activities and Supporting PRA Technical Acceptability” Presented to Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC)
RISK INFORMED APPROACHES FOR PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: REGULATORY AND INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES Björn Wahlström.
1.6 FIRE MODELING IN SUPPORT OF FIRE PRA An Educational Program to Improve the Level of Teaching Risk-Informed, Performance- based Fire Protection Engineering.
Smart Grid - Cyber Security Small Rural Electric George Gamble Black & Veatch
NFPA-805 Duke Power Transition – Lessons Learned
1 10 CFR Part 26 Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan Martin Human Factors Engineering June 23, 2010 HPRCT conference.
RIM ) - REWRITE OF SECTION XI, DIVISION II, USING RISK INFORMED METHODOLOGY - FRANK J. SCHAAF,JR, P.E. ASME CHAIRMAN, SWGRIM CONSULTANT, STERLING REFRIGERATION.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Developing a Chemical Risk Management Program
DELIVERING SAFE & RELIABLE OPERATION
ToR of GEOSAF2 WG on Operational Safety Review of WG2.
Oconee RPS/ESPS Digital Upgrade Presented by: Michael Bailey June 3,
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Hazard Identification
Current Air-Operated Valve Regulatory Activities Steven Unikewicz US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation January 2006.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
FIRE PROTECTION TOPICS OF INTEREST Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Electrical Fire in Terminal Room at Collider-Accelerator Department Relay-Fire Investigation Committee
A procedure for controlling risks 1 st step – to eliminate and identify hazards 2 nd step – to rank the risk associated with the hazards 3 rd step – to.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
1 Control Room Habitability Program James A. Carlson, Omaha Public Power District, Author Deep Ghosh, Southern Nuclear Operating Greg Holbrooks, PE, Duke.
1 NEI Process Discussion. 2 Topics for Discussion Relationship to NFPA 805 Relationship to Regulatory Guide Technical Process currently in NEI
Integration of Safety into the Design Process Overview of DOE-STD-1189 Richard Black, Director Office of Nuclear & Facility Safety Policy.
1 RIC 2009 NFPA 805 Regulatory Infrastructure Development Steven A. Laur, PE Sr. Tech Adv. Risk-Informed Initiatives NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Software QA Safety Systems at SLAC Enzo Carrone Controls Department – Safety Systems SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Fire Hazards Analysis the ORNL Approach Jeff Sipes Fire Protection Engineer April 17, 2007.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
2011 PLANT OPERATIONS MODULE 8 Maintain Bulk Plant Systems and Equipment.
1 Safety factors for periodic safety review for research reactors Group A: SF1 – SF4.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Proposed Fire Risk Meter Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
2006 CMBG Conference BREAKOUT 1: Component Design Basis Inspection Facilitators: Bill Kline/FENOC Sonya Myers/NMC June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
Engineering Environment Awareness
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
NFPA 805 AND CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT JIM LECHNER JUNE 7, 2016.
External Provider Control
Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) Training for Safety and Health Staff
PREEV PROJECT: REGULATORY PRACTICES ON AGEING AND LIFE EXTENSION
Introduction to the Federal Defense Acquisition Regulation
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Management of Change Report Errors to Management.
General Requirements of NFPA 101
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Risk Management and Mitigation
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
TRTR Briefing September 2013
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection

Fire Protection Under Deterministic Program Reg Guide was developed to provide a comprehensive fire protection guidance document and to identify the scope and depth of fire protection that the NRC would consider acceptable for nuclear power plants

Fire Protection Configuration Management Qualified personnel review new designs and plant modifications, including fire protection systems, must be reviewed to ensure inclusion of appropriate fire protection requirements

Fire Protection Configuration Management Instructions and procedures for design, installation, inspection, test, maintenance, modification, and administrative controls must be reviewed to ensure proper FP requirements are addressed, including – Control of ignition sources and combustibles – Provisions for backup fire protection capability – Disablement of FP system – Restrictions on material substitutions

Fire Protection Configuration Management Under NFPA 805 NEI provides guidance for implementing the requirements of NFPA 805

Fire Protection Configuration Management Under NFPA 805 Plant Change Evaluation Shall be performed to ensure that a change to a previously approved fire protection program element is acceptable Process shall consist of an integrated assessment of the acceptability of risk, defense-in-depth, and safety margins Impact of proposed change shall be monitored

Risk Acceptance Change in public health risk from any plant change shall be acceptable to AHJ CDF and LERF shall be used to determine acceptability

Defense in Depth Plant change evaluation shall ensure philosophy of defense-in- depth is maintained, relative to fire protection and nuclear safety

Defense in Depth for Fire Protection Prevent fires from starting Rapidly detect, control, and extinguish fires that do occur Provide protection for structures, systems, and components important to safety so that a fire that is not promptly extinguished will not prevent the safe shutdown of the plant

Defense in Depth for Nuclear Safety Prevent core damage Prevent containment failure Mitigate consequences

Safety Margins Plant change evaluation shall ensure sufficient safety margins are maintained

Fire Protection Configuration Management Under NFPA 805 The fire prevention activities shall include but not be limited to the following program elements: (3) Administrative controls addressing the review of plant modifications and maintenance to ensure that both fire hazards and the impact on plant fire protection systems and features are minimized

Fire Protection Configuration Management Under NFPA 805 Monitoring Program Ensures availability and reliability of FP systems and features are maintained Assesses performance of FP program in meeting performance criteria Ensures assumptions in engineering analysis remain valid

Fire PRA Fire PRAs do not always use traditional fire area boundaries when developing Physical Analysis Units (PAUs) Non fire rated boundaries can be credited Modified or new equipment / components can introduce new ignition sources or hazards

Fire PRA Fire PRAs in finalization and/or development for all SNC operating units During development of Fire PRA, freeze date for each plant state is applied Potential impacts to Fire PRAs must be documented for post-freeze date Screening being added to Fire Protection checklist