Creative Licensing to Expand Australia’s Public Domain 11 May 2004 Announcing AEShareNet-FfE Philip Crisp Special Counsel, Australian Government Solicitor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft JORUM Depositor Licence By Emanuella Giavarra LLM Chambers of Prof. Mark Watson-Gandy Amsterdam and London
Advertisements

Tradition innovation Online Branding Kate Legg Solicitor.
Victoria’s IP Policy and Records Management Richard Vinciullo, Manager, Government IP Policy.
Module 4: Copyright All My Own Work:
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
Copyright 2004 AEShareNet Ltd Unlocking IP VATL July 2004.
1 1 1 [ideas clarity results] iCommons - Different Licences for Different Contexts: Similarities and differences between Creative Commons and Free for.
Public Relation.  While NAWS has no specific position on Facebook. NA as a whole has a clearly defined outline for the use of Internet technologies.
Copyright & PR Presented by John MacPhail Partner.
P OA Week: Open Access & Copyright Seminar 23 October 2014 Dr. Tobias Schonwetter Director: UCT IP Unit.
What is it and why should I care?
HSC: All My Own Work Copyright.
1 Chapter 17 Licensing Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
The Concept and Advantages of Creating an eBook Business Presented by Milt Zee SCORE Chapter 476 Staten Island, NY.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Supporting further and higher education Digital Preservation: Legal Issues Chinese National Academy of Sciences July04 Neil Beagrie, BL/JISC Partnership.
MODULE C - LEGAL SUBMODULES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics C2. Antitrust C3. Torts C4. Intellectual Property C5. Speaking For The Society.
7B: Implementing 'Open Source' Software licences, Chair: Pia Smith President, Linux Australia.
HOSPITAL COPYRIGHT TOOLKIT A Guide to the Canadian Copyright Act A Presentation prepared by Jan Figurski, MLS Mary McDiarmid, MISt, AHIP c2007.
Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP  opyright for postgraduate students and researchers.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Key Functions and Operation of RROs Lagos, 17 September 2013 Madeleine Pow International Rights Manager UK Copyright Licensing Agency.
Copyright for Managers
Technology-Business-Legal Some Critical Intersections Getting Started Legally IP Protection Licensing Mark J. Sever, Jr., Esquire Deborah A. Hays, Esquire.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R Managing the legal issues: practical steps for handling copyright, IP and other legal issues Kylie.
Chapter 17 E-Commerce and Digital Law
MAKING AVAILABLE RIGHT AS PROVIDED BY RUSSIAN CIVIL LAW State educational institution of higher professional education “Russian academy of justice” Ilya.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J The OAK Law Project Legal Issues in Data Management: A Practical Approach.
SOCIAL NETWORKING The Legal Perspective Lawrence M. Miller Schwartz, Woods & Miller.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R The OAK Law Project Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J 1.
The law on Intermediary Liability in India
Copyright for Authors Jenny Delasalle, Academic Support Manager (Research), Library.
Web 2.0: Making the Web Work for You, Illustrated Unit B: Finding Media for Projects.
 Copyright is the right of the creator of a work to control how that work is used.  The copyright holder may grant licences to certain people to use.
Copyright and EMu: Some thoughts on using the rights module Emily Hudson 5 th Australasian EMu User Group Meeting National Museum.
Intellectual Property Laws and Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia.
Unlocking IP 2006 “Emerging Licence Models in the Schools Sector” National Education Access Licence for Schools (NEALS) Delia Browne National Copyright.
© Copyright Licensing Agency Limited 2007 CLA Licence for NHS England.
New approaches to expanding public rights in copyright Graham Greenleaf Professor of Law, UNSW Co-Director, Baker & McKenzie Cyberspace Law and Policy.
Ethics Citation Policy Know the Rules and Save the Fines.
COPYRIGHT RULES AND REGULATIONS -- What do they permit?
International Seminar on Collective Management of Copyright in the Digital Environment Bangkok, 22 August 2013 Kevin Fitzgerald Chief Executive UK Copyright.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
Copyright Compliance. Overview Who is the Copyright Agency? The Statutory Education Licence Why do I have it? How I can use it Digital vs Hardcopy – the.
HSC: All My Own Work What is copyright and what does it protect? How does it relate to me?
ANATOMY OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT. Licensor, Licensee and Licensed Property Title to the Intellectual Property being licensed Written agreement Licensing.
Implementing Open Content Licences Carol Fripp Dennis Macnamara Unlocking IP November 2004.
Licensing Health and Sensitive Data Dr Jeff Christiansen, Intersect | med.data.edu.au Publishing & Sharing Health-y Data Seminar, 26 Nov
Copyright, Creative Licensing to Expand Australia’s Public Domain Roger Clarke Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, Canberra Visiting Professor, Baker.
Group E - Enrico Costanza Sam Holder, Jonathan Stephens-Jones, Joseph Buckingham, Crispin Clark, Benjamin Dixon Creative Commons, Open Source, Open Movements.
CERN – IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Copyright and Content Tim SMITH Invenio User Group Workshop, CERN, Oct 2015.
Wanted: The Right Content and The Content Rights Putting Knowledge to Work: Building an Institutional Repository for Your Campus California Polytechnic.
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Copyright material does not permit reproducing the material, publicly displaying or performing it, or engaging in any of the acts reserved for the copyright.
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
City of Toronto Open Data
MODULE C - LEGAL SUBMODULES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics
Copyright and Higher Degree Students
COPYRIGHT A Melbourne Athenaeum Library Cybersafety Information Guide
Christoph Spennemann, Legal Expert
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Intellectual Property Rights, Creative Commons Licenses and OERs
Neil Butcher, OER Africa
LRMDS Specification and Guidelines for Intellectual Property Rights Management Copyright by LRMDS.
Presentation transcript:

Creative Licensing to Expand Australia’s Public Domain 11 May 2004 Announcing AEShareNet-FfE Philip Crisp Special Counsel, Australian Government Solicitor tel. (02) ;

Open source / open content in context - the evolution of publishing models Traditional supply chain: –author » publisher » distributor » consumer –few producers; many passive consumers who received ‘commoditised’ product Collecting societies Modern publishing models –no longer linear –consumers may be re-developers, re-publishers –new forms of intermediation (e.g. search engine) –wider class of producers, intermediators bypassed

Publishing objective is not just to make money by exploiting copyright Government –to promote a public cause, e.g. government health campaign to combat obesity –to establish a standard Commercial –loss-leading; i.e, giving away content to promote allied services or products where the real competitive advantage lies –advertising, pure and simple

Publication on Internet... –enables more effective and efficient dissemination of a desired message –saves duplication costs (which are shifted to the user) –(possibly) need to operate fewer shop fronts Anomalous that education users should be asked to pay for downloading practices that are undertaken by other users freely, in homes, schools and offices Problem arises from failure to consider, understand implications of copyright statement

DEST recommendations to the Digital Agenda Review Where a work etc. is made available on the Internet by or with the consent of the copyright owner, and is not subject to a technological protection measure, it should not be an infringement of copyright to reproduce or communicate that material for education purposes The preceding principle may be excluded or modified by agreement

Making it easier in practice: AEShareNet-FfE

Transacting an AEShareNet-FfE Licence Anyone may extend an AEShareNet-FfE licence Licence extended by applying FfE Mark: with link back to AEShareNet-FfE home page No requirement for Material Registration Licence extended to anybody with a copy which legitimately attaches AEShareNet-FfE mark –but must not obtain that copy by circumventing a ‘technological protection measure’

Rights granted under AEShareNet-FfE Licence is limited to Educational Purposes ‘Education’ = a structured program of learning and/or teaching for the benefit of a learner Licensee may: –Use (read, view, play, execute, etc.) the material personally or within their organisation –make copies for personal/internal use subject to TPM But may not: –Develop Enhancements –Supply, etc. to Third Parties –Sub-licence

Points to note re AEShareNet-FfE Key context for use of AEShareNet-FfE is the internet ‘Attachment’ principle; retention of AEShareNet-FfE mark Derivatives: –may copy (part or whole) –may create ‘Edited Version’ (no new © arises) –but may not create ‘Enhancement’ In any case: –must not circumvent a technological protection measure –author’s Moral Rights are preserved –may not deal with material so as to ‘mislead or deceive’

Liberal Publishing Models AEShareNet ( Open source movement Creative Commons ( Commonwealth policy developments: –Commonwealth IT IP Guidelines, 2001 ( –CLRC inquiry into Crown copyright ( –ANAO Report #25 on Intellectual Property Policies and Practices in Commonwealth Agencies (

AEShareNet Architecture Constitution of AEShareNet Limited Charter: business rules, including processes for management of the Licence Protocols, © in AEShareNet databases, dispute resolution, etc Licence Protocols: U, P, S, C, E and FfE Supporting Definitions: ‘Licence Glossary and Interpretation’

Architecture of a Licence Protocol Conditions of the licence (that is transacted) [Part B] meta-level: Rules for transacting a licence [Part C] meta-meta-level: Control information relating to the Licence Protocol (e.g. when this version became effective, and when superseded) [Part A]

Conditions of a Licence – Underlying Concepts Rights –Use (read, view, execute; also make copies for your personal use or use within Licensee organisation) –Development of Derivatives –Supply (distribute, communicate, perform) –Sublicence (extend your Rights to a Third Party) Categories of Derivative –Edited Version –Enhancement –Supplementary Work –Compilation

AEShareNet Licence Protocols AEShareNet-S: Standard licence AEShareNet-P: Preserves integrity of material AEShareNet-U: Unrestricted use AEShareNet-C: Customisable. May be Commercial AEShareNet-E: End-user licence; commoditised products AEShareNet-FfE: Free-for-Education licence

AEShareNet-S as the central Licence Protocol Transacting a licence –Material ‘registered’ on AEShareNet website may apply AEShareNet-S mark, with link to Registration –Licensee visits Registration and accepts Licence Conditions of the Licence –may Use (including copy) –can make an ‘Enhancement’ © consolidates with the original owner, and AEShareNet–S Licence mark is retained –can Supply to Third Parties –Sub-licensing not relevant

Licence Protocols compared AEShareNet–S 2 years; Australia & NZ only Enhancements vest in original owner May Supply to Third Parties Licensor registers; Licensee accepts AEShareNet–U Perpetual, worldwide Enhanced version vests in Licensee Some pre-clearance of Moral Rights May Supply to Third Parties Licensor registers; Licensee uses AEShareNet–E Perpetual, worldwide May not circumvent a TPM Enhancements (if permitted) vest in original owner End user licence; no Supply Rights Licence Fee / Royalties may apply Licensor registers product list; Licensee selects items, quantities AEShareNet–C Customisable licence conditions Enhancements (if permitted) vest in original owner Licence Fee / Royalties may apply Licensor registers; AEShareNet mediates negotiations AEShareNet–P 1 year, worldwide Enhancements not permitted May Supply to Third Parties Licensor registers; Licensee accepts AEShareNet–FfE Perpetual, worldwide Can Use for Education Purposes May not circumvent a TPM Enhancements not permitted No Supply Rights Licensor applies Mark; Licensee uses