M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 Offline monitoring Marco Adinolfi University of Bristol.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.

Advertisements

Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.

Muon Data Quality and Performance A. Belloni - G. Zevi Della Porta for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.

ACAT 2002, Moscow June 24-28thJ. Hernández. DESY-Zeuthen1 Offline Mass Data Processing using Online Computing Resources at HERA-B José Hernández DESY-Zeuthen.

CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.

Lucia Silvestris, INFN Bari and CERN/CMC Status Report on CPT Project 23 March 2001, CERN Meeting del Consorzio INFN Status Reports on CPT Project, on.

1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT

L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.

LHCb Quarterly Report October Core Software (Gaudi) m Stable version was ready for 2008 data taking o Gaudi based on latest LCG 55a o Applications.

Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) Higgs WG meeting – 28 th August, 2007 Outline: Introduction & release plans Progress in menus for cm -2 s -1 Workshop on trigger.

Plans for Trigger Software Validation During Running Trigger Data Quality Assurance Workshop May 6, 2008 Ricardo Gonçalo, David Strom.

Start-Up of FEST Niko Neufeld, CERN-PH Tuesday, Jan. 27 th 2009 FEST Start-Up - Niko Neufeld 1.

STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.

Tracking Task Force Predrag Buncic Offline Week, 19 March 2014.

2nd September Richard Hawkings / Paul Laycock Conditions data handling in FDR2c  Tag hierarchies set up (largely by Paul) and communicated in advance.

Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.

Muon LPC Meeting, 14 Sep Overview of Muon PRS Activities Darin Acosta University of Florida.

Reconstruction Configuration with Python Chris Jones University of Cambridge.

4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.

PWG3 Analysis: status, experience, requests Andrea Dainese on behalf of PWG3 ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1.

Ursula Bassler1online monitoring 7/2/2002 Calorimeter Data Quality  aim: enhance the information flow concerning the data quality between the detector-

ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.

Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.

1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.

Online System Status LHCb Week Beat Jost / Cern 9 June 2015.

Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.

Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.

Offline Status Report A. Antonelli Summary presentation for KLOE General Meeting Outline: Reprocessing status DST production Data Quality MC production.

1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.

MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.

LHCbComputing LHCC status report. Operations June 2014 to September m Running jobs by activity o Montecarlo simulation continues as main activity.

Prompt Calibration Loop 11 February Overview Prompt calibration loop in SCT –Provides ATLAS with conditions data used for the bulk reconstruction.

LHCb report to LHCC and C-RSG Philippe Charpentier CERN on behalf of LHCb.

1 Selection of non-triggering muons in J/ψ  μμ events for the calibration of the Muon System 1)Offline Selection:  use of Mass Constrained Global Fit.

Workflows and Data Management. Workflow and DM Run3 and after: conditions m LHCb major upgrade is for Run3 (2020 horizon)! o Luminosity x 5 ( )

OPERATIONS REPORT JUNE – SEPTEMBER 2015 Stefan Roiser CERN.

Marco Cattaneo Core software programme of work Short term tasks (before April 2012) 1.

Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.

The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.

Summary of Workshop on Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Computing Day February 28 th 2005.

A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)

LHCbDirac and Core Software. LHCbDirac and Core SW Core Software workshop, PhC2 Running Gaudi Applications on the Grid m Application deployment o CVMFS.

DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.

Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.

Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.

LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.

Calo Calibration meeting 08 september 2009 Calorimeter Olivier Deschamps LPC Clermont-Fd Software Status&News.

Валидация TRT DCS CONDITIONS SERVICE Евгений Солдатов, НИЯУ МИФИ “Physics&Computing in ATLAS” – 22/09/2010.

1 Status of Tracker Alignment b-tagging Workshop Nhan Tran (JHU) On behalf of the Tracker Alignment Group.

ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.

ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.

LHCb Computing activities Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group.

1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev

LHCb 2009-Q4 report Q4 report LHCb 2009-Q4 report, PhC2 Activities in 2009-Q4 m Core Software o Stable versions of Gaudi and LCG-AA m Applications.

Marco Cattaneo, 3-June Event Reconstruction for LHCb  What is the scope of the project?  What are the goals (short+medium term)?  How do we organise.

Calorimeter Cosmics Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 20 Feb 2008 Olivier, Stephane, Regis, Herve, Anatoly, Stephane, Valentin, Eric, Patrick.

ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.

ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,

Marco Cattaneo, 20-May Event Reconstruction for LHCb  What is the scope of the project?  What are the goals (short+medium term)?  How do we organise.

Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,

Marian Ivanov TPC status report.

Physics Software Towards first Physics data Reconstruction Alignment

fields of possible improvement

ATLAS B-physics important periods

US ATLAS Physics & Computing

DQM for the RPC subdetector

MonteCarlo production for the BaBar experiment on the Italian grid

Quarkonium production, offline monitoring, alignment & calibration

Presentation transcript:

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 Offline monitoring Marco Adinolfi University of Bristol

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol2LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 On/Off-line monitoring: We get the events we want to the right task. Histograms are produced. We can retrieve them from the grid/online farm. They get analyzed. ×There are enough histograms to find and understand problems. Computing: Flagging as OK in book-keeping triggers reconstruction. ×Stripping, streaming …. Quality: ×MC data ×Aligned, calibrated… We can pretend it is misaligned and miscalibrated ×Patch, tag, distribute database, re-reconstruct Small progress…?

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol3LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 Monitoring… We do find the problems! Wrong conditions tag used in reconstruction. Zero magnetic field immediately found from the histograms.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol4LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 J/Ψ signal Running at 1.8 kHz mb + 10 Hz signal. J/Ψ reconstructed both as μμ and μπ. K 0 and Λ peaks.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol5LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 J/Ψ signal (2 - from Wouter) EXPRESS contains 5Hz min. bias + all J/Ψ events. J/Ψ -> μμ in trigger in the first 1000 events of the FULL and EXPRESS streams. HLT banks not yet checked.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol6LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 J/Ψ signal (3 - from Wouter) Use vertex and mass constraint (see Wouter presentation at the alignment workshop). μμ mass vs. p(μ + ) – p(μ - ). Very sensitive to misalignment. Wrong constants were used. Without constraint With constraint

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol7LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 Stripping Two different issues (see Patrick presentation yesterday) Brunel: Stripping was never tested with recent data and latest Brunel. A lot has changed on the DaVinci side, which has effects on Brunel Needs 3 patches in Configuration.py DaVinci: To select data I need : "COLLECTION=’TagCreator/EventTuple’ DATAFILE=’"+fname+"’ TYP=’POOL ROOT’ SEL=’(StrippingB2Charged2Body>0) || (StrippingB2DPi>0) || (StrippingBd2JpsiKSLine>0) || (StrippingBd2JpsiKstLine>0) || (StrippingBd2KstarMuMu 10Hz>0) || (StrippingBs2JpsiPhiLine>0) || (StrippingBu2JpsiKLine>0) || (StrippingTopo>0)’“ DIRAC needs to set fname, but we don’t want to hard-code all selections. Need one selection that is an or of all others.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol8LHCb software week - 18/06/2009 Much already achieved but we still wish to: Fix some issues with presenter, odd crashes.. Improve distribution of information: typical example the wrong conditions tag. System to make histograms available to experts. Test the whole stream. Normal case: stripping, streaming… Problems case: alignment and calibration, re-reconstruction, validation, new tag distribution. Simulate different triggers. Add L0 simulation. Coordinate more with sub-detectors DQ experts. Wish list