1 Investigating Opportunities Available in Genetic Selection for Healthy Beef J R Tait and James Reecy Iowa State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using NIRS to Predict Palmitic Fatty Acid in Peanut Seeds Barry L. Tillman and George Person.
Advertisements

Chinyere Ekine-Dzivenu (PhD Candidate) Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 1.
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Stephen B. Smith Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Meeting Consumer Demands through Genetic Selection: The NCBA Carcass Merit Project Dan W. Moser on behalf of the CMP Team.
Animal Breeding & Genomics Centre Breeding a better pig in a changing global market Dr Jan ten Napel 18 th March, 2015.
Natural Selection Four factors:
Multiple Breed Evaluation Can MBE enhance crossbreeding? John Pollak Cornell University Director, NBCEC.
 Docility EPD: A Tool for Temperament Devori W. Beckman Iowa State University.
GeneMax™ Mark McCully Certified Angus Beef LLC. Supply challenges for future growth?
Pasture-Finished Beef By Matt Tiefenbrun. What is Pasture-Finished Beef? Raising Beef Cattle strictly on forages –Generally Naturally Raised or Organic.
Understanding and Managing Variation in Meat Tenderness T. L. Wheeler, D. A. King, and S. D. Shackelford U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
BEEF CATTLE FEED EFFICIENCY: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Dan Faulkner Department of Animal Sciences.
Beef Relationships using 50K Chip Information L.A. Kuehn, J.W. Keele, G.L. Bennett, T.G. McDaneld, T.P.L. Smith, W.M. Snelling, T.S. Sonstegard, and R.M.
 87 of the top 100 active proven TPI sires are descendants of Planet, O Man, Shottle and Goldwyn.  58 descendants of O Man  32 descendants of Shottle.
Walloon Agricultural Research Center Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Quality Department Chaussée de Namur, 24 – 5030 GEMBLOUX - Tél :++ 32 (0) 81.
Evaluation of meat quality attributes of US Highland cattle Peckman, T. E., Z. D. Callahan, T. A. Wilmoth, and B. R. Wiegand Division of Animal Sciences,
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
2 Iowa State University Dr. Dorian Garrick Dr. Stephanie Hansen Dr. Dan Loy Dr. J.R. Tait Texas A&M University Dr. Chris Seabury University of Illinois.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Improving the health and healthfulness of beef J.M. Reecy, and D.C. Beitz Iowa State University.
Economic Benefits of using Genetic Selection to Reduce the Prevalence of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex in Beef Feedlot Cattle H.L. Neibergs 1, J.S.
2003 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-1) Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of their milk composition H. Duane Norman*,1 and Marie K.
Milt Thomas, Department of Animal and Range Sciences Identification of Molecular Markers to Improve Fertility of Beef Cattle (USDA-NRI )
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality N.D. Scollan.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
As a Producer, How Do I Hit that Target? Twig Marston Extension Beef Specialist K-State Research & Extension.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Carcass Shows & Ultrasound Bernie O’Rourke & Ron Russell UW - Madison Gary Onan & Dewey Wachholz UW – River Falls.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Commercial Ranch Project and DNA testing John Pollak Cornell University.
Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.
Steps to Implement Animal Breeding for Improved Nutritional Quality of Bovine Milk N. Gengler 1,2 and H. Soyeurt 1 1 Gembloux Agricultural University,
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
2008 ADSA-ASAS Joint Annual Meeting Indianapolis, July 7-11 Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acids Estimated by Test-Day Model.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Lipids Triglycerides Phospholipids Sterols Lipids Lipids are a class of nutrients that includes: –Triglycerides (fats and oils) –Phospholipids –Sterols.
Disease Recording A Cross-Roads for the Dairy Industry David Kelton, DVM, PhD Department of Population Medicine University of Guelph.
Fitting Together the Pieces of the Feed Efficiency Puzzle: IGF-I as a biomarker or indicator trait for RFI Gordon Carstens Texas A&M University NBCEC Working.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Relationships between Carcass Quality and Temperament in Beef Cattle Rhonda C. Vann MAFES-Brown Loam Experiment Station- Raymond, MS.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
LOGO Effects of Adding Extruded Flaxseed on Milk Fatty Acids in Holstein Dairy Cows Ali Mahdavi Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Iran.
Effects of Two Measures of Disposition on Post-weaning Gain of Beef Calves R. L. Weaber, Ph.D. F. E. Creason.
ABIC 2014 – Red Deer, AB February 19-21
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
Individual fatty acid measurements in milk from Danish dairy cows
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Exploring the Beef Industry
Fatty acids profile, Atherogenic (IA) and Thrombogenic (IT) health lipid indices of fresh and sundried Tiger shrimps (Peaneus monodon) AINA OLUWAGBENGA.
Work Toward Genetic Improvement of Disposition in Beef Cattle
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
Methods to compute reliabilities for genomic predictions of feed intake Paul VanRaden, Jana Hutchison, Bingjie Li, Erin Connor, and John Cole USDA, Agricultural.
Estimating the nutritional quality of milk fat in cow milk
Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

1 Investigating Opportunities Available in Genetic Selection for Healthy Beef J R Tait and James Reecy Iowa State University

2 Product Branding

3

4 Fatty Acids Fatty acid concentrations determine healthfulness of the lipid Fatty acid concentration is influenced by: Nutrition (Duckett et al., 1993) Breed (Pitchford et al., 2002) S. K. Duckett et al J. Anim. Sci. 71: W. S. Pitchford et al J. Anim. Sci. 80:

Triacylglcyerols Phospholipids Sample Processing Steaks from beef cattle

16:018:0 16:118:1 Fatty acid synthesis 14:1 14:0 Fatty Acid Synthesis and Modification

Atherogenic index The atherogenic index as proposed by Ulbricht and Southgate, 1991 =  (MUFAs) +  (PUFAs) 12:0 + 4*(14:0) + 16:0 Ulbricht, T.L.V., and D.A.T. Southgate Lancet 338:8773

Health Promoting Index =  (MUFAs) +  (PUFAs) 12:0 + 4*(14:0) + 16:0

Variation in Health-Promoting Index of Beef

< Number of Cattle Percentage C14:0 Variation in C14:0 Concentration of Beef

11 Variation in Iron Content of Beef MenFemale

12 Genetic Analysis Estimate h 2 of fatty acids in Angus beef: 14:0, myristic acid 14:1, myristoleic acid 16:0, palmitic acid 16:1, palmitoleic acid 18:0, stearic acid 18:1, oleic acid 18:2, linoleic acid

13 Data Description Data collected from Angus-sired bulls and steers 87 sires with 1 to 41 progeny Calf-fed management Corn-based finishing rations

14 Data Description Longissimus dorsi sample External connective tissue was removed Fatty acids evaluated by gas chromatography

15 Data Descriptors Fatty Acid Mean % of lipid SD % of lipid Min % of lipid Max % of lipid 14: : : : : : :

16 Genetic Analysis MTDFREML Sire model Contemporary group definition: Herd of origin Sex Feedlot management treatment Harvest date

17 Genetic Analysis Model: Y = Xb + Zu + e Fixed effects (b): Model I: Contemporary group only Model II: Cont group & lipid covariate Random effects (u & e): Sire Error

18 Heritability Estimates (% of lipid) Fatty Acid h 2 Model I SE Model I 14: : : : : : :

19 Heritability Estimates (% of lipid) Fatty Acid h 2 Model I SE Model I h 2 Model II SE Model II 14: : : : : : :

20 Heritability Estimates (% of lipid) Fatty Acid h 2 Model I SE Model I h 2 Model II SE Model II Δ h 2 Model II - I 14: : : : : : :

21 Discussion Generally, little change in h 2 estimates with Model II Short-chain, saturated fatty acids are heritable 14:0 (0.49) 16:0 (0.43) Monounsaturated fatty acids are heritable 16:1 (0.49) 18:1 (0.38)

22 Genetic Correlation Estimates Fatty Acid HCW12 FatREAMARBW-B Shear 14: : : : :

23 Conclusions Opportunities exist to select for fatty acid composition of beef Genetic correlations? Fatty acid relationships to consumer acceptability need to be investigated

24 Where do we go from here? Genetic variability exists for fatty acids Very expensive traits to measure Are there other characteristics which make beef “healthful” to consumers? Jan release of BovineSNP50

25 Where do we go from here? Iowa State University, in collaboration with NBCEC, proposed a Healthfulness of Beef study utilizing the BovineSNP50 Discovery and Validation both in the experimental design Pfizer Animal Genetics chose to invest in this project and vision for the beef industry

Used for Beef Cattle Seed Stock Populations Longissimus Dorsi Samples Nutrient Composition Data Tenderness / Taste Data Develop Guidelines for Selection of New Breeding Stock EPDs/DNA Markers Collection of Used for Bulls and/or Genotypes with Superior Genetic Merit for Beef Healthfulness National Cow Herd Management Selection Genetic Evaluation Carcass Data Collection of Used for

27 Acknowledgements ISU – Center for Designing Foods to Improve Nutrition ISU – Burroughs Endowment National Cattlemen’s Beef Assoc. U.S. Meat Animal Research Center NBCEC – National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Pfizer Animal Genetics Jim Reecy Research Group – Mary Sue Mayes, Matt Schneider Don Beitz Research Group – Travis Knight, Shu Zhang, Jon Schoonmaker, Grace Duan, Matt O’Neil Dorian Garrick Rohan Fernando