1 Department of Toxic Substances Control - Office of Pollution Prevention and Green Technology Multimedia Products Unit Andre Algazi - DTSC 916-324-3114.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR CONTRACTORS
Advertisements

The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 Christopher Dang Mr. Bodas P.4.
Do You Comply? On January 4, 2014, water works brass will change forever.
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
September 29-30, 2011 Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance Workshop Lee Johnson, P.E
The New Low Lead Regulations 2014 AWWA Meeting February 26, 2014 LAURA A. TAYLOR (334)
Lead-Free Law Overview (and what it means to you) Rick Fields Zurn Wilkins.
Sanitation in the Food Industry Inspection Standards for the Food Industry.
How to Identify Lead-Free Certification Marks for Drinking Water System & Plumbing Materials Michelle Latham Biologist  Technical Communications Water.
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
AL/MS AWWA Effective Backflow Prevention August 26, 2013 Sam McElroy, PE Civil Services, LLC (256)
Al Fuentes Technical Review and Oversight Team Water Supply Di vision Your Public Water System’s Cross- Connection Control Program.
PRESENTED BY: NAMA’S GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS DIVISION ERIC DELL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act NAMA Webinar.
NSF/ANSI 61 Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects Acceptance criteria….. Regulated contaminants: Includes USEPA and Health Canada regulated.
Adoption and Enforcement of NSF 372 What Devices Need to Comply Presented by: Julius Ballanco, P.E.
BIOTECH SUPPLY October 8-9, 2012 Crowne Plaza, Foster City, CA California Transparency in Supply Chain Act, SB 657, Chapter 556, Statutes of 2010 David.
Lead Free in 2014 By Darnell Wesson. Lead Free: What is it about? Codes and Standards Bradley and Lead Free Bradley and Lead Free Review Questions & Answers.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
ETF – O IL AND G AS T RACT, M AY 5, 2015 GROUNDWATER AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Maryland Farmers’ Market Conference: Food Safety Regulations February 28-29, 2012 Sherry Donovan-Morris, REHS/RS Section Head, Division of Facility &
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
No Lead Laws & Regulations Tampa Bay Area Coop Meeting March 27, 2013.
Colorado’s Groundwater Protection Program Monitoring and Protecting Groundwater During Oil and Gas Development Natural Resources Law Center Intermountain.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Inspection Directions: An EMS Approach to Inspecting for Section 608 and 609 Compliance.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
An Overview of Time, Effort, and Resources Needs in the implementation of Public Law The Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004.
Congratulations! It’s a Burn Dump. What Do You Do Now? LEA/CIWMB PARTNERSHIP CONFERENCE Anaheim, California May , 2005 California Environmental.
Do You Comply? On January 4, 2014, water works brass will change forever.
Introduction to NSF Lead Leaching NSF 61 Safe Drinking Water Act Revision Lead Content Standards – NSF 61-G – NSF 372 Marking.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Purpose of Water Treatment c. Safe Drinking Water Act and SDWA amendments.
State Allocation Board Meeting December 15, 2010 Presented By.
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Metrology Regulatory and Obsolescence Strategy Andrea DavisBridget Berardinelli.
Aberdeen S.D. Community Meeting Aberdeen S.D. Community Meeting Presenters: Mr. Brad Olson, President Aberdeen School Board Mr. Tom Opstad, Superintendent.
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
California Healthy Schools Act
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control Update
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Cannabis Cultivation: A Growing Threat to California’s Water Quality
Protecting the Public from Lead in Drinking Water
Facility Manager IPM PLAN and Policy
Your Public Water System’s Cross-Connection Control Program
Changes to Exempt Categories
Lead in Drinking Water Forum
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Changes to Exempt Categories
Facility Manager IPM PLAN and Policy
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Protecting the Public from Lead in Drinking Water
BAT Work Group.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Toxic Substances Control - Office of Pollution Prevention and Green Technology Multimedia Products Unit Andre Algazi - DTSC Tyrone Smith Dr. Li Tang - DTSC

2 Today’s Topics Goals of AB 1953 Testing and Monitoring Results Regulatory Authorities NSF Standards and 3 rd Party Certification Future Directions - National Standards

3 Regulatory Background "Lead free," as defined in the SDWA, means that the maximum allowed concentration is: 0.2 percent in solder and flux; 8.0 percent in pipes and pipe fittings; 4.0 percent lead by dry weight in plumbing fittings and fixtures.

4 Regulatory Background On January 1, 2010, California law (HSC section ) further reduced "lead free" to mean that the maximum allowed lead content is:HSC section % lead in solder and flux; 0.25 % lead in wetted surfaces of pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings and fixtures, as determined by a weighted average.

5 Regulatory Background The new California law further prohibits: Any person from using any pipe, pipe or plumbing fitting or fixture, solder, or flux that is not "lead free" in the installation or repair of any public water system or any plumbing in a facility providing water for human consumption, except when necessary for repair of leaded joints of cast iron pipes; Any person from introducing into commerce any pipe, pipe or plumbing fitting, or fixture that is not "lead free," except for a pipe that is used in manufacturing or industrial processing; Any person engaged in the business of selling plumbing supplies, except manufacturers, from selling solder or flux in the business that is not "lead free;"

6 Regulatory Authorities State – Department of Toxic Substances Control HSC § – California Department of Public Health HSC § – CA Attorney General’s Office Local – City/County Environmental Health Department – Local Building Department – City Attorney/County District Attorney

7 Regulatory Authorities Con’t While DTSC is required to test and evaluate compliance to the lead free standards, enforcement authority of the lead free standard was not given to DTSC. Regarding the DPH Drinking Water Program (Drinking Water Program), if the products or components are considered part of a public water system, they are regulated through the Drinking Water Program requirements.

8 8 DTSC's Role in Implementing Low Lead in Plumbing Law Role as Auditor Testing Protocol Annual Sampling and Testing – Web Posting and Reporting Coordination and Outreach

9 HSC § DTSC is required to: 1) annually select, to the extent resources are available, up to 75 drinking water faucets and other fittings and fixtures for testing and evaluation to determine compliance with the lead free standards in Health and Safety Code section , 2) post the test results on DTSC’s internet web site, and 3) transmit the test results in an annual report to the California Department of Public Health (DPH).

10 Components and Wetted Surface Areas

Lead in Plumbing Annual Report Posted on DTSC web site n/LeadInPlumbing.cfm Sampling from 1 January 2010 thru 31 December individual plumbing products collected and tested

AB 1953 Sampling Results 12

AB 1953 Result by Product Types 13

14 Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water ActP.L (S. 3874) Amends SDWA Section 1417 – Prohibition on Use and Introduction into Commerce of Lead Pipes, Solder and Flux – Changes the definition of “lead-free” by reducing lead content from 8% to a weighted average of not more than 0.25% in the wetted surface material (primarily affects brass/bronze) – Modifies the applicability of the prohibitions by creating exemptions – Eliminated provision that required certain products to comply with “voluntary” standards for lead leaching – Establishes statutory requirement for calculating lead content – Effective 36 months from signature – January 4, 2014

Lead and Copper Rule - Long Term Revision (LTR) revise the regulations to include the new SDWA definition of lead free plumbing materials in the regulations EPA also intends to clarify how best to distinguish plumbing materials that are exempt from the requirements address third-party certification defining the extent of the repair use prohibition in the act. 15

Lead and Copper Rule – LTR con’t One option could be that unless products are used exclusively for non-potable purposes, they would have to meet the “lead-free” requirements. Another option is that both potable and non- potable versions could be made, but only if the non-potable products are clearly labeled as not for potable applications 16

New Lead Free Exemptions –1417(a)(4)(A) One exemption is for “pipes, pipe fittings, plumbing fittings, or fixtures, including backflow preventers, that are used exclusively for nonpotable services, such as manufacturing, industrial processing, irrigation, outdoor watering, or any other uses where the water is not anticipated to be used for human consumption;” 17

New Lead Free Exemptions 1417(a)(4)(B) Another exemption is for “toilets, bidets, urinals, fill valves, flushometer valves, tub fillers, shower valves, service saddles, or water distribution main gate valves that are 2 inches in diameter or larger. Any item covered by either of the two exemptions can have any amount of lead. 18

Issue #1: Demonstrating that Products are Lead Free Require manufacturers to have products certified by a qualified independent third party – EPA assisted in the development of NSF/ANSI Standard 372 which uses the same calculation as required under new SDWA lead free definition Manufacturer certification with publicly available documentation of their calculations/tests 19

Issue #2: Scope of the Exemptions 1417(a)(4)(A) Exemption –This exemption from the lead free requirements is for products that “are used exclusively for non-potable services”. To qualify for the exemption, must the product be physically incapable of use in potable services or could it be physically capable of use in potable services, but labeled as illegal for use in potable services? 20

Issue #2: Scope of the Exemptions Potential Approaches –Allow dual product lines (potable and non-potable products that are interchangeable) if the non-potable version of the product is labeled as not for potable purposes –All products that are interchangeable with a potable counterpart must meet the new lead content limit because it is not “used exclusively for non-potable services”. 21

Issue #2a: Identifying Non-Potable Products if Dual Product Lines Allowed If dual product lines are allowed, what kind of label should be used? Require labeling of package Require labeling of product Require labeling of package and product 22

Issue #3: Identifying “Lead Free” Products Labeling could help distinguish between back inventory that does not meet 0.25% lead content requirement and products that do meet the 0.25% lead content requirement Approaches ? -Require independent third-party certification against NSF/ANSI Standard 372, which includes certifier’s mark -Require manufacturers to label products that meet 0.25% lead content if not done via third-party certification -Do not require labeling of lead content, rely on labeling of non-potable products or prohibit interchangeable non-potable products 23

Issue #4: Calculation of Lead Content Lead content at the surface of the product is used Lead content of the alloy used to produce the wetted component is used and not just the lead at the surface layer 24

NSF/ANSI 372 – 2011 NSF/ANSI 61 establishes limits for the amount of lead that may migrate into drinking water from the water contact materials within a drinking water contact product NSF/ANSI 372 establishes a limit on the amount of lead that may be contained within the water contact materials in a drinking water contact product. 25

Lead Content Verification Testing Lead content verification testing shall at a minimum include screening of the following: – Materials with lead content specifications greater than zero. – Any materials, including coatings and their substrates, with wetted surfaces areas in excess of 10% of the wetted surface area of the product. 26

Lead content screening Screening may be used to check the lead content in the following cases, but not limited to: – Screening of components where no lead is expected (e.g. certain plastics, elastomers, coatings); – Screening of components where lead is expected for comparison to material specification information; and – Initial screening of components to identify and prioritize items for further testing. 27

Issue #5: Repairing and Returning Products to Service Potential Approaches Entire unit would need to meet 0.25% lead content Only components being replaced would need to meet the 0.25% lead content Approaches assume that all component parts being sold separately meet the 0.25% lead content 28

29 Resources DTSC’s lead in plumbing pagelead in plumbing page – NSF Low Lead Plumbing Products Guide – U.S EPA Commonly Asked Questions: Section 1417 of the Safe Drinking Water Act and the NSF Standard | Drinking Water Standards | US EPA – California Department of Public Health – Drinking Water Program's regulation of public water systems:

30 Future Questions Call or OPPGT,Multimedia Products Unit Tyrone Smith (916)

Contacts For Lead and Copper Rule – LTR Upcoming Guidelines and Comments please contact: Lameka Smith, Standards and Risk Management Division, OGWDW, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; by telephone (202) or 31