China: Policies for Technology Development Kaoru Nabeshima DECRG World Bank September 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implications for South Africa Shahid Yusuf October 27 th 2011.
Advertisements

THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA REPORT st January 2014 Chapter 4 Policies for Accelerating Investment in Africa: National and Regional Aspects.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
1 Using and Misusing Investment Incentives James Alm and David L. Sjoquist March 2008.
1 Productivity and Growth Chapter 21 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
Changes May Influence Future Investments in China Munkhzaya Ochirsukh MA2N0245 Financial Management Case 8.
Promoting Foreign Direct Investment
FDI & Tech Capabilities Khalil Hamdani Lahore School of Economics 27 March 2014.
Advancing Knowledge in the Public Sector: A World Bank Perspective ©Knowledge for Development, WBI Carl Dahlman World Bank Advancing Knowledge and the.
17:Long-Term Economic Growth
1 Economic Growth and Rising Living Standards. Real GDP per Person, (in 2000 US $) 2.
A World Top-Class Science Park to Attract World Top-Class Human Resources -----How Zhongguancun Science Park Becomes a Magnet for Overseas Returnees Zhang.
The New Economy, High Tech Industries and the Role/Limits of State Economic Development Policy.
Dutch Enterprise Policy: Topsector approach OECD CIIE-meeting, March 2015 Henry van der Wiel Ministry of Economic Affairs 26 March 2015.
MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN INDIA. MEANING Multinational corporations (MNCs) are huge industrial organizations having a wide network of branches and.
Nations Have Different Economic Outcomes
Serving Canadian Business in Canada and Abroad. l A global trade service –part of International Trade Canada –150 offices abroad and 12 regional offices.
© Oxford University Press 2009 Part 3 Changing industrial location─How and why does it change over space and time? 3.4What are the location factors of.
1 Globalization and China’s Economic Development Gregory C Chow References: China’s Economic Transformation (Blackwell, 2002) Knowing China (World Scientific,
Amber Huber.  Government intervention to give economic opportunities to production sectors that wouldn’t have occurred without said intervention.  Three.
National Innovation Systems Samantha Pinto Jiaxiao Zhang
Lee Branstetter Nicholas Lardy July, 2006 NBER working paper: China’s Embrace of Globalization.
Xiaolan Fu Oxford University DFID-ESRC Growth Research Programme Meeting Overseas Development Institute, London, July 17th, 2015.
Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Business ECO 4113 FISCAL ECONOMICS Prof. Yeşim KUŞTEPELİ ‘’ The Effects of taxes on investment ‘’ Gizem Berghan,
China: Trade Facilitation Reform and Economic Development Zhang Yansheng Institute for International Economic Research National Development and Reform.
Chinese Promoting The Transformation Of S&T Achievements Law Song Wei
Professor Song CHEN, Ph.D. Deputy Dean, School of Economics & Management Tongji University Oct. 7, 2013 The Changing National.
India’s Innovation System Sunil Mani and Parveen Arora.
1 Enhancing the Development Impact of Migration: Issues and Policy Options Mr. Luca Barbone World Bank February 5, 2009.
Salvatore Zecchini Chairman OECD WP SMEE. Most governments are trying to promote entrepreneurship and SMEs The MENA region is no exception In Saudi Arabia.
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
1 1 Enterprise Development World Business Council for Sustainable Development Geneva, September 2007 Doing Business with the World - The new role of corporate.
Automotive Industry  Proximity to existing and new productions facilities of OEM and Tier 1 companies  Traditions and expertise in the industry, two.
Pre-UNCTAD XXII Civil Society Forum in Africa March,2008 Nairobi.
Economic Growth The long run view. Why economic growth is important The society’s standard of living Ability to produce goods and services Within a country.
Globalization The world economic globalization process
KPGM-TiE Report.  Availability of finance. unavailability of easy and sufficient finances.  Policy framework from Government. Bureaucracy, Corruption,
Trends of Science & Techn ology Potential and R esource in Japan Yuko NAGANO National Institute of Science and Technology Policy JAPAN Feb. 21 th 2010.
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business & Professional Publishing. All rights reserved.
INDUSTRIAL POLICY By Rahim Wazir Ali (3793). Why Industrial Policy?  Comparative Advantage – Specialization  Coordinative Externalities Taiwan’s traditionally.
The BRIC economies Dani Rodrik SW31/PED-233/Law School 2390 Spring 2013.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
© 2007 Thomson South-Western. In this section, look for the answers to these questions: Why does productivity matter for living standards? What determines.
Bulgarian Industrial Association Georgi Shivarov, Vice President The 4 th Vienna Economic Forum 5 – 6 November 2007.
China’s Economy: Recent Growth and Historical Legacies Thomas G. Rawski University of Pittsburgh March 2011.
Harcourt Brace & Company Chapter 24 Production and Growth.
Project Funding For Infrastructure Development in Bangkok Kanit Sangsubhan, Ph.D. Fiscal Policy Research Institute Sustainable Growth, Regional Balance,
MGMT 510 – Macroeconomics for Managers Presented By: Prof. Dr. Serhan Çiftçioğlu.
A Tour of the World Chapter 1. © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Crisis Table 1-1 World Output Growth since 2000.
SME Taxation in China Professor Yang Yao China Center for Economic Research Peking University Creating A Conducive Legal & Regulatory Framework for Small.
The Post-Industrial East Asian City Shahid Yusuf DECRG January 10 th 2005.
Knowledge Deepening and Industrial Change in Malaysia Policy Options Shahid Yusuf DRG World Bank February 25, 2008.
1 Malaysia 2.0: What Will It Take Shahid Yusuf Kaoru Nabeshima DRG World Bank July, 2007.
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Armenia: Trade and Human Development Vrej Jijyan, UNDP Armenia United Nations Development Programme.
Tax System and Tax Incentive
BELARUS: THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS OF TRADE POLICY United Nations Development Programme.
What businesses need to know about the US current account deficit Based on the article By Diana Farrell and Susan Lund The McKinsey Quarterly, 2007 No.
Gross Domestic Product Chapter 12 Section 3 Economic Growth.
Growth in East Asia: Innovative Firms in Dynamic Cities Shahid Yusuf World Bank DECRG February 18, 2004.
Country Report on Local Finance in Korea Korea Domestic Economic Situation and Government’s Effort.
Cultivating Innovative SMEs into Business Giant: the SME Supporting Program in Shanghai Shanghai Torch Hi-tech Industry Development Center July 2008.
Israel Business Proposition and Supporting Messages.
LOGO Building an Eco-system for SMEs Frank G.Liang China Torch Program Administration.
Rising Living Standards
Global Business Environments
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
THE 2014 OECD SCOREBOARD Rome – 7/7/2014
Presentation transcript:

China: Policies for Technology Development Kaoru Nabeshima DECRG World Bank September 21, 2006

The Need for Strengthening Innovation Capability In the past 25 years, China’s growth has averaged 9%. Three quarters of the growth came from increase in inputs, labor and capital. China invests close to 45% of GDP, more than any other country in the world. Manufacturing industries have so far relied upon low input costs, scale of production, and technology absorption. Medium to long term growth potential will depend upon development of broad-based innovation capabilities.

Objectives and Programs Building technological capability has been one of China’s foremost objectives for almost two decades. In support of this, a number of major cross- sectional technology development programs have been launched, including “SPARK,” “Torch,” “863,” “973,” and “985.” In support of this, a number of major cross- sectional technology development programs have been launched, including “SPARK,” “Torch,” “863,” “973,” and “985.”

Policies to stimulate innovation activities A number of public policies are available to stimulate innovation activities through the use of taxes, subsidies, direct financial support, and other incentive mechanisms. The purpose of these policies are: –To raise overall R&D spending –To affect the distribution of R&D spending among industrial sectors –To directly support technology development activities that have large social returns –To encourage capital investment in imported equipment –To attract FDI

Global Trend in Policies Governments, especially in OECD, are now moving away from direct grants for R&D. Instead opting for tax credits for R&D spending so that private firms can choose what to research. –Private firms accounts for the majority of R&D spending, especially MNCs which account for more than half of the global R&D spending. Governments are reducing support for defense-related research and support for public research institutes. Similarly, direct public support for venture capital has been in decline although it accounts for significant shares in Singapore and Korea.

Tax Policies R&D tax credits –Generally positive findings from the literature –Although design issues remain (volume-based vs. incremental, temporary vs. permanent, simplicity and speed of reimbursements, and whether there is a cap). Capital gains tax –This is most important if the intention is to stimulate the entry of new firms that are increasingly high-tech. For these firms, IPO is a significant source of wealth creation. Lower capital gains tax will stimulate the birth of these firms. Investment tax credits –Stimulates investment in equipment which may embody advanced technologies that domestic firms can adopt, absorb, and assimilate.

Tax Policies Structure of direct taxes and loss carry-forward provisions –Low corporate taxes will induce incorporation of businesses. The loss carry-forward provisions will encourage more risk-taking behavior, and stimulate innovation activities. Subnational-level incentives –Such national level incentives can be complemented by tax policies at subnational governments in a decentralized fiscal arrangement.

Other Policies Tax policies can be complemented by other policies: –Direct public support for R&D to private firms, public research institutes, or universities, especially for basic, blue-sky research (although there is a danger of crowding out). –Increasing the supply of S&T workers to facilitate the expansion in R&D activities. Such supply can come from both domestic and foreign sources.

The Case of China Fiscal instruments used: –Tax holidays, preferential tax rates, accelerated depreciation, import duty exemption, export subsides, reduced tax rates, and tax rebates, etc. Direct supports –National high-tech R&D program (863 program) –National Key Technologies R&D program –Torch program –National Program on Key Basic Research Projects –Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Fund –National Key Laboratories –973 program –China Technical Innovation Fund –Various sector specific industrial funds –Various Technology Development Zones

The Case of China Increasing the supply of S&T workers: –Since 1970s, many students have studied in foreign countries. By 2003, over 700,000 students studied abroad, over 500,000 still studying. –Overseas Study Fund to sponsor Chinese students and scholars. In 2004, sponsored 3,630 students to study aboard. –Special fund to attract back those who studied abroad, especially in high-tech areas to work for domestic firms or public research institutes or to startup a new firm. Venture capital industry –Established 300+ venture capital firms with 50 billion yuan portfolio. –Preferential tax treatments for foreign investment and venture capital firms.

The Case of China Incentives to attract FDI in R&D facilities –Close to 700 R&D facilities were set up by MNCs (such as IBM, Motorola, Dell, Siemens, Nokia, Samsung, Intel), mainly in Beijing and Shanghai. –Abundance of academic think-tanks, universities, research institutes are major draws for these firms. –Combined with fiscal incentives such as exemption from import duties and related VAT for R&D purposes; Tariff and import-related VAT exemption for acquisition of new technologies; exemption from corporate tax for services related to technology transfer and technical development activities; reduction in income tax payment if R&D spending increases by more than 10% annually; and the same preferential treatment as foreign funded enterprises Fiscal incentives to attract high-tech FDI –Tax holidays, preferential tax rates, import duty exemption, accelerated depreciations, tax credits, and others to attract FDI in 11 areas of focus.

Some Results These programs have augmented S&T skills, created new institutions and helped to raise R&D spending to 1.4 percent of GDP. China’s high tech industrial sectors have expanded as have the exports of their products—now almost a third of China’s total exports. Numerous science parks and high technology industrial zones have been created in major cities. China’s researchers have rapidly increased the output of scientific articles published, the number of patents registered in China has exploded, patents registered in the United States is increasing, and China is making strides in the life sciences, nanotechnology and new materials development.

How International Experience can Inform China’s Efforts to Develop Technology  Effective research capabilities depend upon the acquisition of experience, tacit knowledge, heterogeneity of research teams and project management skills. Improving the quality of research capital is as vital as volume and quality accumulates slowly. A too sharp increase in R&D spending risks misallocating resources.

How International Experience can Inform China’s Efforts to Develop Technology With the globalization of research and the importance of interdisciplinary activities for innovation, Chinese corporate and university researchers need to form international networks and forge partnerships with S&T workers around the world. The leverage afforded by international alliances can significantly complement domestic research effort. Fiscal incentives and incentives provided through institutions (such as IP) can encourage more MNCs to locate major labs in China. Other incentives can also encourage the circulation of foreign knowledge workers through China, bringing fresh ideas and introducing heterogeneity into the pool of research skills.