The Localized Substation Load Relief (LSLR) Program at Detroit Edison Presentation by: Traci MacDonald AEIC National Conference September 10-13, 2006 Silver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Load Management System with Intermittent Power on the Grid Ruth Kemsley CEng MIMechE MIEE Econnect Ventures Ltd.
Demand Response May 9, United States 40 Million People 8 States Canada 10 Million People 7 Provinces Cost $6.0 to 10.0 Billion.
Prioritized Scheduling and Managing of All Utility Work Utility Characteristics Historical Concerns Improvement Goals Process Teams Implementation of.
Remote Inventory Management System RIMS Cost Control Solutions, LLC.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive James Dagley, Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy.
1 Smart Grid Vision Electric Grid Modernization Steering Committee Grid Facing Technology Subcommittee January 14, 2013.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Dynamic Distribution Grids © 2012 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved. Neal Bartek.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
C onsistent Data For Faster & Better Decision Making P RESENTED AT AEIC L OAD R ESEARCH A NNUAL M EETING M YRTLE B EACH, S OUTH C AROLINA J ULY 2005 By.
Maximizing Your IT Budget through Energy Efficiency Heather Feigum Focus on Energy Advisor.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Integrating Multiple Microgrids into an Active Network Management System Presented By:Colin Gault, Smarter Grid Solutions Co-Authors:Joe Schatz, Southern.
Smart battery technology for a global environment Louie Lane #104 Reno, Nevada
Ensuring Reliable Electricity Supplies Using Distributed Generation Gregory Tress Carnegie Mellon University.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
How Energy Efficiency and Demand Response can Help Air Quality Presentation to the California Electricity and Air Quality Conference October 3, 2006 Mary.
Copyright © 2015 Accenture All rights reserved. A Lync Customer Story May 2015.
IT ASSET MANAGEMENT (From Booz-Allen & Hamilton).
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Xora GPS TimeTrack™ Take charge of your mobile workforce.
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Technical Implications of Electric Vehicle (EV) Integration for the Grid, Bulk and Local Distribution.
1 Docket 7081 Transmission Planning Information Workshops Third Workshop September 30, 2005 Shaping Demand-Side Resources To Address Transmission Constraints.
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant and Wind Power Operational Considerations David Lapinski Consumers Energy Company June 16, 2009.
Over 3,300 Megawatts and Counting Growing and Transforming One of Nation’s Largest DSM Portfolios.
Smart Grid Technologies Damon Dougherty – Industry Manager.
Applications and Benefits of Energy Storage Maui, Hawaii June 16, 2010 Garth P. Corey, Consultant Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multiprogram.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Heat Storm: Update on CPUC Follow-up Actions Steve Larson Executive Director California Public Utilities Commission September 14, 2006.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Lyndonville Electric Department Feasibility Analysis Review December 2,
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Supply Chain Agility in the Volatile World 12 th June 2014 CII Conference of Next Generation Supply Chain.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Hotel Management – Jekkmans Consulting Taken from Hotel Seralago Website.
Reliability & Maintainability Engineering An Introduction Robert Brown Electrical & Computer Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
How AEP is Approaching the Information Management Crisis by Leveraging OSIsoft’s Suite of Tools Bill Sigmon Sr. Vice President Fossil and Hydro Generation.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Developing Load Reduction Estimates Caused by Interrupting and/or Curtailing Large Customers By Carl L. Raish 2000 AEIC Load Research Conference.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Metering Americas April 24, 2006 Advanced Metering.
Dated: 17 February 2016 Instructor :Kashif Mehmood.
Portland State University Smart Grid Class Enabling active consumer participation 20 April 2009 Presentation: History Politics Economics Technology.
V 2 green 1 Plug-in Vehicles and the Smart Grid David Kaplan V2Green Beyond Oil: Transforming Transportation September 4-5, 2008.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Anytime, Anywhere Access Benefits Functionality Work Order Administration Dispatch Work Order Work Order Details New Work Order Additional Functionality.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Beyond the Business Case: AMR Operational Experiences and Benefits
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Industrial Assessment Center Database
The Transition to a High DER Future
IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference 2017
Compressed Natural Gas Supply Vehicles
Presentation transcript:

The Localized Substation Load Relief (LSLR) Program at Detroit Edison Presentation by: Traci MacDonald AEIC National Conference September 10-13, 2006 Silver Legacy Resort Casino - Reno, NV

2 I NTRODUCTION  Background on DTE’s Interruptible Air Conditioning (IAC) Program  Enhancements to the existing IAC program for development of the Localized Substation Load Relief (LSLR) program  LSLR Equipment  Results of the LSLR Pilot Test in 2004  Summer of 2005 and 2006 results

3 IAC P ROGRAM B ACKGROUND  IAC program has historically been used for generation load relief  IAC tariff states that DTE can cycle service to IAC customers for reasons including, but are not limited to, maintaining system integrity, economics or when demand exceeds generation  Cycled interruptions of 15 minutes on and 15 minutes off allow for 30 minutes of cooling by A/C unit every hour  IAC customers can only be interrupted for a maximum of 8 hours/day  Eleven control towers in the DTE service territory are capable of transmitting interruption signals to all IAC customers

4 E XISTING I NFRASTRUCTURE  Having 11 towers allows DTE the flexibility to interrupt all 285,000 IAC customers or just target a specific geographic location to maximize interruption value

5 IAC D EMOGRAPHICS  DTE currently has around 285,000 IAC customers  Expected load shed is approximately 1 kW for each IAC customer  About 250 MW’s of interruptible IAC load on the distribution system  There are close to one million households still remaining in the service territory as potential IAC customers  Sample and Control sites already out in the field which allow LR to analyze usage and study behavior patterns for this class

6 O PTIMUM L OAD S HED W INDOW

7 W HY LSLR?  DTE occasionally exceeds distribution capacity limits on localized circuits during the summer peak season and prior to LSLR, needed to rotate whole circuits to maintain system reliability  Started to focus on using IAC customer sites to provide relief for overloaded substations  The existing IAC program only needed minor tweaking to accommodate the LSLR goals  IAC program historically used to provide load relief at the generation level; now it can also be used to provide relief to localized overloaded distribution circuits

8 LSLR P ROGRAM G OALS  Minimize the need for whole circuit interruptions  Minimize inconvenience to customers by interrupting only IAC loads as opposed to whole house interruptions  Minimize revenue loss to DTE  Provide System Operators with an additional load management tool that can be used to shed load at substations nearing emergency levels

9 E NHANCEMENTS  Replaced the use of a single control tower with a low power portable transmitter  Equipped an existing DTE vehicle with a transmitter, an antenna and a laptop with the Load Management System (LMS) software  Ability to drive directly to the substation(s) in need of load relief  Transmitter sends a 2 mile radius interruption signal to the area surrounding the substation and minimizes interruptions to IAC customers outside the substation service territory

10 N EW I NFRASTRUCTURE  Using the portable transmitter allows DTE to now target interruptions to localized substations and/or circuits versus a whole geographic area

11 E QUIPMENT (Cost per Vehicle)  Remote Transmitter Controller (RTC): $4,000  Load Management (LMS) Software: $1,500  Antenna: $250  Laptop Computer: Stock Item  Transmitter: Stock Item  Company Vehicle: Stock Item

12 LSLR H ARDWARE Transmitter RTC Laptop

13 Antenna

LSLR P ILOT T EST  Purpose was to determine if a portable transmitter could be used to send an interruption signal to 2,121 IAC customers at Sloan substation  Predicted average load shed was 2.0 MVA  Average load shed was 1.8 MVA  Pilot Test was a success!

15 S LOAN S UBSTATION (Load Shed Curve)

16 E CONOMIC A NALYSIS Economic Analysis (based on 2,121 customers):  Lost revenue due to whole house interruption/hour: $340  Lost revenue due to IAC interruption/hour: $150  DTE net savings/hour: $190 ($340 - $150)  DTE net savings per 8 hours: $1,520 Payback:  Cost of Program per Mobile Vehicle: $5,800  LSLR Payback Period: approximately 4 days of use

LSLR P ROGRAM  System Operators determined substations in need of relief and LR dispatched Telecommunications to the field  LR accompanied Telecommunications to the field and assisted with equipment set up and provided on-site training for the program  The LSLR team responded to all 47 LSLR requests by System Operators  Used LSLR on 23 occasions at 26 different substations  The LSLR team was successful in all but 1 request to reduce load at substation sites; that failure was due to an equipment malfunction

LSLR P ROGRAM  System Operators resumed the role of dispatching the LSLR teams to the field  Telecommunications supported the field work for the LSLR program and LR provided oversight for the project  LSLR team responded to all 10 LSLR requests by System Operators and shed load on 8 occasions  Used LSLR on 8 occasions at 7 different substations

19 LSLR C ONCLUSION  LSLR reduces the number and duration of whole circuit interruptions and in some cases, eliminates the need for circuit rotation altogether  Increases customer satisfaction as customers would prefer cycled A/C interruptions rather than whole house interruptions  Relatively minor program costs with no additional labor expense

20 S IGNIFICANT T AKE A WAYS  Strategic Load Research  Leveraging data and knowledge for Corporate success  LR recognized a problem and developed a value adding initiative to resolve