Case based discussion Pankaj Malhotra PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr N M Butt Consultant Haematologist
Advertisements

The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
CML & MPDs Practitioner Conference CML: Cases and interactive voting Brian Huntly University of Cambridge and Addenbrookes Hospital.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when
The role of transplant for CML in the imatinib era Dr Wendy Ingram Consultant Haematologist University Hospital of Wales.
This lecture was conducted during the Nephrology Unit Grand Ground by Nephrology Registrar under Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine in King Saud.
Rakesh Biswas MD Professor, Medicine, People's College of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India Lecture first conceived and delivered to medicine undergrads.
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Treatment of CML Transplant or Imatinib? Mark B Juckett MD Section of Hematology/BMT University of Wisconsin.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
CML in China Qian Jiang, MD Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology
What are the risks and benefits of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ? Wendy Osborne Consultant Haematologist Freeman Hospital, Newcastle.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
CML TKIs – where are we up to? Steve O’Brien
Current use of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia Michael O’Dwyer Haematologica March 2003.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
Incidence of Hypophosphatemia Phos (Low) Number of Subjects (%) Total N = 511 Grade (55) Grade 1 36 (7) Grade (20) Grade 3 80 (16) Grade 4.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
THE DILEMMA OF CML MANAGEMENT IN IRAQI KURDISTAN SHEIKHA.
Dr Jenny Byrne Nottingham
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Dr Nauman Butt – Royal Liverpool University Hospital CML Patient Seminar - 14 th November 2015 What is CML? How do we treat it? Get up to speed…
Molecular Monitoring in CML the process and questions we can answer Letizia Foroni.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Treatment Approaches in Relapsed CML Jorge Cortes, MD Professor of Medicine Deputy Chair, Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Christina Howlett, Pharm.D., BCOP Assistant Clinical Professor, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Oncology Pharmacy Specialist, Hackensack University Medical.
Case report Sudden blastic transformation in patient with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate Mehrdad Payandeh,MD Hematology, Medical.
Future of CML treatments – Are they getting us closer to cure? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Working Group Richard Clark Steve O’Brien.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
The Challenge of Monitoring CML When Resources Are Limited Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML & AML Section Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
HOW TO TREAT FIRST LINE FAILURE?
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Nordic sites Sweden Uppsala University Hospital
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC Clinical Focus: Options for Treatment-Resistant or Treatment-Intolerant.
Ellen K. Ritchie Clinical Director, Richard T. Silver MPN Center
The Nurse View Key Insights Along the CML Continuum
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Resistant CML: Understanding the Science to Change Outcomes
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Great Debates and Updates in Hematologic Malignancies 2014
Imatinib – where are we now. What about generic imatinib
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS WHO 2016
Lymphoid Preponderance and the Absence of Basophilia
Great Debates-CML Omacetaxine succinate
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
Patients with Philadelphia-Positive Leukemia with BCR-ABL Kinase Mutations before Allogeneic Transplantation Predominantly Relapse with the Same Mutation 
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: MD-2025 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
The Pathway to Progress Against Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.
Presentation transcript:

Case based discussion Pankaj Malhotra PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Case History A 43-year old gentleman presented with weakness and fatigability x 3 months Hb 13.4 gm/dl, WBC 220,000 cells/mm3, Plat cells/mm3 Spleen 10 cm BM: Hypercellular, 8% blasts, Ph 20/20 positive, Q RT PCR for BCR ABL mRNA 80% Sokal High-risk

Case History A 43-year old gentleman presented with weakness and fatigability x 3 months Hb 13.4 gm/dl, WBC 220,000 cells/mm3, Plat cells/mm3 Spleen 10 cm BM: Hypercellular, 8% blasts, Ph 20/20 positive, Q RT PCR for BCR ABL mRNA 80% Sokal High-risk Availability of Imatinib/Dasatinib/Nilotinib

Choice of first line therapy Feb Imatinib 400 mg OD 2.Imatinib 800 mg OD 3.Dasatinib 100 mg OD 4.Nilotinib 300 mg BD 5.Nilotinib 400 mg BD 6.Bosutinib 500 mg OD Would Sokal high-risk score have impact on the choice of first line therapy?

Choice of first line therapy Feb Imatinib 400 mg OD 2.Imatinib 800 mg OD 3.Dasatinib 100 mg OD 4.Nilotinib 300 mg BD 5.Nilotinib 400 mg BD 6.Bosutinib 500 mg OD Does enough finances/insurance coverage impact on choice of first line therapy

Case History A 43-year old gentleman presented with weakness and fatigability x 3 months Hb 13.4 gm/dl, WBC 220,000 cells/mm3, Plat cells/mm3 Spleen 10 cm BM: Hypercellular, 8% blasts, Ph 20/20 positive, Q RT PCR for BCR ABL mRNA 80% Sokal High-risk Active coronary artery disease and AF

Choice of first line therapy Feb Imatinib 400 mg OD 2.Imatinib 800 mg OD 3.Dasatinib 100 mg OD 4.Nilotinib 300 mg BD 5.Nilotinib 400 mg BD 6.Bosutinib 500 mg OD Would active coronary artery disease & AF impacts your decision making?

Case History A 43-year old gentleman presented with weakness and fatigability x 3 months Hb 13.4 gm/dl, WBC 220,000 cells/mm3, Plat cells/mm3 Spleen 10 cm BM: Hypercellular, 8% blasts, Ph 20/20 positive, Q RT PCR for BCR ABL mRNA 80% Sokal High-risk Past history of pulmonary tuberculosis

Choice of first line therapy Feb Imatinib 400 mg OD 2.Imatinib 800 mg OD 3.Dasatinib 100 mg OD 4.Nilotinib 300 mg BD 5.Nilotinib 400 mg BD 6.Bosutinib 500 mg OD Would a past history of lung infection impacts your decision making?

Choice of first line therapy depends upon 1.Available finances/Full insurance 2.Side effect profile of the drugs 3.Co-morbid conditions of the patient 4.Phase of the disease(Acc or BC) 5.Sokal score (?)

Choice of first line therapy depends upon 1.Available finances/Full insurance 2.Side effect profile of the drugs 3.Co-morbid conditions of the patient 4.Phase of the disease(Acc or BC) 5.Sokal score (?) 6.Physician preference/Patient preference (?)

Comparison of TKI Favour Imatinib Cheaper Long-term experience Known side effect profile CCyR 70% at 1 year Less effective More than 100 mutations Favour 2 nd G TKI More effective CCyR 80-85% Fewer mutations (<10) Costly Post marketing surveillance suggest some unusual side effect Fewer options if disease progress

The patient was started on Imatinib 400 mg/day

Progress Achieved CHR by 2 months RQ PCR for BCR-ABL at 3 months 22% IS What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low

Progress Achieved CHR by 2 months RQ PCR for BCR-ABL at 3 months 12% IS What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low

The patient was started on Dasatinib 100 mg/day

Progress Achieved CHR by 2 months RQ PCR for BCR-ABL at 3 months 12% IS What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low What are the long-term chances of PFS of this gentleman? ( RQ PCR >10% at 3 months)? 1.High 2.Low

Thus with 2 nd G TKI, you expect more rapid response, may be CCyR at 3 months/BCR ABL <2% at 3months

Assessment at 6 -months Glivec 400 mg/day continued Hb 10.0 gm/dl MCV 102 WBC 3500 cells/mm3 Plat 100,000 cells/mm3 BM: Mild hypocellular Cytogenetics 2/20 = MCyR Q PCR 1% IS What is your assessment and would you consider change in your strategy?

Current role of Allo HSCT

Conclusions Rapid advancement taking place in the field of CML Availability of many drugs have made life easy as well as difficult both for the physician as well as the patient Need to continue update our knowledge on CML on the basis of continuously emerging data