Published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to get published (in EJHG)?. Questions to ask Is your paper within the scope? Does the journal reach an appropriate audience? How easy is electronic.
Advertisements

1 Publishing in European Journal of Teacher Education 28th August 2010 Kay Livingston, Editor, EJTE Geri Smyth, Co-Editor, EJTE Katie Peace, Publisher,
How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published
HOW TO WRITE AN ARTICLE FOR PUBLICATION Leana Uys FUNDISA.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 10, 2011 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Learning the Language of the Review Process Patricia.
Publishers of original thinking. What kinds of academic writing are there? There are many kinds of writing that originates from academia. In my view there.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.
Understanding Research Articles Microbiology Laboratory.
Paper written! Now for the harder part: getting it published! Sue Silver, PhD Editor in Chief Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Ecological Society.
Announcements ●Exam II range ; mean 72
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, 2 nd edition. Paper versus speech versus poster: Different formats for communicating research.
How to Critically Review an Article
Research Methods. Research Projects  Background Literature  Aims and Hypothesis  Methods: Study Design Data collection approach Sample Size and Power.
Agronomy Journal Editorial Board Meeting Tuesday, October 23, 2012, 3:00 to 5:00pm.
Journals published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science.
Research Report Chapter 15. Research Report – APA Format Title Page Running head – BRIEF TITLE, positioned in upper left corner of no more than 50 characters.
Publication in scholarly journals Graham H Fleet Food Science Group School of Chemical Engineering, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia .
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
11 Reasons Why Manuscripts are Rejected
Writing a research paper in science/physics education The first episode! Apisit Tongchai.
 Jennifer Sadowski & Kaati Schreier May 30, 2012.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Skills Building Workshop: PUBLISH OR PERISH. Journal of the International AIDS Society Workshop Outline Journal of the International.
A short guide to publishing in European Journal of Soil Science EJSS wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ejss.
Ginny Smith Managing Editor: Planning and Urban Studies Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.
A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T Y Faculty of Agricultural Sciences (DJF), Department of Integrated Pest Management Scientific Publishing, Flakkebjerg, September.
The Publication Process. Publication Steps Pre-Submission Initial Submission Behind the Scenes First Response Revise and Resubmit Revise for Submission.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 16, 2012 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Ethical Issues and Understanding the Review Process.
THE REVIEW PROCESS –HOW TO EFFECTIVELY REVISE A PAPER David Smallbone Professor of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, SBRC, Kingston University Associate.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 Observations on assignment 4 - Reviews General observations  Good effort! Some even.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
Choose a journal for these papers  Get together with your team.  Together, read the three abstracts.  Read the three journal descriptions.  Based on.
Scope of the Journal The International Journal of Sports Medicine (IJSM) provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with basic or applied information.
B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. 5. Presentation.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
Roadmap for Publication and Maximizing Your Chances for Getting Published Nathan Pickett PhD candidate, Dept. of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences, University.
What’s Included in a Review Irving H. Zucker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center A Primer for Potential Reviewers Experimental Biology 2014 San.
How to get published in EJHG. EJHG key metrics 2015 IF (2014: 4.225) No 36 /167 in ‘Genetics and Heredity’ No 70 /289 in ‘Biochemistry and Mol Biology’
CPD 3 - Advanced Publishing Skills 1 - How to Get Published and to Continue to Get Published in Leading Academic Journals Professor Tarani Chandola with.
How to get your research published.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
How to Write a Scientific Journal Article: 101
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
Journals published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
What the Editors want to see!
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Presenting and publishing work
How to publish your work in academic journals
5. Presenting a scientific work
5. Presenting a scientific work
Menghindari Penolakan Editors dan Reviewers
Strategi Memperbaiki dan Menyiapkan Naskah (Manuscript) Hasil Review
Presentation transcript:

Published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What is this session about?  targeting future (and current) authors  understanding journal policies and processes  not a guarantee for paper acceptance  a guide to help you optimize your time and efforts (and ours!!) Welcome from EJSS and SUM Welcome from EJSS and SUM Hubert Tunney and Steve Jarvis

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science The aims of the two journals  SUM  focuses on scientific principles to understand and solve soil problems with crop production and environmental issues.  provides background scientific evidence for management techniques to achieve sustainable use of land.  papers take a broad view of 'use' and 'management’ as well as concern with technique development for monitoring soils  international relevance

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science The aims of the two journals  EJSS  international quality, innovative science  advances in understanding of soil processes  developments in advanced techniques  topics include:  biological/chemical//physical interactions  carbon and organic matter  development of statistical and spatial distribution methods  soil variability, distribution and development

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Why are we doing this? For the two journals:  35 (EJSS) and 19 (SUM) % of our MSs are rejected immediately (2011)  only 30% are published  very large regional variation

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Origin of papers sent to SUM & EJSS (%) (2011) SUMEJSS China: India: 9 8 UK: 7 6 Rest of Europe: USA + Canada: 5 8 Australasia: 4 5 Rest of the world: 25 23

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Why such a large rejection rate?  wrong topic  no novelty/innovation, local relevance only  poor science/poor execution/poor experimental design  poor interpretation and analysis  plagiarism/double publishing  too applied (EJSS) -> SUM  too ‘processy’ (SUM)->EJSS

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Other common problems (may be possible to rectify)  too long (<5000 SUM : <6500 EJSS )  too short!!!  too descriptive- no hypothesis  English presentation  does not meet formatting style or quality of journals

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Title may be a clue 1. Inappropriate articles for SUM  Impacts of soil slaking and drying on release and retention of cations during desalinization - too processy  Topography and water regimen influence on phosphorus desorption.. semi-arid soils- local relevance  Impact of sewage sludge amendment on heavy metal in soils of soybean..- environmental survey

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Title may be a clue 2. EJSS “Response of ground nuts to fertilizer and manure addition in North Tawtonia in 2011” by Jarvis and Tunney  Is it novel/innovative? Possibly but....  Is it too applied? Yes  New basic/process information? No  Of general international interest No (North Tawtonia)  Adequate experimental design? Probably not (one year)

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science How does the editorial system operate? reject 1. Initial review (Eds): No  immediate reject Yes  Associate Ed. & refs  2 reject 2. Review No  reject Yes  revision  3 3. Revision Reject but re-submit  1 Major revision  4 Minor revision  4 Reject 4. Review Reject Major revision  3 Minor revision  3 Accept  5 5. Editor in Chief Final review and edit Questions to authors Send to publishers

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What to do before you start Ask yourself:  is the experimental approach and design good?  have you consulted others: statisticians, statisticians, statisticians....?  does the work meet the main criteria for the journal ?  did you think carefully about publication before you started?

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science For EJSS:  is it good science (this includes experimental design and techniques)?  is it new or novel?  does it improve significantly our understanding of soil processes?  is it interesting to an international audience?  is analysis of the data adequate and appropriate to the investigation?

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science For SUM:  is it good science (this includes experimental design and techniques)?  is it new or novel?  does it contribute to the management and use of soils?  is analysis of the data adequate and appropriate to the investigation?

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What to do before you write  read guidance to authors very carefully (go to websites; author guidelines)  look at slide shows on website  look at example paper: website or recent issue (on-line or print) - structure - figures and tables - references - statistics

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Statistics and soils Excellent series of papers by Webster: guidance on the use and presentation of statistical methods and results in soil science: –SUM 5 (2) and EJSS 48 (3): regression –EJSS 52 (2): statistics to support soil research and their presentation –EJSS 58 (1): analysis of variance, inference multiple comparisons and sampling effects

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Statistics and soils Some highlights. 1  sampling design – details given?  pseudo-replication?  clear presentation of results? See examples by Webster  CV – should be restricted to variables with an absolute zero  ‘Treatment A yielded significantly more than treatment B (P = 0.05)’ – essential to also quote mean values  overall, better to give Standard Errors of the mean rather than Standard Deviations

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Statistics and soils Some highlights. 2.  regression – give the regression equation, S.E. and value of R 2  ANOVA – must include replication and randomization  importance of data transformations  present numerical results to 3 significant figures

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What to do when you write  follow the recommended style, length & format  check references: precision & numbers  ask colleagues to read your MS  for non-native English speakers – get guidance and help from a native English speaker

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Example of typical structure of a SUM paper Phosphorus fertilizer form affects phosphorus loss to waterways: a paired catchment study Abstract Introduction: Materials and methods Site and measurements Treatments Statistical analyses Results Discussion Conclusions

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Example of the structure of a EJSS paper Stock, turnover time and accumulation of organic matter in bulk and density fractions of a Podzol soil Summary Introduction Materials and methods Site description Sampling Analyses Density fractionation Turnover time of organic carbon Statistics Results Discussion Conclusions

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What to do when the decision is made 1. Reject:  outright/immediate rejection  little chance- accept decision  later rejection after full review  if the advice from Assoc. Ed and referees is solid – accept decision  contact Ed in Chief ONLY if you have evidence that the reviewers are wrong  don’t rant at the EiC!

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science What to do when the decision is made 2. Revision:  take each recommendation very seriously - do not ignore  explain your reactions and changes carefully  provide concrete evidence if you ‘dispute’ decisions: “We are right” is not good enough

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Final comments 1.  pressure to publish and the work involved is great  MS per year  do not take short cuts  our AEs & referees will find you out!  take advice  read decision letters and review reports very carefully

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Final comments 2. If all this advice is followed:  improved chances of MSs being accepted  continued flow of high quality papers  improved international representation of good work  more satisfaction for you  an easier life for all of us!!!

Soil Use and Management European Journal of Soil Science Thank you for coming and for listening: Thank you for coming and for listening: Please do ask questions Do not hesitate to contact us if you wish any initial guidance on the potential suitability of a paper:.. and we look forward to receiving your papers.

Published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science For more information go to web sites: EJSS - SUM -