12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN1 Muon Detector Description status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua, Jean Francois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACAT05 - DESY Zeuthen125/05/2005 Detector Description of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and H8 Muon Testbeam D. Pomarède CEA/DAPNIA/SEDI/LILAS - Saclay.
Advertisements

MuonGeoModel Structure Clients Validation run-time Conditions EDM Raw geometry issues Available Tools Status Connection with the COOL Alignment (A-lines)
RPC timing in simulation Current Situation MC Geant4 RPCSensitiveDetector.cxx Or RPCSensitiveDetectorCosmics.cxx RPC_Digitization RPC_digit_To_RDO RPC_RDO_To_Prep:
CMS Full Simulation for Run-2 M. Hildrith, V. Ivanchenko, D. Lange CHEP'15 1.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
ALICE Offline week, CERN 21 February 2005 I. Hrivnacova 1 New geometry framework in MUON I.Hrivnacova IPN, Orsay ALICE Offline week, CERN 21 February 2005.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
ATLAS EXPERIMENT INTEGRATION TASK: SPACE MANAGEMENT Tatiana Klioutchnikova 05/06/
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
28/05/2008Muon Combined Performance Meeting 1 Muon Detector Description and Simulation status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier,
Software Solutions for Variable ATLAS Detector Description J. Boudreau, V. Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh R. Hawkings, A. Valassi CERN A. Schaffer LAL,
2nd September Richard Hawkings / Paul Laycock Conditions data handling in FDR2c  Tag hierarchies set up (largely by Paul) and communicated in advance.
0 Status of Shower Parameterisation code in Athena Andrea Dell’Acqua CERN PH-SFT.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
A few issues about MuonGeoModel stefania spagnolo 2/7/08.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
Muon Spectrometer Detector Description Outline: - Present situation - Missing elements - New chain to update parameters - Alignment issues - GeoModel issues.
RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.
Clash Cleanup and Cutout Implementation Dennis Wright ATLAS Muon Week 9 June 2008.
Physics Validation. Validations 18/12/13: DC14 (1) 5 validation tasks for this week: Several DC14 simulation tests, grouped into 3 tasks 2 tasks on IBL/ITK.
Y.Fisyak, BNL - STAR Upgrade workshop, 12/2/ Integrated Tracker – STAR tracking framework of the future update on  status and  perspective IT(TF)
The GeoModel Toolkit for Detector Description Joe Boudreau Vakho Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh CHEP’04 Interlaken.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
14/11/2007CERN - Muon Week1 Detector Description status and plans Laurent Chevalier Dapnia – Saclay Stefania Spagnolo Univ. del Salento and INFN Lecce.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
Status of the ATLAS Detector description Stan Bentvelsen Berkeley software week May 2000.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Pavel Nevski DDM Workshop BNL, September 27, 2006 JOB DEFINITION as a part of Production.
30/09/081 Muon Spectrometer Detector Description Outline: - Present situation - Dead Matter - Validation - GeoModel.. Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua,
12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN1 Muon Detector Description status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua, Jean Francois.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
18/04/2007Muon Week - CERN1 Detector Description status report Laurent Chevalier Stefania Spagnolo.
Joerg Dubert’s Questions as you all aware we currently do not yet know how the final mechanical design of the new Small Wheel will look like. Nevertheless,
Detector Description (Overview) C.Cheshkov. 25/9/2006Detector Description (C.Cheshkov)OutlineTerminology Overview on: Detector geometry implementation.
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
Goals and requirements 1 st flexible geometry version Next geometry version development Conclusions and outlook A realistic and flexible VTX geometry in.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
This document is a working document and a base for discussions. Everybody who thinks to have better ideas is warmly invited to change it ! Muon alignment.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
Muon Alignment: Organization
Muon Spectrometer Detector Description
MuonGeoModel status of progress on main items
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Update primary numbers active part
LHCb Alignment Strategy
MuonGeoModel – recent developments
Mdt example now: MdtReadoutElement = 1 multilayer
Pierluigi Paolucci & Giovanni Polese
MuonGeoModel: status and plans
Implementation of Chamber Misalignments and Deformations in the
Recent Results on TRT Alignment
Presentation transcript:

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN1 Muon Detector Description status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua, Jean Francois Laporte, Stefania Spagnolo, Dennis Wright

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN2 Outline –Geometry tags from Atlas-CSC (Bulk of CSC production) to Atlas-Geo (data taking layout) –XML to GeoModel translation for Inert Materials –Performance issues: Robustness: clash cleanup Memory allocation –FDR2: alignment constants loaded run-time Atlas-CSC and Atlas-CSC the FDR 2 tags –Summary of Muon DD functionality in recent and future releases

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN3 Content/use of a Geometry tag * Structured according to amdb specific conventions ** Derived(not primary) from XML amdb blob = dump of the ascii file(active + XML dead matter) in a blob XML (*)(*) amdb blob tables (*) tables (**) ascii file Muonboy via Amdc Id Dict. name Cabling Maps names Digitization Data Decoding Reconstruction hopefully soon

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN4 Geometry tags ATLAS-CSC ATLAS-CSC –Based on Technical Drawings of Layout R (amdb version R01) but Station positions (P-lines) account for Egg shape global deformation –default station position ≠ nominal layout Additional random displacements (~1mm) and tilts (~1mrad) of stations with MDTs as static Alignment Corrections (A-lines) –A-lines loaded init time from the same source of P-lines (geom-DB, no Cond- DB) but applied as corrections (Delta Transforms) on top of the default position and orientation of the station –MuonGeoModel implementation fully driven by primary numbers in the Oracle tables (=primary source) for the active part (good validation) (≠primary source) for the inert materials (very limited validation) –Barrel Toroid, Endcap Toroids, Atlas Feet, Shielding (disk, forward and toroid) –many missing blocks Calorimeter Saddle, TGC supports, Big wheel supports … …others, some not yet implemented in Amdb ATLAS-CSC

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN5 Geometry tags ATLAS-GEO ATLAS-GEO vs ATLAS-CSC –Moving from Layout R in tech. drawings to the MS layout as installed (amdb version R03) –Active Geometry: MDT HV-RO side checked and fixed for a few chambers station positions fixed for a few stations RPC layout in Small Sectors + RPC positioning in the stations with single RPC units + RPC chambers with cutouts + RPC special chambers heavily revisited CSC position fixed (layer 2 installed not layer 1) –Dead Matter: In the XML description: fixes to MDT Big Wheel, Calorimeter Saddle, TGC support; pos. of ID Patch Panels PP2; Muon Barrel + sect. 13) Access Platforms, Feet Struts, pos., BOL Support, Tie road, ECT cryostat fix –Validation of R03: VERY LIMITED UNTIL NOW – NEED HIGH STAT. SAMPLEs hit relocation OK – Amdc vs MGM OK – No unexpected clashes involving active geo. first simulation tests showed a problem with CSC now fixed for reconstruction/trigger (LVL1 + HLT) emulation we need new RPC cabling maps (few chambers - BOG and S2/3 in BMS at  2 and 4- with #of strips changed w.r.t. old layouts)

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN6 RPC layout in R03 As shown also from hit residuals studies with cosmic ray data, the RPC layout in the small sectors does not correspond to the nominal layout ATLAS-CSC ATLAS-GEO see B. Liberti et al

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN7 RPC layout in R03 BMS5 BMS2A/CX BMS4 BMS3A/CX BMS6 BMS4A/CX s2 RPC chambers s3 RPC chambers changed w.r.t. R01 in position in the station # of eta strips cutouts BOG as an example of chamber with single RPC unit: in some cases inverted position of gas gaps and thick support panel

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN8 Dead Matter in GeoModel/GEANT from XML Andrea Dell’Acqua developed a XML -> GeoModel parser for a transparent translation of Amdb dead matter in GeoModel –no more painful hand coding of the dead matter shape and positioning –use directly primary source of dead matter description AGDD2Geo in (not active yet in any default configuration) Amdb blob (with XML dead matter) read from Oracle all components in Amdb are translated into GeoModel volumes, hence Geant4 volumes via Geo2G4 by job-option one can enable to built a selection; no changes needed for the moment in MuonGeoModel planning to start with MDT/TGC supports in the big wheels –if tests in simulation are OK add platforms, services at eta 0, calo saddle, etc. –presumably wait longer before replacing components already existing in MuonGeoModel

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN9 AGDD2Geo MDT supports AGDD2Geo required - some fixing of syntax of XML description in amdb (done in r03) - an update in Geo2G4 in order to handle assemblies of assemblies (done for )

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN10 AGDD2Geo TGC supports

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN11AGDD2Geo Access platforms Active geo. (MuonGeoModel) + new dead together

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN12 AGDD2Geo TO DO in and material consistency checks: AGDD had extra materials with no correspondence in Oracle yet. geometry checks (mostly in simulation) check for unforeseen overlaps, for correct material distribution GEANT4 tracking performance maybe the most critical chapter (impact on simulation timing, memory) reconstruction checks make sure the whole chain from simulation to reconstruction works properly After these checks – we’ll freeze, as default, a configuration of default options for MuonGeoModel + AGDD2Geo to enable the tested components in simulation and reconstruction

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN13 Clash review – simulation robustness Dennis Wright working on a very careful clash hunting and fixing fixes in –started from nominally aligned layouts, cured residual small active-active clashes due mostly to shared surfaces (introduced suitable tolerances on volume dimensions) –moved to misaligned layout: many clashes of tilted chamber corners (~100  m) cured by reshaping a tighter station envelop, by subtracting and adding half cylinder shapes to a minimal trapezoid event display becomes heavy solved by enabling(in MC)/disabling(in Reco) this fine clash fixing procedure by job option –simplified spacer beam description + fixes (should improve G4 tracking perf.) + refine LB and CR description linking one object to the other to (close to reality) –fix BOG cutouts –attaching active-inert clashes fixed feet description to fix a clash with BOG chambers work in r03

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN14 Clash review – simulation robustness after working on cutouts: –currently only cutouts in MDTs of BOG stations are implemented –strategy to implement the rest: use GeoCutVolAction for RPCs and DEDs (class propagates cutouts in mother volume down to all daughters) –OK for above components because there aren't many sub-volumes must handle MDTs differently to avoid creating too many boolean volumes –re-writing Mdt.cxx and parts of MultiLayer.cxx in order to generalize MDT cutouts to other cutout chambers besides BOGs improvements in AMDB required in order to continue work in r03

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN15 Memory issues MuonGeoModel budget ~ 130 MB (out of ~1GB allocated by simulation tasks, ~2GB allocated by reconstruction tasks) –50 MB are purely from GeoModel can be reduced to a minimum in reconstruction by forgetting all the internal details of detectors (i.e, components linked to readout geometry classes, used by reconstruction) –to be done –80 MB are a tracking related cache (used to be built run-time on demand, since is fully built init time) can be turned on in simulation –easy and done can be optimised (centrally, not in MuonGeoModel)

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN16 FDR2: alignment constants loaded run-time MuonAlignmentDbTool loadParameters Cool Folder MUONALIGN/MDT/BARREL Cool Folder MUONALIGN/MDT/BARREL MuonDetectorTool::Align registered for call back against MUONALIGN/MDT/BARREL A-line container in storegate A-line container in storegate MuonDetectorManager updateAlignment compute deltaTransforms clear tracking cache update GeoModel transform tree clear/update MuonGeoModel tracking cache step 1 step 2 The Alignment wg provided Alines in COOL computed with an emulation of the optical al. system with IoV in the range of the FDR2 data sets just in time for the FDR2 start-up System tested up to reconstruction ~1 year ago with old COOL versions and run/event based IoV definition Before FDR2 we have been able to test the access to the condDB by emulating fake events with time- stamps matching the A-lines IoV --- test OK but no integration of reconstruction unable to test with coherent sim. data + cond. data in advance

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN17 FDR2: alignment constants loaded run-time The integration of reconstruction has been tried just at FDR2 – we found out what we missed –by default MuonGeoModel assumes no access to the cond DB minimal change in configuration tested on run , before trying in FDR2 –worked fine if MuonTrackingGeometry disabled (otherwise a susp. crash) integrated: but crash run-time on a data set  disable –Of course testing in final full environment are mandatory to ensure no bugs are lurking around a bug identified in MuonGeoModel in the mechanism for clearing the tracking related cache – maybe related to the observed crash –MuonAlignmentDbTool/MuonDetectorTool are designed to read a single folder from COOL when updated but Optical alignment for Barrel / EndCap A / EndCap C are independent systems writing asynchronously into COOL ! some redesign is needed –Better planning + better definition of responsibilities would have helped: goals of FDR2 for the muon alignment wg and subsequent requirements on muon software discussed in ~April but not updated as needed up to FDR2 start

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN18 FDR2: alignment constants loaded run-time –From the test on run , before trying in FDR2 with MuonTrackingGeometry disabled and the extra conf. options Full reconstruction has been run and the effect of loading/not-loading the alignment constant was observed in muon reconstruction d0 condData -d0 def.reco /mm barrel d0 condData -d0 def.reco /mm endcaps MuonBoy reconstructed tracks (MS hits only) back extrapolated to IP rms = 470  m No diff. in the output of reco. in ECs since only barrel A-lines were read from COOL and passed to Muonboy by the MuonGeoModel MuonDetectorMgr No diff. in the output of reco. in ECs since only barrel A-lines were read from COOL and passed to Muonboy by the MuonGeoModel MuonDetectorMgr

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN19 Summary of Muon DD functionality in recent and future releases In / –MuonGeoModel can handle old layouts + ATLAS-GEO (much closer to ATLAS pit for active geo. than before) still need extensive validation make sure we handle it in reconstruction (cablings updates for RPC !) –small differences in conf. for simulation and reconstruction (default): caching flag OFF, fine clash removal ON –default dead matter as before (a part from minor fixes) –new dead matter (via XML  GeoModel parsing) will be validated in custom productions In Y (FDR2 reconstruction release) and AtlasPoint1 branch –Try to finalize the access and use of condition data (access to more folders, full test up to reconstruction) for FDR 2 samples and for cosmic data (A-lines measured in P4/5 – available for barrel sector 5 and EC) By integrate validated new dead matter and alignment data handling

12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN20Conclusions Lot of progress in many areas: –new dead matter –systematic clash fix Data force to improve realism: –RPC layout, CSC layout some revision of TGC probably necessary Data and full scale exercise (as FDR2) demonstrate that progress/dev. of sw components is driven by muon wide objectives  improve communication  from a recent example: from FDR2 planning to Alignment wg and software wg (geometry + db access + checks are reco. level) Still needed –better way of enforcing coherence: simul / reco / cablings svc.s –better definition of intermediate task “borders”  better scheduling of work to be done