Ballistics and navigation support for the Venera-D mission V. A. Shishov 1, V. A. Stepaniants 1, A. G. Tuchin 1, S. M. Lavrenov 2 (1)Keldysh Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miusskaya pl. 4, Moscow, Russia Lavochkin Research and Production Association,
Advertisements

15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using the Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator.
The ballistic support of the “SPECTR-RG” spacecraft flight to the L2 point of the Sun-Earth system I.S. Ilin, G.S. Zaslavskiy, S.M. Lavrenov, V.V. Sazonov,
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 3 MAE 5595
Space Engineering I – Part I
More Satellite Orbits Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
To the adaptive multibody gravity assists tours design in Jovian system for the Ganymede Landing. Grushevskii A.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A Method of Orbits Designing Using Gravity Assist Maneuvers to the Landing.
Multiobjective Optimization of Multiple-Impulse Transfer between Two Coplanar Orbits using Genetic Algorithm Nima Assadian *, Hossein Mahboubi Fouladi.
Golubev Yu.F., Grushevskii A.V., Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G. A method of orbits designing using gravity assist maneuvers to the landing.
Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Chapter 5 Projectile Motion and Satellites. Projectile Motion Describe the motion of an object in TWO dimensions Describe the motion of an object in TWO.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
Unit 2 GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT & SPACE SEGMENT
Presented by Rehana Jamal (GIS Expert & Geographer) Dated: Advance Applications of RS/GIS in Geo-Environmental Conservation Subject Lecture-6.
Satellite communications and the environment of space Images: NASA.
The project of the scientific - educational small satellite for research of Earth upper atmosphere density Prof. Igor Belokonov
Chpt. 5: Describing Orbits By: Antonio Batiste. If you’re flying an airplane and the ground controllers call you on the radio to ask where you are and.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
AT737 Satellite Orbits and Navigation 1. AT737 Satellite Orbits and Navigation2 Newton’s Laws 1.Every body will continue in its state of rest or of uniform.
Today’s APODAPOD  Read NASA website:  solarsystem.nasa.gov solarsystem.nasa.gov  IN-CLASS QUIZ THIS FRIDAY!!  Solar Lab, Kirkwood, Rooftop this week.
Róbert Adam.  GLONASS = Global navigation satellite system (Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema)  Radio-based satellite navigation operated.
Method of Virtual Trajectories for the Preliminary Design of Multiple Gravity-Assist Interplanetary Trajectories Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
Dr Mark Cresswell Satellite Sensors EG5503.
Understand the factors and requirements associated with a spacecraft launch Understand the dynamics of Gravity Assist and the basic principles of placing.
Two Interesting (to me!) Topics Neither topic is in Goldstein. Taken from the undergraduate text by Marion & Thornton. Topic 1: Orbital or Space Dynamics.
DISTRIBUTION AMONG INDUSTRIES Space industry Power industry Rail transportation Different industries.
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.
THE DIURNAL TEMPERATURE REGIME OF THE SURFICIAL REGOLITH OF PHOBOS IN THE LANDING SITE REGION OF THE FOBOS-GRUNT LANDER FOR DIFFERENT SEASONS: THE MODEL.
Mark Beckman - Flight DynamicsMB-1 Lunar Flight Dynamics Mark Beckman July 12, 2012.
IPPW-9, Toulouse 2012A. Sánchez Hernández, UPC D YNAMICAL STUDY OF THE AEROBRAKING TECHNIQUE IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF M ARS Alberto Sánchez Hernández ETSEIAT.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
Radiation environment estimates for Europa lander mission M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I. S. Veselovsky 1,2, A. A. Sukhanov 2 1.
Finding Your Way— Maps, Compass and GPS Eagle Vision 2005.
The law of orbits:  All planets move in elliptical orbits, with the sun at one focus.
Satellites.
A SATELLITE CONSTELLATION TO OBSERVE THE SPECTRAL RADIANCE SHELL OF EARTH Stanley Q. Kidder and Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute for Research.
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
Space platform and Orbits Introduction to Remote Sensing Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung.
UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED Lesson 2 Basic Orbital Mechanics A537 SPACE ORIENTATION A537 SPACE ORIENTATION.
Optoelectronic System for the Takeoff, Approach and Landing a Helicopter on a Ship “SAGA”
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION "PHOBOS-GRUNT" PROJECT MISSION CONCEPT & CURRENT STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT IKI, 13 October.
TRACKING OF PHOBOS-GRUNT MISSION IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Alexander S. Samotokhin, Andrey G. Tuchin M.V. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Interplanetary Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker University of Colorado – Boulder Lecture 29: Interplanetary 1.
Spaceweather Working Group Spaceweather Working Group Earth Science Mission Operations Eric Moyer ESMO Deputy Project Manager - Technical
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
Categories of Satellites
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
The Motion of Planets Kepler’s laws Johannes Kepler.
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
Different scenarios of the “Venera-D” mission KIAM Ballistic Center Team (Keldysh Institute Of Applied Mathematics RAS)
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Deployment Optimization for Various Gravitational Wave Missions
Lunar Trajectories.
Mikhail Koptev Yaroslav Mashtakov Mikhail Ovchinnikov Sergey Shestakov
LRO Mission Baseline Ephemeris v10.0
AGI’s EAP Curriculum Orbital Mechanics Lesson 3 - Orbital Transfers
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Ballistics and navigation support for the Venera-D mission V. A. Shishov 1, V. A. Stepaniants 1, A. G. Tuchin 1, S. M. Lavrenov 2 (1)Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, (2)Moscow State Institute of Electronics and Mathematics (Technical University) Moscow 2012

Comparison of probable start windows by summary costs of characteristic velocities Departure date Arriving dateFlight durance (days) Departure Velocity (km/sec) Arriving Velocity (km/sec) Velocity sum (km/sec)

Isolines of the total characteristic velocities for the 2020 start window По оси абсцисс – даты старта, по оси ординат – продолжительность перелёта (в сутках). На перекрестье красных линий – оптимальная дата старта ( ) и продолжительность перелёта (196 суток). Optimal date to start Transition duration 196 days Dates are on the axis of abscissa Flight durations are on axis of the ordinates (in days)

Main ballistics tasks to be solved during the Venera-D mission Pointing for the on-Earth tracking stations Trajectory measurement raw processing Determination and forecast of the SC motion parameters Maneuver and adjustment calculations Data calculations for the on-board control system Scientific program providing

Flight trajectory adjustments Insertion into transfer orbit after motion on the orbit around the Earth The first correction is performed on the seventh day of the flight. The second correction is performed four days prior to the Venus approach. After performing the second correction and the DM separation the SC withdrawal maneuver is performed. The third motion correction of the SC is implemented one day before approaching for the trim purpose. The capture maneuver is performed at the outgoing hyperbola pericenter and the SC goes to the high eccentricity orbit around Venus.

Maneouver and correction execution errors 1.Errors of the flight path transfer impulse (the first) performance are 0.2% by value and 0.7° by direction. 2.Errors of the correction impulses (the second etc.) and the withdrawal maneouver are 0.5 m/sec by value and 0.7° by direction.

Orbital measurements in the project Venera-D carry on 1.up to 2 Mkm distances from tracking stations in Baikonur and Bear Lakes with Spectr-X facilities (antenna THA-57,diameter=12.5m); 2.at distances more than 1.5 Mkm from tracking stations in Ussuriisk(antenna P-2500, diameter=70 m) and Bear Lakes (antenna TNA-1500, diameter=64 m) equipped with large radars. Radiated frequency: 7.1–7.2 GHertz. On-board frequency conversion coefficient: 880/749. Zone of unambiguous measurement of the range (in the slant distance sense): 1023 km. Measurement errors: 20 m by range, 0.2 mm/sec by range rate.

Flight trajectory measurement program On the path part prior to the first correction the measurements are carried on daily, four tracking stations being on duty up to distances 2 Mkm, two ones being on service after this threshold. On the path part after the first correction the measurements are carried on every four days, two tracking stations in the Bear Lakes and Ussuriisk being at work. The measurements are carried on by two tracking stations daily during two weeks prior to the second correction fulfillment. And after second correction two tracking stations do measurements one time weekly.

The scheme of the Descent Module (DM) delivery One should provide with the prescript Venus atmosphere enter angle, illumination constraints and radio vision conditions from the on-ground tracking stations as well. These circumstances are ensured by two corrections on the flight trajectory: namely on the seventh day of flight and the four days prior to entering Venus atmosphere. The DM escapes the main SC and does autonomous flight after the second correction. The Orbital Apparatus (OA) performs the withdrawal maneuver and then the trim maneuver to transfer at the outgoing hyperbola with given inclination (90º) and given pericenter height (250 km) where it get the braking impulse to go on the elliptical orbit around Venus. With all that the ОА should reach the minimum distance up to Venus the four hours earlier than the DM would reach its atmosphere. In entering the Venus atmosphere the DM has to connect with the OA which would retransmit the telemetrical flow to the Earth.

The scheme of the Descent Module (DM) delivery

Ballistics destination areas on the Venus surface in 2020 – 2026 years 2020 г2021 г2023 г 2024 г 2026 г

Dependence of angles the Earth-Decent Module-Venus (E-L-V) and the Sun-Decent Module-Venus (S-L-V) from landing longitudes for 2020 year

The period options for the main SC orbits and for the subsattellite orbits № The subsattellite orbit period, (hours) The main SC orbit period (hours)

Option 1. The main SC orbit elements after setting in the Venus orbit ParameterValue Semiaxis ( tkm) Eccentricities0.899 Inclination ( degrees)90.0 Longitude of the ascending node (degrees)240.2 Argument of the pericenter (degrees)334.4 Mean motion (n) rad/tsec Period (hours)48.0 Distance at the pericenter (tkm) Height at the pericenter (km) Distance at apocenter (tkm) Height at apocenter (km) Latitude of the under-satellite point (degrees)– Longitude of the under-satellite point (degrees)

Energy costs of the SC to maneuver on the Venus satellite orbits (VSO) The transition impulse module to the VSO is equal to 648 m/sec. The transition impulse module from the two days orbit period to the one day orbit period is equal to 158 m/sec.

The SC orbit motion determination on the VSO Range and range rate measurements The Earth Tracking station Line of sight Possible change of the SC apocenter

Enumeration of error sources for the SC motion and the count model Insufficient accuracy for the Venus gravity field taken into account for fast operative work ; the NASA RS-SHTJV360 gravity model has order 360x360; Availability of the unaccounted micro-accelerations because of attitude engine burns; Inaccurate accounting of the solar radiation pressure influence Inexactness in the relative motion of Venus to the Earth

Conclusions 1. With optimizing mission energy costs we get that the Decent Module area location on Venus turned out to be off direct radiovision from the Earth and isn’t illuminated by the Sun. Hence telemetry from Decent Module has to communicate through the Orbital Craft and the Decent Module performance capacity has to maintain by inner source. 2. Changing in the ballistics scheme to ensure the sharp navigation calls for additional energy costs. 3. It is advisable to construct the task of joint determination for motion parameters of the SC, Venus and the Earth within a single dynamical model.