Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Peninsula School District
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290/ACTIVITIES STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR CLASSIFIED WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 SOESD’S IMPLEMENTATION STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATOR EVALUATION PROJECT Presentation to the SLCSD Board of Education May 7, 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
THIS IS With Host... Your The CLASS Team CLASS Elements Who’s Who OCSD Evaluation Do you know? Clear the AIR. 100.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
ENHANCING A CULTURE OF EXCELLENCE Summer 2015 Accountability Commitment Excellence.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
Special Education Educator Evaluation and Professional Growth.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
To Test or Not to Test?...that is the question! By: Sandy Church and Linda Lerch.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Quality Compensation Program
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
University Supervisors
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Hello Adam Cibulka Chuck Syperski
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups (OCEA, OSEA, School Board, and Admin) Sub-committees – Classroom educators and classified from various grade levels Our Staff – Certified, Classified, and administrators ODE coaches ODE Collaboration grant NEA NEA Foundation Grant

Evaluation Prior to 2011 Educator creates an Individual Professional Growth Plan (PGP) – completed annually Traditional Evaluation (3X) Scheduled pre-observation meeting and planning Formal observation Post observation conference Summative (three levels – meets, area for improvement, does not meet) Non-Traditional Evaluation (contracted educator) Mutually agreed upon goals that are monitored Scheduled conferences to monitor progress (evidence) Summative (three levels – meets, area for improvement, does not meet)

Evaluation Pilot (SY11-12 & 12-13) Evaluation Process – Educators do a self-assessment on the domains (Charolette Danielson) Educators complete an Individual Growth and Evaluation form (SMART format) to set goals (2) SLO were added in to a pilot group w/ mid-year check Educator has a Professional Growth and Evaluation conference to go over goals with administrator/supervisor

Evaluation Pilot (SY11-12 & 12-13) Continued Educator completes a Professional Growth and Evaluation reflection on the domains and teaching Summative meeting with administrator/supervisor to review progress. 2 nd. Year of pilot (12-13) will determine educator placement on the continuum Beginning in we will use a matrix model for our summative (professional practice and student growth)

Evaluation Pilot - Observations Kim Marshall Observation style 5 mini-observations (unannounced) per year during the pilot (minimum) 2 formal feedback (verbal and written) 3 informal feedback (verbal, but can be written) Formal observation is available if requested (educator/admin) Observation feedback is included in the summative evaluation. A summative score.

Observations Differentiated Beginning

Professional Development Additional Professional Development TeachScape on-line PD of domains 2 and 3 Including training in each bldg. on how to use Implementation of TalentEd to house all evaluation and observation documents SLO workshop for Educators (pilot) Additional use of PLC time by staff to understand the domains of the evaluation system and to improve teaching All administrators have received and continue to receive inter-rater reliability training on the domains

Aligned Professional Development Increased discussion and dialogue on student learning outcomes and student engagement Creation of Teacher Educator Leaders and Mentor/Mentee opportunities CLASS 101 for Educators to understand the new evaluation system and mini-observations CLASS 201 for Administrators to understand their role in the new evaluation system and for them to learn about their new evaluation system

Professional Development Next Steps Continued PD on the domains Training for all staff on Student Learning Outcomes Analyzing the summative data for additional supports as needed Creating a menu of PD opportunities for staff to use on-line Continued Mentor/mentee opportunities

Communication CLASS Design Team wiki All documents and information related to what we are doing CLASS Newsletters and monthly updates within district

Questions Oregon City Contact Info: Brent Leong CLASS Phoenix Coordinator Teresa Figgins CLASS Sub-committee member Cindy Williams OCEA President