Bacterial chemotaxis Dr. habil. Kőhidai László 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Receptor clustering and signal processing in E.coli Chemotaxis Ref.1----TRENDS in Microbiology Vol.12 No.12 December 2004 Ref.2----PNAS Vol. 102 No. 48.
Advertisements

Lecture 2, Oct 11 Important points from 10/7:
Bacterial motility, chemotaxis Lengeler et al. Chapter 20, p Global regulatory networks and signal transduction pathways.
5/10/2015Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
Prokaryotic Cell Structure and function (Part II) Prokaryotic Cell Structure and function (Part II) BIO3124 Lecture #3 (II) 1.
Flagella Slender rigid structures
Chemotaxis and Motility in E. coli Examples of Biochemical and Genetic Networks Background Chemotaxis- signal transduction network Flagella gene expression.
Cell Structure and Function Chapter 3 Basic Characteristics of Cells Smallest living subdivision of the human body Diverse in structure and function.
Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis Lengeler et al. pp
Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis UCSF iGEM Team 2006 Patrick Visperas Matthew Eames Eli Groban Ala Trusina Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao.
Sept 25 Biochemical Networks Chemotaxis and Motility in E. coli Examples of Biochemical and Genetic Networks Background Chemotaxis- signal transduction.
Tuning Bacterial Behaviour Judy Armitage University of Oxford Department of Biochemistry and Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology StoMP 2009.
CHAPTER 8 Metabolic Respiration Overview of Regulation Most genes encode proteins, and most proteins are enzymes. The expression of such a gene can be.
Differentiation Cell & Molecular Biology. Genetic Control All cells in the body have the same genetic information Not all cells are identical. Cellular.
Sites of regulation. Feedback inhibition Mechanism of allosteric inhibition.
Chemotaxis: Another go Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre Birmingham University.
Modeling the chemosensing system of E. coli
2 component regulatory systems Maltose=effector, BUT if signal not DIRECTLY involved, but needs to be transmitted and changed = signal transduction Sensor.
Bacterial Physiology (Micr430) Lecture 15 Bacterial Physiological Adaptation (Text Chapter: 18.1; 18.5; 18.7) Note: we are switching the order of topics.
Bacterial Chemotaxis Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre University of Birmingham, UK March 2007 Dr. Chrisantha Fernando Systems Biology Centre.
Ab initio genotype-phenotype association reveals intrinsic modularity in genetic networks (in bacteria) Olivier Elemento, Tavazoie lab.
The flagellar motor is reversible CCW: runCW: tumble.
Other Extracellular Layers Outer membrane Capsule Sheath Cell Appendages Filamentous, small: Fimbriae, Pili, & Spinae Filamentous, large: Flagella Outer.
Proteins (aka polypeptides)
BIOC3800 Sensory Transducers Dr. J.A. Illingworth.
Gene Expression and Regulation
Translation mRNA exits the nucleus through the nuclear pores In the cytoplasm, it joins with the other key players to assemble a polypeptide. The other.
Bacterial chemotaxis lecture 2 Manipulation & Modeling Genetic manipulation of the system to test the robustness model Explaining Ultrasensitivity and.
1 Introduction to Biological Modeling Steve Andrews Brent lab, Basic Sciences Division, FHCRC Lecture 1: Introduction Sept. 22, 2010.
Overview of next five lectures: How is directional motility accomplished at the single cell level? An emphasis on experimental approaches for testing models.
Adaptation Essential for sensory perception Nearly universal Salmonella How to move towards unseen food?
Robustness in protein circuits: adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis 1 Information in Biology 2008 Oren Shoval.
Two - Component Signal Transduction modular stimulas-response systems  Response Regulator: conserved receiver domain + specific effecter domain  Histidine.
March 8, 2007March APS Meeting, Denver, CO1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana.
Cell Communication Chapter Cell Communication: An Overview  Cells communicate with one another through Direct channels of communication Specific.
Fig 7.1. Fig 7.2 The bacteria flagella motor [source: Berg HC, Ann. Rev. Biochem 2003] Fig 7.3.
Life Sciences-HHMI Outreach. Copyright 2009 President and Fellows of Harvard College. Daniel Smith - Sanborn Regional High School Summer 2009 Workshop.
1/2/2016Yang Yang, Candidacy Seminar1 Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis Yang Yang and Sima Setayeshgar Department of Physics Indiana University,
FLAGELLAR MOTORS.
Loose Ends on Chapters 3,5,6 SummerMicrobiology. Spore survival Dipicolinic acid and Ca++ account for 15% of the total spore mass Dipicolinic acid theoretically.
Protein and cell nano-structures. Electron Carriers Function in Multienzyme Complexes The electron carriers of the respiratory chain are organized into.
Microbiology and Molecular Biology for Engineers IGEM, 20 June 2006.
Dr. Laila M. Matalqah Ph.D. Pharmacology Pharmacodynamics 1 General Pharmacology M212.
PROTEINS L3 BIOLOGY. FACTS ABOUT PROTEINS: Contain the elements Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, and NITROGEN Polymer is formed using 20 different amino acids.
In-silico Implementation of Bacterial Chemotaxis Lin Wang Advisor: Sima Setayeshgar.
Approach…  START with a fine-tuned model of chemotaxis network that:  reproduces key features of experiments (adaptation times to small and large ramps,
SC430 Molecular Cell Biology Welcome to Unit 6 Seminar with Dr Hall-Pogar Tonight we will discuss –Biological processes in the cell –Diseases that result.
Transcription(I) 王之仰.
Dr. habil. Kőhidai László
Advanced Aspects of Chemotactic Mechanisms:
Signals and Responses Cell Communication.
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
The chemotaxis network of E. coli
Module 2: Robustness in Biochemical Signaling Networks
Bacterial Chemotaxis Bacteria swim toward attractants and away from repellents. Their motion is a biased random walk due to control of tumbling frequency.
Time for Bacteria to Slow down
Bacterial flagellar motor
Nutrient-Sensing Mechanisms across Evolution
Dr. habil. Kőhidai László
Signal transduction: Gyrating protein kinases
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
The Turn of the Screw: The Bacterial Flagellar Motor
Mechanism of chemotaxis in E
Rasika M Harshey, Ikuro Kawagishi, Janine Maddock, Linda J Kenney 
Bacterial chemotaxis: The five sensors of a bacterium
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Near-Perfect Adaptation in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Simulating cell biology
Presentation transcript:

Bacterial chemotaxis Dr. habil. Kőhidai László 2012.

Diverse swimming behaviours of chemotaxis and their interpretation regarding concentration gradients and cell size

Bacterial flagellum nm monotrich lopotrich peritrich Main composing protein: flagellin (53.000) pentahelical structure fast regeneration (3-6 min.)  5

stator rotor „hook” flagellum S L P M   22.5 nm 27 nm Structure of basal body of bacterial flagellum

CCW CW Correlation of swimming types and direction of flagellar rotation in bacteria tumbling

R M Berry: Torque and switching in the bacterial flagellar motor. An electrostatic model. Biophys J April; 64(4): 961–973

Gradient Length of linear path Number of tumblings Gradient Length of linear path Number of tumblings

E. coli

Bacterial chemotaxis and adaptation Swimming of cells is influenced NOT ONLY by the changes of concentration of the ligand. Adaptation mechanisms refer to the presence of a ‘primitive’ memory of cells !

periplasmaticbinding/transportmolecules sugars dipeptides amino acids chemotaxisreceptpors intracellullar signalling pathway

Detection of bacterial cheotaxis receptors receptor clusters division furrow/ring

Aspartate receptor ligand binding domain domain „coiled-coil” domain residues for methylation signal transmitter domain

COO COO ligand binding domain residues for methylation 8 db szignal transmitter domain in basal activity Composition of Asp receptor

COO COO C O O C O O COO COO CH 3 Methylation of Asp chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase methylesterase

CheA-P + CheY CheY-P+ CheA CheACheA-P CheY-P + CheZ CheY + P i CW rotation „tumbling” Mg 2+ CheW, CheB-P Repellent molecule 200 ms

CheA - activity CheY-P - amount direction of H + transport in the motor region of flagellum is reversed CCW rotation „swimming” Attractant molecule

T ap T rg T sr T ar dipeptides galactoseribose Leu, Ser Ni 2+, Asp CheR CheB-P CheB CheA CheA-P CheY CheY-P CheW CheZ MOTOR

MalE RbsB MglB DppA Ser Asp Maltose Ribose D-Gal Dipeptide Gases Tsr Tar Trg Tap Aer CheA CheW CheR CheB CheY CheZ FliGFliMFliN MotA =MotB +m -m +P +P -P m = methylation P = phosphorylation

CH 3 CheB-P CheB CheA CheA Che A-P CheY CheY-P Repellent molecules Receptor Effector

CheACheW CheV -P CheY CheC CheX FliY Motor app CheZ Pi P- Pi Sink P- CheB H2OH2O Methanol CheD H2OH2O NH 3 -P ATP ADP -CH 3 CheR SAM Homocyst L

Structure of CheY

Structure of ChA - ChY complex

Significant flagellar proteins of bacteria FlgK -„hook” region FlgK -„hook” region FlgD-determines the length FlgB, C, G - connecting „rod” FlgB, C, G - connecting „rod” FliF - M-ring FliF - M-ring Mot A - transmembrane proton-channel Mot A - transmembrane proton-channel Mot B -linker protein Mot B -linker protein Fli G -CheY-CheZ Fli G -CheY-CheZ Fli M-connections Fli N-

Flagellar proteins Determined by more than 30 genes organized into Determined by more than 30 genes organized into several operons several operons Their synthesis / expression is regulated by Their synthesis / expression is regulated by Sigma 28 factor Sigma 28 factor „Hook associated protein” (HAP) : „Hook associated protein” (HAP) : - nucleation point of flagellins - increases the mechanical stability Main classes: Fli, Flg, Flh Main classes: Fli, Flg, Flh

Characterization of bacterial chemotaxis proteins CheA - histidine autokinase CheA - histidine autokinase P amino acids, non inhibited region P amino acis, interacts with CheY  CheAL (long) - His48 autophosphorylation which is a component of the CheY and CheB activation component of the CheY and CheB activation  CheAL – its function is pH-dependent. Optimal pH Tar és Trg receptors signalling is turned on when cytopl. pH decreses below pH 7.6 when cytopl. pH decreses below pH 7.6  ChAS (short) – possesses kinase activity, but the subunit does not autophosphorylating does not autophosphorylating - the aminoterminal 97 aa. long sequence - the aminoterminal 97 aa. long sequence is missing is missing

CheA hyper kinase – ponit mutation in Pro337 which results a faster phosphorylation CheA hyper kinase – ponit mutation in Pro337 which results a faster phosphorylation CheA - regulates phsphorylation of CheV CheA - regulates phsphorylation of CheV CheN - present in Bacillis substilisban and homologue to CheA of E. coli CheN - present in Bacillis substilisban and homologue to CheA of E. coli Characterization of bacterial chemotaxis proteins

CheY - Composed by 128 aa., its phosphorylation results a CheY - Composed by 128 aa., its phosphorylation results a conformational change in positions listed below: conformational change in positions listed below: 17, 21, 23, 39, 60, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 85, 86, 87, 88, 94, 107, 109, 112, 113, 114, , 86, 87, 88, 94, 107, 109, 112, 113, 114, 121 Presence of Mg 2+ is essential for activation of CheY; Presence of Mg 2+ is essential for activation of CheY; Mg 2+ results the release of salt bond Lys109 - Asp 57 Mg 2+ results the release of salt bond Lys109 - Asp 57 which makes possible the phosphorylation Characterization of bacterial chemotaxis proteins

H P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Phosphorylation RR-bdg. Dimer Catal. CheW rec bdg. Che A (kb. 650 AA) Che Y (kb. 120 AA) N C DD D T/S K DD D T/S K Mg 2+ bdg. Phosphorylation Catal. NC

Characterization of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis proteines (MCP) proteines (MCP) MCP1 - Tsr, MCP2 - Tar, MCP3 - Trg, MCP4 - Tap MCP1 - Tsr, MCP2 - Tar, MCP3 - Trg, MCP4 - Tap H kD pI 5.1; H kD pI 5.1; H kD pI 5.3 H kD pI 5.1; H kD pI 5.1; H kD pI 5.3 DcrA - composed by 668 aa., oxygen sensor composed by DcrA - composed by 668 aa., oxygen sensor composed by hem and 2 hydrophobic sequences - hem and 2 hydrophobic sequences - induced by changes in redox-potential induced by changes in redox-potential (Desulfovibrio vulgaris) (Desulfovibrio vulgaris) Tlpc - 30% homology with E.coli MCP; Tlpc - 30% homology with E.coli MCP; its defect resulst the loss of pathological chemotaxis

Methylation is a food molecule dependent process (e.g. E.coli) Methylation is a food molecule dependent process (e.g. E.coli) Starvation results the methylation of a membrane associated Starvation results the methylation of a membrane associated 43kDprotein; - in the presence of food the methylation is stopped The link between the methylation system and activation The link between the methylation system and activation of chemotaxis points to the essential common phylogenetical of chemotaxis points to the essential common phylogenetical background of chemotaxis receptor and the signalling background of chemotaxis receptor and the signalling process. process. Characterization of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis proteines (MCP) proteines (MCP)

MCP-k demethylation MCP-k demethylation Attractant MCP-CH 3 -CH 3 CARRIER CARRIER Methanol + CARRIER slow rapid The non methylated intermedier results „tumbling”, then the ADAPTATION takes place. then the ADAPTATION takes place. Characterization of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis proteines (MCP) proteines (MCP)

Detection of MCP-fluorescence in diverse phenotype cells phenotype cells

Adaptation - Tumbling

Accumulation of cells in in the rings representing optimal concentrations - adaptation Ser ring Asp ring

Methylation – Effect of carbohydrate type ligands

Methylation – Time dependence

Chemotaxis - Evolution Methyl-transferases CheR Homology: E.coli methyl-transferase methylates MCP of Bac. subst. Difference: Bac. subst. CheRB Adaptation to repellents E.coli CheREAdaptation to attractants

Methyl-esterases CheB Homology: Bac.subst. MCP E.coli CheB + ATTRACTANT DEMETHYLATION Bac.subst. CheB E.coli MCP + ATTRACTANT MCP determines the kinetics of reactions Chemotaxis - Evolution DEMETHYLATION

E. coli B. subst. C. gelida Dynamics of methanol-production and the ligand specificity

Chemotaxis - Evolution Bac.subst. CheY Bac.subst. CheY E.coli CheA E.coli CheA Bac.subst. CheY-P Bac.subst. CheY-P E.coli CheZ E.coli CheZ CheY-P CheY Bac.subst. positive chemotaxis - CheY-P Bac.subst. positive chemotaxis - CheY-P E.coli positive chemotaxis - Chey-P E.coli positive chemotaxis - Chey-P Bac.subst. and E. coli CheW 28.6% homology Bac.subst. and E. coli CheW 28.6% homology Bac. subst. CheB and E.coli CheY 36% homology Bac. subst. CheB and E.coli CheY 36% homology Bac. subst. and E. coli - M ring and rod Bac. subst. and E. coli - M ring and rod

Effect of Ca 2+ on the bacterial chemotaxis 38kD, Ca 2+ -binding protein is detectable 38kD, Ca 2+ -binding protein is detectable Ca 2+ channel blockers (e.g. verapamil, LaCl 3 ) Ca 2+ channel blockers (e.g. verapamil, LaCl 3 ) disturbs chemotaxis disturbs chemotaxis

Sigma factor Che ? Sigma28CheY CheB CheW Bas.body The Sigma28 factor coding gene is part of a 26 kb operon The Sigma28 factor coding gene is part of a 26 kb operon Regulates synthesis of flagellin, „hook-assoc. protein” (HAP) Regulates synthesis of flagellin, „hook-assoc. protein” (HAP) and some motor proteins and some motor proteins Deficiency: paralytic flagellum; MCP deficiency Deficiency: paralytic flagellum; MCP deficiency

Measurement of bacterial chemotaxis in 3-channel system