ENAR conference on the transposition of the Race Directive – building strategies for equality SHIFT OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF Barbara Cohen, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EQUINET E UROPEAN N ETWORK OF E QUALITY B ODIES The role of National Equality Bodies in the implementation of EU equal treatment legislation.
Advertisements

Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.2 Answers. What is the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
The right to a fair hearing before the Mental Health Review Board – what it means and how to ensure it Catherine Leslie Lawyer / Pro Bono Coordinator Mental.
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
1 Implementation impacts of the EU directives on foreign employment - Single Permit Directive, Employers Sanctions Directive in Germany Caritas Association.
Establishing Foreign Law Source: Gerhard Dannemann: Establishing Foreign Law in a German Court, German Law Archive,
Framing Antidiscrimination in Europe : Comparative findings and policy recommendations Eléonore Lépinard and Patrick Simon - INED.
The Disability Discrimination Act. The DDA (1995) originally applied only to education institutions as employers and service organisations. The Special.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
CHAPTER 1 The sources and institutions of employment law.
EU Anti-Discrimination Legislation Tansy Hutchinson Policy Officer European Network Against Racism.
Community anti-discrimination legislation: possible developments and interpretations Evelyn Ellis.
Equal Opportunity Law Sex and Race Discrimination
UNFAIR DISMISSALS ACTS 1977 – UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS THESE ACTS GIVE REDRESS FOR DISMISSALS WHICH ARE DEEMED TO BE UNFAIR.
EQUINET LEGAL SEMINAR DISCRIMINATION CASES IN FRONT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT S AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL EQUALITY BODIES Wednesday 28 March 2012, Brussels.
Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) Recent case-law of the CJEU: enforcement.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
UK equality law developments Professor Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers and Kings College London.
Development of NGO lobbying strategy on the transposition of the Race Directive Patrick Yu Executive Director N.I. Council for Ethnic Minorities.
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE UK POLICE SERVICE Click on slide-show icon When completed exit PowerPoint programme to return to the CD- ROM content.
ENAR Policy Seminar From Racism to Equality? Realising the potential of European Anti- Discrimination Law 6-7 October 2006 Brussels.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
THE NEW LEGAL FRAMEWORK KEY CONCEPTS UNDERLYING THE EU DIRECTIVES AND PROGRESS TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION.
The European Union Race Directive attorney Lilla Farkas LLM.
JáN KIMÁK LEGAL CONCEPT OF EQUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL LAW
LEGAL STUDIES Unit 4 AOS2 Overview U4.AOS2. Unit 4 Area of Study 2 Unit 4 Area of Study 2 Court processes and procedures, and engaging in justice 1. Elements.
KEY EMPLOYMENT & DISCRIMINATION CASES 2010 Alison Collins 9 th February 2011.
10th Annual AIJA Tribunals Conference Melbourne Session 8: Current Practical Matters of Interest to Tribunals and Tribunal Members Lawyers in Tribunal.
The Equality Commission Role and Services
International legal frameworks Combating discrimination Luk Zelderloo, EASPD Secretary General 19 th – 20 th March 2009.
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
1 Community Legislation on Equal Treatment DG ‘Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities’ Equality, Action against Discrimination: Legal Questions.
Data collection on discrimination complaints Developing an Equinet data collection template on com- plaints to quasi-judicial equality bodies Barbara Liegl.
Week 6 Definitions and forms of discrimination; institutional racism 30 March 2006.
Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the federal judges The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the federal.
Gender and Access to Justice Gender and the Law, November 17th-18th 2011, St Lucia Mary Stacey.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Ensure all mobiles are switched off Feel free to ask questions – just raise your hand first Have your précis notes (Ch.10.
European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) & GLOBEA Anti-discrimination seminars: the EU Race Equality Directive European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) & GLOBEA Anti-discrimination.
Equinet Legal Seminar 30 June 2009 ECJ limits in discrimination. Preliminary ruling procedure before ECJ. How national equality bodies can make use of.
European Commission Employment & Social Affairs European Union against Discrimination Article 13 European Legislation to Combat Discrimination ENAR Conference,
Equinet Legal Seminar 1 July 2010 New Equinet report: Influencing the Interpretation of the Law – Powers and Practices of Equality Bodies Nanna Margrethe.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
Equinet Legal Seminar 11 October 2010 Collecting evidence – practical shortcomings of the traditional tools of evidence in discrimination cases PhD Bjørn.
Starting Line: reflections on the campaign for a European directive? Patrick Yu Executive Director of NICEM Former Chair of Starting Line.
CHARTER SECTIONS 15, 16-23, 24, 27, 32, 33. Section 15 – EQUALITY RIGHTS 1. Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the.
CHAPTER 6 Discrimination on the grounds of sex, sexual orientation, race, religion or belief.
1 Equality Impact Assessment- Legal & Policy Context Presented by Ionann Management Consultants Ltd ionann.co.uk January 2008 Qmul-EiaTrng SlideShow.ppt.
Stereotypes, structural inequality and human rights Dr Dimitrina Petrova 1.
The use of situation testing as evidence in legal proceedings Marton Udvari Legal Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic Minorities (NEKI)
Hungarian Best Practices -NGOs Combating Discrimination- Zsófia Moldova Hungarian Helsinki Committee.
The anti-discrimination legislation in Albania Presentation of the corresponding EU Directives and of their approximation.
Exclusions and Reviews. Key Points Permanent exclusion should only be used as last resort Decision to exclude must be lawful reasonable and fair A permanent.
Current challenges in the field of equality law Dr Sara Benedi Lahuerta Equinet Conference Strengthening the effectiveness.
Findings on how the legal system addresses multiple discrimination in healthcare Erica Howard, Senior Lecturer in Law, Middlesex University.
Protection of Roma Rights at the Domestic Level European Roma Rights Centre.
For more course tutorials visit PPA 403 Entire Course PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 1 Values in Administrative Law PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 2 The Federal.
PPA 403 MASTER Dreams Come True/ppa403master.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Dimitris Dimitriou European Commission EMPL/C3
HUMAN RIGHTS Discrimination
MULTIPLE AND INTERSECTIONAL DISCRIMINATION - CHALLENGES SERBIA
The Future of Equality law at Work
Overview of existing EC legislation on equal treatment between men and women and the role of the European Commission Rashmin Sagoo DG Employment, Social.
Systems of Redress Redress means to remedy (put right) a situation which is unfair. You need to know how these systems of redress can safeguard and promote.
THE EU POLICY TO FIGHT AGAINST DISCRIMINATION.
Presentation for the Equinet Seminar on Tackling discrimination and protection for carers in Europe The Greek Labor Inspectorate and its cooperation with.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Justice in the Criminal Justice System
Current challenges in the field of equality law
Anti-discrimination Law and Practice in Slovakia Lessons Learned
Presentation transcript:

ENAR conference on the transposition of the Race Directive – building strategies for equality SHIFT OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF Barbara Cohen, UK

shift of the burden of proof - background very difficult for the victim to prove discrimination discriminator holds all of the information but unwilling to admit discrimination lack of consistency - in domestic courts and in different member states developed from ECJ decisions in ‘equal pay’ cases

shift of the burden of proof - the Race Directive Article 8 Member States must make appropriate changes in their national judicial systems If victim establishes facts from which direct or indirect discrimination may be presumed, then it is for the respondent to prove there has been no breach of the principle of equal treatment Does not apply to criminal proceedings Not required to be applied to investigative procedures

shift of the burden of proof - how does it work DIRECT DISCRIMINATION: 1.Victim must establish difference in racial or ethnic origin and difference in treatment 2. THEN - unless respondent can provide another satisfactory explanation 3. Court or tribunal must uphold complaint of direct racial discrimination

shift of the burden of proof - how does it work INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION: 1.Victim must show a provision, criterion or practice that particularly disadvantages persons of a racial or ethnic origin 2. AND IF respondent cannot provide another satisfactory explanation 3. THEN – unless respondent can justify 4. Court or tribunal must uphold complaint of indirect racial discrimination

shift of the burden of proof - burden begins with the ‘victim’ Problem of obtaining evidence to show difference in treatment or ‘particular disadvantage’ -before begin legal proceedings -court or tribunal ordering respondent to disclose evidence - other sources of information role for NGOs: advising and representing victims of discrimination

shift of the burden of proof - the Race Directive Article 10 Duty of the Member State to make people aware of the shift of the burden of proof in race discrimination cases: To members of ethnic minority communities To all employers To all other public and private bodies To lawyers, judges and others who staff judicial agencies key roles for NGOs: to lobby national government and to help raise awareness