Investigations of Cell Phone Use While Driving in NC Jane Stutts William Hunter Herman Huang University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cell Phone Use While Driving Why it is a crash risk.
Advertisements

Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
ABATE SHARE THE ROAD MOTORCYCLE AWARENESS COURSE.
Chapter 1-3 Test Review Driver’s Education. List the 5 restrictions you must follow while on you special learners permit.
APHA-2006: Session Choice of denominator to measure disparities in motor vehicle crash deaths of teens and young adults Christopher J. Mansfield,
Good Drivers Just Driving! Driving and Mobile Phone BUILDING EFFICIENCY MIDDLE EAST AUGUST 2010.
1 Investigating Crash Interaction of Younger and Older Drivers Iowa State University Hossein Naraghi Masters Thesis Defense October 15, 2004.
Texas State Wide Injury Prevention Initiative 1. What is distracted driving? 2.
Chapter 1 You are the driver
STOPPING THE #1 KILLER OF TEENS IN AMERICA. TOO MANY TEENS ARE DYING Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens in America About 3,500 teens per.
First Annual Virginia Distracted Driving Summit David S. Zuby Chief Research Officer September 19, 2013 Richmond, Virginia.
Safety Meeting Cell Phone Safety EDM Services, Inc. May 2008.
Driver Distractions 3,328 deaths were caused by distracted driving crashes. Distracted driving is….. Any activity that diverts a persons attention away.
Early 2008 Highlights Office of Accident Records Lee Axdahl.
® © 2013 National Safety Council Safe Teen Driving Distractions Support for this project was provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a breaking response. [1] IE484 Lab Section 1 Jennifer Powell.
Kerri Procida Audience: year olds. .. There are more than 1,700 fatalities and 840,000 injuries yearly due to vehicle crashes off public highways.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
1 A comprehensive investigation of the risky driving behaviour of young novice drivers Presenter: Bridie Scott-Parker, PhD Candidate (Prof Barry Watson,
Delaware Office of Highway Safety Spring “Distraction occurs when a driver voluntarily diverts attention away from driving to something not related.
Distracted Driving Ashley DeYoung High School Drivers.
Distracted Driving Awareness
Traffic Safety Impacts of Digital Roadside Advertising in Alabama and Florida Virginia Sisiopiku, UAB K. Haleem, M. Islam, A. Gan, P. Alluri, A. Sullivan,
Cell Phone Use While Driving Why it is a crash risk.
Distractive Driving By: Karley Fiesel & Amber Werner.
In a brief paragraph: Your goal is to try and convince someone to stop using their phone (texting, ing, calls, etc.) while driving. What would.
Legislative Update Lieutenant Darrin Clark Illinois State Police.
DISTRACTED DRIVING/ TEXTING & DRIVING MICK MULHERN GOVERNOR’S TRAFFIC SAFETY BUREAU IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
THIS IS With your hosts Alabama Driver’s License Graduated Driver’s License Child Passenger Safety Distractions TriviaStatistics.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
NAME Prosecuting Attorney Distracted Driving. Common Traffic Issues Intoxicated Driving Intoxicated Driving Over The Limit, Under Arrest Over The Limit,
The Driver and Pedestrian Distraction Challenge Diane Wigle Safety Countermeasures Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April.
Learning To Drive Driving Factors. Inattention Inattention great enough to cause a crash can result from driving distractions or lack of sleep. Did You.
Texting while driving, To do or NOT to do? By: Jennifer M. Richards.
1 Car ownership, mileage, and risky driving among young intermediate drivers Presenter: Bridie Scott-Parker, PhD Candidate (Prof Barry Watson, Dr Mark.
Against Cell Phone Use While Driving Sylmarie Nunez-Luna Section 7.
Managing Risk When Driving. All Licensed Drivers – 191,275,719 All Drivers Involvement Rate in Fatal Crashes/100,000 Licensed Drivers – (37,795.
Response Time Transportation: Ch. 1, Act. 1. What do you think? How fast do you think you would be able to respond to an emergency situation on the road?
CHAPTERS 1 AND 2 Chapter 1 & 2 Driving: It’s a privilege not a right.
Distracted Driving in New York State: A Status Report Presentation at 29 th International Forum on Traffic Records and Highway Information Systems Denver,
2008 Missoula Long-Range Transportation Plan Survey May 20, 2008.
Task Force on Safe Teen Driving Joint Transportation Committee January 10, 2013.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
1 Driver Distractions: The Ticking Time Bomb Lee Whitehead Director, DDC State Program Administration September 2007.
Asleep at the Wheel: The Prevalence and Impact of Drowsy Driving.
Prepared for Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Office of Grants and Research, Highway Safety Division Traffic Safety Forum Presented.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
1 Public Library Use in Oregon Results from the 2006 Oregon Population Survey Oregon State Library March 2007.
Evaluation of Law Enforcement Presence on Changing Drivers’ Behaviors – Red Light Running International Traffic Records Forum July 2003.
Iowa STEM Monitoring Project Preliminary results from the Statewide Survey of Adult Attitudes Toward STEM Presented at the Governor’s STEM Advisory Council.
Shilah Snead High School Student Drivers What is distracted driving? driving a vehicle while engaging in another activity Can fall under 3 different.
Driver Education Mrs. Bell C-115
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Developing A Thesis Chapter 2.1 – In Search of Good Data
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Spanish university workers 學生 : 莊靖玟.
Tim Horberryb, Cathy Bubnicha, Laurence Hartleya,*, Dave Lamblea Drivers' use of hand-held mobile phones in Western Australia 學生. 莊靖玟.
DISTRACTED DRIVING. Overview: distracted driving > What is distracted driving? > What are the characteristics of distracted driving? > Attitudes and Concerns.
June 2016 Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Examine Teen Driver Behaviors Present in Motor Vehicle Crashes,
Cell Phones and Driving
IN CONTROL: BEYOND DISTRACTION WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT DISTRACTED DRIVING AND TEENS.
DISTRACTION NATION What drivers are willing to do
Welcome to Oregon Distracted Driving Kelly Kapri March 4, 2017
Prevalence of Distracted Driving
MS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISTRACTED DRIVING IN MISSISSIPPI 2011
Investigation and Prosecution of DISTRACTED DRIVING Cases
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Driver Education Programs and Implementing Effective Strategies The Nebraska Experience ADTSEA Conference 2018.
Running Red Lights Running red lights. A random digit dialing telephone survey of 880 drivers asked, “Recalling the last ten traffic lights you drove.
Presentation transcript:

Investigations of Cell Phone Use While Driving in NC Jane Stutts William Hunter Herman Huang University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center

Project Tasks: Statewide telephone survey of cell phone users and non-users. Analysis of characteristics of cell phone-related motor vehicle crashes. Supplemental data collection by NC State Highway Patrol.

Statewide Telephone Survey Goals Obtain updated information on cell phone use and user characteristics. Compare cell phone users to non-users. Obtain opinions of users and non-users on issues of cell phone safety and regulation. Obtain baseline measures for future comparisons.

Telephone Survey Conclusions 3 in 5 drivers have used a cell phone while driving. Usage highest in and age groups, and does not differ by gender or race. Average talk time decreases with age, and is higher for males than females. 1 in 4 users have a hands-free device, but not all use it.

Survey Conclusions (cont.) Users perceive talking on phones to be less distracting and less of a safety concern than non-users. Users less likely to support legislation that would prohibit anything other than hand-held phone use. Users less likely to support stricter penalties for cell phone drivers in crashes.

Identification and Analysis of Cell Phone Crashes Computerized search of NC crash report narratives from January 1996 through August 2000 Search words: answer, carphone, cell, dial Narratives read to determine their relevance 452 cell phone crashes identified –0.04% of all crashes (an underestimate) –Increased from 0.01% in 1996 to 0.15% in 2000

Sample Narratives Driver 1 bent down to answer car phone and ran into back of Veh. 2 which knocked Veh. 2 into rear of Veh. 3. Driver 1 stated that he ran off the roadway while trying to reach for his cell phone. (Not used) Driver 1 stated that she had just got out of the eye doctors office and her pupils were dialated and she ran the red light.

Data Limitations Search terms may have missed some narratives. Drivers may not admit they were using a cell phone. Officers may not ask about cell phone use. Extent of underreporting is not known. Hand-held vs. hands-free is not known.

Crash Severity for Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Urban vs. Rural Crashes for Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Gender of Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users in Crashes

Age of Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users in Crashes

Time of Day of Cell Phone vs. Non Cell Phone Crashes

Road Class for Cell Phone vs. Non Cell Phone Crashes

Vehicle Type for Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Violations for Crash-involved Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Summary of Findings Cell phone crashes more likely to occur: –On local roads and in urban areas –During mid-day or early afternoon hours Drivers involved in cell phone related crashes are more likely to be: –Ages –Male –Driving sport utility vehicles –Cited for failure to reduce speed or traffic signal violations

Special Data Collection by NC State Highway Patrol All 8 NC SHP districts participating Two month data collection period, May 15 - July 14, 2002.

Supplemental Data Collection Form “Complete this form for any crash where a cell phone was in use.” What type of cell phone was the driver using? (hand-held, hand-held with headset, etc.) What was the driver doing at the time of the crash? (talking, dialing, answering, etc.) How important was the cell phone in causing the crash? (very, somewhat, not at all, uncertain) How did you obtain information about cell phone use in this crash? (observed, driver volunteered, questioned driver, witness report, etc.) Estimated 11.8% of cell phone crashes statewide reported by NC HP. 1,475 projected crashes annually

Descriptive Results 29 cell phone crashes statewide over the 2-month data collection period –Only 1 hands-free phone –Predominantly occurred while talking on phone (9 crashes), followed by reaching for phone (5 crashes), dialing (4 crashes) and answering phone (3 crashes) –86% very significant, 14% somewhat significant in causing crash –Information most often volunteered by driver, but officers also questioned driver.

Cell Phone Crash Projections 29 cell phone crashes statewide over a 2-month period Translates to 174 crashes annually But only 11.8% of cell phone crashes statewide reported by NC SHP. 1,475 projected crashes annually

Full report can be accessed at: Thank You!

Survey Methods Random digit dial household telephone survey. Adults ages 18+, NC resident, valid driver’s license. Targeted 500 users, 150 non-users. At least 50 respondents in each of following age groups: 18-24, 25-39, 40-54, 55-69, 70+. Descriptive tabulations and multivariate regression analysis using SAS.

Screener Results Residency, age, driver license checks, plus “Do you talk on a cell phone while driving?” 1006 completions, 106 non-completions (90.5% of all contacts) 550/1006 cell phone users (54.7%)

Percent Using Cell Phone While Driving by Age Adjusted % using cell phone while driving: 58.8%

Age Distribution of Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Gender Distribution of Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Vehicle Type Distribution of Cell Phone Users vs. Non-users

Cell Phone Use Characteristics- Type of Hands Free System Hands-free 28% Headset 64% Speaker phone 33% Other 3%

Outgoing & Incoming Calls per Day by User Age

Outgoing & Incoming Calls per Day by User Gender

Opinions on Cell Phone Legislation (Percent who would vote to support)