SRPMIC Ozone Monitoring Sites Senior Center SiteHigh School Site Red Mountain Site Lehi Site.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
Advertisements

LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
QUALITY OF AIR PROTECTION 2008 Workshop –for West Balkan contries Importance of National References Laboratories for Air Quality role on the AQ/AC chain.
Ljupcho Grozdanovski Division for air quality monitoring Ministry of environment and physical planning Prizren, July 2013 Air Quality support meeting,
Linear Equations Review. Find the slope and y intercept: y + x = -1.
Objectives 10.1 Simple linear regression
Joe White (608) Wayne Chase (608) WisDOT Materials Management Section 1.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Region 11 Education Service Center January 28, 2015.
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Decisions, uncertainty, and the law Statistical considerations of environmental risk policy Peter Guttorp
Statistical Process Control
Section 2 - Concentration and Molarity
Statistical Process Control
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES & ACCREDITATION An Overview OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Environmental Protection & Natural Resources Air Quality Program.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Guest Speaker: Jeremy Howe Little River Band Of Ottawa Indians The Measuring Sticks of Air Monitoring.
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Monitoring For Ozone Donovan Rafferty Ecology Ron Cunningham Oregon DEQ Anthony Reneau Tanabyte Engineering A review for station operators.
Results you can rely on What Is New/Updated in Air Quality? TRC Companies, Inc. August 2011 TRC Companies, Inc. August 2011.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Precursor Gas Quality Assurance Implementation Dennis K. Mikel EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Gaseous Pollutants mini-course TAMS Center February 2009 Creating a Test Atmosphere.
Hartford Hospital Research Institute Time and Effort Reporting Prepared By: HHC Office of Compliance, Audit and Privacy Angelo Quaresima, Research Compliance.
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP, TAMS Center Tribal Air Monitoring and QA Requirements for NAAQS- Comparable Data.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Air Quality Program Environmental Protection & Natural Resources.
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Annabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Appendix A: Calculations for Data Quality Assessment QC check statistics Precision calcs Bias calcs PM stats Reporting: quarterly and annual.
NAAQS Altitude Effects Ozone Transport Commission Annual Meeting June 11, 2014 Baltimore, MD Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC
1 Dec. 11, 1997 LEADS Quality Control Systems Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
Air Quality Program Environmental Protection & Natural Resources Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Community Development Department (CDD) Environmental.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Strategic Planning for an Air Quality Program Ondrea Barber Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
Measurement Quality Objectives = Data Validation Requirements Excerpted from EPA QA Handbook Volume II (aka “Redbook”)
Testing of New Ozone Photometers Ozone Transport Commission/MANEVU Fall Meeting November 14, 2013 Washington, DC Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington,
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
Quality Management & Operations Support Branch Quality Assurance Section Presented By: Webster Tasat.
Section 5 Control Charts. 4 Control Chart Applications Establish state of statistical control Monitor a process and signal when it goes out of control.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Robert S. Wright US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC EPA Protocol Gases Fall 2012 Update PurityPlus Specialty Gas Producers.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 3. Definitions Quality Assurance - A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes of doing right.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Calibration Calibration of the analyzer establishes the relationship between actual pollutant concentration input and the analyzer response. Should be.
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
5.3: Write Equations in Point-Slope Formula
Leroy Williams GRIC DEQ Air Program
QA/QC Gaseous Pollutants mini-course TAMS Center February 2009.
Presentation transcript:

SRPMIC Ozone Monitoring Sites Senior Center SiteHigh School Site Red Mountain Site Lehi Site

Raw Data Traces Back to SRP Standard Reference Photometer (SRP) Ozone Primary Standard Ozone Transfer Standard Ozone Monitor Ozone Raw Data

13.Correct the concentration measured by the DAS by applying the latest calibration equation as: = where: Cda = the corrected concentration from the DAS (ppm), Cd = the measured concentration from the DAS (ppm), a = the intercept of the DAS calibration curve, and b = the slope of the DAS calibration curve. Referenced to QA Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program, EPA-454/B Section 12.2 when the calibration curve is subsequently used to compute concentration measurements x = (y - a)/m where y represents the analyzer response reading, a is the intercept and m is the slope, Section 12.4 EPA suggests the ambient readings be calculated from the most recent multipoint calibration curve or from a fixed nominal or universal calibration curve, and Section 12.5 Data Reduction Using Calibration Information. 14.Calculate the percent difference between the actual ozone concentration ( Ci ) and the corrected DAS concentration ( Cd ) for the audit and span concentrations as: Percent Difference = x 100% 15. Record all values on the "zero/span check and QC check" worksheet and the precision check control chart. Compare the percent difference with the quality control limits specified in the project Quality Assurance Plan. If the difference is outside of the limits, perform the necessary corrective action. Intercept value from Analyzer’s calibration curve Slope value from Analyzer’s calibration curve Raw data value

Statements from QA Handbook Volume II Calibration relationship are applied to analyzer responses to determine actual concentration Ideally, all ambient measurements obtained from an analyzer should be calculated on the basis of the most recent multi-point calibration The calibration slope and intercept used to calculate ambient measurements are updated only for major calibration When this calibration relationship is subsequently used to compute concentration measurements (x) from analyzer response reading (y), the formula is transposed to form, x = (y – b)/m.

It all starts with Transfer Standard’s certification Transfer Standard Certification Primary Standard Transfer Standard Make:API 400EMake:TECO 49C-PS S/N:1900S/N: Certified: DateSlopeInterceptCorrelatation 12/1/ /2/ /3/ /4/ /11/ /23/ /19/ /25/ /18/ /3/ /26/ /10/ /8/ /30/ AVG: STDEV: AQP\AIR MONITORING\Data Records Management\Certification\Ozone\75056 TS\TS Slope Records Average Slope and Intercept

Created slope & intercept from site monitor calibration Transfer Standard’s slope and intercept is integrated to calculate in the ozone Multi-Point Calibration Slope and intercept is created from site monitor Multi- Point Calibration Calibration relationships of slope & intercept are calculated to analyzer’s raw data to determine actual concentration

Data Correction in E-DAS Network when applying calibration relationship to actual concentration units

Process of correcting ambient data to actual data Example Ambient data is.0302 ppm (parts per million) Apply most recent analyzer calibration curve slope and intercept (1.001 and ) to calculate ambient data.0302 ppm and to determine the actual concentrations would be.0304 ppm ( )/ =.0304 ppm raw data – intercept slope EPA data reports are truncated

Sample of QC Data corrected to actual

Ozone Reporting Data to EPA Most Agency Data Report Report ambient data Ambient Data SRPMIC Data Report to EPA Report data that is actual concentration Correct ambient data to calibration relationship Ambient Data

Purpose Data is Corrected to Actual from Raw Have confidence data is corrected to the next level Data is fine tuned even though not much difference from raw data Data is more defensible especially when it is certified We maybe doing extra steps in adjusting data than other agencies but it is worth reporting actual data

Air Quality/Monitoring Staff Stan Belone, Environmental Engineer Mangas Slinkey, Senior Environmental Specialist Shimmy Smith, Environmental Specialist Administration Chris Horan, Manager, Environmental Protection & Natural Resources