FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEA as an aid in Design 1.Applying FEA to a fairly complex design can initially overburden us with information. We therefore need a method of analysing.
Advertisements

Mast Storage Rack NNSY Sean Ellis, Philip Crist, Max Carpenter, Gershom Obeng.
1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
Far Detector Assembly Block Pivot Table Design Review WBS Dave Pushka April 2 nd 2008.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
1 MC Assembly via Test Cell Crane FPA Stage 3 Peer Review August 12, 2005 T. Brown.
FEA as an aid to Design Andrei Lozzi 2014
Pipe Supports and Restraints
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Bridge Design Project Using SolidWorks and SolidWorks Simulation to design, test and build structures.
October 21, 2003LST Mechanical Design Review - SLACN. Yu BaBar IFR Upgrades An FEA Study of the Effects of Adding Brass Plates in the IFR.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 20: Connections
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
Senior Design: Validation of Design December 15, 2008.
IRMS Rotator Module Support Structure Conceptual Design B. Weber October 3, 2011.
Chapter Ten Jacquard Fabrics 10.1 Elements of Jacquard Shedding 10.2 Preparation for Designing the Jacquard Fabrics 10.3 Steps in construction of Jacquard.
APPENDIX A (RFI) FOR THE FABRICATION OF MULTIPLE STEEL REACTION STRUCTURES FOR NASA-MSFC STRUCTURAL TESTING Mike Roberts 12/2/09.
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. FDR Charge (answers were added below after the review) Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR - Charge to Reviewers –The.
Addendum to EDMS document “Instruction Manual for inserting the CMS ZDCs using the HXTC crane” In addition to the ZDC detectors in the TAN instrument.
Steel Erection These handouts and documents with attachments are not final, complete, or definitive instruments. This information is for guidance purposes.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
Chapter 29 Determining Simple Beams. 2 Links for Chapter 29 Loads & Supports Properties of Lumber Beam Design Related Web Sites.
LATLAT Beam Test Workshop 20th March GLAST Program Beam Test Workshop CU Outer Shipping Container Michele Pinchera
Industry Fundamentals and Occupational Safety Unit 6
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. Background Modular Coil winding forms are cast structures which provide the foundation on which the coils are constructed.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
1 MME3360b Assignment 04 10% of final mark 6 problems, each worth 16.7% of assignment mark Due April 9 th, 2012.
1 LHC-DFBX Shipping Specification Steve Virostek LBNL Presented at the DFBX RFP Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley US LHC.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
12.5 Method of Superposition:
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
TVAC Trolley Design Review1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September.
Flange Plates to be Welded to Beam Flanges.
The analysis runs in the following slides are based on a W8 x 58.0 wide beam with dimensions shown bellow.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
LAT Transport Container1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review 8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Final Design Review November 17, 2005 Man Access Port /Lateral Supports NCSX.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
Forklift pick set-up interfacing with a MCHP
Baby Mind C OIL DESIGN AND ASSEMBLY SCENARIOS Helder Silva Phillipe Benoit Alexey Dudarev Gabriela Rolando Herman ten Kate Etam Messomo Laurent Nicola.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
1 VV Support Fixture FPA Stage 1 PDR Review August 10, 2005 T. Brown.
6-Mar-2016 Dan Wenman | FC Installation 1 APA installation and integration at CERN Shipment of APAs APA handling Acceptance testing Tools needed.
ORKA support - status report Scope of conceptual design task Develop a conceptual design for how to support the ORKA detector inside the CDF detector Develop.
K.Long/G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Status CM20 Feb 08 1 Mice Tracker Mechanical Status Contents:- Tracker 1 Status Tracker 2 Status Further Hardware.
Engineering Analysis & Updated Layout Drawings SofaKing 9 March 2005.
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
SBN Far Detector Installation & Integration
Escalator Installation
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES TRUSS DESIGN
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
BFC Structural Steel and Timber Design
SNS PPU Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI
Presentation transcript:

FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007

1.Are the requirements well defined? 1.Does the design meet the requirements? 2.Do the drawings define the design adequately to be used as the sole basis for fabrication and acceptance of the support fixture? 3.Does the analysis adequately underpin the design and have they been checked? 4.Has safety been adequately addressed in the design of the support fixture? 5.Can the support fixture be fabricated and installed within the budget and schedule identified in the project baseline? 6.Have all relevant chits from previous design reviews been adequately addressed? Charge

Scope This review covers the Station 3 lift fixture, laser mounts and screens. The support fixtures for the MC’s and VV have already been covered in an earlier FDR. The local alignment fixtures used to provide added positional adjustments of the MCHP will be shown.

Requirements Provide a lift structure that will allow safe movement of the MCHP over the VV Provide stable mounting brackets for the laser Provide stable laser path tracing support frames

Assembly components making up Station 3 Laser screens Laser support brackets Fixed left MCHP support Moveable right MCHP support VV support Lifting fixture frame weldment Items in red are included in this review

Structure only Left side base grout plates Fixed left MCHP support Moveable right MCHP support VV support Weight of structure: 4970 lbs Cost range: $18,350 or $3.69/lb $25,880 or $5.21/lb $26,496 or $5.33/lb $32,144 or $6.47/lb $20,478 or $4.12/lb (includes $2k shipping) MCHP and VV support structure

Lifting fixture frame weldment Lift fixture mounting bracket weldment Sissco lift system Lifting fixture frame weldment

The lifting fixture frame weldment was arranged to span the MCHP CG with attachments made to existing support holes on the MC feet A single lift fixture can be used on both the MCHP left and right side. The plan is to procure only one.

Lifting fixture frame weldment drawing se

The weldment is joined using fillet welds except at beam cap interfaces where two sided “J” grooves are used.

Laser support brackets Inboard horizontal laser Outboard horizontal laser End vertical laser

Reworked Screen New Screens New left side base / grout plates New and reworked laser screens

Floor mounted tracks and screen drawing se

Left Side Right Side Strap Length 29” max travel 120” constant length wire rope

Left Side Right Side Fraction of load carried by each sling MCHP CG Lift pt 3 Lift pt 1Lift pt 2 Lift pt 3 Fig 1 Fraction of load carried by each sling

Lift pt 1Lift pt 2 Lift pt 3 MCHP CG Position of hook on left side at Step 247 The position show is the lift position on the left side at Step 247 Weight Calculations

FEA Assumptions:  Linear analysis  The lift support frame was fully constrained at the bottom pads  Material properties ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi, Ftu = 58 ksi Allowable stress: at 2/3 yield is 22 ksi at 1/3 ultimate is 19.3 ksi  The total weight of the lift is 24,000 lbs Station 3 rigging analysis

The maximum load condition occurs on the left side at Step 247 at lift point 1 Peak stress is 16.8 ksi (multi pass) 18,000 lbs 4,560 lbs 1,680 lbs

The maximum load condition occurs on the left side at Step 247 at lift point 1 Peak stress is 16.1 ksi (multi pass) 18,000 lbs 4,560 lbs 1,680 lbs 16.1 ksi

 12 ksi With added rib the local peak stress drops from 16.8 to 16.2 ksi and moves to the opposite side ksi

18,000 lb load at inner lift point in the direction of the lift at Step 247 Peak deflection is.0018” (multi pass)

Assume 24,000 lb load at lift point 1 in the direction of the CG Peak stress is 35.7 ksi (multi pass) 25.3 ksi 35.7 ksi 24,000 lbs

Assume 24,000 lb load at lift point 1 in the direction of the CG with an added stiffener Peak stress is now 22.7 ksi (multi pass)

Assuming 24,000 lb load at lift point 2 in the direction of the CG Peak stress is 19.3 ksi (multi pass) moves to the lower section of the web

24,000 lb load at lift point 3 in the direction of the CG Peak stress is 17.7 ksi (multi pass)

Fixture Reaction Loads 1-8 bolt, SAE J429 Grade B8 Bolt Ftu = 150 ksi Fy = 130 ksi Tension allowable (based on 1/3 ult) = 27,551 lbs Fixture Reaction Loads 1-8 bolt, SAE J429 Grade B8 Bolt Ftu = 150 ksi Fy = 130 ksi Tension allowable (based on 1/3 ult) = 27,551 lbs

Lifting shackle link calculation

Station 2 style adjuster plates mounted to the support base Local alignment fixtures are used for positional adjustments (similar to Station 2)

Baseline procurement cost estimate Weight of structure: 4970 lbs Cost range: $18,350 or $3.69/lb $25,880 or $5.21/lb $26,496 or $5.33/lb $32,144 or $6.47/lb $20,478 or $4.12/lb (includes $2k shipping) (MC and VV supports) (5) 17,396 4,750 22,855 Remaining Remaining purchase New cost inputs: Uncertainty range - 10% / +15% Items purchased

Estimate for outstanding procurements 22,855 Left from original budget $ 5,023 Over original budget Note: if all procurements come in at the $3.69/lb cost of the first procurement then the hardware cost would come in $1948 under budget.

1.Are the requirements well defined? Requirement are specified 1.Does the design meet the requirements? Yes 2.Do the drawings define the design adequately to be used as the sole basis for fabrication and acceptance of the support fixture? Drawings have been prepared and are ready to be issued for approval 1.Does the analysis adequately underpin the design and have they been checked? Analysis and calculations have been completed 2.Has safety been adequately addressed in the design of the support fixture? Analysis shows structural margins are satisfied and techniques are defined to allow assembly adjustments to be performed without working under the load. 3.Can the support fixture be fabricated and installed within the budget and schedule identified in the project baseline? Cost and schedule estimates have been made and reviewed. 4.Have all relevant chits from previous design reviews been adequately addressed? This is new information; no chits are outstanding. Charge