Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Far Detector Assembly Block Pivot Table Design Review WBS 2.9.1.4 Dave Pushka April 2 nd 2008.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Far Detector Assembly Block Pivot Table Design Review WBS 2.9.1.4 Dave Pushka April 2 nd 2008."— Presentation transcript:

1 Far Detector Assembly Block Pivot Table Design Review WBS 2.9.1.4 Dave Pushka April 2 nd 2008

2 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 2 Block Pivot Table Requirements Provide a Horizontal Surface for Block Assembly Move a Completed Block from the assembly area to its position on the detector Rotate a Completed Block from a horizontal to a vertical position Disengage from a Placed Block, Return to Assembly area and repeat. Specifics are in NOvA note 113 version 5 from 7/2007 (new requirements included in version 6 are not addressed in this talk)

3 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 3 Block Pivot Design Status Last Analysis Work Performed in late December 2007 Big Picture Largely Complete, was working on details: –Pivot Bearing Support on Table and Vertical Side Support to ensure the bearing housing is sufficiently rigid. –Connection between pallet and table. –Reduce weight (cost) for the lower side support weldment. –Quantify lateral load capability for seismic criteria (UBC zone 0). I have performed the analysis, images, and conclusions presented here unless otherwise noted.

4 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 4 Block Pivot Table Pivoting

5 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 5 Block Pivot Table Components Detector Assembly Table Upper Support Frames Lower Support Frame Lower Frame Brace Pivot Cylinders Kneeling Cylinders Horizontal Drive Elements Rear Table Support Pallet Rolling Elements Rail

6 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 6 Images of Key Components LOWER SIDE SUPPORT WELDMENT 2 REQ’D PALLET 1 REQ’D PER BLOCK UPPER VERTICAL SIDE SUPPORT WELDMENT 2 REQ’D ASSEMBLY TABLE SHOWN EXPLODED 12 WELDMENTS

7 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 7 Block Pivot Table Design & Fabrication Process Steps Write Requirements Document (Done and re-done, recent changes not incorporated in the design presented in this talk). Develop Conceptual Design (Done). Prepare Cost Estimate based on the conceptual design (Done). Conduct Internal Review (This Review on April 2nd) Perform Engineering analysis to size members and develop the final design. Generate engineering notes (In progress). Identify and correct any safety or performance hazards. Prepare part fabrication drawings and perform the peer review of the engineering notes concurrently. (In process - usually performed by one person checking one engineering note). Initiate independent review of the design (usually performed by a committee and involves presentations as well as the signed off fabrication drawings and checked engineering notes). Identify and correct any safety hazards. Fabricate components (includes parts provided by outside vendors and in house shops) Assemble components at FNAL to confirm proper fit up, test pivot operation with a section of the table, test horizontal drive operation. Test operating procedure. Identify and correct any safety or performance hazards. Disassemble and ship components to far detector location Re-assemble and test at far detector. Re-test operating procedure. Identify and correct any safety or performance hazards at the far detector location.

8 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 8 Component Analysis Status Detector Assembly Table –Deflections when Vertical Due to Cantilevered Block using beam elements –Local Deflections when Horizontal due to uniform Pressure on Surface, several iterations performed (Wands, Lee, Pushka) using solids –Large Scale deflections modeled using beam elements (Pushka) and solid elements (Wands) Upper Support Frames – Static loading Condition to calculate stress and deflections. Four iterations performed using solid elements. Present design is satisfactory but not as efficient as it could be. Lower Support Frame – One condition, Static loading condition, using solid elements. Pivot Cylinders – Loads as a function of extension completed included in TDR. Kneeling Cylinders – Only one condition, Static loads determined Horizontal Drive Elements – Required drive traction estimated, used to specify the hydraulic motor and urethane tire. Rear Table Support – Hand calculations used to size members for static loading condition based on AISC 9 th edition ASD Pallet – Beam element analysis completed for local and large scale deflection (Pushka), Repeated with solid elements for same conditions (Lee). Rolling Elements – Hand calculations performed to size elements Rail – matched to rolling elements Internal Review Remains In Progress Today.

9 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 9 Images of Key Components

10 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 10 Design Status of Key Components All Key Components have been modeled. Geometry is understood. All Key Components have been thru at least one analysis iteration. The Table and the Upper Supports have received multiple analysis iteration. Nearly all components have been shown to be suitable for the intended loads. Individual weldments are transportable by truck. Engineering notes and Analysis note have been written. Fabrication drawings have been started. Table Weldment fabrication drawings complete. Cost estimates have been prepared. Weldment costs are estimated based on the present weights of the parts. Purchased components are based on budget pricing received from vendors.

11 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 11 Issues Table Flatness and weld distortion: –I believe the weld distortions can be controlled to meet the flatness tolerance (3/8”) over the whole surface. Other people don’t. Until this is prototyped… Why a plate structure? –If 60 inch deep wide flanges beams were commercially made, they would be used here. Deflection is inversely proportional to the depth, so for the same weight (cost), use a deep section to minimize deflection. Look at a steel highway overpass bridge girder. Lateral Loads for the quasi-static dynamic loading, seismic criteria. –Calculations remain to be formally written. Details of bearing pivot housing, cylinder connections, need additional analysis, including fatigue.

12 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 12 Block Pivot Table Risks and Mitigations Table Surface Not Flat Enough –Use self leveling epoxy grout to fill in the low areas. Pivot Bearings Bind –Replace Bearings, Commercial, Off the shelf plain bearings Hydraulic Cylinders Leak, –Replace Cylinder Seals – Standard Issue with Hydraulics Rolling Elements Fail to Roll Properly –Replace Roller Elements and inspect rail surface Rail Surface Wears Prematurely –Replace Rail Surface with properly hardened material Hydraulic Drive Units Fail to Drive Satisfactorily –Replace Drive Units – Commercially produced and stocked unit Hydraulic Power Unit Fails to Operate Properly –Replace Power Unit(s) – Packaged, off the shelf item

13 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 13 Assembly at Far Detector Step 1: –Use 10 ton building crane to unload the following items off a flat bed trailer in loading dock area and place on the floor in the assembly area: Lower Support Frame (2) Lower Brace –Assembly two lower support frames and the lower brace: –Duration: 2 crew days

14 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 14 Assembly at Far Detector Step 2: –Use 10 ton crane to unload the following items off flat bed trailers in loading dock area and place on top of the lower supports already in the assembly area: Upper Support Brace Kneeling Cylinder –Assemble to get: –Duration: 2 crew Days

15 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 15 Assembly at Far Detector Step 3 : –Use 10 ton building crane to unload the following items off a flat bed trailer in loading dock area and place on the assembly: Rear Table Support –Get: –Duration: 1 Crew Day

16 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 16 Assembly at Far Detector Step 4: –Use 10 ton building crane to unload the following items off a flat bed trailer in loading dock area and place on the assembly: Vertical Dunnage Hinge sections of table (4) –Get: –Duration: 2 crew days

17 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 17 Assembly at Far Detector Step 5 : –Use 10 ton building crane to unload the following items off a flat bed trailer in loading dock area and place on the assembly: Edge sections of table (4) –Weld to Get : –Duration: 6 Crew Days

18 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 18 Assembly at Far Detector Step 6 : –Add Outer Table Sections –4 Crew Days

19 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 19 Assembly at Far Detector Step 7 : –Connect Pivot Cylinders –Duration –1 Crew Day

20 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 20 Assembly at Far Detector Step 8: –Remove Dunnage –Test Operation of Pivot –Test Horizontal Drives –Install Controls –Duration: 2 weeks

21 April 2nd Engineering Review Dave Pushka 21 Assembly at Far Detector Step 9 : –Install 1 st Pallet –Duration 3 Crew Days


Download ppt "Far Detector Assembly Block Pivot Table Design Review WBS 2.9.1.4 Dave Pushka April 2 nd 2008."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google