1 Datasets /DoubleMu/Run2012A − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012A −recover – 6Aug2012 – v1 /DoubleMu/Run2012B − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012C − 24Aug.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

William Edson SUNY at Albany Anirvan Sircar Louisiana Tech University.
1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
Some D0 Meeting November 2003 Muon Isolation Studies Ken Johns University of Arizona.
Slide 1 SMP-V: Report for Luminosity Calibration Study Jiyeon Han, Ping Tan Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Hwidong Yoo Stoyan Stoynev Ilya Kravchenko, Jamila Butt.
Evidence for high mass exclusive dijet production in the D0 experiment Zdenek Hubacek Czech Technical University in Prague (on behalf of D0 Collaboration)
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
S. Li 1,2, Y. Liu 1 E. Monnier 2, Z. Zhao 1 Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China 1 & Centre de Physique.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Status of Muon Trigger Efficiency Measurement for ICHEP Benedikt Hegner, Benjamin Klein, Yvonne Küssel, Patricia Lobelle, Markus Marienfeld, Rahmat Rahmat,
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
Higgs to WW Analysis in CDF and ATLAS R StDenis. Higgs to WW CDF and ATLAS Reproduction of Previous Results:Identifying, datasets, Rows and columns Data.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
1 Hadronic Event Shape Variables in pp collision at 7 TeV Introduction Data-set and Event Selection Comparison of Basic Jet Objects in Data and MC Event.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
1 H → γγ analysis Maosen Zhou 02/04/ For the coupling measurement,the categories are chosen to probe different Higgs production models,such as.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
QCD estimate with the matrix method Alexander D. with the help of many…
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
Slide 1 Status Report. Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic.
B Tagging studies with non prompt J/Ψ's
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Measurements of Electron Charge Mis-identification Rate and Electron Efficiency within SUSY analysis framework Zhichao Zhan SDU Shan Jin IHEP Xueyao Zhang.
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
ttbar τ + jets: Update on QCD Estimation
SM Higgs for Summer p17 publications:
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Dijet+MET Events induced by Cosmic Ray Muons
2vtx tagged dijets mass resolution study
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
VBF Higgs at LHC 方亚泉 高能物理研究所 April 2nd, 2018.
ttbar + jets AOD analysis
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Presentation transcript:

1 Datasets /DoubleMu/Run2012A − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012A −recover – 6Aug2012 – v1 /DoubleMu/Run2012B − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012C − 24Aug 2012 − v 1 DoubleMu/Run2012C –EcalRecover –11Dec2012 – v1 /DoubleMu/Run2012C − Prompt − v 2 /DoubleMu/Run2012D − Prompt − v 1 Datasets of 2012 JSON from Cert_ _8TeV_13Jul2012ReReco_Collisions12_JSON_v2.txt Cert_ _8TeV_06Aug2012ReReco_Collisions12_JSON.txt Cert_ _8TeV_24Aug2012ReReco_Collisions12_JSON.txt Cert_ _8TeV_PromptReco_Collisions12_JSON_v2.txt Cert_ _8TeV_11Dec2012ReReco-recover_Collisions12_JSON.txt Cert_ _8TeV_PromptReco_Collisions12_JSON.txt MC

2 Selections Triggers HLT_Mu17_Mu8_v* HLT_Mu17_TkMu8_v* Muon Muon matched trigger objects Muon pT > 20 GeV and |Muon eta| < 2.4 Opposite charge muons Tight Muon ID from Muon POG Loose PF base Combined relative ISO from Muon POG Z mass window of 71 to 111 GeV Jets Tight jet MVA Jet pT > 30 GeV |Jet eta| < 2.4 Loose Jet ID from POG Clean Jets from muons with DeltaR<0.5 MC is ID, Iso,and trigger efficiency corrected. Official PU reweighting is used.

3 Z mass Z phi N jet ≥0 Z Properties

4 Z pT Z Y N jet ≥0 Z Properties

5 Jet Multiplicity Inclusive jetsExclusive jets All region (|jet η| <4.7 )

6 Jet Multiplicity Inclusive jetsExclusive jets Only Forward region (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central

7 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central Jet pT N jet ≥1

8 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central Leading Jet pT N jet ≥1

9 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central 2nd Leading Jet pT N jet ≥1

10 Leading jet in Central (|jet η| <2.4 ) Leading Jet pT N jet ≥1 Leading jet in Forward (|jet η| >2.4 )

11 2nd Leading jet in Central (|jet η| <2.4 ) 2nd Leading Jet pT N jet ≥1 2nd Leading jet in Forward (|jet η| >2.4 )

12 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central Jet Rapidity N jet ≥1

13 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central Leading Jet Rapidity N jet ≥1

14 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central 2nd Leading Jet Rapidity N jet ≥1

15 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central |∆Y j1j2 | N jet ≥1

16 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central |∆φ j1j2 | N jet ≥1

17 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central ∆R j1j2 N jet ≥1

18 All region (|jet η| <4.7 )Forward only (|jet η| >2.4 ) and veto jet events in central M j1j2 N jet ≥1