SEE (Spatial Emissions Estimator): A New Tool for Estimating Link & Zone Emissions with MOVES Presentation for Southeast Texas Photochemical Modeling Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Advertisements

EPA’s Plan for MOVES: A Comprehensive Mobile Source Emissions Model John Koupal, Harvey Michaels, Mitch Cumberworth, Chad Bailey, Dave Brzezinski U.S.
Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Implementing Soak-Time Distribution Models in a GIS Framework Aruna Sivakumar Department of Civil Engineering (Transportation) University of Texas at Austin.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
A GIS Approach to Pedestrian Level of Service Natalia Domarad 14th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio May 5-9, 2013.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Emissions Estimation Tool for El Paso Border Crossings JAC Meeting January 23, 2014 Reza Farzaneh, Ph.D., P.E. Josias Zietsman, Ph.D., P.E.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
Presented by: David Jackson & Michael Snavely, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Robert Calix, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority May 9,
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009 MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator.
Network Benefit Cost Analysis: An Overview of the Application of NET_BC Software for Caltrans District 5’s System Analysis Study TRB Planning Applications.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Recent Developments in the Community Emissions Model CONCEPT 5 th Annual CMAS Model User Conference Tuesday October 17, 2006 Mark Janssen LADCO.
Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
“Green” PORTAL: Adding Sustainability Performance Measures to a Transportation Data Archive Emissions Modeling.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Computers in Urban Planning Computational aids – implementation of mathematical models, statistical analyses Data handling & intelligent maps – GIS (Geographic.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
MOVES Briefing for NACAA EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality March 3, 2009.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
COG/DTP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow Comments on Draft MOVES 2009 International Emission Inventory Conference April 16-17, 2009 Baltimore,Maryland.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Sunil Kumar MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG January 19, 2010 Review of MOVES2010 Local Data Inputs.
Use of IM & NEI Data Trends to Improve Vehicle Emissions Models IM Solutions Salt Lake City April 2014 Jim Lindner.
Transportation Modeling Options for City Departments LSA Associates, Inc. City of Fort Collins January 2001.
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
Improving Local Inputs to MOVES
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
EPA Tools and Data Update
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
TRB Application Conference
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Comparison and Analysis of Big Data for a Regional Freeway Study in Washington State Amanda Deering, DKS Associates.
Presentation transcript:

SEE (Spatial Emissions Estimator): A New Tool for Estimating Link & Zone Emissions with MOVES Presentation for Southeast Texas Photochemical Modeling Technical Committee July 21, 2014 John Koupal, Scott Fincher, Allison DenBleyker, Sandeep Kishan Eastern Research Group, Inc.

Acknowledgments  Cambridge Systematics : David Kall, Tarannum Rima (speed model work)  ERG: Heather Perez, Mindy Mitchell 2

Overview  Drivers for New Tool  Approach  Example Results  Improving Inventory & Spatial Resolution  Summary & Next Steps 3

Drivers for New Tool  Update from MOBILE6 to MOVES  Integrate link & trip activity from travel model  Provide detailed spatial allocation of emissions  On-network: link-based  Start & evaporative emissions: travel analysis zone (TAZ) based  Heavy-duty truck extended idle (hoteling): truck stop locations  Maintain consistency with MOVES County Scale  Build hooks for improving inventory  Updated speed post-processing model  Accounting for heavy-duty “hot spots” not in travel model  Ability to account for road grade 4

Approach 5

Spatial Emissions Estimator (SEE)  Emission results at link, zone and county level  Uses direct MOVES runs as much as possible, with supplemental scripting where necessary  Makes full use of TDM spatial activity information  Uses MOVES input tables (County/Project DB)  On-network and off-network approaches different, but integrated into one system, with common input/output databases  Simple user interface 6

Heavy-Duty Extended Idle Activity Allocations Processed TDM Output Link,/Zone Activity By Hour SEE SEE Overview MOVES CDB Meteorology Fuel I/M Age Distribution Population GUI Hourly Emissions Link Zone County Region 7

SEE: Under the Hood  User makes basic input/output selections in GUI  PERL scripts drive MOVES setup & runs  Project scale: link emissions  County scale: off-network emissions, ramp emissions, running loss evap  PERL scripts post-process results  Emissions by link  Zone emission allocations  Spatial aggregation  TxLED emissions adjustment 8

On-Network Approach (Links)  Running emissions estimated at link level by hour  ~45,000 links in 8-county HGB area  SEE runs MOVES at project scale  Allows bottom up calculation from links  Flexibility for future improvements  Scripts convert TDM output to MOVES project level database (PDB) link inputs  To reduce model runtime, MOVES only runs unique combinations of roadtype & average speed, by hour  Actual vs. binned speed  Script applies to rest of links based on individual link activity (Source Hours Operating, SHO) 9

TDM Link Data TRANSVMT Script MOVES Database: “Link” tables MOVES Project Scale Runs Already existsNew Unique links Link Output Script Link Input Script Finds unique combinations of roadtype & average speed and converts to MOVES input In Harris County example, ~25,000 links  26 unique links if binned by avg speed MOVES runs on unique links only. Unique links could be used across hour of the day, except for meteorology Emissions from unique links scaled based on Source Hours Operating (SHO) to estimate emissions for all other links. SHO = link volume * (link length / avg. speed) On-Network Approach Required to run each hour of the day individually (project scale only does 1 hour at a time) 10

TDM Link Data TRANSVMT Script MOVES Database MOVES Project Scale Runs MOVES Inputs: Meteorology Fuel I/M Age Distribution Population Already existsNew Unique links Aggregation Scripts Link-Level Emissions Zone-Level Emissions County-Level Emissions Link Output Script Link Input Script On-Network Approach 11

On-Network Challenges Differences in MOVES county and project scale led to some challenges in getting project–based run to match county-based Travel fraction Project scale doesn’t calculate travel fraction Created additional scripting to replicate county scale travel fraction using source type hour fraction, revised age distribution input Ramps TDM produces unique ramp activity, but not able to replicate county ramp emissions at link level Current approach simply estimates ramps separately at county level MOVES2014 updates may make link-level ramps easier Running Loss Evap Project scale doesn’t include evap emissions Estimated at county level 12

Off-Network Approach (Zones)  Starts, Evaporative, Heavy-Duty Extended Idle emissions estimated at TAZ level by hour  ~3,000 zones in 8-county area  SEE runs MOVES at county scale  Scripts allocate county emissions to zones  Possible within MOVES, but longer runtime  Start allocations: TDM trip origins by zone, period  Park allocations: TDM trip ends by zone, period  Idle allocations: GIS analysis of truck/rest stop in 8 county area 13

TDM O/D Output Scripts Zone-Level Emissions MOVES Database MOVES County Scale Runs Truck Stop GIS Data MOVES Inputs: Meteorology Fuel I/M Age Distribution Population Off-Network Emissions: Better Spatial Allocation Already existsNew Zone Allocations Scripts 14

Start Allocation – AM Peak 15

Park Allocation – AM Peak 16

Extended Idle – Locations Blue triangles show prospective extended idle locations (truck/rest stops, etc.) from Truck Stop Plus database 17

Extended Idle Allocation 18

Example Results 19

Example Results - Overview  Benchmark vs. County Level Totals  SEE county totals compared to MOVES County Scale run  2018 TRANSVMT runs provided by HGAC  Aggregated to county–level activity for MOVES county runs (VMT, speed distribution, road type distribution, hourVMTfraction)  Other 2018 inputs from TCEQ SIP runs  e.g. meteorology, I/M, fuels, age distribution  Link/zone emissions map by hour  Example hourly totals by process, vehicle type 20

Benchmark Results 21

8-County Onroad NOx by Link/Zone/Hour requires MS Powerpoint in slideshow mode to cycle through 24 hours Links: running emissions Zones: start, ext. idle emissions 22

NOx Emissions Density (Noon) 23

Harris County Hourly HC Emissions by Process  HC emissions  All source types  HC Daily Average (CY2009): –40% Starts –30% Running –25% Evaporative –2% Refueling Losses –3% Extended Idle 24

Harris County Hourly NO x Emissions by Process 25  NOx emissions  All source types  NOx Daily Average (CY2009): –82% Running –15% Starts –3% Extended Idle

26 Absolute Emissions (tons)Relative Contributions Harris County Hourly HC Emissions by Vehicle Type

Harris County Hourly CO Emissions by Vehicle Type 27 Absolute Emissions (tons)Relative Contributions

Harris County Hourly NO x Emissions by Vehicle Type 28 Absolute Emissions (tons)Relative Contributions

Improving Inventory & Spatial Resolution of Emissions 29

Opportunities for Improvement  Updated TDM speed post-processing model  HGAC has updated model; Evaluated and implemented as choice in TDM script by Cambridge Systematics  Adding Heavy-duty “hot spots”  Operation in ports (based on EPA/TCEQ/HGAC study)  Distribution centers, etc.  Updating vehicle starts from TDM trips and/or HGAC surveys  Improving Long-Haul Truck VMT based on updates currently being made for 2011 NEI  Road grade 30

Differences in TRANSVMT and HGAC Speed Models (Cambridge Systematics)  HGAC considers signals in arterial speed calculations  HGAC calculates free flow speed and LOSE speed for freeways differently  HGAC continues to lower speed at v/c>1.5 31

Speed Model Impacts on Distributions 32

Adding Heavy Duty Hot Spots: Port Terminal (NCHRP 25-38) 33

MOVES Project Setup Populated with data collected from EPA/TCEQ/HGAC Houston Port Study MOVES Project InputDefinition For This ProjectData Sources PeriodWeekday 10-11am June Link VolumeNumber of trucks in the portPort Entry/Exit Data Link Source Types 100% Combination Short-Haul Trucks (Source Type 61) - Age Distribution- Captured plate data (Denver U. RSD) matched with TXDOT registration records Meteorology-MOVES Default Fuel Supply-MOVES Default Fuel Formulation-MOVES Default Fuel Type & TechnologyDiesel- Operating Mode Distribution Within-Port VSP Distribution (or use drive cycle directly) Portable data loggers 34

35 Age distribution Driving activity Port-specific MOVES inputs MOVES Results Bayport Terminal NOx & PM ~ 2% of total areawide emissions for combination short-haul trucks Other port terminals in area not included (e.g. Barbour’s Cut) 35

Summary & Next Steps 36

Summary & Next Steps  SEE is a new tool that allows MOVES emissions to be estimated at the link & zone level  Matches county-level runs for conformity purposes  Provides framework for including new elements, such as heavy-duty hot spots.  Next steps:  Improve processing time  Add GUI  Documentation  TRB paper planned 37