Stream Sampling for Benthic Macroinvertebrates What are the bugs telling us? And who understands them? Presented By: Grant De Jong Rocky Mountain Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Evaluation of Aquatic Ecosystem Health Using a Multi-metric Index of Biological Integrity for Okanagan Streams.
20 th Annual Student GREEN Congress “Counting Critters” Workshop.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Biomonitoring the study of biological organisms and their responses to environmental conditions; can be fish, algae or insect communities.
A Comparative Study of Water Quality and Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Diversity in the Rio Grande and its Ditches By Lian Liu Mentor: Ayesha Burdett.
With a special focus on Mayflies, Caddisflies, and Stoneflies Aquatic Entomology & Benthic Macroinvertebrates.
An analysis of the aquatic insect communities of McMichael Creek, PA under open and closed canopies Christopher Hartzler, James Hartzler, Bradley Rehnberg.
Macroinvertebrates and Bioassessment: Using Biological Indicators to Measure Stream Health Caitlin Chaffee URI Cooperative Extension.
Chris Nagai Nick Foster Christen Dschankilic Streams of Science.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
MCDEP’s Database Conversion Overview Benthic MonitoringFish Monitoring Rapid Habitat Geomorphology Physchem Herpetofauna Spring MonitoringSummer Monitoring.
Aquatic invertebrates and water quality monitoring in the Little Luckiamute River Aquatic invertebrates and water quality monitoring in the Little Luckiamute.
Hypothesis development Environmental quality of the Poudre River Urban impact from Fort Collins Influence assessed through physical, chemical and biological.
To what extent is there excess sediment in the Middle Truckee River that impairs aquatic life use? Application of benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment.
Draft Multimetric Indices for Colorado. Data Preparation Established reference and stressed criteria Identified reference and stressed sites Classified.
Benthic invertebrate response to heavy metal contamination in the Panther Creek drainage (Idaho): A case study using McQuire’s Metal Tolerance Index (MTI)
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survey Honors Biology
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Index for the Truckee, Carson, and Walker Rivers Erik W. Leppo January 5, 2009 Reno, Nevada.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Biological Assessment REFORM Summer School, Wageningen (NL), 28 June 2015 Christian Wolter Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
BENTHIC MACRO-INVERTEBRATES. MACRO = LARGE INVERTEBRATE = ANIMAL LACKING A BACKBONE.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Volunteer-based Stream Monitoring- Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Paul Steen Watershed Ecologist Huron River Watershed Council.
CWWUC Presentation April 8, 2009 Application of the Integrated Impact Analysis Tool.
Sampling Biodiversity Using macroinvertebrates
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
Aquatic Entomology Mr. Distasio Field Environmental Science I.
Water Assessment Data Lab Assignment # 5 Land Use The first thing you notice when field sampling is the area around your site. What type of land use.
Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn Fork Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn.
Water Quality of Mullins Creek/ Determined by Aquatic Diversity Josh Thomasson Biology-Environmental Concentration Tennessee Techological University Cookeville,
MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION
Lab: Benthic Bugs and Bioassessment
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Macroinvertebrates Little Creatures that tell us If our natural waterways are healthy.
Aquatic Diversity of Macro Invertebrates in Mullins Creek Josh Thomasson Biology-Environmental Concentration Tennessee Techological University Cookeville,
The Arizona Rivers Project Southwestern Academy June 2009 Fun with Macroinvertebrates.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates What these critters can tell us about water quality.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES TO ASSESS WATER QUALITY IN BOLIN CREEK David Lenat Lenat Consulting Services.
Look Closely for Water Quality Activity by Alison Smith, SRP.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
Headwater Macro-invertebrate Field Evaluation Index (HMFEI) Photo by Garrett Rauckhorst.
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
Macroinvertebrates as Water Quality Indicators on Mount Mansfield
Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Composition Over an Elevation Gradient
Fun with Macroinvertebrates
Exploring Water Quality
Biological Assessment of Pond Health
Clark Fork Symposium Friday April 24th 2015
LAKE AND STREAM METRICS
Environmental Studies Program
Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Populations to Assess Campus
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Macroinvertebrates are animals without a backbone that can be seen with the naked eye. These bottom-dwelling animals include crustaceans and worms but.
MacroinverteWHATS? Macroinvertebrates!.
Combinations (= multimetrics)
By: Sarah, Kevin, Joe, John and KC
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
Benthic Invertebrate Distribution in
Presentation transcript:

Stream Sampling for Benthic Macroinvertebrates What are the bugs telling us? And who understands them? Presented By: Grant De Jong Rocky Mountain Water Quality Analysts Association 2014 Annual Symposium April 25, 2014

“Benthic Macroinvertebrates”? “Bugs”? This? Heteroptera? An aquatic, multicellular animal without a backbone and large enough to be seen with the naked eye.

Who are they?

Step 1 – Collect your bugs

Kick Net (qualitative, or, at best, semi-quantitative) This is the “kick net” some people use This is the kick net I prefer to use –Use it to sample habitat other than riffles

Qualitative – presence/absence, maybe some relative abundance –Gives us a “Who’s there” approach –Not generally amenable to statistical analysis Quantitative – numbers –Usually reported in #/m 2 Replication –Gives us ability to run statistics ANOVA, t-tests, etc.

Hess sampler Originally designed for use in soft-bottom streams in the East. Steve Canton and Jim Chadwick modified it for the cobble-bottom streams of Colorado and the West.

Colorado State Protocol Uses a semi-quantitative approach: –1 kick net sample in 1 m² of riffle habitat over 60 seconds Since this was done at 100’s of sites, the data can be used in a regional approach Individual sites can be compared to the region, but not to each other

Step 2: Lab work Samples come to the lab filled with –Sticks –Stones –Grass –Algae –Mud –Sand –Unidentifiable plastic stuff –and Bugs! Someone gets to sort the bugs from all that debris.

and then identify all those bugs and count them.

Invertebrate Taxonomy Bugs from the samples are identified – usually to the genus or species level. Quality assurance on IDs and counts – 95% is pass level Report lists all of the taxa and their counts for each replicate at each site.

Final Bug Report INSECTA EPHEMEROPTERA Baetis bicaudatus Paraleptophlebia sp. Timpanoga hecuba ODONATA Archilestes sp. Enallagma sp. PLECOPTERA Cultus aestivalis Doroneuria baumanni Skwala paralella Sweltsa sp. COLEOPTERA Agabus sp. TRICHOPTERA Arctopsyche grandis Hesperophylax sp. Hydropsyche sp. Rhyacophila brunnea/vao DIPTERA Ceratopogoninae Neoplasta sp. Simulium sp. CRUSTACEA AMPHIPODA Hyalella azteca cx. MOLLUSCA PELECYPODA Dreissena polymorpha

Final Bug Report Several metrics automatically calculated on a replicate basis (therefore, we can use them for statistical analysis) –Total density –Number of taxa –Number of EPT taxa –EPT Index –Ephemeroptera Abundance Some metrics calculated based on composite of replicates –All above metrics –Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index –Additional metrics

Translating the Data Our “Universal Translator” – takes bug names and translates them into ecological entities BUGSWITH, GEI’s in-house, proprietary system in Excel for managing invertebrate data –Benthic Invert Taxa List –Data Entry/Report Production Worksheets –Taxon Characterization Worksheet –Metric Calculation Worksheet –List of Taxonomic Literature –Data can be used to calculate Colorado Multimetric Index (MMI)

Benthic Invert Taxa List - the “backbone” of the system List of 12,337 invertebrate taxa (1 January 2014) –Started with <2,000 taxa, using Barbour et al. (1999) –Taxa added as we encounter checklists or taxonomic revisions –Total of 10,491 (85%) are insect taxa Features: –Standard Taxonomic Effort –Taxonomic Serial Numbers –Tolerance Values –Species Traits –Geographic Distribution Supported by >670 pieces of literature (books, articles, etc.)

Standard Taxonomic Effort Indicates standard taxonomic level to stop at when identifying invertebrates –Usually genus level –Some species level –Sometimes family or subfamily level Indicates appropriate literature to use Identifies monospecific genera at Nearctic, regional, or state levels Identifies synonyms, so proper name can be used Includes some distributional information

Taxonomic Serial Numbers TSNs are unique numbers assigned to each taxon U.S. Department of Agriculture –Integrated Taxonomic Information System –Standardized identification system

Tolerance Values Based on Saprobien System of early 1900s Chutter (1972) first to assign tolerance values Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI ) –Wisconsin –Designed to identify organic pollution –Values based mostly on professional experience Some at Family level, but generally use genus and species level TVs

Tolerance Values 0 - Pristine10 - Degraded TV 0 – 3 Intolerant 4 – 6 Moderate 7 – 10 Tolerant

Hilsenhoff Biotic Index HBI = Σ (density * TV) / Total Density TaxonDensityTVDensity x TV Baetis tricaudatus Rhyacophila sp.2500 Chironomus sp Total Density175Σ TV = 800 HBI = 800/175 = 4.57