Elements of Decision Problems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decision Theory.
Advertisements

1 1 Slide © 2001 South-Western College Publishing/Thomson Learning Anderson Sweeney Williams Anderson Sweeney Williams Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS QUANTITATIVE.
Ch 7 Decision theory Learning objectives: After completing this chapter, you should be able to: 1.Outline the characteristics of a decision theory approach.
Decision Analysis. What is Decision Analysis? The process of arriving at an optimal strategy given: –Multiple decision alternatives –Uncertain future.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or.
Chapter 7 Decision Analysis
Slides prepared by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Chapter 4 Decision Analysis.
Part 3 Probabilistic Decision Models
1 1 Slide Decision Analysis Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Decision Analysis Chapter Outline n Structuring the Decision Problem n Decision Making Without.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
Decision analysis: part 1 BSAD 30 Dave Novak Source: Anderson et al., 2013 Quantitative Methods for Business 12 th edition – some slides are directly from.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Decision Tree Analysis. Decision Analysis Managers often must make decisions in environments that are fraught with uncertainty. Some Examples –A manufacturer.
Influence Diagrams & Basic Decision Trees
Problem 4.15 A stock market investor has $500 to spend and is considering purchasing an option contract on 1000 shares of Apricot Computer. The shares.
R. Keeney November 28,  A decision maker wants to behave optimally but is faced with an opponent  Nature – offers uncertain outcomes  Competition.
Strategy and Analysis in Using NPV (Chapter 8) Financial Policy and Planning MB 29.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of.
Multi-Attribute Utility Models with Interactions
Decision Analysis Dr. Saeed Shiry
Decision Analysis April 11, Game Theory Frame Work Players ◦ Decision maker: optimizing agent ◦ Opponent  Nature: offers uncertain outcome  Competition:
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Introduction to Decision Analysis
1 Module 2 Modeling Decisions ELEMENTS OF DECISION PROBLEMS.
Operational Decision-Making Tools: Decision Analysis
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany.
1 Chapter 3 Structuring Decision. 2 Structuring Decisions Learning Objectives Fundamental steps in model creation Identify and structure values and objectives.
Chapter 8 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with Probabilities n Risk Analysis and Sensitivity.
©Chelst & Canbolat Value-Added Decision Making Chapter 2 – Influence Diagrams Learn by example Learn vocabulary and grammar 9/19/
“ The one word that makes a good manager – decisiveness.”
1 Chapter 3 Structuring Decisions Dr. Greg Parnell Department of Mathematical Sciences Virginia Commonwealth University.
Chapter 7 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.
Decision Analysis (cont)
Decision Analysis H.Malekinezhad Lecture 2. Definitions A decision is a choice between alternatives based on estimates of the values of those alternatives.
Value of information Marko Tainio Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
Decision & Risk Analysis Influence Diagrams, Decision Trees NOTE: Some materials for this presentation courtesy of Dr. Dan Maxwell Reference: Clemen &
Decision Analysis Steps in Decision making
QM Spring 2002 Business Statistics Probability Distributions.
Introduction to Probabilistic Analysis Introduction to Probabilistic Analysis The third phase of the cycle incorporates uncertainty into the analysis.
Decision Analysis Mary Whiteside. Decision Analysis Definitions Actions – alternative choices for a course of action Actions – alternative choices for.
Copyright © 2009 Cengage Learning 22.1 Chapter 22 Decision Analysis.
Lecture 6 Decision Making.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Decision Trees. Introduction Decision trees enable one to look at decisions: with many alternatives and states of nature which must be made in sequence.
Amity School Of Business Operations Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
Decision Analytic Approaches for Evidence-Based Practice M8120 Fall 2001 Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc, FAAN School of Nursing & Department of Medical Informatics.
1.6 Organisational planning and decision making By the end of the lesson, you should be able to: Analyse and interpret business plans Compare and contrast.
QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
DECISION MAKING TOOLS 1. Elements of Decision Problems 2.
Decision Analysis.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :葉麗雯 Date : 2005/10/27.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Decision Analysis.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Pay Off Table and Decision Tree.
IB Business & Management
Decision Tree analysis. Decision making Decision making is the process of evaluating two or more alternatives leading to a final choice. It is closely.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Decision Analysis Building the Structure for Solving.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
IE 485 «Decision Making in Health Care»
OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
Operations Management
John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY.
Supplement: Decision Making
Constructing influence diagrams
Presentation transcript:

Elements of Decision Problems Given a complicated decision problem, one should first identify the elements of the problem Values and objectives Decisions to make (and alternatives) Uncertain events (and outcomes) Consequences

Values and Objectives Values Objectives What the decision maker cares about Objectives The specific things to be achieved Include objects and the direction of preference e.g. Maximizing profits, maximizing life quality Some objectives can be related e.g. Improving the image of a company may in turn bring it more profits There can be tradeoffs among multiple objectives e.g. Economic benefits gained by using chemical insecticide lead to health risk A requisite model includes all objectives that matter and only those that matter in the decision context at hand

Decisions to Make Decision Alternatives Sequential Decisions Specific alternatives e.g. Purchasing or leasing a car Choose a specific value out of a range of possible values e.g. Deciding the amount of money to invest in a project Consider the possibility of no action and of waiting to obtain more information Sequential Decisions Multiple decisions are ordered sequentially Dynamic decisions: a future decision may depend on exactly what happened before e.g. First decide purchase or lease a car, next decide what kind of car to purchase or lease, then decide where to get the car, … It is important to identify the order in which the decisions occur

Uncertain Events Uncertainty about the future makes decision problems hard It is important to focus on only the relevant uncertain events The possible outcomes can be finite or within some range of values e.g. whether it will rain or not, the annual profits of a company Complicated decision problems can involve interdependent uncertain events e.g. The interest rate of car mortgage depends on the market economy status The time sequence of uncertain events in sequential decisions is critical What events are unknown and what information is available before a decision is made

Consequences The final results after the last decision has been made and the last uncertain event has been resolved Defining Measurement Scales for Consequences Consequences corresponding to objectives with natural attribute scales can be measured objectively e.g. monetary values, time, length, weight, etc. Consequences corresponding to objectives without natural attribute scales Measured indirectly with proxies e.g. GPA as a measure of a person’s intelligence Measured subjectively using an attribute rating scale e.g. The quality of life can be measured using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire (best, better, satisfactory, worse, and worst) Tradeoffs among multiple objectives

Computer Industry Growth Influence Diagrams Invest? Venture Succeeds or Fails Return on Investment Computer Industry Growth Overall Satisfaction Decision Node Chance Node Computation Node Payoff Node Influence Diagram of a Venture Capitalist’s Decision Problem

Influence Diagrams (Cont.) Relationships between nodes are symbolized with arrows or directed arcs Distinctions are made here between sequence and dependence arcs only for teaching purposes. Once you are familiar with the differences, you can use solid arcs throughout the influence diagram like the convention used in the textbook

Influence Diagrams (Cont.) Influence Diagrams and Fundamental Objectives Hierarchy The Payoff node corresponds to the most general objective (located at the upper-most level) in the fundamental-objectives hierarchy The computation nodes correspond to the objectives at the lower levels in the hierarchy

Constructing an Influence Diagram No set strategy is given; a good approach is to put together a simple version of the diagram first and then add details as necessary Steps for Constructing Influence Diagram 1. Identify the decisions to be made. If there are more than one decision, determine their time sequence and draw sequence arcs to connect the decision nodes 2. Structure fundamental objectives hierarchy and convert the fundamental objectives into payoff or computation nodes in the influence diagram 3. Identify relevance relationships between the decision nodes and computation nodes or payoff node and draw corresponding arcs 4. Identify all the uncertain events 5. Identify the sequence relationships between the chance nodes and decision nodes and draw corresponding arcs 6. Identify the relevance relationships between the chance nodes and draw corresponding arcs

Constructing an Influence Diagram Steps for Constructing Influence Diagram (Cont.) 7. Identify the relevance relationships between the chance nodes and computation nodes or payoff node and draw corresponding arcs 8. Check the appropriateness of the influence diagram (any missing and/or irrelevant information)

EPA Example The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) often must decide whether to permit the use of an economically beneficial chemical that may induce cancer (carcinogenic). Furthermore, the decision often must be made without perfect information about either the long-term benefits or health hazards. Alternative courses of actions are to permit the use of the chemical, restrict its use, or to ban it all together. Tests can be run to learn something about the carcinogenic potential, and survey data can give an indication of the extent to which people are exposed when they do use the chemical. These pieces of information are both important in making the decision. For example, if the chemical is only mildly toxic and the exposure rate is minimal, then restricted use may be reasonable. On the other hand, if the chemical is only mildly toxic but the exposure rate is high, then banning its use may be imperative.

Carcinogenic Potential Influence Diagram of the EPA Decision Problem Net Value Economic Value Cancer Cost Usage Decision? Lab Test Net Value Survey Exposure Rate Economic Value Cancer Cost Carcinogenic Potential

Influence Diagram of the EPA Decision Problem Usage Decision? Lab Test Survey Carcinogenic Potential Net Value Economic Value Cancer Cost Exposure Rate Cancer Risk Influence Diagram of the EPA Decision Problem (adding a computation node)

Decision Trees Decision Trees Display A Decision Problem in Detail Decision trees explicitly identify the sequence of decisions/events (from left to right) Decision trees show all possible future scenarios One branch for each decision alternative One branch for each outcome of an uncertain event (outcomes must be mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive)

Decision Trees (Cont.) Decision Alternative Chance Node Consequence Widely Success $3,000 Business Decision Node Flop Business Result $0 Outcome of Uncertain Event Investment Choice $200 Savings Decision Tree of the Investment Decision Problem

Product-Switching Example A company needs to decide whether to switch to a new product or not. The product that the company is currently making provides a fixed payoff of $150,000. If the company switches to the new product, its payoff depends on the level of sales. It is estimated that there are about 30% chance of high-level sales ($300,000 payoff), 50% chance of medium-level sales ($100,000 payoff), and 20% chance of low-level sales (losing $100,000). A survey which costs $20,000 can be performed to provide information regarding the sales to be expected. If the survey shows high-level sales, then there are about 60% chance of high-level sales and 40% chance of medium-level sales when the company sells the product. On the other hand, if the survey shows low-level sales, then there are about 60%chance of medium-level sales and 40% chance of low-level sales when the company sells the product. 16

Old $150,000 $130,000 Survey High High $300,000 (0.6) $280,000 (0.5) New Medium $100,000 (0.4) $80,000 Old $150,000 Perform Survey $130,000 Survey Low Medium $100,000 (0.6) (0.5) $80,000 New -$20,000 Low -$100,000 (0.4) -$120,000 Don’t Perform Old $150,000 $150,000 New High $300,000 (0.3) $300,000 Medium $100,000 (0.5) $100,000 Low -$100,000 (0.2) -$100,000 17