The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
Advertisements

Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #8. We have looked at.. Airfoil Nomenclature Lift and Drag forces Lift, Drag and Pressure Coefficients The Three Sources of Drag:
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
Project Presentation Boiler Xpress December 5, 2000 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta Matthew Basiletti Ryan Beech Micheal Van Meter AAE 451 Aircraft Design.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #1
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Aerodynamics PDR #1. Objective To examine airfoil choices To examine wing shape choices Structural and Manufacturing Concerns.
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
Christopher Cottingham
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
UCSD/General Atomics Design Project: Aeroelastic Wing Enhancement Jose Panza, Project Sponsor Jose Panza, Project Sponsor Dr. James D. Lang, Project Advisor.
Requirements Propulsion Analysis Airplane Design Construction Final Product.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Parts of an Aircraft. 8/7/2015Aerodynamics Day 12.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Aero Design Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo
Lesson 2-2a Principles of Flight
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
Design Automation for Aircraft Design – Micro Air Vehicle Application
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Craig Kohring, Pat Tice, Sean Dineen, Mark Gasser James Pallardy, Katie Schipf, AJ Dayvie.
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
Lancair IV-P “The Kit that sets the Standards” Designed by Lance Neibauer Plane & Pilot, Aug 98 Lancair website.
Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
Cargo Airplane Challenge
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team One Purdue University AAE 451 Project Debriefing 28 April, 2005
Critical Design Review 24 March, 2005
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney

The Black Pearl: Design Proposal Design Drivers Maximum Level Speed Maximum Climb Rate Low-Drag Flying Wing With Drag-reducing winglets Objectives Increase Available Power Decrease Drag Decrease Weight

The Black Pearl: The Complications Stability Stability Fabrication Fabrication Landing Landing Payload Arrangement Payload Arrangement

The Black Pearl: Complication Remedies Stability Remedies Stability Remedies Wing Sweep Wing Sweep Wing Twist Wing Twist Reflexed Camber Line Airfoils Reflexed Camber Line Airfoils Proper Payload Arrangement Proper Payload Arrangement Winglets Winglets Fabrication Remedies Fabrication Remedies No fuselage or tail No fuselage or tail Fewer control surfaces Fewer control surfaces Landing Remedies Landing Skid Due to landing gear release on Take-Off Payload Arrangement Increased Root Thickness For storage in wing

The Black Pearl: Comparison Aircraft The Black Pearl Zagi XT Surikaty XE Paoli Flying Wing (unpowered) Thunder Tiger TOW (lbs) Wing Span (ft) Wing Area (in 2 ) Wing Loading (oz/in 2 )

The Black Pearl: Take-Off Weight Payload: Payload: Batteries, GPS, Receiver Batteries, GPS, Receiver Payload Weight: 2.85 lbs. Payload Weight: 2.85 lbs. Mission Requirements: Mission Requirements: Max Mach: Max Mach: Cruise Mach: Cruise Mach: Cruise Alt.: 500 ft. Cruise Alt.: 500 ft. Aspect Ratio: 6 Aspect Ratio: 6 Structure Factor: 0.54 Structure Factor: 0.54 Final Take-Off Weight: 6.26 lbs. Final Take-Off Weight: 6.26 lbs.

The Black Pearl: Wing Loading Mission Requirements: High Speed High Climb Rate Cruise: 1.69 lbs/ft 2 Climb: 2.94 lbs/ft 2 Preliminary Take-Off Distance: 120 ft.

The Black Pearl: Wing Design Multiple Airfoil Sections Multiple Airfoil Sections MH-45 at root MH-45 at root E-230 at tip E-230 at tip Increase in size to accommodate payload Increase in size to accommodate payload Less Geometric Twist = Less Drag Less Geometric Twist = Less Drag Effective dihedral incorporated into design for stability Effective dihedral incorporated into design for stability Winglets add effective dihedral Winglets add effective dihedral

The Black Pearl: Fuselage Design No Actual Fuselage Wing root thickened to accommodate payload Landing skid centered underneath wing Optimized airfoil fuselage shape

The Black Pearl: Wing Bubble

The Black Pearl: Airfoil Geometric Constraints

The Black Pearl: Flaps Design Take-Off Speed: 25 ft/s Sf/Sw: 0.4 Plane Flaps High AR Calculations Maximum CL:1.5 with flaps 1.0 without flaps Stall Angle = 12 o 14 o without flaps

The Black Pearl: Motor Selection Max Speed: 98 ft/s Max Speed: 98 ft/s Total Drag: 0.28 lb f Total Drag: 0.28 lb f Astro 15 Motor Astro 15 Motor 6,800 RPM 6,800 RPM SHP-0.35 SHP-0.35 Thrust at Cruise: 1.96 lb f Thrust at Cruise: 1.96 lb f T/W Ratio: 0.38 T/W Ratio: 0.38 Gear Drive Combo Gear Drive Combo 12x8 Propeller 12x8 Propeller 12 Cells 12 Cells

The Black Pearl: Power Requirements

The Black Pearl: Takeoff and Landing Analysis Mission requirements: Mission requirements: 300 ft. max take-off 300 ft. max take-off Without flaps: 211 ft. take-off length Without flaps: 211 ft. take-off length Skid Landing: High Friction Skid Landing: High Friction Leads to low-predictability from spreadsheet Leads to low-predictability from spreadsheet

The Black Pearl: Stability Design Payload arrangement Payload arrangement Forward C.G.  Positive Static Margin Forward C.G.  Positive Static Margin Wing Sweep: 20 o Wing Sweep: 20 o Wing Twist Wing Twist Washout Washout Reflexed Camber Line Airfoil Reflexed Camber Line Airfoil Low (or positive) moment coefficient Low (or positive) moment coefficient

The Black Pearl: Aerodynamic Wing Twist

The Black Pearl: Stability Design Part II Winglets Enhance directional stability Wing alone is directionally stable Wing Dihedral: -1o Roll Stability

The Black Pearl: Structure Two main spars for structure support Cutout in back of wing 4”x14” for propeller Thin Balsa wood skin Hatches incorporated into fuselage “bubble” for easy access to payload Smoother surface of entire wing

The Black Pearl: Structure (cont’d)

The Black Pearl: A New Beginning