Drainage Channel Restoration Construction Project Wood Co. Engineer’s Office Great Lakes Protection Fund A.D. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, R. McCall, D.J. Mears.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Kitchen Creek CREP & Stream Bank Stabilization Project Project Sponsors: Greenbrier Valley Conservation District West Virginia Conservation Agency U.S.D.A.

Advertisements

Drainage Management to Improve Water Quality and Enhanced Agricultural Production Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL by.

Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007 Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Councilman Tom LaBonge, CD 4 General Manager Jon Kirk Mukri City of Los.

Tour of Five Small Flood Control Dams in Iowa and Nebraska Rehabilitation Needs of Aging Small Flood Control Dams.

A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.

Missouri Department of Transportation US Fish and Wildlife Service Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Restoration Breakout Session Shannon Kusilek,

Cameron County Conservation District. Chapter 102 Rules and Regulations  Erosion is natural, so what’s the deal?  Accelerated Erosion is not natural.

Watershed Dams in Georgia 1. –357 Total –195 High Hazard (NRCS) –NRCS constructed – owned by local sponsors –Most built between 1950s-1970s for flood.

CHAPTER 102 Plain English Guide to the Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Regulations Fulton County Conservation District 216 N. Second Street, Suite 15.

JUNE 18, 2014 BOULDER COUNTY WATERSHED COALITIONS Comprehensive Creek Planning Initiative (CCP)

Does agricultural drainage affect the Minnesota River? “Agricultural drainage systems make crop production more successful.” - University of Minnesota.

“That’s Not A Levee Boil !” or “How to do more with less” By Glen Pearson, Northern District 2005 Annual Geology and Groundwater Meeting Geology and Groundwater.

Storm Water Management and Erosion/Sediment Control Storm water management reduces quantity, and improves quality, of runoff in the watershed Site based.

The Benefits of Investing In Conservation… …and the Costs of Not Investing Developed by Daniel Mountjoy USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Laura.

Illinois Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer State Water Quality Specialist Champaign, IL NRCS USDA.

Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.

Clean Water Act Section 404: An O&G Perspective Andrew D. Smith SWCA Environmental Consultants.

Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.

Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.

Ch  Know what design frequency means  Know how to delineate a drainage area on a topographic map 2.

ABSTRACT The upper Willamette basin from Eugene to Albany was settled by Euro-Americans in the 1840’s. Since then, the Willamette River had been a vital.

Stream Crossings: Effects on Streams at Fort Riley Military Installation Gilbert Malinga 1, James Steichen 1, Stacy Hutchinson 1,Phillip Woodford 2, Tim.

Preventing Nonpoint Source Pollution

1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.

A Review of Some Grant-Funded Watershed Projects in Central Illinois: Part II Illinois Lake Management Association Grant Opportunities and Funding Options.

1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.

A combination of warm weather grasses, terrestrial and aquatic plants in and around the spring Stormwater Management Plan for College Springs Park Benjamin.

1 Field Maintenance of Structural and Vegetative Measures Level 1A: Fundamentals Seminar Education and Certification for Persons Involved in Land Disturbing.

Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.

Rush River Assessment Project Hydrologic Flow Study Sibley County SWCD Presentation to the Minnesota River Research Forum March 10, 2005.

Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.

Drainage Water Management with Surface Drainage Systems USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer & Provider.

Dr. Larry C. Brown Professor, Extension Agricultural Engineer Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering The Ohio State University.

LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.

Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002.

Chapter 37 Pipeline Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the.

Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.

Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.

Salinity Control on the Pecos River Robert E. Mace, Ph.D., P.G. presented at the Multi-State Salinity Coalition’s Salinity Summit January 26, 2012; Las.

Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.

US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District Knife River Reducing Sediment Delivery Through Forest Restoration.

Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.

A Tool for Communicating the What, Why and How of Floodplain Systems D. A. Farver 1 and D. Mecklenburg 2 1 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Addressing the Sediment Problem in Sonoma Creek Watershed Rebecca Lawton 1, Deanne DiPietro 1, Laurel Collins 2, Arthur Dawson 1 1 Sonoma Ecology Center,

Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.

Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.

Laguna Canyon Creek Protection and Restoration. Major Watercourse Laguna Canyon Creek is a major watercourse. The City identifies it as that and treats.

Planning Habitat Restoration for Dredging Projects WEDA Midwest Chapter Conference Green Bay, Wisconsin April 27, 2012 Jack Brunner.

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,

Invent the Future Biological Systems Engineering VirginiaTech Invent the Future Watershed Science and Engineering Group Agricultural Drainage, Extreme.

EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.

RACC High School Training June 26, 2012 Jody Stryker University of Vermont Introduction to Watershed Hydrology.

STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.

Pollution Control: For Field Office Construction Sites.

MELBOURNE HILL ROAD CATCHMENT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Reference Panel Meeting, 6 February 2014.

Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.

The Boardman: A River Reborn Removing Dams for a Free Flowing River.

Wetland Restoration Planning considerations New Forest Consultative Panel – 3 Sept 2015.

City Council March 4, Introduction The UCRA recommends the development of a storm water storage basin just to the east of FM 1223, south of Avenue.

CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM

Town of Brighton, Department of Public Works

USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service

Black Creek Streambank Stabilization Projects

EFFECTIVE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS FOR IN-CHANNEL PROJECTS

Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007

Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,

2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources

Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources

Stream Crossing Replacement Policy

Presentation transcript:

Drainage Channel Restoration Construction Project Wood Co. Engineer’s Office Great Lakes Protection Fund A.D. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, R. McCall, D.J. Mears V. Bouchard, P. Richards, B. Sohngen, and L.C. Brown

Drainage Intensity, North Central Region, USA

Two-Stage Design Method for ditches being developed by Ward and Mecklenburg

Width and depth of small main channel can be estimated from drainage area (this case based on data obtained in Ohio’s Portage River Watershed by Ward, Mecklenburg, others)

Factors such as amount of maintenance, depth of ditch, bed material, depth to bed rock, and other factors influence ditch stability (data obtained by Ward, Mecklenburg, others)

Portage River Basin in Northwest Ohio (study area)

Sub-watersheds of Upper Portage River Basin

Aerial photo showing project location (Mary E. Smith farm) and cross-sections along Fast Road ditch in Wood County, Ohio.

Ohio County Ditch Law Chapters 6131, 6133, 6135, 6137 of the Ohio Revised Code Chapter 6133 specifically addresses Joint County Ditches ORC provides for review, feasibility, design, construction, assessments, and maintenance

Typical Design/Proposed Cross Sections Original elevations within ditch Excavated spoils red red New elevations within ditch yellow yellow New cross-sectional elevation (2-stage design)

Cross-section of Station 69+00

Sequential development at station May 2002 Before construction looking upstream Before construction looking downstream After construction looking upstream After construction looking downstream

Excavator forming slope of bank of new ditch channel

White pipe shows where bench meets toe of bank slope.

Reconstructed Benches Existing Vegetation After Reseeding

Estimated Project Costs Summary Mary E. Smith, Joint County Ditch Improvement Project No Process, engineering costs Advertisement, mailings, materials, construction staking, inspection, engineering design, contingencies, and initial maintenance fund $24,865 Construction costs Excavation, tree and debris removal, rock work, subsurface drain outlet replacement and splash apron, seeding, fertilizer, etc. $13, 606

Project Summary Total project cost = $38,471 % Process and Engineering = 65% % Construction = 35% Acres benefiting = 2323 ac Appraised benefits = $299,473 B/C = 7.78 For ORC Ditch Petition Projects, benefits must exceed costs

Design Method and Future Work Study of other Ohio watersheds being conducted (engineering, hydrology, ecology, economics, etc.) Design process being refined by Ward and Mecklenburg, others Other demonstration sites being developed New, multi-state project funded by USDA and EPA initiated in 2003 (Ohio, Minnesota and Illinois)

Project Collaboration / Sponsored Funding The Ohio State University: Departments of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering; School of Natural Resources; and Agricultural, Environmental and Developmental Economics Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Conservation Heidelberg College, Water Quality Laboratory University of Findlay Wood County Engineer’s Office Ohio State University Extension, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Soil and Water Conservation Districts Great Lakes Protection Fund