Kids Need Their Dads Pennsylvania’s Father Engagement Strategy State Children’s Roundtable Priority June 28, 2011 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CQI in Idaho August 20, 2013 Presenters: Debra Alsaker-Burke, Statewide Child Protection Manager, Idaho Supreme Court Sarah Siron, Mgmt. Analyst, Sr. for.
Advertisements

Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Permanency Practice Initiative June 27, Hypothesis Enhanced judicial oversight partnered with strength-based, family led, community involved practice.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,
Collaborating with Courts to Reduce and Eliminate Disparities Michael Nash, Presiding Judge of Juvenile Court, Los Angeles County Superior Court Maryam.
Truancy Workgroup Members Co-Chairs – Honorable John Kuhn & Cynthia Stoltz, Esq. Members: Courts Common Pleas Judges, MDJs, Hearing Officers, Court Administrators.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
702: Leading Those Who Engage Incarcerated Parents.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference.
National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts Office of Children & Families in The Courts.
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services Permanency Enhancement Project (PEP) Statewide Action Team Overview Prepared by: Doris M. Houston,
1 THE SKILL BUILDING CURRICULUM Developed by: Sheila A. Pires Human Service Collaborative Washington, D.C. In partnership with: Katherine J. Lazear Research.
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
1 Court-Agency Collaboration in Child and Family Service Reviews (CFSRs): Steps for Each Stage of the Process Hon. Stephen W. Rideout & Hon. William Jones.
Welcome from Child Support Enforcement Program Our goal is to ensure that families receive the child support they need and deserve.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
1 Kids Need Their Dads Fatherhood Workgroup Report State Children’s Roundtable State Children’s Roundtable May 27, 2011 Harrisburg, PA.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Creating Trauma-Informed Systems Susan Ko, PhD Director, Service Systems National Center for Child Traumatic Stress.
November 17, 2014 Webinar Tara Grigg Garlinghouse, NRCLJI 2013 NATIONAL REPORT ON CIP PROJECTS AND INITIATIVES.
Overview of the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center.
NEXT STEPS AFTER CFS REVIEW HHS/ACF will issue final report on Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) Once final report is issued, it will be disseminated.
1 Moving Children to Timely Permanence Training for Legal Representation for Children and Parents A Report to the State Roundtable of Pennsylvania.
The Arizona Community of Practice (AzCoPT) June 12,
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,
National IVE Roundtable June 4, 2015 Title IV-E Collaborations with Private Partners Susan Ault Senior Director Strategic Consulting.
Judge Mark Pouley Commissioner Michelle Ressa October 9, 2012 ICW Summit.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Partners in Juvenile Defense National Juvenile Defender Center Est (under ABA until 2005) Executive Director: Patricia Puritz Dedicated.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Incident Management PCCYFS June 27, 2007 Incident Management for the Office of Children, Youth and Families.
Kids Need Their Dads: Addressing the Issue of Nonresident Fathers in the Child Dependency System Fatherhood Workgroup A Preliminary Report to the State.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Copyright 2007 American Bar Association ABA Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Kathleen McNaught Elizabeth Thornton Cristina Cooper Jeffrey.
1 Moving Children to Timely Permanence Training for Legal Representation for Children and Parents A Report to the State Roundtable of Pennsylvania.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
2005 PA Community on Transition Conference Summary July 20 – 22, 2005.
Using the Safe and Together ™ Model to Guide and Enhance Policy Related to Domestic Violence and Child Maltreatment Kristen Selleck, MSW David Mandel &Associates,
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Effective Collaboration Between Migrant and Homeless State Education Programs Presented By Lisa Phillips, State Coordinator for NC 2012.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra Jenkins David Kelly Kathleen.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
The POPS Project Program Overview Finding provided by.
207 : Developing Family Leadership: Using Data to Help Develop Practice The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program 207: Developing Family Leadership:
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives October 23-24, 2014 Pocatello, Idaho.
Pennsylvania’s Action Plan October 2005-November 2009.
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
IV-D Impact on Tribal Clerks of Courts 10:45 a.m. – 12:00 PM, July 15, 2009 National Tribal Child Support Association Ninth Annual Conference Attorney.
County Name Next Steps Meeting and Licensing Exit Conference Date.
RESOURCES.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project
National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Kids Need Their Dads Pennsylvania’s Father Engagement Strategy State Children’s Roundtable Priority June 28,

2 Building the Foundation Assumptions:  Statewide issues & solutions (no pilots)  Administrative Collaboration (Courts/Agency)  Voluntary process (no Supreme Court “directives” – just “gentle pressure applied relentlessly”)  Focus on strengths & solutions  Relationships, relationships, relationships

3 Building the Foundation Pennsylvania’s CIP structure:  Local Children’s Roundtables  Leadership Roundtables  State Roundtable: Workgroup Structure

Pennsylvania Children’s Roundtable Structure Local Children’s Roundtable County Commissioners Hearing Masters Solicitors Guardians ad Litem Parent Attorneys Youth & Families County Child Welfare Staff Juvenile Probation Staff 8 Leadership Roundtables (LR) comprised of like size counties grouped together LR 1 LR 2 LR 3 LR 4 LR 8 LR 7 LR 6LR 5 Lead Dependency Judge & Children &Youth Administrator plus one additional designated stakeholder from the Local Children’s Roundtable advance to a Leadership Roundtable Lead Dependency Judge and Children &Youth Administrator (co-chairs) advance to the State Roundtable and act as representatives for each LR (additional representation for some LRs). Office of Children and Families in the Court Leadership Roundtable Co-Chairs Directors of Human Services Guardians ad Litem Solicitors Child Advocates Special Invited Guests State Supreme Court Justice Secretary of Public Welfare Deputy Secretary of OCYF Pennsylvania Legislators American Bar Association American Humane Association Pennsylvania Bar Association Pennsylvania County Commissioners Meets Annualy Meets Semi-annually Meets regularly as determined by lead dependency judge and child welfare administrator Law Enforcement Medical Professionals County Agencies School Districts Other Community Stakeholders Other Service Providers Office of Children & Families in the Courts Program Analyst

6 Pennsylvania’s Timeline  Honorable Max Baer, Supreme Court Justice 2004  Supreme Court assumes oversight of CIP 2006  OCFC created July 2006  Inaugural meeting of State Roundtable June 2007  CPCMS Outcome tracking data system roll-out 2008  Permanency Practice Initiative (Phase One) begins March 2009  Family Group Decision Making  Family Finding  Family Development Credentialing  Mission & Guiding Principles for Pennsylvania’s Dependency System created May 2009  Father Engagement selected as State Roundtable Priority May 2009  Dependency Bench Book created 2010  PPI Phase Two begins August 2010  PPI Phase Three begins February 2011

10 Building the Foundation for Father Engagement State Roundtable presentation May 2009 – Karen Jenkins, AHA & Mimi Laver, ABA Father Engagement Workgroup established 2009 “Bringing Back the Dads” – distributed at 1 st Children’s Roundtable Summit September 2009 First Report to State Roundtable & York County Panel presentation May 2010 Father Engagement Keynote at 2 nd Children’s Roundtable Summit – September Distributed Green Book - Father Engagement Plenary Session: Ron Clark, NFI & Jessica Kendall, ABA - County Planning document Second Report to State Roundtable May 2011

Pennsylvania Children’s Summit September 28, 2010 Philadelphia acourts.us/assets/ files/page- 329/file-547.jpg

QIC Tools Used  Bringing Back the Dads: Engaging Non-Resident Fathers in the Child Welfare System  Advocating for Nonresident Fathers in Child Welfare Court Cases (Green Book)  National Expert Presenters  ABA Center on Children and the Law  National Quality Improvement Center  Policy Roundtable – Washington DC  Best Practice Conference – Washington DC 12

QIC Policy Roundtable February 8, 2011 Washington DC

Father Engagement Workgroup Honorable Kim Berkely Clark, Committee Co-chair Honorable Maria Musti Cook, Committee Co-chair Ann Marie Cucinotta, Berks Hearing Master Barbara Ash, Philadelphia HS Legal Dept. Bill Phifer, Allegheny CYS CarrieAnn Frolio, York CYS Honorable George Hartwick, III, Dauphin Commissioner Dan Worley, York Parent Advocate Gene Detter, CWTP Karen Jenkins, American Humane Association Lisa Chambers, Allegheny CYS Tonya Burgess, CWTP Parent Ambassador Tina Zanis, Provider Steve Suknaic, Dauphin JPO Honorable Flora Barth Wolf, Philadelphia

Workgroup Activities Researched state and national best practices ( QIC) Conducted Pennsylvania survey of courts and child welfare professionals (2009) Conducted focus group of non-resident fathers (2009) Created Key Areas for Fathers in Child Welfare (2009) Created protocols for agency, attorneys, & court (2010) Created Father Brochure (2011) Creating regional training (2011) 15

To What End: Change Perceptions, Change Behavior, Change Outcomes Develop Protocol for:  Establishing Paternity  Locating Fathers  Engaging Fathers:  Case planning  Services  Court Supporting Culture Change  Agency (Father-friendly checklist)  Court  Community/Services Developing Education – judges, attorneys, child welfare, cross-system 17

To What End: Change Perceptions, Change Behavior, Change Outcomes  Incorporated as overarching theme in Judicial Bench Book Judicial Bench Book  Incorporating Father Engagement in all Workgroup discussions & planning: Legal Representation, Visitation, Bench Book  Collecting data to conduct evaluation of efforts & impact (CPCMS Module & focus groups)  Included in Pennsylvania’s Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) 18

19 Establishing Paternity One Father per Child!!!!!

Engagement Requires a Cultural Change We must recognize and acknowledge the value of fathers in the lives of their children Leadership from the top is needed to accomplish this but change at all levels needs to occur 20

Engaging Fathers Engagement with a non- custodial father is an ongoing, strength-based, solution focused process It takes more than sending him a letter! 21

2011/2012 Activities  Developing a plan for the dissemination of the father’s brochure  Developing Fatherhood component for all judicial, legal and child welfare education sessions  Developing father support groups in counties 22

2012 Workgroup Activities Send request to Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee – revised CPCMS order forms to: – include a checkbox that would require the court to find that paternity has been established and how paternity was established – collect data to measure outcomes with respect to father engagement 23

Protocols & Best Practice  Child Welfare Agency  Parent Attorney  Court 24 ocfc/father-involvement

Kids Need Their Dads! Pennsylvania’s Father Engagement Work Thank You!! 25