The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra 22-24 Nov. 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
The Giant Magellan Telescope Phasing System
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
AO188/LGS status AO188 development group(Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) (JST)
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
GMT Phasing GLAO – not needed LTAO – Phase stabilization done at ~1kHz with edge sensing at M1 and M2 – Phase reference set at ~.01Hz using off-axis star.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Requirements Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
NGAO Trade Study : LOWFS type and architecture Stephan Kellner, Ralf Flicker NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela HI, 1/22/2007 Status report.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
A Short Presentation of Ongoing AO Work at Lund Observatory Mette Owner-Petersen Lund Observatory Workshop for “Forskarskolen i Rymdteknik” Gothenburg.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
AO Opto-mechanical System Design Status, Issues, and Plans Don Gavel UCO/Lick Observatory (for the opto-mechanical design team) Keck NGAO Team Meeting.
Build to Cost Meeting: Major NGAO system cost savings ideas Don Gavel NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
Next generation wide field AO (GLAO) and NIRMOS for Subaru Telescope.
J. Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) Operational Readiness
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
AO4ELT - Paris Giant Magellan Telescope Project Science Drivers & AO Requirements Patrick McCarthy - GMT Director Phil Hinz & Michael Hart - GMT.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
OC, June 3, SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Some Thoughts on Ground Layer Adaptive Optics & Adaptive Secondary Mirrors for Keck P. Wizinowich 9/15/14 1.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Opening New Frontiers with the GMT, Seoul, October Giant Magellan Telescope How does an adaptive secondary mirror support the unique qualities of.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
1 Guidestar Laser Requirements for ELTs Brent Ellerbroek (with thanks to Norbert Hubin and Michael Lloyd-Hart) 2007 CfAO Fall Retreat Lake Arrowhead November.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Telescope Phasing Slides Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov. 2010

2 Outline 1.Project Status 2.AO requirements 3.Baseline Design 4.Unresolved technical issues 5.Meeting goals GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov. 2010

Project Status We’re working towards project PDR in “early” AO PDR must precede this; planning for Dec New project manager Keith Raybould starts Dec. 6. Major replanning effort has begun -Restructured WBS -Bottoms-up cost estimate (to complete by January 2011) Previous cost estimate for AO: $58.6 M (2004 $) -Schedule through construction (complete ~March 2011?) Current direction from management: Design to the the science requirements, without cost constraint. GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

Thoughts on AO project management AO system will likely cost ~$75M. Most of this work will have to be done by industry. However, AO/instrument groups at partner institutions provide experience, design expertise, and an ideal environment for technology development and testing. We’re very aware that project organization, systems engineering, and communications must be improved. Launching online communications tools (Basecamp) Hiring additional systems engineers Instituting a change control board GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

55 ModeDescription Natural Guide Star AO (NGSAO) High Strehl over a narrow field of view using bright guide stars. Requirement: 160 nm RMS WFE for R<8 stars. Laser Tomography AO (LTAO) Moderate Strehl over narrow field of view with high sky coverage Requirement: 200 nm RMS WFE over 80% of sky at b=50°. Ground Layer AO (GLAO) Image improvement over very wide field of view by correcting only low-altitude turbulence. Goal: 2-4x image size reduction in near-IR over 8’ diameter. Top-level performance requirements GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov Additional Requirements: Shall not preclude future implementation of MCAO and MOAO observing modes. AO system shall have <20% emissivity (<10% goal).

Instrument-specific Requirements 4 instruments currently being studied, with a wide range of AO requirements not captured in top-level requirements: GMTIFSNGS/LTAO with strict tip/tilt requirements GMTNIRSNGS/LTAO with loose tip/tilt requirements TIGERHigh Strehl – potentially NGS only NIRMOSGLAO only Challenge for AO team is to design a single system which will suit any 1-2 of these which are selected for 1 st light construction. Our strategy: -Design common components (ASM, lasers, RTC) which meet the most stringent requirement. -Design a suite of sensors which can meet requirements of each mode, and assume that the selected instruments will only implement certain sensors. -Do this with minimum duplication of effort: eg. only 1 IR-WFS design. GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

AO System Baseline Design 7 On-axis LGS Projector Free space beam relay Lasers: 6x30W CW + spare 7x672 actuator adaptive secondary mirror Wavefront sensors: Visible WFS modules attach to front of instruments: 1 HO-WFS, 3 LO-WFS, 6 LGS-WFS 1 IR-WFS internal to instrument which require high sky coverage 1 Optical Phasing Sensor common to all instruments top view Separate GLAO dichroic & LGS-WFS assembly GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov. 2010

8 Phasing System Baseline Design GLAO: No phasing necessary NGSAO: Use a pyramid NGS sensor to sense both telescope & atmospheric piston. LTAO: Slow (~1 min) Optical Piston Sensor with large patrol area + fast (100 Hz) relative metrology of adjacent segments. Average over atmospheric piston and accept 120 nm RMS WFE. Various alternative LTAO piston sensing approaches have been discussed, but none demonstrated to be sufficiently general. GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov. 2010

AO System Design Effort 5 components to the preliminary design effort: UANGSAO and GLAO subsystems ANULTAO subsystems SAOOptical phasing sensor ADS/MGAdaptive secondary mirror Proj. OfficeSystems engineering, edge sensors Potential additional design contracts to industry: Real- time computer, … GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

Unresolved Technical Questions Sky coverage & NGS sensor architecture… Can we develop an IR WFS design which suits all instrument’s needs? Are any of the alternative LTAO optical piston sensor approaches worth pursuing? Need to define and simulate interaction between AO and piston control loops. Are active optics WFS necessary/useful in NGSAO or LTAO control loop? Could active optics WFS be sufficient for all NGS sensing in GLAO mode? GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

Unresolved Management Questions What systems & sensors are crucial to prototype? -Optical Phasing Sensor… sensitivity & seeing dependence GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

[My] Meeting Goals We agree on a baseline design, including which aspects are yet to be defined. We agree on various groups’ responsibilities for the preliminary design phase, and the critical interfaces between these subsystems. We set up a schedule for communication between groups on design & interfaces. We compile a list of the technical questions which need to be resolved, and assign these to individuals. We compile a list of management and systems engineering issues which the project office must address. GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov

End 13GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov. 2010