“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEMES IN FAMILY LAW. WHO Regulates: State vs. Federal Law WHY Regulate: Goals of Family Law HOW to Regulate: Discretion vs. Rules LIMITS on Regulation:
Advertisements

Law the system of rules of conduct established by the government of a society to maintain stability and justice Law provides a means of enforcing these.
Amendment
The Judiciary. Is the Judiciary a political branch of the government? Should it be? What are the dangers of an unelected, activist judiciary? What are.
UNIT VI – THE U.S. CONGRESS (12), & LGBT RIGHTS PART 1 – LGBT RIGHTS Advanced Placement ® American Government and Politics.
Entrance Procedures  Turn in homework to the box  Be in your seat with a sheet of paper, ready to begin the Do Now  Turn in homework to the box  Be.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Constitutional Rights C. 13 s.1. All Americans have Basic Rights What are Human rights? Human rights are fundamental freedoms Freedoms for all people.
Fourteenth Amendment How it Defines citizenship & provides protections.
Plessy vs. Ferguson Background Activists in Louisiana were looking for a person to help them challenge the Separate Car Act in Louisiana. The act.
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
U.S. Citizenship Lesson 12.
United States vs. Windsor By: Taylor Beshel. U.S. vs. Windsor Argued: March 27, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013.
THEMES IN FAMILY LAW.  WHO Regulates: State vs. Federal Law  WHY Regulate: Goals of Family Law  HOW to Regulate: Discretion vs. Rules  LIMITS on Regulation:
Major Court Rulings for ESL Students Jonathan Hooper North Parkway Middle School
th Amendment. Suffrage For Against Everyone should have equal rights Women should have the right to life, liberty, and property More voices in.
Legal Background of Civil Rights. Have your “Legal Background of the Civil Rights Movement” on your desk – we will go over it today.
Chapter One (Section One)
Myra Colby Bradwell Born in 1831 in Manchester, Vermont In 1852 Myra married James B. Bradwell, an Englishman who had immigrated to the United States and.
1993: Hawaii Supreme Court rules that forbidding same-sex couples to marry is unconstitutional sex discrimination under the equal rights provisions of.
American Government Fall 2007 Civil Liberties. Freedoms from arbitrary government interference Found in Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) –Speech –Press.
Marriage (n)- the social institution under which a man and a woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments or religious.
BY: WILL CLAYTON & GRIFFIN SMITH.  Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
Equality and Hierarchy: Women’s Experience
Fundamental Principles of Democracy
Minorities and Equal Rights By: Brennan Holzer and Patrick Markey.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
THE WOMEN’S MOVEMENT. Background Historically, women have been considered intellectually inferior to men. They were seen as major sources of temptation.
Suffrage at Last Angela Brown Chapter 8 Section 2 1.
Everything Old is New Again Pre Suffragette Era Coverture, Woman Lawyers in the 1800’s, Expatriation Act and the Suffragette Movement.
AP American Government Chapter 19: Wilson Homework: Assignment 5 Quiz due Monday When can government make distinctions, classify people or treat them differently;
 Government, including states, cannot unreasonably discriminate against individuals; the government must treat people equally.
SOURCES OF LAW AND THE COURTS A NATION OF LAWS EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE.
L EGAL I SSUES IN H IGHER E DUCATION : T HE S TUDENTS LS 517 Admissions & Diversity.
CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE US FROM THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TO THE 1940S.
CHAPTER 4: FEDERALISM Section 1: Federalism: The Division of Power.
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Part 1: The Federal Court System Part 2: Civil Liberties and the 1 st Amendment Part 3: Civil Rights, Equal Protection Under the Law.
The Bill of Rights and Selective Incorporation. Bill of Rights First 10 Amendments Requested by delegates to state ratifying conventions to limit the.
Lecture number 12 Topic: Basic rights, freedoms and duties of man and citizens in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Amendments of Freedom and Justice
Chapter One (Section One)
Civil Rights: Overview
Civil Liberties Personal guarantees and freedoms that the government can not curtail Protection from the government Bill of Rights Specific rights that.
Same-sex marriage 1993: Hawaii Supreme Court rules that forbidding same-sex couples to marry is unconstitutional sex discrimination under the equal rights.
Howard Kaplan & Tiffany Middleton
Equal Protection & the 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment and Loose Ends
Equal Protection and Civil Rights
Civics In Our Lives.
Civil Rights: Overview
Woman's Movement: The Right to Vote
Amendment 9 Unenumerated rights—
2.3 Civil Rights and Equal Protection.
Chapter One, Section One
Chapter One (Section One)
The 14th Amendment How the Supreme Court and Congress Have
Chapter 7, Section 1: Changing the Law of the Land
Підготувала учениця 11-У класу Чупилка Тетяна
Civics In Our Lives.
Civics In Our Lives.
Civics In Our Lives.
The Bill of Rights and Selective Incorporation
Amendment 14 Citizenship Rights
Civic Participation amendments
Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
Bradwell v. The State of Illinois
Obergefell v Hodges By: Lynzee Morris.
Presentation transcript:

“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Fourteenth Amendment to The U.S. Constitution:

Myra Colby Bradwell Born in 1831 in Manchester, Vermont. In 1852 Myra married James B. Bradwell, an Englishman who had immigrated to the United States and studied law in Memphis Tennessee. In 1854, the Bradwells moved to Chicago, where James opened a law office and eventually became a judge of the Cook County Court. Myra began to study law to help her husband as his assistant. She later decided to open a practice of her own. In 1868 Myra founded a weekly legal newspaper called the Chicago Legal News. With Bradwell servicing as both editor and business manager, the Chicago Legal News quickly became a success. In 1869, after passing the state bar examination, Bradwell applied to the Illinois Supreme Court for admission to the bar. The court rejected her application on the grounds that as a married woman she “would be bound neither by her express contracts nor by those implied contracts which it is the policy of the law to create between attorney and client.” She reapplied, but the court rejected her again, this time because she was a woman, regardless of her marital status. The Court ruled, "God designed the sexes to occupy different spheres of action, and that it belonged to men to make, apply and execute laws, was regarded as an almost axiomatic truth." She appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 1873 upheld the Illinois decision, saying that it could not interfere with each state’s right to regulate the granting of licenses within its borders. James Bradwell Myra Colby Bradwell

Myra Bradwell Bradwell v. The State of Illinois (1873), U.S. Supreme Court Main Point 1 (Majority Decision written by Justice Miller): Citizenship does not give one the right, under the fourteenth amendment, to practice law in the courts of a state. “We agree with [counsel] that there are privileges and immunities belonging to citizens of the United States, in that relation and character, and that it is these and these alone which a State is forbidden to abridge. But the right to admission to practice in the courts of a State is not one of them. This right in no sense depends on citizenship of the United States.” p. 84. Justice Samuel Freeman Miller

Main Point 2 (Concurring Opinion by Justice Bradley): Men and women are very different. Women are naturally timid and delicate and there are many occupations for which they are unfit. Man is woman’s protector and defender. …[T]he civil law, as well as nature herself, has always recognized a wide difference in the respective spheres and destinies of man and woman. Man is, or should be, woman's protector and defender. The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life. p. 85. Justice Bradley Main Point 3 (Concurring Opinion by Justice Bradley): Women belong to the domestic sphere, and should not adopt a career distinct and independent from that of her husband. The constitution of the family organization, which is founded in the divine ordinance, as well as in the nature of things, indicates the domestic sphere as that which properly belongs to the domain and functions of womanhood. The harmony, not to say identity, of interests and views which belong, or should belong, to the family institution is repugnant to the idea of a woman adopting a distinct and independent career from that of her husband. p. 85.

Main Point 4 (Concurring Opinion by Justice Bradley): God has given women the role of wives and mothers. This is a natural law to which we must adapt, and not be persuaded by exceptional cases. The paramount destiny and mission of woman are to fulfill the noble and benign offices of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator. And the rules of civil society must be adapted to the general constitution of things, and cannot be based upon exceptional cases. p. 85.

Historical Significance In the 1875 case Minor V. Happersett, the Court ruled against women suffrage in Missouri on the basis that the Fourteenth Amendment does not add to the privileges and immunities of a citizen, and that historically “citizen” and “eligible voter” have not been synonymous. About a hundred years later, the Court began employing the Fourteenth Amendment as a way of overturning gender-discriminatory state laws. In doing so, however, it would typically use the "equal protection" clause, rather than the clause cited in Bradwell, "privileges and immunities." In 1882, the Illinois legislature passed a law guaranteeing all persons, regardless of sex, the right to select a profession as they wished. Although Bradwell never reapplied for admission to the bar, the Illinois Supreme Court informed her that her original application had been accepted. As a result, she became the first woman member of the Illinois State Bar Association; she was also the first woman member of the Illinois Press Association. On March 28, 1892, she was admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition to her efforts to win admission to the bar, Bradwell played a role in the broader women's rights movement. She was active in the Illinois Woman Suffrage Association and helped form the American Woman Suffrage Association. She was also influential in the passage of laws by the Illinois legislature that gave married women the right to keep wages they earned and protected the rights of widows. Bradwell died February 14, 1894, in Chicago, Illinois.