Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT August 7, 2009 Directors Conference Peoria, IL.
Advertisements

Integrated Systems to Support Implementation
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Michelle A. Duda, Sandra F. Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke National Implementation Research Network Implementation and System.
Karen A. Blase, PhD Dean L. Fixsen, PhD, Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW, Allison Metz, PhD, Sandra Naoom, MSPH, Michelle Duda, Ph D From Outcomes to Implementation.
The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Building Implementation Capacity to Improve Youth Outcomes Allison Metz, Ph.D. Associate Director National Implementation Research Network University of.
STAFF COACHING The Pathway to Successful Outcomes OJACC 2012 Jennifer Kisela & Kelli Held.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Installing Alternative Response in Ohio
Scaling Up Innovations Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Rob Horner, Ph.D. University of Oregon.
April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.
The Early Learning Challenge in North Carolina January 23, 2014 Marshall Tyson, MPH NC Division of Public Health Oscar Fleming, MSPH National Implementation.
Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute Implementing Innovations.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai Taking EBPs to Scale: Capacity Building PBS Conference 2008.
Allison Metz, PhD Karen Blase, PhD Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill System.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Michelle A. Duda, Sandra F. Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke National Implementation Research Network Frank Porter Graham Child.
Using Implementation Science To Inform Professional Development
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Karen A. Blase, PhD & Allison Metz, PhD Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill Terms of Reference:
Implementation and Scaling Literacy Programs
Presented by Shawn Fletcher Special Thanks To: Oregon DATA Project Team, EBISS, & David Douglas School District.
Selecting, Training and Coaching for Effective and Sustainable RtI Implementation A Model for Leadership Teams Margie McGlinchey; Ph.D. Kim St. Martin;
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Michelle A. Duda, Barbara Sims, Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, National Implementation Research Network FPG Child Development Institute University of.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Michelle Duda, Sandra Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke, Frances Wallace National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte.
SISC Implementation Science Simcoe Muskoka Kathy Simpson.
Strand D Sustaining & Scaling Implementation of SWPBS: Systems & Applications Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS April 4,
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Karen A. Blase Barbara Sims Michelle A. Duda Dean L. Fixsen Jonathan Green Ron Dughman, RRCP Jeanna Mullins, RRCP Presented by Jeanna Mullins, Mid-South.
Barbara Sims Brenda Melcher Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Michelle Duda Washington, D.C. July 2013 Keep Dancing After the Music Stops OSEP Project Directors’
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, 2008.
Ensuring RtI’s Successful Implementation
Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Scaling Up Improved Education Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Rob Horner, Ph.D. University of.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, Sandra F. Naoom, Melissa Van Dyke, Frances Wallace National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental.
Implementation Conversations Jennifer Coffey Audrey Desjarlais Steve Goodman.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
Karen A. Blase, PhD, Allison Metz, PhD and Dean L. Fixsen, PhD Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
State Scaling-up Workgroup March 6, SWG Agenda 9:00 Welcome & Introductions 9:15 Review Agenda/TIPS Meeting Form 9:20 Purpose of the Scaling-Up.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement A service of the Children’s Bureau, Member of the T/TA Network Readiness for Systemic.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy Inc. and CCSSO CCSSO/SCEE National Summit on Educator Effectiveness April 10, 2013 Implementation Science: Closing.
State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices U.S. Department of Education July 2010 Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. Michelle.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
1 Organizational Readiness Jan M. Markiewicz, M.Ed. National Center August 13, 2007.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Translating Aspiration to Operation: Developing Active Implementation Capacity and Infrastructure W. Oscar Fleming; MSPH Tuesday, September 29 th 2:30-4:00pm.
Sandra F. Naoom, MSPH National Implementation Research Network Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill.
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
State Scaling-up Workgroup
Using the Hexagon tool to Effectively select a practice
Creating a Coherent Communication System
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill Working Smarter: The implementation journey to improve student outcomes

Continuous Improvement Cycles Part 5

Changing on Purpose New practices do not fare well in existing organizational structures and systems For Example: Transformation is not like plug and play devices for a computer, it is more like changing operating systems while downloading delicate files.

Innovations and Systems EXISTING SYSTEM EFFECTIVE INNOVATIONS ARE CHANGED TO FIT THE SYSTEM EXISTING SYSTEM IS CHANGED TO SUPPORT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INNOVATION EFFECTIVE INNOVATION

AN ETERNAL STRUGGLE THE YIN & YANG OF CHANGE Innovations and Systems EXISTING SYSTEM EFFECTIVE INNOVATIONS ARE CHANGED TO FIT THE SYSTEM EXISTING SYSTEM IS CHANGED TO SUPPORT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INNOVATION EFFECTIVE INNOVATION

Changing on Purpose People, organizations, and systems… Cannot change everything at once (too big; too complex; too many of them and too few of us) Cannot stop and re-tool (have to create the new in the midst of the existing) Cannot know what to do at every step (we will know it when we get there) Many outcomes are not predictable (who knew!?)

Improvement Cycles PDSA (plan, do, study, act) Cycle Rapid – Cycle o Problem Solving o Practice Improvement Transformation Zones PEP-PIP Cycle (policy enabled practice – practice informed policy) Usability testing

Shewhart (1924); Deming & Juran (1948); Six-Sigma (1990) Plan – Decide what to do Do – Do it (be sure) Study – Look at the results Act – Make adjustments Cycle – Do over and over again until the intended benefits are realized PDSA Cycles: Trial & Learning

Plan – Find a way for kids to clean the stove routinely Do – Say, “clean the stove please” Study – See what parts they clean well and what parts they miss Act – Develop a card with a few cleaning hints Cycle – Continue until there are enough hints to routinely have a clean stove Clean the Stove

Actual Program Ideal Program To Narrow the Variation of the Actual from the Ideal PDSA Cycles: Trial & Learning David Thomas, 1985

Plan – Innovation core components Do – Selection, training, coaching Study – Fidelity, outcomes Act – Make adjustments Cycle – Do over and over again until fidelity is reached in a reasonable period of time PDSA Cycles: Trial & Learning

PLAN DO STUDY ACT P D S A P D S A P D S A P D S A Innovation Training Coaching Fidelity Administration

Plan – Coaching methods Do – Frequency, intensity, duration Study – Time to reach fidelity for the past 20 teachers/ staff Act – Revise coaching methods to shore up weak areas Cycle – do over and over again as conditions and people change forever more PDSA Cycle - Eternal

PDSA Cycles Shewhart (1924); Deming (1948); Six-Sigma (1990) Plan – Develop specific things to do Do – Do them (make sure) Study – See what happens Act – Make adjustments Cycle – Do over and over again until the goal is reached (again)

PEP-PIP Cycle Policy enabled practice (PEP) Practice informed policy (PIP) The PDSA cycle in slow motion Monthly instead of hourly, daily cycles Bigger issues where agreement (issues, solutions) and certainty (if this, then that) are not apparent

PEP-PIP Cycle Policy Enabled Practice (PEP) Practice Informed Policy (PIP) Management Team Implementation Teams System Change “External” Leadership

Policy Practice Feedback Loops Policy (Plan) Practice (Do) Structure Procedure Policy Practice Form Supports Function at every level (National, State, County, Municipal, Agency) Feedback Study - Act “External” System Change Support

System Alignment State Department Regions Agencies Practitioners/ Staff Effective Practices ALIGNMENT Federal Departments Implementation Teams FORM SUPPORTS FUNCTION

Summary Implementation is hard work Information by training by itself will NOT lead to changes in practitioner skills and abilities Implementation occurs in stages and getting to Full Implementation can take 2-4 years Each stage of implementation has it’s own set of activities and challenges Successful implementation occurs when the innovation (i.e. ESD) is embedded within the schools culture Successful implementation requires behavior change o Research related to implementation is still in it’s infancy o Policy enables new practice but practice needs to inform policy

"All organizations [and systems] are designed, intentionally or unwittingly, to achieve precisely the results they get." R. Spencer Darling Business Expert

Our Journey Continues

Next Steps on Our Journey On your journey of implementing this research into practice, continue your partnership with your regional T/TAC Instructor(s)

For More Information Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D At the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC

For More Information Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Download all or part of the monograph at: Monograph/ Monograph/ To order the monograph go to: