Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness Agenda

2 Webinar Logistics  Everyone is muted  Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question  You may chat privately with individuals on your team  If you have problems, you may send William Bentgen a message via the chat function or an email at williamb@ccsso.org 2

3 Welcome  Janice Poda, CCSSO  Initiative Director Education Workforce 3

4  Bobbi Burnham, CPEP Project, Office of the Deputy Commissioner  Steve Dibb, Director of the Division of School Support  Debbi Luedtke, Professional Development-Q Comp TAP, Supervisor, Division of School Support Minnesota Department of Education Participants 4

5 North Carolina & NIRN Participants  Amy Scrinzi, K-5 Mathematics, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction  Dan Tetreault, K-5 English Language Arts, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction  Dean Fixsen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Co- Director and Founding Member, National Implementation Research Network  Barbara Sims, Associate Director, National Implementation Research Network 5

6 State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence-based Practices (SISEP)  Current methods for encouraging the use of evidence-based programs and other innovations in education are insufficient  Islands of excellence  Implementation science and best practices are universal and apply equally well in education  A sea of change 6

7 Evidence-base Actual Supports Years 1-3 Outcomes Years 4-5 Every Teacher Trained Fewer than 50% of the teachers received some training Fewer than 10% of the schools used the CSR as intended Every Teacher Continually Supported Fewer than 25% of those teachers received support Vast majority of students did not benefit Aladjem & Borman, 2006; Vernez, Karam, Mariano, & DeMartini, 2006 Longitudinal Studies of a Variety of Comprehensive School Reforms Implementation Science 7

8 Formula for Success Effective intervention X Effective implementation = Effective outcomes 0.97 0.03 X 8

9 © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 All Students & Families School Teachers and Staff State Department Leadership State Department Leadership 1 for each School Building Implementation Team Implementation- Skilled Workforce Staff with special implementation skills Re-Purpose “District” Implementation Teams 1 for every group of 15-25 Schools Regional Implementation Teams 1 for every group of 4 “Districts” Adult interactions produce Student benefits 9

10 Implementation Team Regional, District, Building Teams Know innovations very well (formal and craft knowledge) Know implementation very well (formal and craft knowledge) Know improvement cycles to make interventions and implementation methods more effective and efficient over time 10

11 Impl. TeamNO Impl. Team Effective Effective use of Implementation Science & Practice IMPLEMENTATION INTERVENTION 80%, 3 Yrs 14%, 17 Yrs Balas & Boren, 2000 Green & Seifert, 2005 Fixsen, Blase, Timbers, & Wolf, 2001 Letting it Happen Helping it Happen Implementation Team 11

12 YEARS AMOUNTS Funding Capacity Implementation Teams Organization Change System Reinvention Capacity Building 12

13  Defined and Measureable Goals  Evidence-Based Practices  Data-Driven Decision Making  Tiered Levels of Support that Accelerate the Learning of ALL Students  Implementation of Instruction/Intervention as Intended  Culturally Responsive Teaching and Learning  Aligned with MN Pre K-12 State and Local Academic Standards  Parent and Community Engagement  Stages of Implementation (exploration and adoption, program installation, innovation/refinement, sustainability)  Core Implementation Components (staff selection, training, coaching, evaluation, systems intervention)  Leadership at ALL levels (technical and adaptive)  Coherent Alignment of Policies and Practices (implementation teams, continuous feedback loop, shared vision, collaboration, data support, professional development) Principles of Effective Practice (“What”) Principles of Effective Practice (“What”) Key Components of Implementation (“How”) MN Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)

14 © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Coaching Training Selection Integrated & Compensatory Competency Drivers Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Organization Drivers Adaptive Technical Leadership Drivers Performance Assessment (fidelity) Implementation Drivers Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions meet Implementation Reliable Student Benefits 14

15 © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Coaching Training Selection Integrated & Compensatory Competency Drivers Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Organization Drivers Adaptive Technical Leadership Drivers Performance Assessment (fidelity) Implementation Drivers Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions meet Implementation Reliable Student Benefits 15

16 Improvement Cycles 16

17 Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students System Change Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws SISEP System Change Support Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice System Reinvention 17

18 Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws System Reinvention Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students System Change SISEP System Change Support Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice 18

19 Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws System Reinvention SISEP System Change Support System Change Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice 19

20 Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice System Reinvention SISEP System Change Support Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students System Change Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws 20

21 Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students System Change Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws SISEP System Change Support Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice System Reinvention 21

22 Implementation Team State Management Team Teachers Innovations Students System Change Adaptive Challenges Duplication Fragmentation Hiring criteria Salaries Credentialing Licensing Time/ scheduling Union contracts RFP methods Federal/ State laws SISEP System Change Support Practice- Policy Communication Cycle Policy Supports Effective Practice System Reinvention 22

23 © Fixsen & Blase, 2008 All Students & Families School Teachers and Staff State Department Leadership State Department Leadership Building Implementation Team “District” Implementation Teams Regional Implementation Teams Transformation Zone A vertical slice of the system 23

24 For More Information Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D.  919-966-3892  dean.fixsen@unc.edu dean.fixsen@unc.edu Karen A. Blase, Ph.D.  919-966-9050  karen.blase@unc.edu karen.blase@unc.edu Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/ www.scalingup.org www.implementationconference.org 24

25 Implementation Science Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Download all or part of the monograph at: http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31 Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature 25

26 Upcoming Webinars  Connecting Educator Effectiveness and Common Core Implementation, Tuesday, March 13, 2:00-3:30 p.m. EDT  Special Webinar: International Summit on Preparation, Tuesday, March 20, 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. EDT  Regular monthly webinars, the second Tuesday of each month, from 2:00-3:00 or 3:30 p.m. ET 26

27 Planning for the Summit  May 2-4, Seattle, WA National Summit on Educator Effectiveness  Special Preparatory Webinar: Coherence and Comprehensiveness: Using Your Theory of Action April 10, 2:00-3:30 pm ET 27

28 Questions  If you have additional questions for the presenters, SCEE members can post them to: http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/disc ussion/topic/show/534964 http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/disc ussion/topic/show/534964 28

29 Contact Information Education Workforce Initiative Janice Poda, CCSSO janicep@ccsso.org ESEA Flexibility Toolkit for Principle 3 Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy/SCEE circe@westwinded.com State Policy Database Valerie Nyberg, West Wind Education Policy/SCEE valerie@westwinded.com 29

30 Thank you 30


Download ppt "The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google