Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Scheduling and Organizing the Intervention/Enrichment Period for Tiered.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
James Madison University
Advertisements

RtI and Title I in Wisconsin
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Robert Lynn Canady Professor Emeritus University of.
RTI and Title I An Overview Facilitated by Tara Black & Dean Richards.
©Joan Sedita, Keys to Literacy Planning Grades 4-12 Joan Sedita
©Joan Sedita School-Wide Literacy Planning Grades 4-12 Joan Sedita.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Scheduling and Organizing the Intervention and Enrichment Period for Tiered.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Summit County’s Changing Demographics Hispanic Population3262,4064,207 Total County Population15,51829,73636,100 Hispanics as percent of.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Gifted and Differentiation Forum Nov. 1, 2010 Julian Middle School Commons.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
The Financial and Instructional Impact of Changing the School Schedule Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University
Instructional Coaches in Sheldon ISD
Elementary School Scheduling: Enhancing Instruction for Student Achievement Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University P.O. Box 203.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Elementary School Scheduling: Enhancing.
Materials and Resources This Portion of the SAS website includes sample materials, and units which align with state standards. Materials are created.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Responsiveness to Intervention and Instruction VPA 2011 Thursday a.m. Julie Jameson Benay.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Robert Lynn Canady Professor Emeritus University of.
Timberlane Regional School District
Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Scheduling and Organizing the Intervention/Enrichment Period for Tiered.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
Scheduling and Organizing an Intervention/Enrichment for Tiered Instruction in Response to Intervention in Elementary Schools Michael D. Rettig
Noble Middle School AIG Program Overview. Standard 1: Student Identification This standard outlines how our district screens, refers, and identifies students.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
2  Tier 1: › Is for ALL students › Is highly effective teaching and learning › Contains the core curriculum › Includes differentiated learning › Formatively.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University The Challenges and Benefits of Scheduling.
Implementing & Evaluating a School RTI Framework Shawna Moran, EII, ODE Odyssey - August 2013.
Creating a School-Wide Literacy Plan Richmond Public Schools Assistant Principals Meeting September 28, 2011.
Teaching and Assessing for Learning – The schools’ curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and.
Elementary School Scheduling: Enhancing Instruction for Student Achievement Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University P.O. Box 203.
Scheduling at Tier 2: How Do We Fit It All In? September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Topics for Discussion 1.Foundations 2.Inventory /Audit Current Practices 3.Four Essential Requisites.
Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Elementary School Scheduling: Enhancing.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
What is Title 1?  It is a federal formula grant.  It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
James Madison University
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
PLC Book Gro.
Department of Exceptional Student Education
ESL Data-Driven Instruction
RTI: Response To Instruction
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Fallsmead Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University Scheduling and Organizing the Intervention/Enrichment Period for Tiered Instruction in Response to Intervention

 What is Response to Intervention (RTI)?  What is an Intervention/Enrichment Period?  Why do schools need/implement the I/E period?  Scheduling Time for Intervention and Enrichment in Elementary, Middle, and High Schools.  Organizing the Intervention/ Enrichment Period.

 Where should the time come from to create the I/E period?  How many periods should be scheduled?  Where in the schedule should the I/E period be placed?

However…remember the prime rule of school scheduling: To put something in, you must take something out !

Scheduling the Intervention/Enrichment period is relatively easy. Changing the culture of a school to one in which teachers and administrators collaborate on data analysis, progress monitoring, and the organizational tasks necessary to make the I/E period truly responsive to students’ learning needs is very difficult!

Formative Assessment Data Analysis Tiering and Planning Intervention and Enrichment Progress Monitoring

 Tier 1: Learn basic curriculum through typical instruction w/differentiation.  Tier 2: Need periodic intervention; should receive enrichment when not receiving intervention.  Tier 3: Need long-term and intensive intervention; enrichment???

 Elementary School: Within Class, Within Grade, Multiple-Grade, School-wide  Middle School: Within Team, Within Grade, School-wide  High School: Partial School- wide (multiple periods) and School-wide

The Centers Approach  Individual classroom teachers organize enrichment centers for tier 1 students.  Classroom teachers pull small groups from centers to provide Tier 2 (moderate, short-term) interventions.  Clinical specialists pull-out (or push-in) and provide Tier 3 (intense, longer-term) interventions. The Re-grouping Approach  Classes are re-grouped across a team or grade level to form tiered groups.  Tier 1 students are provide enrichment by one more classroom teachers or other personnel (Gifted, encore, etc.).  Tier 2 students are provide interventions by other classroom teachers.  Tier 3 students are provided interventions by clinical specialists.

Table 4.1 Sample Structure of Intervention/Enrichment Period for One Grade Level GroupsActivityStaff 25% of studentsWriting lab One (of three) classroom teachers 25% of students Science and social studies enrichment activities Library/media specialist 15% of studentsMath interventions Second classroom teacher or computer lab 35% of studentsReading interventions Third classroom teacher, LD teacher, 2 reading specialists

Table 4.2 Sample Structure of Intervention/Enrichment Period for One Grade Level with Four Base Teachers and 92 Students Number of studentsActivityStaff 20 studentsSocial studies enrichmentTAG teacher 15 studentsScience enrichment Library/media specialist or classroom teacher 18 studentsWriting labTitle I or reading specialist 12 studentsSpecial services LD teacher, ESL teacher, speech/language teacher 10 studentsMath interventions Math specialist, classroom teacher, and/or computer lab 17 studentsReading interventions Title I, reading specialist, SPED teacher, one or more classroom teachers

 Scheduling the Intervention/Enrichment period is easy compared to organizing and preparing for instruction within it.  All students and staff must be productively engaged during the period.  Clear, consistent, and involved leadership is required to ensure that assessment, data analysis, tiering, planning intervention and enrichment instruction, and progress monitoring all are carried through.  Time must be allocated for planning for groupings and instructional activities.  It may be wise to select specific programs for enrichment and/or intervention activities rather than having teachers design their own.  It may be wise to start out providing interventions in one subject only, most likely language arts.  A standard assessment tool should be used to determine groupings (Dibles, PALS, district quarterly assessments, etc.).  An Response to Intervention (RTI) type tier structure based upon this assessment is necessary to allocate students to enrichment, moderate intervention and intensive intervention groups.  A decision must be made as to whether or not special services (i.e. special education or ESOL) will be “the” intervention for some qualifying students during the I/E time or will they be served at a different time by those professionals.