An Overview of the Triple Bottom Line Approach Bob Willard www.sustainabilityadvantage.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of CSR in Kenya
Advertisements

1 UNGC Module 2 – Session 2 THE UN GLOBAL COMPACT MODULE 2 - THE BUSINESS CASE Session 2: Understanding the Business Benefits of Corporate Environmentalism.
NON-FINANCIAL METRICS. “NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES ARE CRITICAL IN THE GROWING MANDATE FOR BETTER OVERSIGHT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” IN THE DARK.
THE NEW SUSTAINABILITY ADVANTAGE : The Presentation Featuring excerpts from three talks by Bob Willard about the book.
ESG ISSUES Environmental, Social and Governance February 23,
Measurement and Accountability: Why Bother? Johanne Gélinas Partner, Sustainability & Climate Change CSIN 2 nd National Conference - Accountability Through.
Governance Jos Luhukay, PhD National Committee on Governance National Information & Communications Technology Council 17 January 2007 Balancing Economic.
The Business Model: Challenges and Opportunities Bob Willard World Economic Center Montreal October.
“Our biggest challenge in this new century is to take an idea that seems abstract -- sustainable development -- and turn it into a daily reality for all.
Jan Ruecker James Choi Sakshi Sachdev Shan Moin Jarrett Robbins Anh Dang.
A Discussion of Sustainability Brent McKnight. Conceptualizing sustainability “Sustainable Development meets the needs of the present without compromising.
Nigel Marsh, Global Head of Environment, Rolls-Royce plc
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY doing business the right way
Communicating the Bu$ine$$ Case for $ustainability Strategies
The Green Company Challenges for Corporate Leaders Stefan Doering Tuesday April 1 st, 2008.
What is it, and why should you care? UGBA 178 Erik Kiewiet de Jonge.
Winning Strategy 2 CSR plan
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Small Firms: Theory and Reality Dr. Athanasios Hadjimanolis Associate Professor European University of Cyprus.
Strategic Management Process
Sustainability & Innovation
Organizational Objectives
Why the $u $ tainability Imperative Makes Sen $ e Bob Willard CAUCE June 7, 2011.
UNDP & the Business SectorBureau for Resources and Strategic Partnerships Business, sustainable development and the MDGs: A changing landscape.
© 2010 IMD International. Not to be used or reproduced without permission. Building the business case for sustainability in SMEs A structured framework.
Year 12 Business Studies Operations REVIEW.
Points Covered….. Who are Groundwork Hotel sector overview Challenges you face Where Groundwork can help Examples of support available.
TWO QUESTIONS: DOES THE UK WANT A CHEMICAL INDUSTRY? AND IS IF SO IS THE UK A PLACE FOR THE INDUSTRY TO INVEST AND GROW? Dr Diana Montgomery Deputy Chief.
Attracting appropriate user funding in the context of declining public funding.
Part E – IMPACT OF MULTINATIONAL BUSINESSES ON HOST COUNTRIES AS (3.2): Demonstrate understanding of strategic response to external factors by a.
CSR Kieran Nellist Alexey Trush Karthik Kuppuswamy Kalin Pipatanantakurn Panji Sukma Majid Zabihi 1.
Bob Willard The Business Ca $ e for the “Sustainability Imperative” Learning for a Sustainable.
Motives for CSR in the Lithuanian SMEs from non-manufacturing industries.
Arab african international bank ARAB AFRICAN INTERNATIONAL BANK SHARING EXPERIENCE Dr. Dalia Abdel Kader Head of Marketing and Communications Arab African.
Chapter 11.  A way companies manage the business processes to produce an overall positive impact on the society  A commitment to improve community well.
Sustainability-Related Risks and Opportunities for Business Bob Willard Business Education For the Long Run April 23, 2004.
UK Government approach to CSR Jane Leavens CSR Policy Department of Trade and Industry.
Stakeholders. DO NOW Page 71 Tata Nano Divides Opinion answer all questions at the top of page 72.
ABB and Corporate Social Responsibility Dr. Gülden Türktan.
CHALLENGING BOUNDARIES Rhodia way, The way we do business.
Part A – SOCIAL & CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY AS (3.2): Demonstrate understanding of strategic response to external factors by a business that operates.
 Innovation By Alma Bautista, Ken Hau, Michael Corral.
'Change Management in European Enterprises' International Meeting Athens, September 14, 2007 Michael Spanos Managing Partner
Sustainability Planning Thinking Clearly in a Climate of Fear November 14, 2008 US National Whitewater Center Tom Lannin, PhD.
Operationalising sustainability agenda. Our vision “Banking is vital to restoring a vibrant global economy. Banks can be powerful contributors to economic.
The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Serbia Kai Bethke 26 June 2007.
Drivers Introduction n Forces for Change n Business Drivers y Reputation & License-to-Operate y Cost reduction & Eco-efficiency y Market Growth y Market.
Copyright © 2008 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd. 1 Chapter Seven Corporate Social Responsibility: The Concept Prepared by Mark Schwartz, York University Canadian.
CHRISTINE PAK, KELLE PATTERSON, ERIN DONNELLY, YI SHI, HANRUI ZHANG U1 Corporate Responsibility and Green Practices.
Strategic Planning Workshop 2 Environmental Scan Stakeholder Engagement SWOT Analysis.
African Institute of Corporate Citizenship founded in Ethos Institute’s 2006 International Conference Government and market social.
Starter: What is a mission statement?
The Business Case for Sustainable Development Bob Willard
Sustainable Business Practices Program Bellevue College Marika Reinke NEW PROGRAM.
A view from the Top John shonk Bob Odgers Don Ewalt.
We Complete Your Success Planning for Business Continuity Governance for SMEs Nigeria.
Interaction Private Sector Working Group Discussion with USAID Global Partnerships January 30, 2014.
The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Small and Medium Enterprises in Bulgaria Kai Bethke 12 June 2007.
ERT351 SUSTAINABLE AGRO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Week 1 : Sustainability by Faa.
Business and the Global Challenge – a Novo Group Perspective Lise Kingo, Corporate Vice President, Novo A/S, Stakeholder Relations World Environment Center,
Level 2 Business Studies AS90843 Demonstrate understanding of the internal operations of a large business.
Sustainable Companies for the 21st Century Evolution of the Components of Sustainability for GlaxoSmithKline Dr. James Hagan Vice President Corporate Environment,
Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the responsibility a firm has to all of its stakeholders rather than just the.
Sustainability Internal Drivers and Self-Assessment Dennis J. Stamm
Social ECG issues changing business context Environmental Governance
Sustainable Theory.
Handout 6: Organisational objectives
CREATION SHARE VALUE SHAAHIN ,SHAHSAVARI.
Chapter 6: Goals and Objectives Learning Objectives
Sustainability Internal Drivers and Self-Assessment Dennis J. Stamm
The Corporate Social Audit Corporate Sustainability
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the Triple Bottom Line Approach Bob Willard

 Terminology  The bottom line  The catch  7 benefit areas  What if’s Agenda

Economy / Profits Sustainable business  Profits  Taxes, R&D  Jobs  Expenditures  Training  Fair trade  Core values Terminology Environment / Planet Eco-Efficiency  Manufacturing efficiencies  Operations efficiencies  Product efficiencies  Smart design  Cradle-to-cradle, take-back  Beyond compliance  Restorative to nature Equity / People Ethical business Internal employees  Human rights  Health & Safety  Empowerment  Respect, Caring Local community Rest of the world “Sustainable Development (SD)” “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” “Sustainability” “Triple Bottom Line (TBL)” 3Es3Ps

Business Priorities Productivity Brand Image Profit Growth Attracting & Retaining Top Talent Managing Risks Innovation Speed to Market Leadership Market Share Motivation Share Price Competitive Advantage Governance Expense Savings New Markets Complying with New Regulations Attracting & Retaining Customers Responding to Emerging Market Forces Revenue

Dow Jones Sustainability Index

Potential profit increase: 38% + Energized employees + Improved corporate image + Competitive advantage + Positioned for the future Benefits to “SD Inc.”

1. Show senior leadership  Include SD in vision / mission / strategies  Avoid “green-washing” hype  Visibly support SD: speeches, questions, actions 2. Educate the whole company  Visibly sponsor and support the sessions 3. Establish an “SD Profit Center”  Led by a top person  Reinforces that it is business strategy vs. a compliance or philanthropy issue The Catch

1.Reduced recruiting costs 2.Reduced attrition costs 3.Increased employee productivity 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share 7.Reduced risk, easier financing 7 Benefit Areas Usual focus

1.Reduced recruiting costs -1% 2.Reduced attrition costs -2% 3.Increased employee productivity +10.5% 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing -5% (-2.5%) 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites -20% (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share +5% 7.Reduced risk, easier financing -5% 7 Benefit Areas … % Improvement … yielding a Profit increase of +38%

7 Benefit Areas … Relative Sizes

10 Market Forces 5 Mega-Issues5 Demanding Stakeholders Climate ChangeGreen Consumers Pollution & Health Activist Shareholders Globalization Backlash Civil Society / NGOs Energy Crunch Government Regulators Erosion of TrustFinancial Sectors Sea Change Of Rising Expectations

The Perfect Storm … of Opportunities Innovation Productivity Growth Brand Image Competitive Advantage $aving$ Revenue +38% Profit 10 Market Forces 5 Maga-Issues5 Demanding Stakeholders Climate ChangeGreen Consumers Pollution & Health Activist Shareholders Globalization Backlash Civil Society / NGOs Energy CrunchGovernment Regulators Erosion of Trust Financial Sectors

1.Reduced recruiting costs -1% 2.Reduced attrition costs -2% 3.Increased employee productivity +10.5% 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing -5% (-2.5%) 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites -20% (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share +5% 7.Reduced risk, easier financing -5% 7 Benefit Areas … % Improvement … yielding a Profit increase of +38%

1.Reduced recruiting costs -1% 2.Reduced attrition costs -2% 3.Increased employee productivity +10.5% 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing -5% (-2.5%) 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites -20% (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share +5% 7.Reduced risk, easier financing -5% What if … … yielding a Profit increase of +38% -2% +35%

1.Reduced recruiting costs -1% 2.Reduced attrition costs -2% 3.Increased employee productivity +10.5% 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing -5% (-2.5%) 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites -20% (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share +5% 7.Reduced risk, easier financing -5% What if … … yielding a Profit increase of +38% +4% +23%

1.Reduced recruiting costs -1% 2.Reduced attrition costs -2% 3.Increased employee productivity +10.5% 4.Reduced expenses in manufacturing -5% (-2.5%) 5.Reduced expenses at commercial sites -20% (energy, water, consumables) 6.Increased revenue / market share +5% 7.Reduced risk, easier financing -5% What if … … yielding a Profit increase of +38% -2% +4% +20%

An Overview of the Triple Bottom Line Approach Bob Willard