The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
OSPI Social Studies Assessment Training
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Backward Design Stages Identify Student Learning Expectations/ Targets Determine acceptable Evidence of student learning. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Stage 1: Identify desired results. Stage 2: Determine acceptable evidence. Stage 3: Plan learning experiences and instruction. Wiggins, G & McTighe. J,
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe Chapter 7: What is “Uncoverage”? Created & Presented by Jane Cook, EASTCONN Staff Development/Literacy.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
MODULE 3 1st 2nd 3rd. The Backward Design Learning Objectives What is the purpose of doing an assessment? How to determine what kind of evidences to.
Authentic Performance Tasks
BACKWARD MAPPING: Beginning with the end in mind
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Please check, just in case…. Announcements 1.Classroom/caseload learning objectives description due next week. 2.First classroom—based assessment due.
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
Understanding By Design
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
SATURDAY, JANUARY 9, 2010 MARCIE TAYLOR-THOMA World History Writers’ Training.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods
Understanding by Design
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
EDU 385 EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CLASSROOM
MODULE 7 Putting All Together and Designing the Course.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Paul Parkison: Teacher Education 1 Articulating and Assessing Learning Outcomes Stating Objectives Developing Rubrics Utilizing Formative Assessment.
Teaching a Lesson (and Researching!)  Available online at  Examples and supplemental information in BLUE.
Teacher-Librarian Supported Inquiry-Based Learning
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
Using Understanding by Design
Adapted from Understanding by Design Academy, Seattle, WA, July 2001 presented by Jay McTighe, ASCD. Think “Scrapbook” versus “Snapshot ”
Understanding Backwards Design – U. S. History Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
LSAC Academic Assistance Training Workshop June 13 – 16, 2012 OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT – THE BASICS Janet W. Fisher Suffolk University Law School.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
Assessment Whittney Smith, Ed.D.. “Physical vs. Autopsy” Formative: Ongoing, varied assessment used as a tool for learning and diagnosing Summative:
The Backward Design Process
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Understanding By Design
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
Planning Instructional Units. Planning Vital and basic skill for effective teaching Helps you feel organized and prepared Is only a guide: not carved.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Assessment Ice breaker. Ice breaker. My most favorite part of the course was …. My most favorite part of the course was …. Introduction Introduction How.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Understanding Backwards Design - Civics Dr. Sarah Mathews Florida International University
Effective lesson planning and design By Debora Chappelle.
Would you agree That the only thing over which we have control is the quality of the work we provide our students?
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Understanding by Design DESIGNING CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Evidence of Understanding
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
3 Stages of Backward Design
Understanding by Design
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter G. Woodson

What is the primary goal in my course? Cover the basic material Impart new discipline knowledge Facilitate student learning Ensure student success Other

Traditional course design… Content coverage Activity centered Not always clear connection to desired learning outcomes or larger understanding

Traditional course design Choose text Identify chapters to be covered Develop lectures or labs Create exams

Understanding by Design Wiggins and McTighe Represents BIG ideas with value beyond the classroom Requires “uncoverage” “Backward Design” - key Engages students

Understanding by Design – Why Bother? Focus on what you want students to achieve Move away from “coverage” Improve student and faculty engagement Connect course outcomes, assessments, and activities Facilitates mapping of course outcomes and student assessment to program, department, and institution – level goals

Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins Two Big Ideas of Understanding by Design Jay McTighe

Plan Learning Experiences Determine Acceptable Evidence Identify Desired Results Backward Design

Stage 1: Identify the Desired Results Outcomes Program, course, unit

Learning Outcomes What will my students know? What will my students be able to do? What will my students be to understand/appreciate?

Identifying Key Ideas Big-picture knowledge, allows One to find and retrieve information Prerequisites for success Students will know long after the class ends

Something to think about…. Course Outcomes Concepts and issues - What must the student understand to demonstrate the intended outcome? Process skills -What skills must the student master to demonstrated the intended outcomes?

Key Ideas…. Choose a course. Identify what is… worth being familiar with important to know and do enduring understandings

Stage 1: Identify the desired results (based on Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe) Learning Outcomes What relevant goals (eg. course outcomes) will this design address? Understandings: Students will understand that …. What are the big ideas? What specific understandings about them are desired? What misunderstandings are predictable? Q Essential Questions: What provocative question will foster inquiry, understanding, and transfer of learning Students will know… What key knowledge and skills will the student acquire as a result of the this unit? What should they eventually be able to do as a result of such knowledge and skills? A Students will be able to…

Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence

How will you know if students have achieved the desired results and met the expectations? What will you accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency? What is evidence of in-depth understanding as opposed to superficial or naïve understanding? What kinds of assessment evidence will anchor units and guide instruction?

To what extent do the assessments provide fair, valid, reliable, and sufficient measured of the desired results?

Fair allow for students of both genders and all backgrounds to do equally well. Valid an indication of how well an assessment actually measures what it is supposed to measure Reliable an indication of the consistency of scores across evaluators or over time

Plan a range of assessment formative summative balance use observations quizzes and tests performance tasks projects must support students in developing understanding give students opportunities to demonstrate that understanding criterion-based student self-assessment essay or paper webpage portfolio authentic learning tasks

Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence Performance Tasks: Through what authentic performance tasks will students demonstrate the desired understandings? By what criteria will performance of understanding be judged Other Evidence: Through what other evidence (eg. quizzes, tests, observations, reading response) will students demonstrate achievement of the desired results? How will students reflect upon and self-assess their learning?

Criteria

RubricsRubrics 1 Rubric 2

Co-Constructing Criteria What makes a “good” oral presentation? List one attribute per sticky note. When complete put sticky notes on designated chart paper.

With your partners, group attributes together. Title each category. Share your categories and their content with the large group.

Stage 3: Plan Learning Experiences

“ Beyond learning about a subject, students will need lessons that enable them to experience directly the inquiries, arguments, applications, and points of view underneath the facts and opinions they learn if they are to understand them.” (Source: Understanding Design by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, p. 99)

The learning experience requires students to: “Theorize, interpret, use, or see in perspective what they are asked to learn…(or) they will not likely understand it or grasp that their job is more than recall.” Source: Understanding Design by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, p. 99

ACTIVE LEARNING Video

Rich Learning Experiences Role-play Problem-based activities Case studies Simulations Dramatizations Project based Practicums Service learning Situational observations

Authentic Learning Authenthtic Learning Assessment

Plan Learning Experiences Determine Acceptable Evidence Identify Desired Results Backward Design

What are the advantages of Understanding By Design approach to program, course, and unit development? What are the challenges of implementing an Understanding By Design approach? Additional thoughts, comments….

Alignment

“ Education is not filling a pail, but the lighting of a fire.” -William Butler Yeats