NATIONAL RECREATIONAL BOATING SURVEY Understanding Its Structure and Impact Tamara L. Terry, ERAC Committee Chair (on behalf of 2014 ERAC C1 charge team)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Nettie’s Nickel 4 Comprehensive AT Report Writing 2 Support a District’s Offer of FAPE Nettie Fischer, ATP July 22, 2014.
School statistic collections Summary of previous years, results, issues and proposed changes to future years collections.
NASBLA 54th Annual Conference September 14-18, 2013 Boise, Idaho NASBLA ERAC Engineering, Reporting & Analysis Committee Tammy Terry – Chair (OH) Cody.
CERT Program Manager: Training and Exercises
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
NASBLA ERAC Terms and Definitions Project Next Steps Webinar July 15, :00 p.m. EDT
VSC DATA COLLECTION William S. Griswold. 2 Presentation Agenda 1 USCG Strategic Plan 2 NASBLA Work Group 3 Project purpose 4 Results to date 5 Q&A.
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 1-1 Business Statistics: A First Course (3 rd Edition) Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
AESP MARKET RESEARCH, EVALUATION, AND GREEN HOUSE GAS TOPIC COMMITTEE MEETING April 22, 2015 First quarter TC Meeting, on behalf of the AESP.
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Survey Use & Design.
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 1-1 Basic Business Statistics (9 th Edition) Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
Experience in Applying Online Learning Techniques in Computer Science & Engineering Dr. Aiman H. El-Maleh Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University.
Agenda: Block Watch: Random Assignment, Outcomes, and indicators Issues in Impact and Random Assignment: Youth Transition Demonstration –Who is randomized?
How to Present Effective Safety Meetings
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Sampling.
VSC DATA COLLECTION William S. Griswold. 2 Presentation Agenda 1 USCG Strategic Plan 2 NASBLA Work Group 3 Project purpose 4 Results to date 5 Q&A.
Presented by: Insert Name Safety Management Consultant
District Rotary Foundation Seminar District 5470 Rotary District Grants Certification.
Nordic Collaboration on Fishing Safety Workshop in Copenhagen Feb 2014 Improvement and Harmonisation on Nordic fishermen´s data on injuries and working.
The NASBLA Lighthouse ERAC’s One-Stop Shop for Your Boating Data/Analysis Needs Tamara Terry, ERAC Chair, OH Kris Wahlers, CO Glenn Moates, TN Eric Lundin,
Data Management Grade 7. What’s the Story? Secondary data is information that was collected by someone else. Referring to information that was published.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
ESurvey Adjustments The following slides should be used to educate internal audiences at your organization on esurvey adjustments. We recommend that you.
Implementing Adult Risk Factor Surveillance in Manitoba Case Studies ARFS Symposium January 26, 2011.
Lesli Scott Ashley Bowers Sue Ellen Hansen Robin Tepper Jacob Survey Research Center, University of Michigan Third International Conference on Establishment.
Marine Recreational Information Program Update Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council April 9, 2013 Rob Andrews Office of Science and Technology.
Community Health Assessment: Primary Data Collection LHD TA Project – Learning Collaborative 1 Community Health Assessment Second Learning Session Sheena.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Research Plan Public Workshop #1 February 20, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
From Theory to Practice: Inference about a Population Mean, Two Sample T Tests, Inference about a Population Proportion Chapters etc.
Validity and Reliability Example of Past Paper Answer – 2007 Q6.
NEIL EISNER ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL FOR REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MCSAC AUGUST 28, 2012 Retrospective Reviews of Rules.
Basic Business Statistics
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Answering Question 6 Source Questions General Points Candidates should define validity and reliability Award up to 3 marks for a point that is.
NASBLA ERAC Engineering, Reporting & Analysis Committee ‘What’s Cooking’ Briefing on 2015 Committee Activity Tammy Terry – Chair (OH) Glenn Moates – Vice.
The 2006 American Community Survey (ACS) Content Test Questions on International Migration: Improving Data on the U.S. Foreign-Born Dean H. Judson For.
Methodology and Sample: CrossMedia Research™ Based on potential exposure to campaign  Using responses from consumers as to their media consumption across.
FORESTUR How to work… …with this training platform? …with this methodology?
Actionable Items 2012 ERAC Committee September 10, 2012 Mobile, Alabama Tammy Terry, OH (Chair) Deb Gona (NASBLA)
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
Basic Business Statistics, 8e © 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 1-1 Inferential Statistics for Forecasting Dr. Ghada Abo-zaid Inferential Statistics for.
1 of 29Visit UMT online at Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 1, STAT125Basic Business Statistics STATISTICS FOR MANAGERS University of Management.
A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues Recreational Boating Accident Reporting Manual (COMDTINST M ) Federal Register.
COMSTAC Systems Working Group Summary 10 October 2012.
Welcome to Human Behavior and the Social Environment Dawn Burgess, Ed. D.
ABOVE GUIDELINE RENT INCREASE [AGI] What You Should Know.
The Research Process Why Do Research? Tennessee State University Undergraduate Classes.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
CJ-499 CAPSTONE Instructor David F. Connor. Unit 1 Assessment No Assessments scheduled for this Unit Complete – Introduce Yourself Response Read about.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #2 – FAA Oversight September 18th, 2012.
Davide Azzolini, FBK-IRVAPP Enrico Rettore, FBK-IRVAPP Antonio Schizzerotto, FBK-IRVAPP MENTEP Kick-Off Meeting Brussels, April 2015.
Toolbox Meetings What is a toolbox meeting? An informal 5 to 15 minute meeting held by supervisors used to promote safety.
NASBLA Social Media: What is it for? NASBLA is involved in numerous Social Media that all serve a distinct purpose. So, what are they all for?
IMPACT EVALUATION PBAF 526 Class 5, October 31, 2011.
Data analysis of nighttime boating accidents: ERAC Charge C-2 L. Daniel Maxim, USCGAux and Tamara Terry, Ohio L. Daniel Maxim, USCGAux and Tamara Terry,
NASBLA Education and Outreach Committee
Boating Statistics 2009 Presentation to the National Boating Safety Advisory Council 16 April 2010 Susan Tomczuk Boating Safety Division U.S. Coast Guard.
National Boating Safety Advisory Council
Objective 10 “Data Central”
Engineering, Reporting & Analysis Committee (ERAC)
Engineering, Reporting & Analysis Committee (ERAC)
PowerSchool for Parents
Advanced and/or On-Water, Skills-Based Boating Education
Actuaries Climate Index™
Introduction to Rotary Club Central
National Recreational Boating Safety Survey (NRBSS): Data in Relation to the Future of Recreational Boating in the United States Susan Willis, Ph.D., Gina.
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL RECREATIONAL BOATING SURVEY Understanding Its Structure and Impact Tamara L. Terry, ERAC Committee Chair (on behalf of 2014 ERAC C1 charge team) October 19, 2014 NASBLA 55 th Annual Conference Bar Harbor, Maine

Why does it matter? Results from the NRBS will probably be used by the Coast Guard as one tool to measure your states, programs, and campaigns in the future. Data from the NRBS will definitely be used to measure the success of actions in support of the National Recreational Boating Safety Program Strategic Plan. 2 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Why does it matter? By understanding how the survey is conducted and how the data is collected, you’re better equipped to understand the findings -Allows you to provide input on results; explain anomalies -Allows you the opportunity to offer suggestions to improve future versions of the survey 3 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

What’s in it for me? Establishing baseline numbers of vessels in your state -Registered vs Unregistered -By Boat Types -Has a number of caveats that will be discussed today Determining opinions and perceptions about boating -May supplement or validate existing data -May provide data that cannot be obtained through other sources 4 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Your Team Rachel Graham, ORBruce Rowe, Forever Resorts Joe McCullough, AKTed Sensenbrenner, BoatUS Seth Wagner, FLKaren Steely, Aaron Foundation Alex Cascione, USCGASusan Tomczuk, USCG Bill Griswold, USBIPaul Newman, USCG Dan Maxim, USCGAPhilippe Gwet, USCG Fred Messmann, NSBCRachel Warner, USCG Gene Molteni, USPSTammy Terry, OH Here to do the “heavy lifting” and “deep digging” to help you understand and maximize the data available in the NRBS How can we help? 5 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

How can we help? 6 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

July/August 2014 Small Craft Advisory articles -Focused on explaining exposure hours and “risk ratios” -Responded to questions the team—and many of you—had asked One additional item not covered there: Why is there no lifejacket wear question on the survey? -Will provide similar resources in the future as opportunities arise How can we help? 7 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

The NASBLA Lighthouse Online Forum -Warehouse of additional survey references and resources -A place to ask questions and post comments How can we help? 8 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Expanded Data Pulls -In cooperation with the USCG, the team is currently exploring the more detailed data available from the NRBS -Items that were not presented in the 2012 NRBS Summary published by the Coast Guard, but may be of interest to you -First on the list: Providing states with the NRBS estimates of 1) the number of registered/unregistered boats by boat type within each state, and 2) the exposure hours for these groupings. How can we help? 9 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

After first review by the team, it appears that some results estimated from the NRBS at the state level are relatively dependable for states’ use -Overall (total) number of registered and unregistered vessels (all boat types combined) -Number of powerboats (registered and unregistered) -Exposure hours calculated for these two groups using these boat numbers NRBS boat numbers Lessons learned 10 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

What makes these results more dependable/accurate/ precise? -Powerboats dominate the data sets -Powerboats are registered in all states NRBS boat numbers Lessons learned 11 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Other results aren’t quite as dependable/accurate/ precise -Non-powerboat groups -- both the number of vessels and presumably the exposure hours calculated from these numbers NRBS boat numbers Lessons learned 12 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

What makes them less dependable/accurate/precise? -These groups make up a smaller proportion of the total number of vessels in all states -Significant differences in the way that non-powered vessels are registered and/or titled from state to state -Some groups’ sample sizes are not large enough to generate statistically valid exposure hours -In the case of the canoes/kayaks groups, the NRBS figures include motorized as well as manual vessels NRBS boat numbers Lessons learned 13 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Don’t take our word for it… -You can see the data tables for yourself – and we encourage you to do so…especially for your state -Visit The NASBLA Lighthouse at Click on “Get Equipped” and choose “National Recreational Boating Survey” -Let us know if you see anything else of interest in your review NRBS boat numbers Check them out yourself 14 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Next on ERAC’s list of NRBS items to explore -COMING SOON (to be released shortly after the conference): Simplified explanation/chart of weighting process used in the Participation Survey portion of the 2012 NRBS -Examination/comparison of NRBS exposure hours by boat type in relation to accidents involving those boat types (contingent on some of the validity issues we’ve discussed here today) -Consideration of potential impacts/differences in NRBS trip survey respondents from multiple vessel versus single vessel households What else can we help you with? 15 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Next on ERAC’s list of NRBS items to explore -Consideration of NRBS data collected with regard to the boating day (day of week) that was sampled -Exploration of the pros/cons of using exposure hours versus registered boats as the denominator in risk equations -Exploration of the pros/cons of using fatal incidents versus fatalities as the numerator in risk equations What else can we help you with? 16 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

Next on ERAC’s list of NRBS items to explore -Consideration of methods that could be used to estimate registered boats/exposure hours in non-survey years (for trend analysis) -Consideration of methods to account for survey non-response bias -Consideration of methods to address ongoing issues regarding the calculation of casualty and fatality rates—especially for states where a large proportion of fatalities or injuries involve out-of-state boaters What else can we help you with? 17 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact

We want to hear from you… -Have the ERAC products produced to date been useful to you? -Are the upcoming ERAC work items we shared today of interest? -What other items would you like ERAC to explore with regard to the NRBS? -If you don’t have a solid handle on what you want, just give us the general gist of it us at subject: We’d appreciate input 18 National Recreational Boating Survey: Understanding Its Structure and Impact